| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides access to a manually curated collection of prompts extracted from top-ranked GPTs in OpenAI's official GPT Store, organized by popularity ranking (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.) and functional category. The repository maintains markdown files containing the actual system prompts used by high-performing GPTs, enabling developers to inspect and reuse proven prompt patterns without reverse-engineering or API inspection.
Unique: Maintains a manually curated index of actual system prompts from OpenAI's official GPT Store ranked by real-world adoption metrics, rather than generic prompt databases. Organizes prompts hierarchically by category and popularity rank, enabling developers to identify which prompt patterns correlate with high user engagement.
vs alternatives: Differs from generic prompt databases (e.g., PromptBase) by focusing exclusively on proven, top-ranked GPTs from the official store with transparent ranking data, rather than user-submitted prompts of variable quality.
Implements a hierarchical taxonomy organizing prompts across functional domains (Academic, Programming, Design, Productivity, Lifestyle/Entertainment, Education) with subcategories for specialized use cases (e.g., literature review tools, code automation, logo designers). The directory structure enables browsing and filtering prompts by domain without requiring keyword search, making it discoverable for developers seeking domain-specific prompt patterns.
Unique: Uses a multi-level directory taxonomy (Open GPTs → Category → Specialized Subcategory) combined with markdown file naming conventions to enable both programmatic and human-browsable discovery without requiring a search engine or database backend.
vs alternatives: Provides better discoverability than flat prompt lists by organizing around functional domains and real GPT Store categories, while remaining simpler to maintain than a full-featured prompt search platform.
Maintains a dedicated section for community-created prompts (e.g., Mr. Ranedeer, QuickSilver OS) submitted by users outside the official GPT Store, with a contribution workflow that allows developers to add, improve, and version control prompts collaboratively. This enables the repository to function as a community knowledge base where prompt engineering patterns are shared, iterated on, and attributed to contributors.
Unique: Implements a GitHub-based collaborative model where community prompts are version-controlled, attributed to contributors, and discoverable alongside official GPT Store prompts, treating prompt engineering as a collaborative software development practice rather than a static knowledge base.
vs alternatives: Enables community iteration and attribution in ways that centralized prompt marketplaces (PromptBase, OpenAI's own prompt sharing) do not, by leveraging git history and pull request workflows for transparency and collaborative improvement.
Aggregates academic research papers and technical documentation on advanced prompting methodologies including Chain-of-Thought (CoT), Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT), Graph-of-Thoughts (GoT), Skeleton-of-Thought (SoT), Algorithm-of-Thoughts (AoT), and Self-Consistency Improvement techniques. The papers/ directory serves as a curated research index bridging academic literature and practical prompt engineering, enabling developers to understand the theoretical foundations and implementation patterns for sophisticated reasoning prompts.
Unique: Curates a focused collection of peer-reviewed papers specifically on advanced prompting techniques (CoT, ToT, GoT, SoT, AoT) organized by technique type, serving as a bridge between academic research and practical prompt engineering rather than a general LLM research repository.
vs alternatives: Provides a curated, technique-focused research index that's more accessible than searching arXiv or Google Scholar, while remaining more rigorous and research-grounded than generic prompt engineering blogs or tutorials.
Maintains documentation and resources on prompt injection attacks, adversarial prompting, and prompt protection techniques, enabling developers to understand vulnerabilities in GPT-based systems and implement defensive measures. This capability addresses the security dimension of prompt engineering by collecting attack patterns, defense strategies, and mitigation approaches in a centralized, discoverable format.
Unique: Integrates prompt attack and defense resources into a prompt engineering repository, treating security as a first-class concern alongside prompt optimization. Provides attack patterns and defense strategies in a discoverable format rather than scattered across security blogs or research papers.
vs alternatives: Combines attack patterns and defenses in a single resource, whereas most prompt engineering guides focus only on optimization, and security resources are typically separate from prompt engineering communities.
Implements a lightweight, git-based storage system where prompts are maintained as markdown files in a GitHub repository, enabling version control, change tracking, collaborative editing, and attribution through native git workflows. Each prompt is stored as a standalone markdown file with metadata (rank, category, description) embedded or inferred from filename and directory structure, making prompts both human-readable and machine-parseable.
Unique: Uses git and markdown as the primary storage and versioning mechanism rather than a custom database or prompt management platform, leveraging existing developer workflows and tools while maintaining simplicity and transparency through readable file formats.
vs alternatives: Provides version control and collaboration benefits of git-based systems without requiring custom infrastructure, whereas dedicated prompt management platforms (e.g., Langchain Hub) require proprietary APIs and don't integrate as naturally with developer workflows.
Exposes prompts ranked by their corresponding GPT's position in the OpenAI GPT Store (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.), providing a popularity-based ranking signal that correlates with real-world user adoption and perceived effectiveness. Developers can browse prompts ordered by rank to identify which prompt patterns are most successful in the market, using ranking as a proxy for prompt quality and effectiveness.
Unique: Surfaces GPT Store ranking data as a discovery mechanism, treating rank as a quality signal and enabling developers to identify market-validated prompt patterns without requiring manual evaluation or performance testing.
vs alternatives: Provides ranking-based discovery that generic prompt databases lack, while remaining simpler than building a full competitive analysis platform with real-time GPT Store scraping.
Maintains a comprehensive library of prompt templates spanning diverse domains (Academic, Programming, Design, Productivity, Lifestyle/Entertainment, Education) with specialized subcategories (literature review, code automation, logo design, task automation, adventure games, homework help). This enables developers to find domain-specific prompt patterns without building from scratch, with templates covering both common use cases and specialized applications.
Unique: Organizes templates across six major domains with specialized subcategories, providing breadth across use cases while maintaining focus on real GPT Store applications rather than generic prompt templates.
vs alternatives: Covers more domains and real-world use cases than most prompt template libraries, while remaining more focused and curated than generic prompt databases.
+1 more capabilities
Automatically loads and parses documents from diverse sources (PDFs, Word docs, HTML, Markdown, code files, databases) into a unified in-memory representation using format-specific loaders and node-based document abstractions. Each document is decomposed into Document objects containing metadata, content, and relationships, enabling downstream processing without format-specific handling in application code.
Unique: Provides a unified loader abstraction (BaseReader interface) that normalizes 100+ data source connectors into a single Document/Node API, eliminating format-specific branching logic in application code. Loaders are composable and chainable, allowing sequential transformations (e.g., load → split → extract metadata → embed).
vs alternatives: Broader out-of-the-box loader coverage than LangChain's document loaders and more structured node-based decomposition than raw text splitting, reducing boilerplate for multi-source RAG pipelines.
Splits documents into semantically coherent chunks using multiple strategies (character-based, token-aware, recursive, semantic) with configurable overlap and chunk size. Preserves document hierarchy and metadata through a node tree structure, enabling retrieval systems to maintain context relationships and enable hierarchical re-ranking or parent-document retrieval patterns.
Unique: Implements a node-tree abstraction that preserves document hierarchy and enables parent-document retrieval patterns. Supports multiple splitting strategies (recursive, semantic, code-aware) with pluggable custom splitters, and automatically propagates metadata through the node tree.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than LangChain's text splitters because it preserves hierarchical relationships and supports semantic splitting; better for complex document structures than simple character-based splitting.
LlamaIndex scores higher at 40/100 vs awesome-prompts at 35/100. However, awesome-prompts offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Processes documents containing mixed content (text, images, tables, code) by extracting and understanding each modality separately, then synthesizing information across modalities. Uses vision models for image understanding, specialized parsers for tables and code, and integrates results into a unified document representation for retrieval and generation.
Unique: Integrates vision models, table parsers, and code extractors into a unified multi-modal document processing pipeline that synthesizes information across modalities. Preserves modality-specific structure (table schemas, code formatting) while enabling cross-modal retrieval and generation.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive multi-modal support than text-only RAG; built-in vision integration reduces boilerplate for document understanding compared to manual vision API calls.
Enables streaming of LLM responses token-by-token and real-time retrieval updates, allowing applications to display partial results as they become available. Supports streaming from retrieval (progressive document discovery) and generation (token-by-token output) with backpressure handling and cancellation support for responsive user experiences.
Unique: Provides first-class streaming support for both retrieval and generation with automatic backpressure handling and cancellation. Enables progressive result display without custom async/streaming code in application layer.
vs alternatives: More integrated streaming support than manual LLM API streaming; built-in retrieval streaming and backpressure handling reduce complexity compared to custom streaming implementations.
Tracks API costs for LLM calls, embeddings, and other operations with per-query and per-session cost attribution. Provides cost optimization recommendations (e.g., batch processing, model selection, caching) and enables cost-aware query planning to balance quality and expense. Integrates with multiple LLM providers to normalize cost tracking across models.
Unique: Provides automatic cost tracking across multiple LLM providers with per-query attribution and cost optimization recommendations. Integrates with query execution to enable cost-aware planning without manual cost calculation.
vs alternatives: More integrated cost tracking than manual API billing review; built-in optimization recommendations reduce guesswork for cost reduction.
Enables building custom RAG pipelines by composing modular components (retrievers, synthesizers, agents, tools) through a declarative or programmatic API. Supports complex workflows with branching, loops, and conditional logic, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Pipelines are reusable, testable, and can be deployed as APIs or batch jobs.
Unique: Provides a flexible pipeline composition API supporting both declarative and programmatic definitions, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Enables complex workflows with branching and conditional logic without custom orchestration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible pipeline composition than fixed RAG architectures; better workflow support than manual component chaining.
Generates embeddings for documents/nodes using pluggable embedding providers (OpenAI, Hugging Face, local models) and stores them in a unified vector store interface that abstracts over multiple backends (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, FAISS, Chroma, etc.). The abstraction layer enables switching vector stores without changing application code, and handles batching, retry logic, and metadata indexing.
Unique: Provides a unified VectorStore interface that abstracts 10+ vector database backends, enabling zero-code switching between providers. Handles embedding batching, retry logic, and metadata propagation automatically. Supports both cloud and local embedding models through a pluggable EmbedModel interface.
vs alternatives: Broader vector store coverage and more seamless provider switching than LangChain's vectorstore integrations; better abstraction consistency across backends than using raw vector store SDKs directly.
Retrieves semantically similar documents from vector stores using embedding-based similarity search, with optional re-ranking, filtering, and fusion strategies (hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval). Supports multiple retrieval modes (similarity, MMR, fusion) and enables custom retrieval logic through a pluggable Retriever interface that can combine multiple strategies.
Unique: Implements a pluggable Retriever abstraction supporting multiple retrieval strategies (similarity, MMR, fusion, custom) that can be composed and chained. Built-in support for re-ranking via LLM or cross-encoder, and hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval without custom integration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible retrieval composition than LangChain's retrievers; built-in re-ranking and fusion strategies reduce boilerplate for advanced retrieval pipelines.
+6 more capabilities