| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 16 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Agno's Team class coordinates multiple specialized agents through a hierarchical orchestration layer that manages message routing, state synchronization, and execution order across agents. Teams use a registry-based agent discovery pattern where each agent maintains its own context and tools, with the Team runtime handling inter-agent communication via a message queue and shared session state. The framework supports both sequential and parallel agent execution patterns with automatic dependency resolution.
Unique: Uses a registry-based agent discovery pattern with session-scoped state management, allowing agents to maintain independent memory/knowledge bases while coordinating through a shared Team runtime that handles message routing and execution context propagation
vs alternatives: Simpler than LangGraph's explicit state machine definition because Agno infers agent dependencies from tool availability and message types, reducing boilerplate for common multi-agent patterns
Agno's Knowledge class implements a retrieval-augmented generation system that combines vector database backends (Qdrant, Pinecone, LanceDB) with semantic search strategies and content processing pipelines. When an agent queries the knowledge base, the framework performs hybrid search (semantic + keyword), chunks documents using configurable strategies, and injects retrieved context into the agent's prompt with source attribution. The system supports remote content integration (URLs, PDFs, web scraping) with automatic chunking and embedding generation via the model's embedding API.
Unique: Integrates content processing pipeline with vector database backends, supporting automatic chunking, embedding generation, and hybrid search strategies (semantic + keyword) without requiring separate RAG orchestration frameworks
vs alternatives: More integrated than LangChain's RAG because Agno's Knowledge class handles embedding generation, chunking, and search within the agent's execution context, reducing context switching and configuration overhead
Agno supports structured output generation where agents return data conforming to a predefined JSON schema or Python dataclass. The framework passes the schema to the model's structured output API (OpenAI's JSON mode, Claude's tool_choice, Gemini's schema validation) and validates the response against the schema before returning to the agent. Type hints on dataclasses are automatically converted to JSON schemas compatible with each provider. Validation failures trigger automatic retries with corrected prompts.
Unique: Provides unified structured output support across multiple model providers with automatic schema translation and validation, enabling type-safe agent responses without provider-specific code
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual JSON parsing because Agno's structured output system automatically handles schema translation, validation, and retries across providers, whereas manual parsing requires error handling and retry logic
Agno's evaluation framework provides tools for measuring agent performance against predefined test cases with metrics like accuracy, latency, token usage, and cost. Evaluators can be defined as Python functions that compare agent outputs against expected results or human judgments. The framework supports batch evaluation across multiple test cases and generates reports with aggregated metrics. Integration with observability platforms enables tracking evaluation metrics over time to detect performance regressions.
Unique: Provides a built-in evaluation framework with custom metric support and batch evaluation, enabling agents to be tested against predefined benchmarks without external testing frameworks
vs alternatives: More integrated than external testing frameworks because Agno's evaluation system is designed specifically for agents and understands agent-specific metrics (token usage, latency, cost), whereas generic testing frameworks require custom metric implementations
Agno's scheduling system enables agents to be executed on a schedule (cron-like expressions, intervals) without manual triggering. Scheduled tasks are persisted in the database and executed by a background scheduler. Each scheduled execution creates a new session with its own context and memory. The framework supports task dependencies (execute task B after task A completes) and conditional scheduling (execute only if previous execution succeeded). Execution history and logs are persisted for audit trails.
Unique: Provides native scheduling support for agents with task dependency management and execution history persistence, enabling autonomous agent workflows without external schedulers like Celery or APScheduler
vs alternatives: Simpler than Celery for agent scheduling because Agno's scheduling system is built-in and understands agent-specific concepts (sessions, memory, context), whereas Celery requires custom task definitions and result handling
Agno's registry system provides a centralized catalog of agents, tools, and models that can be discovered and instantiated at runtime. Agents and tools can be registered with metadata (description, tags, version) and retrieved by name or tag. The registry supports dynamic configuration where agent parameters (model, tools, knowledge base) can be overridden at runtime without code changes. Registry entries can be persisted in a database or loaded from configuration files.
Unique: Provides a built-in registry for agents and tools with dynamic configuration and metadata support, enabling runtime agent composition without code changes
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual configuration management because Agno's registry system provides centralized discovery and dynamic configuration, whereas manual approaches require hardcoded agent definitions or external configuration management
Provides an evaluation framework for assessing agent performance through custom metrics, execution tracing, and integration with observability platforms. The framework captures execution traces (inputs, outputs, tool calls, latencies), enables custom metric definitions, and exports traces to external observability systems (LangSmith, Datadog, etc.), enabling quantitative agent evaluation and performance monitoring.
Unique: Evaluation framework captures detailed execution traces (inputs, outputs, tool calls, latencies) with custom metric definitions and integration with external observability platforms, enabling quantitative agent performance assessment and debugging
vs alternatives: More integrated than external evaluation tools because tracing is native to agent execution; custom metrics are defined in Python rather than requiring external configuration
Enables agents to schedule background tasks and periodic executions through a scheduling system that manages task queues, execution timing, and result persistence. The framework supports cron-like scheduling, one-time tasks, and task dependencies, with automatic retry logic and failure handling, enabling agents to perform long-running operations without blocking user requests.
Unique: Scheduling system enables agents to schedule background tasks with cron-like patterns, automatic retry logic, and result persistence, without requiring external job queue infrastructure
vs alternatives: Simpler than Celery for agent task scheduling because scheduling is built-in and integrated with agent execution; no separate worker process management required
+8 more capabilities
AutoGen 0.4 implements a strict three-layer architecture (autogen-core, autogen-agentchat, autogen-ext) where agents communicate via an event-driven runtime using typed message protocols. The AgentRuntime abstraction supports both SingleThreadedAgentRuntime for local execution and GrpcWorkerAgentRuntime for distributed multi-process coordination, with subscription-based message routing that decouples agent communication from implementation details. Messages are strongly typed via Pydantic models (LLMMessage, BaseChatMessage, BaseAgentEvent), enabling compile-time validation and IDE support.
Unique: Implements a protocol-based agent abstraction (Agent interface) that decouples agent implementation from runtime, enabling the same agent code to run in SingleThreadedAgentRuntime, GrpcWorkerAgentRuntime, or custom runtimes without modification. This is achieved through Pydantic-validated message types and subscription-based routing rather than direct method calls, making the system fundamentally composable.
vs alternatives: Unlike LangGraph's state machine approach or CrewAI's sequential task execution, AutoGen's event-driven architecture enables true asynchronous agent coordination with compile-time type safety and seamless distributed execution via gRPC without code changes.
The autogen-agentchat package provides high-level agent abstractions including AssistantAgent (LLM-powered reasoning), CodeExecutorAgent (sandboxed code execution), and specialized agents (WebSurferAgent, FileSurferAgent) that implement common multi-agent patterns. Each agent encapsulates a specific capability (LLM inference, code execution, web interaction) and integrates with the underlying AgentRuntime via the Agent protocol, allowing developers to compose agents into teams without managing low-level message routing.
Unique: Provides a unified Agent interface where AssistantAgent, CodeExecutorAgent, WebSurferAgent, and FileSurferAgent all implement the same protocol, enabling them to be composed into teams without adapter code. Each agent type encapsulates domain-specific logic (LLM calls, subprocess execution, web scraping) while exposing a consistent message-based interface, allowing developers to swap implementations or add custom agents.
AutoGen scores higher at 77/100 vs Agno at 58/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More composable than LangGraph's node-based approach because agents are first-class runtime objects with consistent interfaces; more flexible than CrewAI's role-based agents because agents can be dynamically instantiated and reconfigured at runtime without role definitions.
AutoGen Studio provides a web-based UI for building multi-agent systems without writing code. Users define agents, configure LLM providers, design group chat workflows, and test conversations through a visual interface. The system generates AutoGen Python code that can be exported and deployed. Studio integrates with the autogen-agentchat API and provides real-time conversation testing, agent configuration management, and workflow visualization.
Unique: Provides a visual interface that generates valid AutoGen code, bridging the gap between no-code design and code-based customization. Users can design workflows visually and export runnable Python code that uses the same autogen-agentchat API, enabling gradual transition from no-code to code-based development.
vs alternatives: More integrated than separate no-code tools because generated code is directly executable AutoGen code; more flexible than pure no-code platforms because users can export and customize generated code.
AutoGen supports both Python and .NET (C#) ecosystems with cross-language interoperability through gRPC. The .NET SDK provides equivalent abstractions (Agent, AgentRuntime, ChatCompletionClient) that communicate with Python agents via gRPC workers. This enables mixed-language agent teams where Python agents and .NET agents operate in the same system, with transparent message passing and shared runtime infrastructure.
Unique: Implements cross-language support through GrpcWorkerAgentRuntime that treats .NET agents as remote workers communicating via gRPC, enabling the same Agent protocol to work across language boundaries. This is achieved through protocol buffer definitions that define message schemas language-agnostically.
vs alternatives: More integrated than separate Python and .NET frameworks because agents are truly interoperable; more flexible than language-specific frameworks because teams can choose the best language for each agent.
AutoGen's memory system manages agent context and conversation history through configurable storage backends (in-memory, file-based, database). The system supports context windowing strategies (sliding window, summarization) to manage token usage in long conversations. Memory is integrated with the Agent protocol, allowing agents to access conversation history and maintain state across multiple interactions. The system supports both short-term memory (current conversation) and long-term memory (persistent storage).
Unique: Implements memory as a pluggable component with multiple storage backends, enabling agents to work with different memory strategies without code changes. Context windowing is configurable and can use different strategies (sliding window, summarization, semantic pruning) depending on application needs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than LangGraph's built-in memory because it supports multiple backends and strategies; more comprehensive than CrewAI's memory because it includes both short-term and long-term storage with configurable windowing.
AutoGen integrates with OpenTelemetry to provide comprehensive observability of agent execution, including traces of agent interactions, LLM calls, tool invocations, and message routing. The system exports traces to OpenTelemetry-compatible backends (Jaeger, Datadog, etc.) for visualization and analysis. Telemetry is built into the core runtime, requiring no agent code changes to enable tracing.
Unique: Integrates OpenTelemetry at the core runtime level, enabling automatic tracing of all agent interactions without requiring agent code changes. Traces capture the full execution graph including message routing, LLM calls, and tool invocations, providing comprehensive visibility into agent behavior.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than LangGraph's logging because it captures the full execution graph; more standardized than custom logging because it uses OpenTelemetry, enabling integration with any observability platform.
AutoGen's BaseGroupChat abstraction enables multi-agent conversations where agents take turns or participate based on routing logic, with pluggable termination conditions (MaxMessageTermination, TextMentionTermination, custom predicates) that determine when a conversation ends. The group chat maintains conversation history, manages agent selection for each turn, and integrates with the AgentRuntime to coordinate message passing between agents. Termination conditions are evaluated after each agent response, enabling early exit when goals are met or token limits approached.
Unique: Implements termination conditions as composable predicates (MaxMessageTermination, TextMentionTermination, custom functions) that are evaluated after each agent turn, decoupling conversation flow control from agent logic. This enables developers to mix-and-match termination strategies without modifying agent code, and to add new conditions by implementing a simple interface.
vs alternatives: More flexible than CrewAI's task-based termination because conditions are evaluated dynamically per turn; more explicit than LangGraph's conditional edges because termination is a first-class concept with dedicated abstractions rather than embedded in routing logic.
AutoGen's code execution system (via CodeExecutorAgent and autogen-ext) supports multiple execution backends including local subprocess execution, Docker containers, and Jupyter notebooks, all exposed through a unified CodeExecutor interface. Code is executed in isolated environments with configurable timeouts, resource limits, and output capture. The system integrates with the agent runtime to return execution results as typed messages, enabling agents to reason about code output and iterate on implementations.
Unique: Abstracts code execution through a CodeExecutor protocol with multiple implementations (LocalCommandLineCodeExecutor, DockerCommandLineCodeExecutor, JupyterCodeExecutor), allowing the same agent code to run against different backends by swapping the executor instance. This is achieved through dependency injection at agent initialization, enabling seamless environment switching.
vs alternatives: More flexible than LangGraph's built-in code execution because it supports multiple backends and isolation levels; more secure than CrewAI's subprocess execution because it provides Docker containerization as a first-class option with explicit timeout and resource management.
+6 more capabilities