| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides trust scores for AI agents through the Model Context Protocol (MCP) standard, enabling Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to query agent reputation data without requiring API keys or configuration. The system integrates directly into the MCP server architecture, allowing seamless tool calling from within agent conversations to fetch and evaluate agent trustworthiness metrics before transaction execution.
Unique: Implements trust scoring as a zero-configuration MCP tool that requires no API key or client-side setup, leveraging MCP's native function-calling protocol to embed agent vetting directly into LLM reasoning loops without context overhead or authentication friction
vs alternatives: Eliminates authentication and configuration barriers that plague traditional API-based trust services, enabling instant agent reputation checks within any MCP-compatible environment without developer setup
Exposes agent reputation data as a plug-and-play MCP server that requires no API keys, environment variables, or configuration files to activate. The server auto-discovers and registers itself within the MCP ecosystem, allowing clients to immediately call reputation-scoring functions without setup overhead. This is achieved through MCP's standard server discovery and tool registration mechanisms, with sensible defaults for all parameters.
Unique: Implements MCP server registration with zero configuration by using MCP's native discovery and auto-registration patterns, eliminating the need for API keys, environment setup, or manual tool registration that typical MCP integrations require
vs alternatives: Faster to integrate than REST API-based reputation services because it skips authentication, credential management, and manual endpoint configuration — just add the MCP server and start calling reputation functions
Provides structured MCP tool definitions that allow LLM clients to query a centralized agent reputation database, returning trust scores, transaction history, flagged behaviors, and confidence metrics. The system uses MCP's tool-calling protocol to expose database queries as semantic functions, enabling agents to reason about trust signals and make decisions about which agents to interact with. Queries are executed server-side against the reputation database, with results formatted as structured JSON for downstream processing.
Unique: Exposes agent reputation queries as semantic MCP tools rather than raw API endpoints, allowing LLMs to reason about trust signals and integrate vetting decisions into agentic workflows without explicit API calls or JSON parsing
vs alternatives: More natural for LLM-based agents than REST APIs because queries are expressed as semantic tool calls that fit naturally into reasoning chains, reducing the cognitive load on agents to construct and interpret API responses
Enables agents to programmatically filter and rank other agents based on reputation scores, using MCP tool calls to query the reputation database and apply filtering logic. The system returns ranked lists of agents sorted by trust score, allowing downstream agents to select the most reliable option for a given task. This capability is implemented through MCP tool composition, where reputation queries feed into agent selection logic within the LLM's reasoning loop.
Unique: Implements agent filtering as a reasoning task within the LLM's planning loop, allowing agents to dynamically apply trust-based selection logic without hardcoded rules or external orchestration — the agent itself decides which peers to trust based on reputation data
vs alternatives: More flexible than static agent whitelists because trust decisions are made dynamically based on current reputation data, and more transparent than opaque routing algorithms because the agent can explain its selection rationale
Surfaces flagged behaviors and risk indicators from the reputation database, allowing agents to identify agents with security incidents, policy violations, or suspicious activity patterns. The system returns structured risk signals (e.g., 'fraud_suspected', 'policy_violation', 'unusual_activity') alongside reputation scores, enabling downstream agents to make informed decisions about whether to interact with flagged agents. Risk indicators are computed server-side and cached in the reputation database.
Unique: Provides structured risk indicators as first-class data in the reputation API, allowing agents to programmatically detect and respond to security incidents without requiring manual review or external monitoring systems
vs alternatives: More actionable than generic trust scores because risk indicators are specific and categorical, enabling agents to implement nuanced safety policies (e.g., 'refuse fraud-flagged agents but accept policy-violation agents with manual review')
Exposes aggregated, anonymized agent reputation data as public MCP resources, enabling researchers, builders, and agents themselves to analyze trust patterns across the agent ecosystem. The data is queryable without authentication, supporting transparency initiatives and enabling data-driven decisions about agent reliability trends and ecosystem health.
Unique: Publishes agent reputation as open MCP resources rather than gated behind authentication, enabling ecosystem-wide transparency and enabling third-party analysis tools to build on top of reputation data.
vs alternatives: More transparent than proprietary agent rating systems because all reputation data is publicly queryable via MCP, enabling independent verification and reducing information asymmetry in agent selection.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs AgentScore at 28/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities