MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs Acrylic at 40/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Acrylic | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Web App | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 40/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Converts user creative direction (via preset selections or freeform text input) into AI-generated paintings through an undisclosed generative model pipeline. The system processes user intent through either guided preset workflows or text prompts, submitting them to a backend image generation service that produces digital artwork in seconds. Architecture appears to abstract the underlying model (type unknown) behind a simplified UI layer optimized for non-technical users, with no exposed parameters for seed control, iteration count, or model-specific tuning.
Unique: Integrates image generation with AR preview and print-on-demand fulfillment in a single workflow, abstracting away model complexity behind preset-guided UI rather than exposing prompt engineering—targets non-technical homeowners rather than power users seeking fine-grained control
vs alternatives: Simpler onboarding and faster time-to-purchase than Midjourney (no prompt expertise required) but sacrifices output quality and customization depth; differentiates through AR visualization solving the 'will this look good on my wall?' problem that pure digital art tools cannot address
Overlays AI-generated artwork onto user's physical room via device camera using augmented reality, allowing real-time visualization of how the painting will appear on actual walls before purchase or printing. The system likely uses ARKit (iOS) or equivalent AR framework to anchor the digital image to detected wall surfaces, handling lighting conditions, perspective transformation, and spatial positioning. This bridges the gap between digital creation and physical space by providing immediate visual feedback in the user's actual environment rather than abstract mockups.
Unique: Uniquely solves the 'will this actually look good on my wall?' problem by anchoring AI-generated artwork to real physical spaces via AR rather than providing abstract 2D mockups or flat previews—differentiates from pure image generation tools by closing the gap between digital creation and physical deployment
vs alternatives: Provides more concrete spatial feedback than Midjourney's static previews or Stable Diffusion's gallery views, but AR utility is heavily constrained by device compatibility and lighting conditions, making it less universally applicable than traditional mockup tools
Converts approved AI-generated artwork into physical canvas prints through an integrated print-on-demand pipeline, with payment processing exclusively via Apple Pay. The system handles order placement, print specifications (dimensions, materials unknown), production, and shipping without requiring users to manage separate print vendors or payment processors. Architecture abstracts fulfillment complexity behind a single checkout flow, likely integrating with a third-party print service backend while maintaining Acrylic branding.
Unique: Integrates image generation, AR preview, and print fulfillment into a single end-to-end workflow rather than requiring users to export artwork and manage separate print vendors—payment exclusively via Apple Pay creates tight platform coupling but eliminates payment method friction for iOS users
vs alternatives: Faster path to physical product than Midjourney (which requires separate print vendor integration) but more restrictive than Stable Diffusion (which allows free export to any print service); Apple Pay-only constraint eliminates payment flexibility but reduces checkout complexity for target audience
Embeds Acrylic's image generation and AR preview capabilities within Typedream's design platform, allowing designers to create client portfolios that showcase custom AI-generated artwork alongside other design assets. The integration likely provides API-level or component-level access to Acrylic's generation pipeline, enabling Typedream users to generate, preview, and showcase artwork without leaving their design workflow. This creates a cohesive ecosystem where interior design work, client presentations, and artwork generation happen within a single platform.
Unique: Positions Acrylic as a native capability within Typedream's design ecosystem rather than a standalone tool, reducing context-switching and enabling designers to offer AI-generated artwork as an integrated service—creates platform lock-in but streamlines workflow for existing Typedream users
vs alternatives: More seamless than integrating Midjourney or Stable Diffusion into Typedream (which requires manual export/import) but creates dependency on Typedream platform health and limits portability of generated assets
Controls product access through a private beta program requiring users to join a waitlist before gaining generation and preview capabilities. The system gates all core functionality (image generation, AR preview, print ordering) behind beta access, preventing public use and allowing the team to manage user growth, gather feedback, and control infrastructure load. This approach enables controlled rollout, quality assurance, and user research before public launch.
Unique: Uses private beta gating as primary access control mechanism rather than freemium or public launch, allowing controlled user growth and infrastructure scaling—reflects pre-launch product maturity and intentional go-to-market strategy
vs alternatives: More exclusive than Midjourney's public beta but less transparent than Stable Diffusion's open-source approach; creates artificial scarcity and early-adopter appeal but limits market reach and user feedback volume compared to public beta alternatives
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs Acrylic at 40/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities