| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) specification as a server, exposing a standardized interface for AI models and clients to discover and invoke capabilities through a well-defined message protocol. Uses JSON-RPC 2.0 transport layer with request/response semantics for tool registration, resource exposure, and prompt templating. Handles bidirectional communication patterns where the server can both respond to client requests and initiate server-to-client notifications.
Unique: Implements MCP as a first-class server abstraction rather than a client library, enabling this artifact to act as a capability provider that multiple AI clients can connect to simultaneously, following the MCP specification's server-side patterns for tool registration and resource management.
vs alternatives: Unlike REST APIs or custom integrations, MCP servers provide AI models with standardized tool discovery, schema validation, and prompt templating out of the box, reducing integration boilerplate and enabling seamless multi-model compatibility.
Exposes custom tools through MCP's tool registry with JSON Schema definitions for input validation and type safety. Each tool includes a name, description, input schema (with required/optional parameters), and handler implementation. The server validates incoming tool calls against the schema before execution, ensuring type correctness and preventing malformed invocations. Supports nested object schemas, arrays, and enum constraints for rich parameter validation.
Unique: Uses JSON Schema as the canonical tool definition format, enabling AI models to understand tool capabilities through introspection and self-service discovery, rather than relying on natural language descriptions alone. Integrates schema validation directly into the request handling pipeline.
vs alternatives: More expressive than simple function signatures and more standardized than custom validation code, JSON Schema-based tool definitions enable AI models to reason about tool capabilities and generate correct invocations without trial-and-error.
Exposes arbitrary resources (files, database records, API responses) through MCP's resource system using URI-based addressing. Resources are registered with a URI template, MIME type, and content handler. Clients request resources by URI, and the server retrieves or generates the content on demand. Supports templated URIs with variables (e.g., `file:///{path}`, `db:///{table}/{id}`) for dynamic content resolution. Resources can be text, binary, or structured data.
Unique: Implements a URI-based resource addressing system that decouples content location from AI model context, enabling on-demand retrieval and lazy-loading of large documents without bloating conversation history. Uses MIME type metadata for content-aware handling.
vs alternatives: More efficient than embedding all documents in context upfront, and more flexible than static file serving — resources are dynamically resolved and can pull from databases, APIs, or computed sources.
Provides a prompt templating system where reusable prompt templates are registered with variable placeholders and optional descriptions. Templates support variable substitution with context-aware defaults and validation. When invoked, the server resolves variables (from client input, tool outputs, or resource content) and returns the rendered prompt. Supports nested templates and conditional logic through variable references.
Unique: Centralizes prompt templates as first-class MCP resources, enabling AI models to discover and invoke prompts dynamically rather than relying on hardcoded system prompts. Supports variable resolution from multiple sources (client input, resources, tool outputs).
vs alternatives: More maintainable than embedding prompts in client code, and more discoverable than storing prompts in documentation — templates are versioned, validated, and invoked through the same MCP protocol as tools and resources.
Implements MCP's initialization handshake where the server and client exchange capability information (supported tools, resources, prompts, sampling methods). The server advertises its capabilities through the `initialize` response, and the client declares its supported features. This enables graceful degradation when clients don't support certain MCP features (e.g., older clients without sampling support). The server can conditionally expose capabilities based on client capabilities.
Unique: Implements bidirectional capability negotiation where both server and client declare supported features, enabling dynamic adaptation rather than assuming a fixed feature set. Allows servers to conditionally expose capabilities based on client support.
vs alternatives: More flexible than static API contracts, capability negotiation enables MCP servers to evolve without breaking older clients, and allows clients to discover what's available without hardcoded assumptions.
Enables the MCP server to request the client (typically an AI model or agent framework) to invoke a language model for text generation, reasoning, or decision-making. The server sends a sampling request with a prompt, model parameters (temperature, max_tokens, stop sequences), and optional system context. The client handles the actual model invocation and returns the generated text. This reverses the typical client-server relationship, allowing servers to leverage AI capabilities without embedding a model.
Unique: Reverses the typical client-server relationship by allowing servers to request model invocations from clients, enabling tool handlers and server logic to leverage AI reasoning without embedding a language model. Delegates model selection and API management to the client.
vs alternatives: More efficient than embedding a separate model in the server, and more flexible than hardcoding model calls — the server can request reasoning from whatever model the client has access to.
Abstracts the underlying transport mechanism, supporting multiple protocols for client-server communication: stdio (for local processes), HTTP (for network clients), and WebSocket (for real-time bidirectional communication). The server implementation handles protocol-specific details (serialization, connection management, error handling) while exposing a unified MCP message interface. Clients can connect via their preferred transport without the server needing to know the details.
Unique: Provides a unified MCP message interface across multiple transport protocols, allowing the same server implementation to work with stdio (Claude desktop), HTTP (web clients), and WebSocket (real-time clients) without transport-specific code in business logic.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-transport servers, enabling the same MCP server to integrate with Claude desktop, web applications, and remote clients without reimplementation.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs project-01 at 23/100. project-01 leads on ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities