Multimodal Visual Reasoning With Extended Thinking

via “multimodal mathematical reasoning evaluation across visual domains”

Visual mathematical reasoning benchmark.

Unique: Combines visual understanding with mathematical problem-solving across three newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, PaperQA) plus 28 existing multimodal datasets, totaling 6,141 examples with explicit focus on compositional reasoning where visual perception and mathematical logic must be jointly applied. Unlike single-domain benchmarks, MathVista spans geometry, statistics, and scientific figures, exposing differential model performance across mathematical reasoning types.

vs others: Broader than domain-specific benchmarks (e.g., geometry-only or chart-only) and more rigorous than general vision-language benchmarks because it requires both accurate visual interpretation AND correct mathematical reasoning, not just image captioning or visual QA on non-mathematical content.

via “multimodal perception and knowledge integration assessment”

Expert-level multimodal understanding across 30 subjects.

Unique: MMMU's explicit design to require simultaneous perception, knowledge, and reasoning (rather than testing each in isolation) reflects real-world expert tasks where these capabilities must be integrated. Questions cannot be solved by visual recognition alone or knowledge lookup alone, forcing genuine multimodal reasoning.

vs others: Most multimodal benchmarks (MMBench, LLaVA-Bench) test visual recognition or simple visual question-answering; MMMU's integration of expert-level domain knowledge with visual reasoning creates a more realistic assessment of multimodal AI readiness for professional applications.

via “multimodal vision-language reasoning with 128k context window”

Meta's largest open multimodal model at 90B parameters.

Unique: Combines 70B text backbone with integrated vision encoder to achieve 128K unified context across modalities, enabling document-scale visual reasoning without separate image-to-text preprocessing pipelines that degrade information fidelity

vs others: Larger unified context window than GPT-4V (which uses 128K but with less documented multimodal integration) and open-weight advantage over proprietary alternatives, though requires significantly more compute for deployment

via “multimodal context window with cross-modal reasoning”

Multimodal-first API — vision, audio, video understanding across Core/Flash/Edge models.

Unique: Processes multiple modalities (text, image, video, audio) in a single context window with joint reasoning, rather than using separate models or sequential processing steps that require external coordination.

vs others: Enables true multimodal reasoning in a single inference pass, whereas most multimodal APIs require separate calls for different modalities or use sequential processing that loses cross-modal context.

via “common-sense reasoning on visual scenes”

Real-world visual QA requiring spatial reasoning.

Unique: Evaluates common-sense reasoning on real-world photographs where correct answers require implicit world knowledge rather than explicit visual features, testing whether models have internalized practical understanding during pretraining — architectural choice that assesses reasoning capability beyond visual pattern matching

vs others: More representative of real-world reasoning requirements than visual-only benchmarks, but harder to validate and more prone to annotation bias than benchmarks with objective ground truth

via “visual-reasoning-over-complex-scenes”

Open multimodal model for visual reasoning.

Unique: Trained on 77K complex reasoning samples (49% of instruction-tuning dataset) generated by GPT-4, explicitly optimizing for multi-step inference over visual content; this heavy weighting toward reasoning tasks differentiates it from captioning-focused vision models

vs others: Outperforms general-purpose vision models on reasoning-heavy benchmarks like Science QA (92.53% accuracy) because nearly half its training data is reasoning-focused, whereas models like CLIP or standard captioning systems optimize for classification or description

via “multimodal reasoning with cross-modal attention”

Google's fast multimodal model with 1M context.

Unique: Uses cross-modal attention to reason across text, image, video, and audio simultaneously in a single forward pass, rather than processing modalities separately and combining results post-hoc

vs others: More coherent reasoning than sequential modality processing because attention mechanisms can identify relationships between modalities; enables more complex reasoning tasks than single-modality models

via “multimodal reasoning assessment”

Massive multitask multimodal understanding (images + text)

Unique: MMMU extends the MMLU framework specifically for multimodal inputs, introducing a diverse set of reasoning problems that integrate visual and textual elements, which is not commonly found in other benchmarks.

vs others: More comprehensive than MMLU for multimodal tasks due to its inclusion of visual inputs, making it a superior choice for evaluating vision-language models.

via “multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning”

* ⭐ 03/2023: [PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model (PaLM-E)](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03378)

Unique: Interleaves visual references with textual reasoning steps in a unified sequence, rather than generating reasoning text separately from visual analysis, enabling tighter visual-linguistic reasoning coupling

vs others: More interpretable than end-to-end visual reasoning because it exposes intermediate steps; more grounded than text-only chain-of-thought because it references visual content explicitly

via “extended reasoning with chain-of-thought for complex visual tasks”

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Thinking is a multimodal model that unifies strong text generation with visual understanding for images and videos. Its Thinking variant enhances reasoning in STEM, math, and complex tasks. It excels...

Unique: Integrates extended reasoning directly into the model's forward pass for visual tasks, rather than using post-hoc prompting techniques like 'think step-by-step', enabling the model to allocate compute dynamically to reasoning-heavy visual problems

vs others: More reliable than prompt-based chain-of-thought for visual reasoning because reasoning is baked into model weights, not dependent on prompt engineering; produces more consistent intermediate steps for STEM tasks

via “multi-modal reasoning with 256k context window”

Grok 4 is xAI's latest reasoning model with a 256k context window. It supports parallel tool calling, structured outputs, and both image and text inputs. Note that reasoning is not...

Unique: 256k context window combined with native multi-modal input (text + images) in a single reasoning pass, enabling visual-textual reasoning without separate encoding steps or context switching

vs others: Larger context window than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (200k) and GPT-4o (128k) with integrated image reasoning, reducing the need for external vision preprocessing

via “multimodal reasoning across text, code, and images in unified inference”

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is Anthropic’s most advanced Sonnet model to date, optimized for real-world agents and coding workflows. It delivers state-of-the-art performance on coding benchmarks such as SWE-bench Verified, with...

Unique: Unified multimodal inference in a single forward pass with integrated vision-language reasoning, vs sequential or separate processing of modalities, enabling more coherent cross-modal understanding

vs others: Better cross-modal reasoning than models that process vision and language separately, and faster than multi-step approaches that require separate API calls

via “extended-chain-of-thought reasoning with explicit thinking tokens”

Qwen3-Max-Thinking is the flagship reasoning model in the Qwen3 series, designed for high-stakes cognitive tasks that require deep, multi-step reasoning. By significantly scaling model capacity and reinforcement learning compute, it...

Unique: Uses dedicated thinking token architecture with RL-optimized allocation strategy, allowing the model to dynamically determine reasoning depth per query rather than applying fixed reasoning budgets like some competitors. Separates internal deliberation from output generation at the token level, enabling transparent reasoning traces.

vs others: Provides deeper, more transparent reasoning than standard LLMs while maintaining faster inference than some reasoning-specialized models by using learned heuristics to allocate thinking compute only when needed.

via “multimodal reasoning with extended thinking for stem and mathematical problem-solving”

Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B Thinking is a multimodal model that unifies strong text generation with visual understanding across images and video. The Thinking model is optimized for multimodal reasoning in STEM and math....

Unique: Unifies visual and textual reasoning through a single 235B parameter model with explicit thinking tokens, rather than treating vision and language as separate processing streams. The architecture uses a shared transformer backbone with vision-language fusion at intermediate layers, allowing mathematical reasoning to operate directly over visual features (e.g., reasoning about graph structure while reading axis labels).

vs others: Outperforms GPT-4V and Claude 3.5 Sonnet on STEM benchmarks (MATH-Vision, SciQA) because thinking tokens enable explicit symbolic reasoning over visual content, whereas competitors rely on implicit visual understanding without intermediate reasoning artifacts.

via “visual-reasoning-and-logical-inference”

LLaVA — vision-language model combining CLIP and Vicuna — vision-capable

Unique: Combines CLIP's visual understanding with Vicuna's language reasoning in an end-to-end trained model, enabling reasoning about visual content without separate reasoning modules; v1.6 improvements to visual reasoning and world knowledge enhance inference capability

vs others: Integrates reasoning directly into the vision-language model rather than as a post-processing step, enabling more coherent and contextually grounded inference; runs locally without cloud API calls for sensitive reasoning tasks

via “visual question answering with reasoning chains”

Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct is a large-scale multimodal vision-language model designed for high-precision understanding and reasoning across text, images, and video. With 32 billion parameters, it combines deep visual perception with advanced text...

Unique: Implements implicit chain-of-thought reasoning within the model's forward pass, decomposing complex visual questions into intermediate reasoning steps without requiring explicit prompt engineering

vs others: 32B parameter scale enables more sophisticated multi-step reasoning than smaller VLMs; more reliable than GPT-4V for structured reasoning tasks due to instruction-tuning on reasoning datasets

via “visual reasoning with chain-of-thought explanations”

GLM-4.5V is a vision-language foundation model for multimodal agent applications. Built on a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 106B parameters and 12B activated parameters, it achieves state-of-the-art results in video understanding,...

Unique: Generates visual reasoning chains natively through the language model component while maintaining visual grounding, rather than using post-hoc explanation techniques — enables reasoning that is grounded in actual visual features rather than model internals

vs others: Provides more transparent reasoning than black-box vision models, and produces more visually-grounded explanations than text-only reasoning models, though less formally verifiable than symbolic reasoning systems

via “multimodal reasoning with image understanding”

[GPT-5](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-5) Image combines OpenAI's GPT-5 model with state-of-the-art image generation capabilities. It offers major improvements in reasoning, code quality, and user experience while incorporating GPT Image 1's superior instruction following,...

Unique: Integrates GPT-5's advanced reasoning capabilities with state-of-the-art image generation, enabling not just image analysis but reasoning-driven visual understanding that can explain complex spatial relationships, abstract concepts in images, and perform multi-step visual reasoning tasks

vs others: Outperforms GPT-4V and Claude 3.5 Vision on complex visual reasoning tasks due to GPT-5's improved reasoning architecture, while also offering integrated image generation capabilities that competitors require separate models for

via “multi-modal input processing with vision understanding”

The o-series of models are trained with reinforcement learning to think before they answer and perform complex reasoning. The o3-pro model uses more compute to think harder and provide consistently...

Unique: Integrates vision encoding with RL-trained reasoning, allowing the model to apply extended thinking to visual problems. Unlike GPT-4V which processes images but lacks deep reasoning, o3-pro can reason through complex visual scenarios (e.g., solving geometry problems from diagrams, debugging code from screenshots).

vs others: Combines vision understanding with superior reasoning capabilities, outperforming GPT-4V on visual reasoning tasks by leveraging extended thinking, though at significantly higher latency and cost.

via “visual-reasoning-and-image-understanding”

* ⭐ 03/2023: [HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in HuggingFace (HuggingGPT)](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17580)

Unique: GPT-4 appears to integrate visual understanding with language reasoning in a unified model, though the paper provides no architectural details on how vision encoding is performed or integrated with the transformer. This represents a departure from GPT-3's text-only capabilities.

vs others: Extends beyond GPT-3 and ChatGPT by adding visual reasoning capabilities, though the implementation approach and performance metrics relative to specialized vision models are not disclosed.