guidance
FrameworkFreeA guidance language for controlling large language models.
Capabilities14 decomposed
grammar-constrained text generation with token-aware parsing
Medium confidenceGenerates text from language models while enforcing constraints defined as an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) of GrammarNode subclasses (LiteralNode, RegexNode, SelectNode, JsonNode). Uses TokenParser and ByteParser engines that work at the text level rather than token level, implementing token healing to correctly process text boundaries. The execution engine accumulates generated text into stateful lm objects that maintain both output and captured variables across generation steps.
Implements token healing at the text level rather than token level, allowing precise constraint enforcement across token boundaries without requiring model retraining. Uses immutable GrammarNode AST with TokenParser/ByteParser engines that integrate directly with model tokenizers via llguidance, enabling sub-token-level constraint enforcement.
Faster and more reliable than post-processing validation because constraints are enforced during generation rather than after, and more flexible than LORA-based approaches because it works with any model backend without fine-tuning.
multi-backend model abstraction with unified api
Medium confidenceProvides a unified interface for executing guidance programs across heterogeneous language model backends including local models (llama-cpp, Hugging Face Transformers) and remote APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, Google VertexAI). Each backend implements a common model interface that handles tokenization, state management, and generation, allowing the same guidance program to run on different models without code changes. The abstraction layer handles backend-specific details like API authentication, context window management, and token counting.
Implements a unified model interface that abstracts both local and remote backends, with token healing applied consistently across all backends through the llguidance tokenization layer. Unlike prompt-based abstractions, this works at the generation engine level, allowing grammar constraints to be enforced uniformly regardless of backend.
More flexible than LangChain's model abstraction because it preserves grammar constraints across backends, and more performant than wrapper-based approaches because it integrates directly with model tokenizers rather than post-processing outputs.
caching and stateless execution modes for performance optimization
Medium confidenceSupports both stateful and stateless execution modes, with optional caching of generation results. Stateless mode allows guidance programs to be executed without maintaining state between calls, reducing memory overhead. Caching can be enabled to store results of expensive generations (e.g., long prompts with complex constraints) and reuse them for identical inputs. The caching layer integrates with the model backend to avoid redundant API calls or model inference.
Integrates caching at the guidance framework level, allowing entire constrained generation results to be cached rather than just model outputs. Supports both stateful and stateless modes, enabling flexible tradeoffs between memory usage and state management.
More efficient than application-level caching because it caches at the generation level, and more flexible than model-level caching because it can cache entire constrained generation pipelines including variable captures.
programmatic control flow with python integration
Medium confidenceAllows guidance programs to interleave Python control flow (if/else, for loops, function calls) with constrained text generation using the @guidance decorator. The decorator transforms Python functions into guidance programs that can mix imperative logic with declarative grammar constraints. This enables complex workflows where generation decisions depend on previous outputs, external data, or application logic.
Uses the @guidance decorator to transform Python functions into guidance programs, enabling seamless interleaving of imperative control flow with declarative grammar constraints. Unlike prompt-based approaches, this allows full Python expressiveness within generation workflows.
More flexible than pure prompt-based workflows because it allows arbitrary Python logic, and more readable than string-based prompt templates because it uses native Python syntax for control flow.
token-level constraint enforcement with llguidance integration
Medium confidenceIntegrates with the llguidance library to enforce grammar constraints at the token level during model inference. The grammar AST is compiled into a state machine that tracks which tokens are valid at each generation step, preventing the model from generating invalid tokens. This is implemented through a custom sampling function that filters the model's token logits based on the current grammar state, ensuring only valid tokens are sampled.
Compiles grammar constraints into a state machine that filters token logits during inference, implemented through llguidance C++ extension for performance. This is the core mechanism that enables reliable constraint enforcement without post-processing.
More reliable than post-processing validation because constraints are enforced during generation, and more efficient than rejection sampling because invalid tokens are filtered rather than sampled and discarded.
recursive grammar rules and reusable constraint patterns
Medium confidenceSupports RuleNode grammar constraints that define reusable patterns and recursive grammar rules. Rules can be defined once and referenced multiple times, reducing grammar duplication and improving maintainability. Recursive rules enable generation of nested structures (e.g., nested JSON, nested lists) without explicitly defining the nesting depth. Rules are compiled into the grammar AST and can be parameterized with arguments.
Implements RuleNode grammar constraints that support recursion and parameterization, enabling complex nested structures to be defined concisely. Rules are compiled into the grammar AST and can be referenced multiple times without duplication.
More maintainable than inline grammar definitions because rules can be reused, and more flexible than hardcoded patterns because rules can be parameterized with arguments.
stateful execution with variable capture and context accumulation
Medium confidenceMaintains execution state through immutable lm objects that accumulate generated text, captured variables, and model state across multiple generation steps. Variables are captured using named capture groups in regex patterns or JSON schema fields, and can be referenced in subsequent generation steps. The stateful model object preserves the full generation history, enabling introspection, debugging, and chaining of multiple constrained generations in sequence.
Uses immutable lm objects that preserve full generation history and captured variables, enabling transparent debugging and chaining. Unlike stateless prompt-response patterns, this allows variables to be extracted mid-generation and used in subsequent steps without re-prompting.
More transparent than LangChain's memory abstractions because the full state is accessible and immutable, reducing bugs from hidden state mutations. More efficient than re-prompting with full history because only captured variables need to be passed forward.
json schema-based structured output generation
Medium confidenceGenerates valid JSON output that conforms to a provided JSON schema by using JsonNode grammar constraints. The schema is converted into a grammar that enforces field types, required fields, nested objects, and arrays at generation time. The generated JSON is automatically parsed and made available as Python objects in the captured variables, eliminating the need for post-generation validation or repair.
Converts JSON schemas into grammar constraints that are enforced during token generation, not after. This prevents invalid JSON from being generated in the first place, unlike post-processing approaches that must repair or reject malformed output.
More reliable than JSON repair libraries (like json-repair) because it prevents invalid JSON generation, and faster than validation-retry loops because it guarantees correctness on the first pass.
regex-based pattern matching and text extraction
Medium confidenceConstrains generation to match regular expressions using RegexNode grammar nodes, enabling precise control over text format and structure. Named capture groups in regex patterns are automatically extracted into variables for downstream use. The regex constraints are compiled into the grammar AST and enforced at the token level during generation, preventing the model from generating text that violates the pattern.
Compiles regex patterns into grammar constraints that are enforced during token generation, not after. Uses named capture groups that are automatically extracted into the lm state, enabling seamless integration with multi-step generation pipelines.
More efficient than regex validation-and-retry because constraints are enforced during generation, and more flexible than hardcoded templates because it allows the model to generate variable content within the pattern constraints.
conditional branching and selection with constrained alternatives
Medium confidenceImplements SelectNode grammar constraints that force the model to choose from a predefined set of alternatives, with each alternative being a grammar subtree. The selection is enforced at generation time, preventing the model from generating text outside the allowed options. Supports both simple string selections and complex nested grammar selections, with captured variables from the selected branch available in the output state.
Enforces selection constraints at the token level during generation, preventing the model from generating alternatives outside the predefined set. Unlike post-processing classification, this guarantees the output is one of the allowed options without requiring validation or retry logic.
More reliable than prompt-based selection (e.g., 'choose from: A, B, C') because the constraint is enforced at generation time, and more efficient than sampling-and-filtering because it prevents invalid generations from being produced.
chat role templating with multi-turn conversation support
Medium confidenceProvides built-in support for multi-turn conversations with role-based message formatting (system, user, assistant). Chat templates are automatically applied based on the model's tokenizer, handling model-specific formatting requirements (e.g., ChatML, Llama2 chat format). The framework maintains conversation history as part of the lm state, enabling stateful multi-turn interactions where each turn can use grammar constraints.
Automatically applies model-specific chat templates (ChatML, Llama2, etc.) based on the model's tokenizer, eliminating manual template handling. Integrates chat formatting with grammar constraints, allowing each turn to enforce structured output requirements.
More robust than manual template handling because it uses the model's native tokenizer to determine correct formatting, and more flexible than hardcoded templates because it adapts to different model providers automatically.
function calling and tool use with schema-based dispatch
Medium confidenceEnables language models to call external functions or tools by generating function calls that conform to a schema-based registry. Functions are registered with their signatures, and the model generates structured function calls (typically as JSON) that are automatically parsed and dispatched to the registered functions. The framework handles schema validation, parameter extraction, and return value integration back into the generation context.
Integrates function calling with grammar constraints, ensuring generated function calls conform to schemas at generation time rather than requiring post-processing validation. Uses the same SelectNode and JsonNode infrastructure as other constrained generation, providing unified handling of tool calls.
More reliable than prompt-based tool calling because function calls are constrained at generation time, and more flexible than hardcoded tool routing because it supports dynamic tool registration and schema-based dispatch.
repetition and iteration patterns with grammar-based loops
Medium confidenceSupports repetition patterns (one_or_more, zero_or_more, repeat) using RepeatNode grammar constraints that allow the model to generate multiple instances of a pattern. Useful for generating lists, arrays, or repeated structures where each repetition must conform to the same grammar. The framework handles variable capture across repetitions, accumulating results into lists that are accessible in the lm state.
Implements repetition as grammar constraints using RepeatNode, allowing the model to generate multiple instances of a pattern with each instance constrained to match the grammar. Unlike prompt-based list generation, this guarantees each item matches the pattern without requiring post-processing.
More efficient than generating items one-by-one because the repetition is handled in a single generation pass, and more reliable than prompt-based list generation because each item is constrained at generation time.
notebook integration with interactive visualization and debugging
Medium confidenceProvides Jupyter notebook widgets that visualize guidance program execution, showing the generated text, captured variables, and grammar constraints in real-time. The visualization includes token-by-token generation progress, constraint violations (if any), and interactive exploration of the grammar AST. Enables developers to debug guidance programs directly in notebooks without external tools.
Provides real-time visualization of grammar constraint enforcement during generation, showing token-by-token progress and captured variables. Unlike external debugging tools, this integrates directly into the notebook environment for seamless development.
More accessible than external debugging tools because it works directly in Jupyter, and more informative than log-based debugging because it shows the grammar AST and constraint violations visually.
Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.
Related Artifactssharing capabilities
Artifacts that share capabilities with guidance, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.
Guidance
Microsoft's language for efficient LLM control flow.
Mistral: Ministral 3 8B 2512
A balanced model in the Ministral 3 family, Ministral 3 8B is a powerful, efficient tiny language model with vision capabilities.
Mistral AI
Revolutionize AI deployment: open-source, customizable,...
Outlines
Structured text generation — guarantees LLM outputs match JSON schemas or grammars.
OpenAI API
The most widely used LLM API — GPT-4o, reasoning models, images, audio, embeddings, fine-tuning.
CTranslate2
Fast transformer inference engine — INT8 quantization, C++ core, Whisper/Llama support.
Best For
- ✓developers building structured output pipelines (JSON extraction, form filling, code generation)
- ✓teams implementing guardrails for LLM outputs without external validation layers
- ✓researchers prototyping grammar-based control mechanisms for language models
- ✓teams building multi-model applications that need provider flexibility
- ✓developers prototyping with cloud APIs but deploying with local models
- ✓organizations evaluating different model providers without rewriting application code
- ✓teams building production systems with high throughput requirements
- ✓developers optimizing performance for repeated or similar generations
Known Limitations
- ⚠Token healing adds computational overhead compared to unconstrained generation; exact latency depends on constraint complexity
- ⚠Grammar constraints must be defined upfront; dynamic constraint generation at runtime is not supported
- ⚠ByteParser requires UTF-8 compatible tokenizers; some specialized tokenizers may not work correctly
- ⚠Complex nested grammars can produce exponential parsing states, requiring careful grammar design
- ⚠Backend-specific features (e.g., vision capabilities, function calling schemas) may not be uniformly exposed across all backends
- ⚠Performance characteristics vary significantly between backends; latency and throughput are not normalized
Requirements
Input / Output
UnfragileRank
UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.
Package Details
About
A guidance language for controlling large language models.
Categories
Alternatives to guidance
Are you the builder of guidance?
Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.
Get the weekly brief
New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.
Data Sources
Looking for something else?
Search →