o1
ModelFreeOpenAI's reasoning model with chain-of-thought problem solving.
Capabilities9 decomposed
extended-chain-of-thought reasoning with compute allocation
Medium confidenceImplements a two-phase inference architecture where the model allocates additional compute tokens (up to 32K thinking tokens) to internal reasoning before generating responses. Uses a hidden reasoning layer that performs step-by-step problem decomposition, hypothesis testing, and self-correction without exposing intermediate thoughts to the user. The thinking phase operates on a separate token budget from the response phase, enabling the model to spend variable compute time on problem complexity.
Separates thinking tokens from response tokens with a dedicated hidden reasoning phase, allowing variable compute allocation per query without exposing intermediate reasoning steps. This differs from standard chain-of-thought which exposes all reasoning in the output.
Achieves 83.3% on IMO qualifying exams and 89th percentile on Codeforces by allocating compute to internal reasoning rather than relying on single-pass generation like GPT-4, with the tradeoff of higher latency.
phd-level stem problem solving with verification
Medium confidenceLeverages extended reasoning to achieve expert-level performance on physics, chemistry, and biology problems through multi-step verification and constraint satisfaction. The model internally validates solutions against physical laws, chemical equilibrium principles, and biological mechanisms before responding. Trained on scientific reasoning patterns that enable it to catch errors, consider alternative approaches, and provide rigorous justification.
Achieves PhD-level performance through internal verification loops that check solutions against domain-specific constraints and principles, rather than relying on pattern matching. The hidden reasoning phase enables the model to catch errors and reconsider approaches without exposing failed attempts.
Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude on STEM benchmarks (83.3% IMO, 89th percentile Codeforces) by dedicating compute to verification and constraint satisfaction rather than single-pass generation.
competitive programming code generation with algorithm optimization
Medium confidenceGenerates optimized code solutions for competitive programming problems by reasoning through algorithmic complexity, edge cases, and optimization strategies during the thinking phase. The model evaluates multiple approaches (brute force, dynamic programming, greedy, etc.), analyzes time/space complexity, and selects the optimal strategy before generating code. Handles problems requiring careful input parsing, constraint satisfaction, and numerical stability.
Achieves 89th percentile on Codeforces by reasoning through algorithmic tradeoffs and complexity analysis in the thinking phase, then generating optimized code. This differs from standard code generation which may produce correct but suboptimal solutions.
Outperforms GPT-4 on competitive programming by allocating compute to algorithm selection and complexity verification rather than direct code generation, achieving 89th percentile vs typical 50-60th percentile performance.
mathematical proof generation with symbolic reasoning
Medium confidenceGenerates rigorous mathematical proofs by reasoning through logical steps, constraint satisfaction, and symbolic manipulation during the thinking phase. The model constructs proofs incrementally, verifying each step against mathematical axioms and previously established results. Handles problems requiring induction, contradiction, case analysis, and algebraic manipulation with formal rigor.
Achieves 83.3% on IMO qualifying exams by reasoning through proof strategies and constraint satisfaction in the thinking phase, then generating formal proofs. This differs from standard language models which may generate plausible-sounding but logically invalid proofs.
Outperforms GPT-4 on mathematical reasoning by allocating compute to logical verification and proof strategy selection rather than pattern-based generation, achieving 83.3% on IMO vs typical 30-40% performance.
200k context window with extended thinking token budget
Medium confidenceProvides a 200,000 token context window that accommodates large codebases, long documents, and extensive problem specifications. The context budget is separate from the thinking token budget (up to 32K), allowing the model to maintain awareness of large amounts of reference material while reasoning through complex problems. Enables processing of entire files, documentation, and multi-file code analysis without truncation.
Separates context tokens (200K) from thinking tokens (32K), allowing large reference materials to be maintained while reasoning is allocated separately. This differs from standard models where context and reasoning share the same token budget.
Provides 2.5x larger context window than GPT-4 (200K vs 128K) with dedicated thinking tokens, enabling analysis of larger codebases and documents without sacrificing reasoning capability.
multi-step error detection and self-correction
Medium confidenceDetects and corrects errors during the reasoning phase by internally testing solutions against constraints, edge cases, and domain principles. The model generates candidate solutions, evaluates them, identifies failures, and iterates without exposing failed attempts to the user. This self-correction loop is performed in the hidden thinking phase, resulting in higher-quality final responses.
Performs error detection and correction in the hidden thinking phase, resulting in higher-quality final responses without exposing failed attempts. This differs from chain-of-thought approaches where all reasoning (including errors) is visible.
Achieves higher correctness rates than standard models by internally testing solutions and iterating, with the tradeoff of higher latency and reduced transparency into reasoning process.
constraint satisfaction and edge case handling
Medium confidenceSystematically identifies and handles edge cases and constraints during the reasoning phase by enumerating boundary conditions, special cases, and constraint violations. The model reasons through input validation, numerical edge cases (overflow, underflow, division by zero), and domain-specific constraints before generating solutions. This enables robust solutions that handle corner cases correctly.
Systematically enumerates and handles edge cases during the reasoning phase rather than relying on pattern matching, resulting in more robust solutions. This differs from standard code generation which may miss edge cases.
Produces more robust code than GPT-4 by reasoning through edge cases and constraints explicitly, with the tradeoff of higher latency and reduced transparency into edge case analysis.
variable latency inference with adaptive compute allocation
Medium confidenceAllocates compute dynamically based on problem complexity, spending more thinking tokens on harder problems and fewer on simpler ones. The model estimates problem difficulty and adjusts the reasoning phase duration accordingly, resulting in variable latency (5-30 seconds) depending on problem complexity. This adaptive allocation improves efficiency compared to fixed-latency approaches.
Allocates thinking tokens adaptively based on problem complexity rather than using fixed compute budgets, resulting in variable latency optimized for efficiency. This differs from standard models with fixed inference time.
More efficient than fixed-latency approaches by allocating more compute to harder problems and less to simpler ones, but less predictable than models with fixed response times.
api-based access with streaming and batch processing
Medium confidenceProvides access to the o1 model through OpenAI's REST API with support for both streaming and batch processing modes. Developers can integrate o1 into applications via standard HTTP requests, with SDKs available for Python, Node.js, and other languages. Batch processing enables cost-optimized processing of multiple problems asynchronously.
Provides standard REST API access to reasoning capabilities with support for both streaming and batch processing, enabling integration into existing applications and workflows. This differs from models that only support chat interfaces.
Offers more flexibility than chat-only interfaces by supporting batch processing and programmatic integration, though with higher latency than local models.
Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.
Related Artifactssharing capabilities
Artifacts that share capabilities with o1, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.
OpenAI: o1
The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...
OpenAI: o3 Pro
The o-series of models are trained with reinforcement learning to think before they answer and perform complex reasoning. The o3-pro model uses more compute to think harder and provide consistently...
DeepSeek: R1 0528
May 28th update to the [original DeepSeek R1](/deepseek/deepseek-r1) Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active...
DeepSeek-R1
text-generation model by undefined. 40,25,647 downloads.
OpenAI: o3 Mini
OpenAI o3-mini is a cost-efficient language model optimized for STEM reasoning tasks, particularly excelling in science, mathematics, and coding. This model supports the `reasoning_effort` parameter, which can be set to...
o3
OpenAI's most powerful reasoning model for complex problems.
Best For
- ✓researchers and engineers solving STEM problems requiring rigorous proof
- ✓competitive programmers optimizing algorithms for correctness and efficiency
- ✓teams building AI systems for scientific discovery and validation
- ✓graduate students and researchers in STEM fields
- ✓educators creating rigorous problem sets and solutions
- ✓teams building scientific discovery tools or tutoring systems
- ✓competitive programmers preparing for contests
- ✓students learning algorithms and data structures
Known Limitations
- ⚠thinking tokens are not visible to users, limiting transparency into reasoning process
- ⚠extended thinking increases latency by 5-30 seconds depending on problem complexity
- ⚠thinking budget is fixed at 32K tokens maximum, may be insufficient for extremely complex multi-domain problems
- ⚠no fine-grained control over thinking allocation strategy per problem type
- ⚠performance degrades on problems requiring specialized domain knowledge beyond training data cutoff
- ⚠cannot access real-time experimental data or current research publications
Requirements
Input / Output
UnfragileRank
UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.
About
OpenAI's first reasoning model that uses chain-of-thought to solve complex problems. Spends additional compute time thinking before responding, achieving PhD-level performance on physics, chemistry, and biology benchmarks. Scores 83.3% on the International Mathematics Olympiad qualifying exam and 89th percentile on Codeforces competitive programming. 200K context window with extended thinking tokens for multi-step reasoning tasks.
Categories
Alternatives to o1
The GitHub for AI — 500K+ models, datasets, Spaces, Inference API, hub for open-source AI.
Compare →FLUX, Stable Diffusion, SDXL, SD3, LoRA, Fine Tuning, DreamBooth, Training, Automatic1111, Forge WebUI, SwarmUI, DeepFake, TTS, Animation, Text To Video, Tutorials, Guides, Lectures, Courses, ComfyUI, Google Colab, RunPod, Kaggle, NoteBooks, ControlNet, TTS, Voice Cloning, AI, AI News, ML, ML News,
Compare →Are you the builder of o1?
Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.
Get the weekly brief
New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.
Data Sources
Looking for something else?
Search →