@modelcontextprotocol/server-system-monitor
MCP ServerFreeSystem monitor MCP App Server with real-time stats
Capabilities9 decomposed
real-time system metrics collection and exposure
Medium confidenceCollects live CPU, memory, disk, and process-level metrics from the host operating system and exposes them through the Model Context Protocol (MCP) as callable tools. Uses native OS APIs (via Node.js child processes or system libraries) to poll system state at configurable intervals, then serializes metrics into structured JSON payloads that LLM clients can query synchronously or subscribe to via MCP's resource subscription mechanism.
Implements system monitoring as an MCP server rather than a standalone daemon or HTTP service, allowing LLM clients to query metrics directly via the MCP protocol without additional infrastructure; uses MCP's resource subscription pattern to enable push-based metric updates to clients that support it.
Tighter integration with LLM workflows than traditional monitoring tools (Prometheus, Grafana) because metrics are callable tools in the agent's action space, not external dashboards; simpler deployment than containerized monitoring stacks because it runs as a single Node.js process.
mcp tool schema generation for system metrics
Medium confidenceAutomatically generates MCP-compliant tool definitions (JSON schemas) for each system metric endpoint, enabling LLM clients to discover and call metric-fetching functions with proper type hints and descriptions. The server introspects available metrics at startup and generates OpenAPI-style schemas that describe input parameters (e.g., process filter, metric type) and output structures, which are then advertised via MCP's tools/list endpoint.
Generates MCP tool schemas dynamically from the server's metric collection logic rather than requiring manual schema authoring; integrates with MCP's tools/list and tools/call endpoints to provide full schema-driven function calling for system metrics.
More discoverable than hardcoded metric endpoints because schemas are self-documenting and machine-readable; reduces friction compared to REST APIs where clients must read documentation to understand available metrics.
process-level resource attribution and filtering
Medium confidenceBreaks down system metrics to the individual process level, allowing LLM clients to query CPU, memory, and I/O usage per process, with optional filtering by process name, PID, or resource threshold. Internally uses Node.js child processes to invoke system commands (ps, top, or equivalent) and parses their output into structured process records, then applies filter logic to return only relevant processes.
Provides process-level granularity in an MCP context, enabling LLM agents to make decisions about specific processes rather than aggregate system metrics; uses command-line parsing to extract per-process data, making it lightweight compared to instrumenting individual processes.
More granular than aggregate CPU/memory metrics because it attributes resources to specific processes; simpler than agent-side instrumentation (e.g., APM libraries) because it uses OS-level visibility without modifying target applications.
configurable metric polling and update intervals
Medium confidenceAllows configuration of how frequently the server collects system metrics (e.g., every 1 second, 5 seconds, or on-demand) and how long metrics are cached before being refreshed. Implements a polling loop that runs at a configurable interval, stores the latest snapshot in memory, and serves cached results to clients until the next poll cycle completes. Configuration is typically provided via environment variables or a config file at server startup.
Exposes polling interval as a configurable parameter rather than hardcoding it, allowing operators to tune the trade-off between metric freshness and CPU overhead; uses in-memory caching to avoid redundant system calls within a polling cycle.
More flexible than fixed-interval monitoring because operators can adjust polling frequency without code changes; more efficient than on-demand polling for high-frequency queries because caching reduces system call overhead.
mcp resource subscription for metric streaming
Medium confidenceImplements MCP's resource subscription mechanism to enable clients to subscribe to metric updates and receive push-based notifications when metrics change, rather than polling. The server maintains a list of active subscriptions and pushes updated metric snapshots to subscribed clients at each polling interval or when metrics exceed configured thresholds. Uses MCP's resources/subscribe and resources/updated endpoints to manage subscriptions and deliver updates.
Leverages MCP's resource subscription protocol to provide push-based metric delivery instead of relying solely on polling; enables efficient multi-client metric distribution by centralizing subscription management in the server.
Lower latency than polling-based approaches because clients receive updates immediately; more efficient than individual polling because the server broadcasts to all subscribers in a single operation.
disk i/o and storage metrics collection
Medium confidenceCollects and exposes disk-level metrics including I/O throughput (read/write bytes per second), I/O operations per second (IOPS), disk utilization percentage, and available/used space per filesystem. Internally queries the OS filesystem APIs (via df, iostat, or equivalent) and parses output into structured disk metrics, optionally tracking I/O deltas between polling intervals to compute throughput.
Combines filesystem capacity metrics with I/O performance metrics in a single capability, providing both storage health (utilization) and performance (throughput/IOPS) visibility; computes I/O deltas across polling intervals to derive throughput without requiring external profiling tools.
More comprehensive than simple disk space checks because it includes I/O performance metrics; more accessible than kernel-level profiling tools (perf, blktrace) because it uses standard OS utilities.
network interface metrics and connection tracking
Medium confidenceCollects network interface statistics including bytes sent/received, packet counts, error rates, and optionally tracks active network connections (TCP/UDP sockets) with their associated processes. Queries OS network APIs (via ifconfig, netstat, ss, or equivalent) and parses output into structured network metrics, optionally computing throughput deltas between polling intervals.
Combines interface-level throughput metrics with process-level connection tracking, enabling agents to correlate network activity with specific applications; computes throughput deltas to provide real-time bandwidth visibility without external tools.
More actionable than raw interface stats because it includes process attribution; simpler than packet-level analysis (tcpdump, Wireshark) because it uses OS-level socket APIs.
memory usage breakdown by category
Medium confidenceProvides detailed memory usage breakdown including resident set size (RSS), heap usage, external memory, and optionally distinguishes between different memory types (physical, swap, cached). On Linux, parses /proc/meminfo and /proc/[pid]/status for detailed memory accounting; on other OSes, uses available APIs to approximate breakdown. Exposes both system-wide memory and per-process memory details.
Provides detailed memory breakdown (RSS, heap, external) rather than just total memory usage, enabling agents to diagnose memory issues; uses OS-specific APIs (/proc on Linux) to access detailed memory accounting without requiring process instrumentation.
More diagnostic than simple memory percentage because it breaks down memory by type; more accessible than language-specific profilers because it works across processes regardless of implementation language.
cpu usage and load average tracking
Medium confidenceCollects CPU metrics including per-core CPU usage percentage, system-wide CPU average, and load averages (1-minute, 5-minute, 15-minute). Computes CPU usage by reading /proc/stat on Linux or equivalent APIs on other OSes, calculating the delta between consecutive snapshots to derive per-core and aggregate CPU percentages. Exposes both instantaneous CPU usage and historical load averages.
Computes CPU usage deltas across polling intervals to provide instantaneous CPU percentage rather than relying solely on OS load averages; exposes both per-core and aggregate CPU metrics, enabling fine-grained CPU bottleneck detection.
More actionable than load average alone because it includes instantaneous CPU percentage; more granular than aggregate metrics because it breaks down usage by core.
Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.
Related Artifactssharing capabilities
Artifacts that share capabilities with @modelcontextprotocol/server-system-monitor, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.
@auvh/climeter-mcp
Usage-based billing for MCP servers — wrap any MCP tool with CLIMeter metering
@listo-ai/mcp-observability
Lightweight telemetry SDK for MCP servers and web applications. Captures HTTP requests, MCP tool invocations, business events, and UI interactions with built-in payload sanitization.
@mcp-use/inspector
MCP Inspector - A tool for inspecting and debugging MCP servers
arcade-mcp
The best way to create, deploy, and share MCP Servers
@traceloop/instrumentation-mcp
MCP (Model Context Protocol) Instrumentation
Mastra/mcp
** - Client implementation for Mastra, providing seamless integration with MCP-compatible AI models and tools.
Best For
- ✓AI agents running on-device that need environmental awareness
- ✓Teams building observability layers into MCP-based AI systems
- ✓Developers prototyping autonomous systems that respond to resource constraints
- ✓Developers building LLM agents that need discoverable system APIs
- ✓Teams using Claude Desktop or other MCP clients that render tool schemas
- ✓Builders prototyping multi-tool agents where metric queries are one of many capabilities
- ✓Agents managing multi-process systems (microservices, worker pools)
- ✓Developers debugging resource leaks in running applications
Known Limitations
- ⚠Metrics are point-in-time snapshots; no built-in time-series storage or historical aggregation
- ⚠Polling-based approach adds latency between metric collection and LLM visibility (typically 1-5 second intervals)
- ⚠Limited to metrics available via Node.js os module; advanced profiling (flame graphs, kernel traces) not supported
- ⚠No built-in filtering or sampling — all metrics sent to client on every query, which may be verbose for high-frequency polling
- ⚠Schema generation is static at server startup; dynamic metrics added at runtime won't be reflected until server restart
- ⚠Schemas describe only the metric interface, not the semantic meaning or interpretation (e.g., what 'high CPU' means in context)
Requirements
Input / Output
UnfragileRank
UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.
Package Details
About
System monitor MCP App Server with real-time stats
Categories
Alternatives to @modelcontextprotocol/server-system-monitor
Are you the builder of @modelcontextprotocol/server-system-monitor?
Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.
Get the weekly brief
New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.
Data Sources
Looking for something else?
Search →