What can @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp do?

oauth2 auto-authentication for gmail api access, gmail message retrieval via mcp tools, mcp server lifecycle management with gmail context, cursor ide integration for gmail operations, gmail label and thread metadata retrieval, automatic token refresh and credential lifecycle management

@gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp

MCP ServerFree

Gmail MCP server with auto authentication support

Open Source

/ 100

6 capabilities

Capabilities6 decomposed

oauth2 auto-authentication for gmail api access

Medium confidence

Implements automatic OAuth2 token acquisition and refresh for Gmail API without requiring manual credential management. The server handles the full OAuth2 flow including authorization code exchange, token storage, and automatic refresh token rotation, eliminating the need for developers to manually manage Google service account credentials or handle token expiration.

Solves for

I want Claude or another AI agent to access my Gmail without storing credentials in plaintextI need to set up Gmail integration in an MCP server without managing OAuth tokens manuallyI want to avoid re-authenticating every time the access token expires

Best for

AI agent developers integrating Gmail with Claude via MCP

Teams building Cursor-integrated Gmail automation tools

Developers who want zero-credential-management Gmail access

Requires

Google OAuth2 credentials (Client ID and Client Secret from Google Cloud Console)

Node.js 14+ runtime

Network access to Google OAuth2 endpoints

Limitations

Requires initial user authorization flow — cannot work in fully headless environments without pre-configured refresh tokens

Token storage mechanism not specified in package metadata — may require external persistence layer for production use

Single-user authentication per server instance — multi-user scenarios require separate server instances or token isolation logic

What makes it unique

Implements automatic token refresh within the MCP server boundary, allowing AI agents to transparently access Gmail without exposing credentials to the client application or requiring manual token management by developers

vs alternatives

Eliminates credential exposure compared to passing raw API keys to Claude, and removes token refresh complexity vs. manually implementing OAuth2 in client applications

gmail message retrieval via mcp tools

Medium confidence

Exposes Gmail API message operations (fetch, list, search) as MCP tools callable by Claude and other AI agents. The server wraps Gmail API endpoints with schema-based function definitions that allow agents to query messages by ID, search with Gmail query syntax, and retrieve thread information with automatic pagination handling.

Solves for

I want Claude to read and summarize my recent emailsI need an AI agent to search my Gmail for messages matching specific criteriaI want to retrieve email threads and metadata without writing Gmail API code

Best for

AI agent developers building email automation workflows

Non-technical users wanting Claude to interact with their Gmail

Teams integrating email context into AI-powered decision-making systems

Requires

Valid OAuth2 access token (obtained via auto-auth capability)

Gmail API enabled in Google Cloud project

MCP client with tool-calling support

Limitations

Read-only operations on messages — no built-in send, draft, or label modification capabilities

Pagination handled server-side but may timeout on very large result sets (1000+ messages)

Gmail query syntax limitations apply — complex boolean queries may require multiple API calls

What makes it unique

Wraps Gmail API as MCP tools with automatic schema generation, allowing Claude to discover and call email operations without hardcoded integrations, and handles Gmail's complex query syntax transparently

vs alternatives

More discoverable than raw Gmail API SDKs because tools are self-documenting via MCP schema, and simpler than building custom REST endpoints for each email operation

mcp server lifecycle management with gmail context

Medium confidence

Implements the Model Context Protocol server specification, handling MCP request/response routing, tool registration, and resource management. The server registers Gmail operations as discoverable MCP tools and maintains the protocol handshake with clients (Claude, Cursor), enabling bidirectional communication for tool invocation and result streaming.

Solves for

I want to expose Gmail operations to Claude as native MCP toolsI need my AI agent to discover available email operations at runtimeI want to integrate Gmail into a Cursor-based development workflow

Best for

Developers building MCP servers for email automation

Teams standardizing on MCP for AI agent integrations

Cursor users wanting native Gmail access in their IDE

Requires

MCP client library compatible with server implementation (Node.js-based)

MCP protocol version 1.0+ support in client

stdio or HTTP transport configuration

Limitations

MCP protocol version compatibility depends on client implementation — older clients may not support all tool features

Server runs as single process — no built-in clustering or load balancing

Tool discovery is static at server startup — dynamic tool registration requires server restart

What makes it unique

Implements MCP server specification with Gmail-specific tool bindings, allowing seamless integration into Claude and Cursor without custom protocol handling by the client

vs alternatives

Standardized MCP approach is more maintainable than custom REST APIs, and enables automatic tool discovery vs. hardcoded integrations

cursor ide integration for gmail operations

Medium confidence

Provides native MCP server support for Cursor IDE, allowing developers to invoke Gmail operations directly within their editor context. The server registers as a Cursor-compatible MCP provider, enabling in-editor tool calls for email retrieval, search, and context injection into code generation workflows.

Solves for

I want to search my Gmail from within Cursor without leaving the editorI need to inject email context into code generation prompts in CursorI want to automate email-based workflows while coding in Cursor

Best for

Cursor users building email automation features

Developers wanting email context in AI-assisted coding

Teams integrating email data into development workflows

Requires

Cursor IDE (version with MCP support)

MCP server running and configured in Cursor settings

Valid Gmail OAuth2 credentials

Limitations

Cursor-specific integration — not compatible with other IDEs (VS Code, JetBrains, etc.)

Tool invocation latency depends on Cursor's MCP client implementation

No built-in UI for email preview — results displayed as text in editor

What makes it unique

Bridges Gmail and Cursor IDE via MCP, enabling email operations to be invoked directly in the editor context without external tools or window switching

vs alternatives

More integrated than browser-based Gmail + separate Cursor window, and avoids context switching compared to manual email checking during development

gmail label and thread metadata retrieval

Medium confidence

Exposes Gmail label hierarchy and thread metadata operations through MCP tools, allowing agents to list available labels, retrieve thread information, and filter messages by label. The server queries Gmail's label API and thread endpoints, returning structured metadata that enables label-based email organization and thread-aware message grouping.

Solves for

I want Claude to understand my Gmail label structure and organize emails by labelI need to retrieve all messages in a specific thread with conversation contextI want to filter email searches by custom labels I've created

Best for

Users with complex Gmail label hierarchies wanting AI-driven organization

Teams building email conversation analysis tools

Developers creating label-aware email automation

Requires

Valid Gmail OAuth2 access token

Gmail API with labels.list and threads.get scopes enabled

Limitations

Label hierarchy is read-only — no capability to create or modify labels

Thread metadata does not include full message bodies — requires separate message fetch calls

System labels (All Mail, Spam, etc.) may behave differently than custom labels in API responses

What makes it unique

Exposes Gmail's label hierarchy and thread structure as queryable MCP tools, enabling agents to understand email organization context without parsing raw API responses

vs alternatives

More structured than raw Gmail API responses, and enables label-aware filtering that would require multiple API calls to implement manually

automatic token refresh and credential lifecycle management

Medium confidence

Implements background token refresh logic that automatically renews expired OAuth2 access tokens using stored refresh tokens. The server monitors token expiration and proactively refreshes credentials before they expire, ensuring uninterrupted Gmail API access without requiring manual re-authentication or error handling by the client.

Solves for

I want Gmail operations to work continuously without token expiration errorsI need automatic credential refresh without manual interventionI want to avoid implementing token refresh logic in my agent code

Best for

Long-running AI agents that need persistent Gmail access

Production systems requiring high availability for email operations

Teams wanting to abstract OAuth2 complexity from agent logic

Requires

Valid OAuth2 refresh token (obtained during initial authorization)

Network access to Google OAuth2 token endpoint

Server running continuously to perform background refresh

Limitations

Refresh token revocation is not detected automatically — requires manual server restart or health check

Token storage is in-memory by default — tokens lost on server restart unless persisted externally

Refresh token expiration (typically 6 months) requires re-authentication after extended inactivity

What makes it unique

Implements proactive token refresh at the MCP server level, eliminating the need for clients to handle token expiration or implement refresh logic themselves

vs alternatives

More reliable than client-side token refresh because it's centralized and doesn't depend on client uptime, and simpler than implementing refresh logic in each agent

Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.

Related Artifactssharing capabilities

Artifacts that share capabilities with @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.

MCP Server44

@gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp

Gmail MCP server with auto authentication support

oauth2 auto-authentication for gmail apigmail message retrieval and filteringpersistent token storage and refresh lifecyclegmail message composition and sending

4 shared capabilities

MCP Server20

MintMCP

** - MCP servers for Google Calendar, Gmail, Outlook Calendar, and Outlook.

gmail message retrieval and composition via mcp

1 shared capability

MCP Server30

agentmail-mcp

AgentMail MCP Server

email-account-connection-via-mcp

1 shared capability

MCP Server22

Google Admin MCP

** – A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server enabling interaction with Google Admin APIs.

mcp server authentication and credential management for google admin apis

1 shared capability

MCP Server46

Google Drive MCP Server

Search, read, and manage Google Drive files via MCP.

oauth 2.0 authentication and credential management

1 shared capability

MCP Server47

google_workspace_mcp

Control Gmail, Google Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Chat, Forms, Tasks, Search & Drive with AI - Comprehensive Google Workspace / G Suite MCP Server & CLI Tool

oauth 2.0/2.1 session-based authentication with credential persistence

1 shared capability

Best For

✓AI agent developers integrating Gmail with Claude via MCP
✓Teams building Cursor-integrated Gmail automation tools
✓Developers who want zero-credential-management Gmail access
✓AI agent developers building email automation workflows
✓Non-technical users wanting Claude to interact with their Gmail
✓Teams integrating email context into AI-powered decision-making systems
✓Developers building MCP servers for email automation
✓Teams standardizing on MCP for AI agent integrations

Known Limitations

⚠Requires initial user authorization flow — cannot work in fully headless environments without pre-configured refresh tokens
⚠Token storage mechanism not specified in package metadata — may require external persistence layer for production use
⚠Single-user authentication per server instance — multi-user scenarios require separate server instances or token isolation logic
⚠Read-only operations on messages — no built-in send, draft, or label modification capabilities
⚠Pagination handled server-side but may timeout on very large result sets (1000+ messages)
⚠Gmail query syntax limitations apply — complex boolean queries may require multiple API calls

Requirements

Google OAuth2 credentials (Client ID and Client Secret from Google Cloud Console)Node.js 14+ runtimeNetwork access to Google OAuth2 endpointsMCP client supporting the Model Context Protocol (Claude, Cursor, or compatible)Valid OAuth2 access token (obtained via auto-auth capability)Gmail API enabled in Google Cloud projectMCP client with tool-calling supportMCP client library compatible with server implementation (Node.js-based)

Input / Output

Accepts: OAuth2 authorization code (from initial user consent flow), Gmail API request parameters (message IDs, query strings, etc.), Message ID (string), Gmail search query (string with Gmail query syntax: from:, to:, subject:, etc.), Pagination parameters (pageToken, maxResults), MCP protocol messages (initialize, call_tool, list_tools), Tool invocation parameters (JSON-serialized arguments), Editor context (selected text, file content), Tool invocation from Cursor command palette or inline, Label ID (string), Thread ID (string), Query parameters for filtering, Refresh token (string, from initial OAuth2 flow)

Produces: Gmail API responses (message objects, thread data, label information), OAuth2 tokens (access token, refresh token, expiration metadata), Gmail message objects (id, threadId, labelIds, snippet, payload with headers and body), Structured metadata (sender, recipient, subject, date, attachments list), MCP protocol responses (tool results, error messages), Tool definitions with JSON schema (name, description, parameters), Email data formatted for editor display, Structured results injectable into code generation prompts, Label objects (id, name, messageCount, threadCount, type), Thread objects (id, snippet, historyId, messages array with metadata), New access token (automatically injected into subsequent API calls), Token metadata (expiration time, token type)

UnfragileRank

Adoption64%(30% weight)

Quality14%(25% weight)

Ecosystem50%(25% weight)

Match Graph10%(15% weight)

Freshness75%(5% weight)

UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.

Type: MCP Server

6 capabilities

Visit @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp→

Package Details

npm

Registry

1.1.11

Version

77,316

Weekly Downloads

About

Gmail MCP server with auto authentication support

Alternatives to @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp

wink-embeddings-sg-100d24Repository

100-dimensional English word embeddings for wink-nlp

Compare →

voyage-ai-provider30API

Voyage AI Provider for running Voyage AI models with Vercel AI SDK

Compare →

@vibe-agent-toolkit/rag-lancedb27Agent

LanceDB implementation of RAG interfaces for vibe-agent-toolkit

Compare →

vectra41Repository

A lightweight, file-backed vector database for Node.js and browsers with Pinecone-compatible filtering and hybrid BM25 search.

Compare →

Are you the builder of @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp?

Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.

Claim this artifact →Verification via email

Get the weekly brief

New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.

Data Sources

mcp registry

Looking for something else?

Search →

Capabilities6 decomposed

oauth2 auto-authentication for gmail api access

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

AI agent developers integrating Gmail with Claude via MCP

Teams building Cursor-integrated Gmail automation tools

Developers who want zero-credential-management Gmail access

Requires

Google OAuth2 credentials (Client ID and Client Secret from Google Cloud Console)

Node.js 14+ runtime

Network access to Google OAuth2 endpoints

Limitations

Requires initial user authorization flow — cannot work in fully headless environments without pre-configured refresh tokens

Token storage mechanism not specified in package metadata — may require external persistence layer for production use

Single-user authentication per server instance — multi-user scenarios require separate server instances or token isolation logic

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

Eliminates credential exposure compared to passing raw API keys to Claude, and removes token refresh complexity vs. manually implementing OAuth2 in client applications

gmail message retrieval via mcp tools

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

AI agent developers building email automation workflows

Non-technical users wanting Claude to interact with their Gmail

Teams integrating email context into AI-powered decision-making systems

Requires

Valid OAuth2 access token (obtained via auto-auth capability)

Gmail API enabled in Google Cloud project

MCP client with tool-calling support

Limitations

Read-only operations on messages — no built-in send, draft, or label modification capabilities

Pagination handled server-side but may timeout on very large result sets (1000+ messages)

Gmail query syntax limitations apply — complex boolean queries may require multiple API calls

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

More discoverable than raw Gmail API SDKs because tools are self-documenting via MCP schema, and simpler than building custom REST endpoints for each email operation

mcp server lifecycle management with gmail context

Medium confidence

Solves for

I want to expose Gmail operations to Claude as native MCP toolsI need my AI agent to discover available email operations at runtimeI want to integrate Gmail into a Cursor-based development workflow

Best for

Developers building MCP servers for email automation

Teams standardizing on MCP for AI agent integrations

Cursor users wanting native Gmail access in their IDE

Requires

MCP client library compatible with server implementation (Node.js-based)

MCP protocol version 1.0+ support in client

stdio or HTTP transport configuration

Limitations

MCP protocol version compatibility depends on client implementation — older clients may not support all tool features

Server runs as single process — no built-in clustering or load balancing

Tool discovery is static at server startup — dynamic tool registration requires server restart

What makes it unique

Implements MCP server specification with Gmail-specific tool bindings, allowing seamless integration into Claude and Cursor without custom protocol handling by the client

vs alternatives

Standardized MCP approach is more maintainable than custom REST APIs, and enables automatic tool discovery vs. hardcoded integrations

cursor ide integration for gmail operations

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

Cursor users building email automation features

Developers wanting email context in AI-assisted coding

Teams integrating email data into development workflows

Requires

Cursor IDE (version with MCP support)

MCP server running and configured in Cursor settings

Valid Gmail OAuth2 credentials

Limitations

Cursor-specific integration — not compatible with other IDEs (VS Code, JetBrains, etc.)

Tool invocation latency depends on Cursor's MCP client implementation

No built-in UI for email preview — results displayed as text in editor

What makes it unique

Bridges Gmail and Cursor IDE via MCP, enabling email operations to be invoked directly in the editor context without external tools or window switching

vs alternatives

More integrated than browser-based Gmail + separate Cursor window, and avoids context switching compared to manual email checking during development

gmail label and thread metadata retrieval

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

Users with complex Gmail label hierarchies wanting AI-driven organization

Teams building email conversation analysis tools

Developers creating label-aware email automation

Requires

Valid Gmail OAuth2 access token

Gmail API with labels.list and threads.get scopes enabled

Limitations

Label hierarchy is read-only — no capability to create or modify labels

Thread metadata does not include full message bodies — requires separate message fetch calls

System labels (All Mail, Spam, etc.) may behave differently than custom labels in API responses

What makes it unique

Exposes Gmail's label hierarchy and thread structure as queryable MCP tools, enabling agents to understand email organization context without parsing raw API responses

vs alternatives

More structured than raw Gmail API responses, and enables label-aware filtering that would require multiple API calls to implement manually

automatic token refresh and credential lifecycle management

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

Long-running AI agents that need persistent Gmail access

Production systems requiring high availability for email operations

Teams wanting to abstract OAuth2 complexity from agent logic

Requires

Valid OAuth2 refresh token (obtained during initial authorization)

Network access to Google OAuth2 token endpoint

Server running continuously to perform background refresh

Limitations

Refresh token revocation is not detected automatically — requires manual server restart or health check

Token storage is in-memory by default — tokens lost on server restart unless persisted externally

Refresh token expiration (typically 6 months) requires re-authentication after extended inactivity

What makes it unique

Implements proactive token refresh at the MCP server level, eliminating the need for clients to handle token expiration or implement refresh logic themselves

vs alternatives

More reliable than client-side token refresh because it's centralized and doesn't depend on client uptime, and simpler than implementing refresh logic in each agent

Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.

Alternatives to @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp

wink-embeddings-sg-100d24Repository

100-dimensional English word embeddings for wink-nlp

Compare →

voyage-ai-provider30API

Voyage AI Provider for running Voyage AI models with Vercel AI SDK

Compare →

@vibe-agent-toolkit/rag-lancedb27Agent

LanceDB implementation of RAG interfaces for vibe-agent-toolkit

Compare →

vectra41Repository

A lightweight, file-backed vector database for Node.js and browsers with Pinecone-compatible filtering and hybrid BM25 search.

Compare →

@gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp

Capabilities6 decomposed

oauth2 auto-authentication for gmail api access

gmail message retrieval via mcp tools

mcp server lifecycle management with gmail context

cursor ide integration for gmail operations

gmail label and thread metadata retrieval

automatic token refresh and credential lifecycle management

Related Artifactssharing capabilities

@gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp

MintMCP

agentmail-mcp

Google Admin MCP

Google Drive MCP Server

google_workspace_mcp

Best For

Known Limitations

Requirements

Input / Output

UnfragileRank

Package Details

About

Categories

Alternatives to @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp

Are you the builder of @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp?

Get the weekly brief

Data Sources

@gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp

Capabilities6 decomposed

oauth2 auto-authentication for gmail api access

gmail message retrieval via mcp tools

mcp server lifecycle management with gmail context

cursor ide integration for gmail operations

gmail label and thread metadata retrieval

automatic token refresh and credential lifecycle management

Related Artifactssharing capabilities

@gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp

MintMCP

agentmail-mcp

Google Admin MCP

Google Drive MCP Server

google_workspace_mcp

Best For

Known Limitations

Requirements

Input / Output

UnfragileRank

Package Details

About

Categories

Alternatives to @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp

Are you the builder of @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp?

Get the weekly brief

Data Sources