@aiclude/mcp-guard
MCP ServerFreeMCP runtime security proxy — intercepts and enforces security policies on MCP tool calls
Capabilities8 decomposed
mcp tool call interception and policy enforcement
Medium confidenceIntercepts all outbound MCP tool invocations at the protocol level before execution, applies configurable security policies (allowlists, denylists, parameter validation rules), and either permits or blocks execution based on policy match. Uses a proxy middleware pattern that sits between the MCP client and server, inspecting the tool name, parameters, and execution context against a declarative policy ruleset.
Operates as an MCP protocol-level proxy rather than application-level wrapper, enabling transparent interception of all tool calls without modifying client or server code. Uses declarative policy rules that can express complex conditions (tool name patterns, parameter constraints, context-based rules) in a single configuration file.
Provides MCP-native security enforcement without requiring changes to existing MCP clients or servers, whereas generic API gateway solutions lack MCP protocol awareness and require custom integration per tool.
prompt injection attack detection and mitigation
Medium confidenceAnalyzes tool parameters and execution context for indicators of prompt injection attacks (e.g., suspicious patterns in string parameters that attempt to override tool behavior or escape context). Uses pattern matching, heuristic analysis, or optional integration with LLM-based classifiers to detect malicious payloads and either sanitize parameters or block execution. Operates on the parameter values before they reach the underlying tool implementation.
Specifically targets MCP tool parameters rather than generic prompt content, using tool-aware detection rules that understand the semantics of different parameter types (file paths, SQL, shell commands, etc.). Can integrate with optional LLM classifiers for context-aware detection while maintaining fast heuristic fallbacks.
More precise than generic prompt injection filters because it understands MCP tool semantics and parameter context, whereas general-purpose content filters treat all text equally and miss tool-specific attack patterns.
tool poisoning prevention via parameter schema validation
Medium confidenceValidates all tool call parameters against strict schemas before execution, ensuring parameters match expected types, formats, ranges, and constraints. Uses JSON Schema or similar declarative validation rules to reject malformed or out-of-bounds parameters that could cause tool misbehavior or security issues. Validation happens synchronously at the proxy layer, blocking invalid calls before they reach the tool implementation.
Applies declarative JSON Schema validation at the MCP protocol boundary, enabling schema-driven security without modifying tool implementations. Supports custom validation rules and coercion strategies that can normalize parameters (e.g., path canonicalization) before passing to tools.
More flexible and maintainable than hardcoded validation in each tool because schemas are centralized and can be updated without redeploying tools, whereas per-tool validation requires changes across multiple codebases.
context-aware access control for tool execution
Medium confidenceEnforces fine-grained access control rules based on execution context (caller identity, tool name, parameter values, execution environment, time-based policies). Uses a context evaluation engine that matches incoming tool calls against rules like 'allow tool X only if caller is admin' or 'block file deletion after business hours'. Rules are expressed declaratively and evaluated synchronously at the proxy layer before tool execution.
Evaluates access control rules against rich execution context (caller identity, environment, time) rather than just tool names, enabling policies that express 'who can call what when'. Uses a declarative rule engine that can combine multiple context attributes in a single policy.
More expressive than simple allowlist/denylist approaches because it can encode context-dependent policies, whereas basic tool allowlists cannot distinguish between different callers or execution environments.
comprehensive tool call audit logging and tracing
Medium confidenceLogs all tool calls (allowed and blocked) with full context including caller identity, tool name, parameters, decision reason, timestamp, and execution result. Stores logs in a structured format (JSON) that can be queried, analyzed, and exported for compliance audits. Integrates with optional external logging systems (e.g., Datadog, Splunk) via standard log sinks. Provides request tracing IDs to correlate tool calls across distributed systems.
Captures complete tool call lifecycle (request, decision, execution, result) in structured logs with request tracing IDs, enabling end-to-end audit trails. Supports multiple log sinks (local, cloud, external services) and can redact sensitive data based on configurable rules.
More comprehensive than application-level logging because it captures all tool calls at the protocol boundary regardless of tool implementation, whereas per-tool logging requires changes to each tool and may miss calls.
rate limiting and abuse prevention for tool calls
Medium confidenceEnforces rate limits on tool calls to prevent abuse, DoS attacks, or resource exhaustion. Supports multiple rate limiting strategies (per-caller, per-tool, per-caller-per-tool, time-window based) and can apply different limits based on execution context. Uses token bucket or sliding window algorithms to track call rates and reject calls that exceed configured limits. Provides configurable backoff strategies and quota reset policies.
Applies rate limiting at the MCP protocol layer with context-aware rules (per-caller, per-tool, per-context), enabling fine-grained quota enforcement. Supports multiple rate limiting algorithms and can integrate with distributed state stores for multi-instance deployments.
More flexible than generic API rate limiting because it understands MCP tool semantics and can apply different limits per tool and caller, whereas generic API gateways apply uniform limits across all endpoints.
declarative security policy configuration and management
Medium confidenceProvides a declarative configuration format (JSON/YAML) for defining all security policies (allowlists, denylists, parameter validation, access control, rate limits) in a single place. Policies are version-controlled, auditable, and can be updated without code changes. Includes schema validation for policy definitions and provides clear error messages for misconfiguration. Supports policy composition and inheritance to reduce duplication.
Centralizes all MCP security policies in a single declarative configuration file with schema validation, enabling version control and audit trails. Supports policy composition and inheritance to reduce duplication across multiple tools and rules.
More maintainable than scattered security logic across multiple tools because policies are centralized and version-controlled, whereas per-tool security requires changes across multiple codebases and lacks a single source of truth.
integration with external identity and authorization systems
Medium confidenceIntegrates with external identity providers (OAuth2, SAML, OIDC) and authorization systems (RBAC, ABAC, policy engines) to make access control decisions based on external context. Supports token validation, role/attribute lookup, and delegation to external policy engines. Caches identity and authorization data to minimize latency and external service dependencies. Provides hooks for custom authorization logic via pluggable adapters.
Provides pluggable adapters for common identity providers (OAuth2, SAML, OIDC) and authorization systems, with built-in caching to minimize external service latency. Supports delegation to external policy engines for complex authorization logic.
Enables MCP security to leverage existing enterprise identity and authorization infrastructure, whereas standalone MCP security requires separate identity management and cannot integrate with organization-wide access control systems.
Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.
Related Artifactssharing capabilities
Artifacts that share capabilities with @aiclude/mcp-guard, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.
@policylayer/intercept
Policy-as-code enforcement for MCP tool calls
mcp-runtime-guard
Policy-based MCP tool call proxy
MCPWatch
** - A comprehensive security scanner for Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers that detects vulnerabilities and security issues in your MCP server implementations.
cordon-cli
The security gateway for AI agents — firewall, auditor, and remote control for MCP tool calls
agentseal
Security toolkit for AI agents. Scan your machine for dangerous skills and MCP configs, monitor for supply chain attacks, test prompt injection resistance, and audit live MCP servers for tool poisoning.
@mcptoolgate/client
MCP Tool Gate client for Claude Desktop - secure MCP tool governance with human-in-the-loop approvals
Best For
- ✓teams deploying LLM agents in production with untrusted model outputs
- ✓enterprises requiring tool-level access control and audit trails
- ✓developers building multi-tenant MCP systems where isolation is critical
- ✓systems where tool parameters can be influenced by untrusted LLM outputs or user input
- ✓teams building agents that call tools with string parameters (file paths, SQL queries, shell commands)
- ✓organizations needing to detect and respond to prompt injection attempts in real-time
- ✓teams with strict parameter contracts for tools (e.g., file operations, API calls)
- ✓systems where parameter validation is critical for security (e.g., SQL injection prevention)
Known Limitations
- ⚠Policy evaluation adds latency per tool call (exact overhead depends on ruleset complexity)
- ⚠No built-in support for dynamic policy updates without restarting the MCP runtime
- ⚠Policies are static configuration — no runtime learning or anomaly detection
- ⚠Cannot inspect tool execution side effects after they occur, only blocks pre-execution
- ⚠Heuristic-based detection has false positive/negative rates — no perfect accuracy
- ⚠Cannot detect sophisticated injection attacks that use encoding, obfuscation, or multi-step exploitation
Requirements
Input / Output
UnfragileRank
UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.
Package Details
About
MCP runtime security proxy — intercepts and enforces security policies on MCP tool calls
Categories
Alternatives to @aiclude/mcp-guard
Are you the builder of @aiclude/mcp-guard?
Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.
Get the weekly brief
New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.
Data Sources
Looking for something else?
Search →