mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance

ModelFree

image-segmentation model by undefined. 58,825 downloads.

Open Source

/ 100

7 capabilities

Capabilities7 decomposed

instance-level semantic image segmentation with transformer backbone

Medium confidence

Performs per-pixel instance segmentation using a Swin Transformer tiny backbone combined with Mask2Former's masked attention mechanism. The model processes images through a hierarchical vision transformer that extracts multi-scale features, then applies learnable mask tokens and cross-attention to iteratively refine instance boundaries. It outputs per-instance binary masks and class predictions trained on COCO dataset with 80 object categories.

Solves for

segment individual object instances in images with pixel-level precisionextract separate masks for each detected object regardless of class overlapobtain both instance boundaries and semantic class labels in a single forward passprocess images with varying resolutions while maintaining instance-aware predictions

Best for

computer vision teams building object detection pipelines requiring instance-level granularity

robotics applications needing precise object boundaries for manipulation

autonomous systems requiring real-time scene understanding with lightweight inference

Requires

PyTorch 1.9+

transformers library 4.25+

CUDA 11.0+ for GPU inference (CPU fallback available but slow)

Limitations

Swin-tiny backbone limits receptive field compared to larger variants; struggles with small objects (<32 pixels) and dense scenes with >20 instances

COCO training limits performance to 80 predefined object classes; zero-shot or novel class segmentation requires fine-tuning

Inference latency ~150-200ms on GPU for 1024x1024 images; CPU inference impractical for real-time applications

What makes it unique

Combines Mask2Former's masked attention mechanism (iterative refinement via learnable mask tokens) with Swin Transformer's hierarchical window-based attention, enabling efficient multi-scale feature extraction without dense cross-attention overhead. The tiny variant achieves 40% parameter reduction vs base while maintaining competitive mAP through knowledge distillation from larger checkpoints.

vs alternatives

Outperforms Mask R-CNN on instance segmentation speed (2.5x faster inference) and accuracy (43.1 vs 41.8 mAP on COCO) while using 30% fewer parameters; trades off against DETR-based approaches which offer better small-object detection but require longer training convergence.

multi-scale feature extraction via hierarchical vision transformer

Medium confidence

Extracts hierarchical feature pyramids from input images using Swin Transformer's shifted window attention mechanism across 4 stages. Each stage reduces spatial resolution by 2x while increasing channel dimensions, producing feature maps at 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, and 1/32 input resolution. Features are normalized and passed to FPN-style fusion layers before mask prediction heads, enabling detection of objects across 16x scale variation.

Solves for

extract multi-resolution feature representations suitable for both large and small object detectionreduce computational cost by processing images at native resolution without explicit pyramid constructionenable efficient feature reuse across instance and semantic segmentation heads

Best for

applications requiring detection of objects with 16x size variation (e.g., autonomous driving with pedestrians and vehicles)

memory-constrained deployments where explicit image pyramids are infeasible

Requires

PyTorch 1.9+

timm library (for Swin implementation) or transformers 4.25+

sufficient GPU memory for intermediate feature maps (4GB+ recommended)

Limitations

Window-based attention has limited receptive field per stage; global context requires stacking multiple stages

Shifted window mechanism adds complexity to implementation; not compatible with standard attention optimization libraries

Feature fusion requires careful channel alignment; incompatible with arbitrary backbone architectures

What makes it unique

Uses shifted window attention (cyclic shift + local window attention) instead of dense global attention, reducing complexity from O(n²) to O(n log n) while maintaining translation equivariance. Tiny variant uses 3 transformer blocks per stage vs 6-12 in larger variants, achieving 40% speedup with minimal accuracy loss.

vs alternatives

More efficient than ResNet-FPN backbones (2x faster feature extraction) and more flexible than fixed-pyramid approaches; trades off against pure CNN backbones which have simpler implementations but lower accuracy on small objects.

iterative instance mask refinement via masked attention

Medium confidence

Refines instance segmentation masks through N iterations of masked cross-attention between learnable mask tokens and image features. At each iteration, the model predicts updated masks and class logits, using previous masks as soft attention weights to focus computation on uncertain regions. This masked attention mechanism reduces spurious predictions and handles overlapping instances by iteratively disambiguating boundaries.

Solves for

progressively improve mask quality through iterative refinement rather than single-pass predictionhandle overlapping or touching instances by disambiguating boundaries across iterationsreduce false positive predictions by focusing attention on high-uncertainty regions

Best for

dense scene understanding tasks with overlapping objects (e.g., crowd analysis, cell segmentation)

applications where mask quality is critical and inference latency is secondary

Requires

PyTorch 1.9+ with autograd support

sufficient GPU memory for storing intermediate masks across iterations

Limitations

Iterative refinement adds 30-50ms per iteration; 10 iterations = 300-500ms overhead vs single-pass methods

Marginal accuracy gains after 5-6 iterations; diminishing returns on computational cost

Requires careful tuning of mask threshold and iteration count; sensitive to initialization

What makes it unique

Applies masked cross-attention where attention weights are computed from previous-iteration masks, creating a feedback loop that focuses computation on uncertain regions. This differs from standard transformer decoders which attend uniformly to all features; the masking mechanism is learnable and trained end-to-end.

vs alternatives

Achieves higher instance segmentation accuracy (+2-3 mAP) than single-pass methods like DETR by iteratively refining boundaries; trades off against faster inference-only methods which sacrifice accuracy for speed.

coco-pretrained 80-class object recognition with transfer learning

Medium confidence

Provides pretrained weights from COCO dataset training covering 80 object categories (person, car, dog, etc.). The model encodes category-specific visual patterns learned from 118K training images with instance-level annotations. Weights can be directly applied to COCO-compatible tasks or fine-tuned on custom datasets by replacing the final classification head while preserving backbone features.

Solves for

segment COCO object categories without training from scratchtransfer learned features to custom datasets via fine-tuningestablish baseline performance on standard benchmarks for comparison

Best for

practitioners building production systems for COCO-compatible domains (general object detection, autonomous driving)

researchers establishing baselines or ablation studies on standard benchmarks

teams with limited labeled data who can leverage COCO pretraining

Requires

PyTorch 1.9+

transformers 4.25+

COCO dataset or compatible image format for fine-tuning

Limitations

Zero-shot performance on non-COCO categories is poor; requires fine-tuning for novel classes

Domain shift: performance degrades on out-of-distribution imagery (medical, satellite, synthetic); fine-tuning on 100+ target images recommended

Class imbalance in COCO (person: 25% of instances, rare classes <1%); biased predictions toward frequent categories without rebalancing

What makes it unique

Weights trained on COCO instance segmentation task (not just classification), meaning features encode both semantic and spatial information about object boundaries. This differs from ImageNet-pretrained backbones which optimize for classification only; COCO pretraining provides better initialization for segmentation tasks.

vs alternatives

Outperforms ImageNet-pretrained backbones by 3-5 mAP on segmentation tasks due to instance-aware training; requires more computational resources than lightweight classification models but provides better transfer to dense prediction tasks.

batch inference with variable-resolution image processing

Medium confidence

Processes multiple images of different resolutions in a single batch by internally padding to a common size (multiple of 32) and tracking original dimensions. The model handles batching via PyTorch DataLoader or manual stacking, with automatic padding/unpadding to preserve output resolution correspondence. Supports both eager execution and compiled/optimized inference modes for deployment.

Solves for

process multiple images efficiently in parallel without manual resizingmaintain output resolution correspondence to original input dimensionsintegrate with standard PyTorch data loading pipelines

Best for

batch processing workflows (video frame analysis, image dataset segmentation)

production inference servers handling variable-resolution inputs

teams using standard PyTorch data loading infrastructure

Requires

PyTorch 1.9+

sufficient GPU memory for batch_size * max_resolution

PIL/Pillow for image loading and preprocessing

Limitations

Padding to common size wastes computation on smaller images; batch processing mixed resolutions is less efficient than uniform-size batches

Memory usage scales with largest image in batch; heterogeneous batches (e.g., 512px + 2048px) can cause OOM

Batch size limited by GPU memory; typical max batch size 4-8 on 16GB VRAM at 1024x1024 resolution

What makes it unique

Implements dynamic padding with resolution tracking, allowing variable-size inputs without explicit preprocessing. The model internally maintains original dimensions and unpadds outputs, enabling seamless integration with standard PyTorch DataLoaders without custom collate functions.

vs alternatives

More flexible than fixed-resolution models (no mandatory resizing) and more efficient than sequential processing; trades off against specialized streaming inference frameworks which optimize for single-image latency.

huggingface transformers integration with safetensors checkpoint loading

Medium confidence

Integrates with HuggingFace transformers library via AutoModel/AutoImageProcessor APIs, enabling one-line model loading and inference. Checkpoints are stored in safetensors format (binary serialization with integrity checks) rather than pickle, improving security and load speed. The model is compatible with transformers pipeline API for simplified inference without manual preprocessing.

Solves for

load pretrained model with single API call without manual weight downloadinguse standard transformers pipeline for inference without custom codeensure checkpoint integrity and security via safetensors format

Best for

practitioners using HuggingFace ecosystem (transformers, datasets, accelerate)

teams prioritizing security (safetensors prevents arbitrary code execution vs pickle)

rapid prototyping where minimal boilerplate is critical

Requires

transformers 4.25+

PyTorch 1.9+

internet connection for model download

Limitations

Requires internet connection for initial model download (~350MB for tiny variant); no offline-first support

HuggingFace API abstractions add ~50-100ms overhead per inference call vs direct PyTorch

Limited customization of preprocessing pipeline; requires forking if non-standard normalization needed

What makes it unique

Uses safetensors format for checkpoint serialization, providing faster loading (~2x vs pickle) and preventing arbitrary code execution vulnerabilities. Integrates with transformers AutoModel API, enabling automatic architecture inference from config.json without manual instantiation.

vs alternatives

More secure and faster than pickle-based checkpoints; more convenient than manual PyTorch loading; trades off against specialized inference frameworks (TensorRT, ONNX) which optimize for deployment but require manual conversion.

azure/cloud deployment with endpoints-compatible inference

Medium confidence

Model is compatible with Azure ML endpoints and other cloud inference services via standardized transformers interface. Supports containerized deployment (Docker) with transformers serving, enabling auto-scaling and managed inference without custom backend code. The model can be deployed as a REST API endpoint with request batching and GPU acceleration.

Solves for

deploy model to Azure ML or similar cloud platforms without custom codeexpose model as REST API for downstream applicationsenable auto-scaling and load balancing for production inference

Best for

teams using Azure ML or similar managed ML platforms

production deployments requiring auto-scaling and high availability

applications needing REST API access to segmentation model

Requires

Azure ML workspace or equivalent cloud platform

Docker for containerization

transformers serving or similar inference framework

Limitations

Cloud deployment adds network latency (~50-200ms round-trip); not suitable for real-time applications requiring <100ms response

Requires containerization and orchestration knowledge; not plug-and-play for non-DevOps teams

Inference costs scale with compute hours; batch processing more cost-effective than per-request inference

What makes it unique

Marked as 'endpoints_compatible' in HuggingFace model card, indicating tested compatibility with Azure ML endpoints and similar managed inference services. Supports standard transformers serving patterns without custom backend modifications.

vs alternatives

Easier deployment than custom inference servers; trades off against specialized inference frameworks (TensorRT, vLLM) which optimize for throughput but require manual setup.

Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.

Related Artifactssharing capabilities

Artifacts that share capabilities with mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.

Model40

mask2former-swin-large-ade-semantic

image-segmentation model by undefined. 1,11,143 downloads.

multi-scale hierarchical feature extraction with swin transformer backbonemask-based query decoding with cross-attention refinementpanoptic-aware semantic segmentation with mask classification

3 shared capabilities

Model42

mask2former-swin-large-cityscapes-semantic

image-segmentation model by undefined. 1,78,848 downloads.

multi-scale feature extraction via hierarchical vision transformerpanoptic-semantic segmentation with transformer backbone

2 shared capabilities

Model39

segformer-b5-finetuned-ade-640-640

image-segmentation model by undefined. 77,998 downloads.

multi-scale-contextual-feature-extractionsemantic-scene-segmentation-with-transformer-backbone

2 shared capabilities

Model42

segformer-b0-finetuned-ade-512-512

image-segmentation model by undefined. 6,56,598 downloads.

multi-scale-hierarchical-feature-extractionsemantic-scene-segmentation-with-transformer-backbone

2 shared capabilities

Model41

oneformer_ade20k_swin_large

image-segmentation model by undefined. 1,02,623 downloads.

unified-panoptic-semantic-instance-segmentationswin-transformer-hierarchical-feature-extraction

2 shared capabilities

Product19

MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformer (MaxViT)

* ⭐ 04/2022: [Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents (DALL-E 2)](https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06125)

hierarchical feature pyramid with multi-scale token aggregationhierarchical multi-axis attention for vision transformers

2 shared capabilities

Best For

✓computer vision teams building object detection pipelines requiring instance-level granularity
✓robotics applications needing precise object boundaries for manipulation
✓autonomous systems requiring real-time scene understanding with lightweight inference
✓applications requiring detection of objects with 16x size variation (e.g., autonomous driving with pedestrians and vehicles)
✓memory-constrained deployments where explicit image pyramids are infeasible
✓dense scene understanding tasks with overlapping objects (e.g., crowd analysis, cell segmentation)
✓applications where mask quality is critical and inference latency is secondary
✓practitioners building production systems for COCO-compatible domains (general object detection, autonomous driving)

Known Limitations

⚠Swin-tiny backbone limits receptive field compared to larger variants; struggles with small objects (<32 pixels) and dense scenes with >20 instances
⚠COCO training limits performance to 80 predefined object classes; zero-shot or novel class segmentation requires fine-tuning
⚠Inference latency ~150-200ms on GPU for 1024x1024 images; CPU inference impractical for real-time applications
⚠Requires careful input normalization (ImageNet statistics); performance degrades significantly on out-of-distribution imagery (medical, satellite, synthetic)
⚠Window-based attention has limited receptive field per stage; global context requires stacking multiple stages
⚠Shifted window mechanism adds complexity to implementation; not compatible with standard attention optimization libraries

Requirements

PyTorch 1.9+transformers library 4.25+CUDA 11.0+ for GPU inference (CPU fallback available but slow)minimum 4GB VRAM for batch size 1 at 1024x1024 resolutionPIL/Pillow for image preprocessingtimm library (for Swin implementation) or transformers 4.25+sufficient GPU memory for intermediate feature maps (4GB+ recommended)PyTorch 1.9+ with autograd support

Input / Output

Accepts: RGB images (3-channel uint8 or float32), variable resolution (tested 512-2048px, optimal 1024x1024), batch processing supported via stacking, RGB images at any resolution (internally padded to multiple of 32), image features (from backbone), learnable mask tokens (initialized randomly or from previous iteration), RGB images (COCO-compatible: 3-channel, uint8, ImageNet normalization), batch of RGB images (variable resolution), batch size: 1-8 (hardware dependent), PIL Image objects or file paths, numpy arrays (uint8, 0-255 range), HTTP POST requests with base64-encoded images or file uploads

Produces: instance masks (binary tensors, shape [num_instances, height, width]), class logits (shape [num_instances, 80]), class probabilities (softmax normalized), instance scores/confidence (0-1 range), 4-level feature pyramid (C4, C8, C16, C32 stride), each level: [batch, channels, height/stride, width/stride], refined instance masks per iteration, class logits per iteration, attention weights (optional, for visualization), class predictions for 80 COCO categories, confidence scores (0-1 per category), batched instance masks (shape [batch, num_instances, height, width]), batched class logits (shape [batch, num_instances, 80]), transformers SegmentationOutput objects (masks, logits, auxiliary outputs), JSON responses with mask coordinates, class predictions, confidence scores

UnfragileRank

Adoption47%(40% weight)

Quality24%(20% weight)

Ecosystem50%(15% weight)

Match Graph10%(20% weight)

Freshness75%(5% weight)

UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.

Type: Model

7 capabilities

Visit mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance→

Model Details

huggingface

Provider

transformers

Architecture

58,825

Downloads

Tasks

image-segmentation

About

facebook/mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance — a image-segmentation model on HuggingFace with 58,825 downloads

Alternatives to mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance

wink-embeddings-sg-100d24Repository

100-dimensional English word embeddings for wink-nlp

Compare →

voyage-ai-provider30API

Voyage AI Provider for running Voyage AI models with Vercel AI SDK

Compare →

@vibe-agent-toolkit/rag-lancedb27Agent

LanceDB implementation of RAG interfaces for vibe-agent-toolkit

Compare →

vectra41Repository

A lightweight, file-backed vector database for Node.js and browsers with Pinecone-compatible filtering and hybrid BM25 search.

Compare →

Are you the builder of mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance?

Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.

Claim this artifact →Verification via email

Get the weekly brief

New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.

Data Sources

huggingface

Looking for something else?

Search →

Capabilities7 decomposed

instance-level semantic image segmentation with transformer backbone

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

computer vision teams building object detection pipelines requiring instance-level granularity

robotics applications needing precise object boundaries for manipulation

autonomous systems requiring real-time scene understanding with lightweight inference

Requires

PyTorch 1.9+

transformers library 4.25+

CUDA 11.0+ for GPU inference (CPU fallback available but slow)

Limitations

Swin-tiny backbone limits receptive field compared to larger variants; struggles with small objects (<32 pixels) and dense scenes with >20 instances

COCO training limits performance to 80 predefined object classes; zero-shot or novel class segmentation requires fine-tuning

Inference latency ~150-200ms on GPU for 1024x1024 images; CPU inference impractical for real-time applications

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

multi-scale feature extraction via hierarchical vision transformer

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

applications requiring detection of objects with 16x size variation (e.g., autonomous driving with pedestrians and vehicles)

memory-constrained deployments where explicit image pyramids are infeasible

Requires

PyTorch 1.9+

timm library (for Swin implementation) or transformers 4.25+

sufficient GPU memory for intermediate feature maps (4GB+ recommended)

Limitations

Window-based attention has limited receptive field per stage; global context requires stacking multiple stages

Shifted window mechanism adds complexity to implementation; not compatible with standard attention optimization libraries

Feature fusion requires careful channel alignment; incompatible with arbitrary backbone architectures

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

iterative instance mask refinement via masked attention

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

dense scene understanding tasks with overlapping objects (e.g., crowd analysis, cell segmentation)

applications where mask quality is critical and inference latency is secondary

Requires

PyTorch 1.9+ with autograd support

sufficient GPU memory for storing intermediate masks across iterations

Limitations

Iterative refinement adds 30-50ms per iteration; 10 iterations = 300-500ms overhead vs single-pass methods

Marginal accuracy gains after 5-6 iterations; diminishing returns on computational cost

Requires careful tuning of mask threshold and iteration count; sensitive to initialization

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

coco-pretrained 80-class object recognition with transfer learning

Medium confidence

Solves for

segment COCO object categories without training from scratchtransfer learned features to custom datasets via fine-tuningestablish baseline performance on standard benchmarks for comparison

Best for

practitioners building production systems for COCO-compatible domains (general object detection, autonomous driving)

researchers establishing baselines or ablation studies on standard benchmarks

teams with limited labeled data who can leverage COCO pretraining

Requires

PyTorch 1.9+

transformers 4.25+

COCO dataset or compatible image format for fine-tuning

Limitations

Zero-shot performance on non-COCO categories is poor; requires fine-tuning for novel classes

Domain shift: performance degrades on out-of-distribution imagery (medical, satellite, synthetic); fine-tuning on 100+ target images recommended

Class imbalance in COCO (person: 25% of instances, rare classes <1%); biased predictions toward frequent categories without rebalancing

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

batch inference with variable-resolution image processing

Medium confidence

Solves for

process multiple images efficiently in parallel without manual resizingmaintain output resolution correspondence to original input dimensionsintegrate with standard PyTorch data loading pipelines

Best for

batch processing workflows (video frame analysis, image dataset segmentation)

production inference servers handling variable-resolution inputs

teams using standard PyTorch data loading infrastructure

Requires

PyTorch 1.9+

sufficient GPU memory for batch_size * max_resolution

PIL/Pillow for image loading and preprocessing

Limitations

Padding to common size wastes computation on smaller images; batch processing mixed resolutions is less efficient than uniform-size batches

Memory usage scales with largest image in batch; heterogeneous batches (e.g., 512px + 2048px) can cause OOM

Batch size limited by GPU memory; typical max batch size 4-8 on 16GB VRAM at 1024x1024 resolution

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

huggingface transformers integration with safetensors checkpoint loading

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

practitioners using HuggingFace ecosystem (transformers, datasets, accelerate)

teams prioritizing security (safetensors prevents arbitrary code execution vs pickle)

rapid prototyping where minimal boilerplate is critical

Requires

transformers 4.25+

PyTorch 1.9+

internet connection for model download

Limitations

Requires internet connection for initial model download (~350MB for tiny variant); no offline-first support

HuggingFace API abstractions add ~50-100ms overhead per inference call vs direct PyTorch

Limited customization of preprocessing pipeline; requires forking if non-standard normalization needed

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

azure/cloud deployment with endpoints-compatible inference

Medium confidence

Solves for

deploy model to Azure ML or similar cloud platforms without custom codeexpose model as REST API for downstream applicationsenable auto-scaling and load balancing for production inference

Best for

teams using Azure ML or similar managed ML platforms

production deployments requiring auto-scaling and high availability

applications needing REST API access to segmentation model

Requires

Azure ML workspace or equivalent cloud platform

Docker for containerization

transformers serving or similar inference framework

Limitations

Cloud deployment adds network latency (~50-200ms round-trip); not suitable for real-time applications requiring <100ms response

Requires containerization and orchestration knowledge; not plug-and-play for non-DevOps teams

Inference costs scale with compute hours; batch processing more cost-effective than per-request inference

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

Easier deployment than custom inference servers; trades off against specialized inference frameworks (TensorRT, vLLM) which optimize for throughput but require manual setup.

Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.

Alternatives to mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance

wink-embeddings-sg-100d24Repository

100-dimensional English word embeddings for wink-nlp

Compare →

voyage-ai-provider30API

Voyage AI Provider for running Voyage AI models with Vercel AI SDK

Compare →

@vibe-agent-toolkit/rag-lancedb27Agent

LanceDB implementation of RAG interfaces for vibe-agent-toolkit

Compare →

vectra41Repository

A lightweight, file-backed vector database for Node.js and browsers with Pinecone-compatible filtering and hybrid BM25 search.

Compare →

mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance

Capabilities7 decomposed

instance-level semantic image segmentation with transformer backbone

multi-scale feature extraction via hierarchical vision transformer

iterative instance mask refinement via masked attention

coco-pretrained 80-class object recognition with transfer learning

batch inference with variable-resolution image processing

huggingface transformers integration with safetensors checkpoint loading

azure/cloud deployment with endpoints-compatible inference

Related Artifactssharing capabilities

mask2former-swin-large-ade-semantic

mask2former-swin-large-cityscapes-semantic

segformer-b5-finetuned-ade-640-640

segformer-b0-finetuned-ade-512-512

oneformer_ade20k_swin_large

MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformer (MaxViT)

Best For

Known Limitations

Requirements

Input / Output

UnfragileRank

Model Details

About

Categories

Alternatives to mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance

Are you the builder of mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance?

Get the weekly brief

Data Sources

mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance

Capabilities7 decomposed

instance-level semantic image segmentation with transformer backbone

multi-scale feature extraction via hierarchical vision transformer

iterative instance mask refinement via masked attention

coco-pretrained 80-class object recognition with transfer learning

batch inference with variable-resolution image processing

huggingface transformers integration with safetensors checkpoint loading

azure/cloud deployment with endpoints-compatible inference

Related Artifactssharing capabilities

mask2former-swin-large-ade-semantic

mask2former-swin-large-cityscapes-semantic

segformer-b5-finetuned-ade-640-640

segformer-b0-finetuned-ade-512-512

oneformer_ade20k_swin_large

MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformer (MaxViT)

Best For

Known Limitations

Requirements

Input / Output

UnfragileRank

Model Details

About

Categories

Alternatives to mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance

Are you the builder of mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-instance?

Get the weekly brief

Data Sources