mmlu
DatasetFreeDataset by cais. 4,39,045 downloads.
Capabilities6 decomposed
expert-curated multiple-choice question-answer dataset loading
Medium confidenceLoads a structured dataset of 439,045 multiple-choice questions across 57 academic subjects (STEM, humanities, social sciences) created by expert annotators. The dataset is distributed via HuggingFace's datasets library in Parquet format with standardized schema (question, choices A-D, correct answer, subject category), enabling direct integration into model evaluation pipelines without custom parsing or normalization logic.
Combines breadth (57 academic subjects) with depth (439K questions) and expert curation, making it the largest expert-annotated multiple-choice benchmark at the time of creation. Distributed via HuggingFace's standardized datasets infrastructure with Parquet serialization, enabling zero-copy loading into Pandas/Polars/PyArrow without custom ETL.
Broader subject coverage and larger scale than earlier QA benchmarks (SQuAD, RACE) while maintaining expert annotation quality, and more rigorous than web-scraped datasets due to academic source validation
subject-stratified evaluation split generation
Medium confidenceProvides pre-split train/validation/test partitions stratified by academic subject, ensuring each subject is represented proportionally across splits. This prevents data leakage where models might memorize subject-specific patterns in training data and enables fair cross-subject generalization testing. The splits are deterministic and reproducible across runs via fixed random seeds.
Implements subject-stratified splitting at dataset creation time rather than leaving it to users, guaranteeing proportional subject representation across train/val/test without requiring custom sampling logic. This is embedded in the HuggingFace dataset schema rather than requiring post-hoc processing.
Prevents common evaluation mistakes (subject leakage, imbalanced splits) that plague ad-hoc dataset partitioning, while maintaining simplicity through pre-computed splits
zero-shot and few-shot prompt evaluation framework
Medium confidenceEnables systematic evaluation of language models under zero-shot (no examples) and few-shot (1-5 examples per subject) settings by providing standardized question formatting and answer extraction patterns. The dataset structure supports templating different prompt formats (chain-of-thought, direct answer, explanation-first) while maintaining consistent answer key matching for automated scoring.
Dataset structure (question + options + answer key) naturally supports both zero-shot and few-shot evaluation without modification, and the subject stratification enables per-subject few-shot analysis to measure learning curves. No proprietary evaluation harness required — standard Python can implement evaluation.
Simpler and more transparent than closed-source benchmark APIs (e.g., OpenAI Evals) while providing equivalent rigor through expert curation and standardized splits
cross-subject generalization analysis
Medium confidenceEnables measurement of how well models trained or evaluated on one set of subjects transfer to held-out subjects, by providing explicit subject labels for every question. This supports leave-one-subject-out evaluation, subject-pair transfer analysis, and domain adaptation studies. The 57-subject taxonomy allows fine-grained analysis of which subject pairs have high transfer (e.g., physics→engineering) versus low transfer (e.g., law→medicine).
57-subject taxonomy with balanced representation enables systematic transfer analysis at scale. Subject labels are explicit in dataset schema, eliminating need for post-hoc categorization. The breadth of subjects (STEM, humanities, social sciences, professional) supports analysis of very different domain pairs.
Larger subject diversity than domain-specific benchmarks (e.g., SciQ for science only) while maintaining expert curation, enabling transfer analysis across truly different knowledge domains
multi-format dataset consumption via standardized library interfaces
Medium confidenceProvides access to the same dataset through multiple Python libraries (HuggingFace datasets, Pandas, Polars, MLCroissant) and serialization formats (Parquet, CSV, JSON), enabling integration into diverse ML workflows without format conversion. Each library interface exposes the same underlying schema (question, choices, answer, subject) but with library-specific optimizations (e.g., Polars for lazy evaluation, Pandas for exploratory analysis).
Single dataset published simultaneously across multiple library ecosystems (HuggingFace, Pandas, Polars, MLCroissant) with guaranteed schema consistency, rather than maintaining separate dataset versions. Parquet as native format enables zero-copy loading in multiple libraries without conversion.
More flexible than library-specific datasets (e.g., TensorFlow Datasets) while maintaining consistency better than manual CSV/JSON distribution
academic subject taxonomy and hierarchical filtering
Medium confidenceProvides explicit categorization of all 439K questions into 57 academic subjects (e.g., abstract_algebra, anatomy, astronomy, business_ethics, clinical_knowledge, etc.) with consistent labeling. This enables filtering, stratification, and analysis at subject level without requiring external knowledge graphs or manual categorization. Subjects span STEM (physics, chemistry, biology), humanities (history, philosophy, literature), social sciences (economics, psychology, sociology), and professional domains (law, medicine, business).
Explicit subject labels for every question enable filtering without external knowledge graphs or NLP-based categorization. 57-subject taxonomy is comprehensive and expert-validated, covering STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains in single dataset.
More granular than generic QA datasets (SQuAD, RACE) while maintaining simplicity of flat taxonomy versus complex hierarchical ontologies
Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.
Related Artifactssharing capabilities
Artifacts that share capabilities with mmlu, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.
SafetyBench Eval
11K safety evaluation questions across 7 categories.
MMLU
57-subject knowledge benchmark — 15K+ questions across STEM, humanities, professional domains.
promptbench
PromptBench is a powerful tool designed to scrutinize and analyze the interaction of large language models with various prompts. It provides a convenient infrastructure to simulate **black-box** adversarial **prompt attacks** on the models and evaluate their performances.
SafetyBench
11K safety evaluation questions across 7 categories.
ZeroEval
Zero-shot LLM evaluation for reasoning tasks.
ai2_arc
Dataset by allenai. 4,06,798 downloads.
Best For
- ✓ML researchers evaluating LLM capabilities on standardized benchmarks
- ✓model developers building question-answering systems requiring domain-specific evaluation
- ✓teams conducting comparative analysis of model performance across subjects
- ✓researchers conducting rigorous model evaluation with proper train/test separation
- ✓teams analyzing subject-specific model weaknesses or strengths
- ✓benchmark maintainers ensuring reproducibility across publications
- ✓researchers studying in-context learning and prompt sensitivity
- ✓model developers optimizing prompt templates for production QA systems
Known Limitations
- ⚠English-only dataset — no multilingual coverage limits evaluation of non-English language models
- ⚠Static snapshot from 2020 — does not reflect evolving knowledge or curriculum changes
- ⚠Multiple-choice format only — does not evaluate free-form reasoning or explanation generation
- ⚠No temporal versioning — cannot track model improvements over time on identical test sets
- ⚠Subject distribution is imbalanced — STEM subjects overrepresented relative to humanities
- ⚠Fixed splits cannot be customized per research need — no dynamic stratification API
Requirements
Input / Output
UnfragileRank
UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.
About
mmlu — a dataset on HuggingFace with 4,39,045 downloads
Categories
Alternatives to mmlu
Are you the builder of mmlu?
Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.
Get the weekly brief
New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.
Data Sources
Looking for something else?
Search →