{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_zerogpt","slug":"zerogpt","name":"ZeroGPT","type":"product","url":"https://zerogpt.cc","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/zerogpt","categories":["testing-quality"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_zerogpt__cap_0","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.binary.ai.text.classification.with.confidence.scoring","name":"binary-ai-text-classification-with-confidence-scoring","description":"Analyzes submitted text using undisclosed machine learning and NLP algorithms to classify content as either human-written or AI-generated, outputting a percentage confidence score. The system processes text through a proprietary detection engine that compares linguistic patterns, statistical properties, and stylistic markers against training data to produce a binary verdict with numerical confidence (0-100%). Processing occurs server-side via web form submission with results returned within seconds.","intents":["Quickly determine if a piece of text was written by a human or generated by an AI model like ChatGPT","Get a confidence percentage for AI-generated content to inform editorial decisions","Screen student submissions for potential AI usage without manual review"],"best_for":["Educators and academic institutions conducting first-pass AI detection on student work","Content moderators and publishers needing lightweight, free screening before human review","Individual content creators self-checking work before publication"],"limitations":["Accuracy degrades significantly on paraphrased, edited, or lightly modified AI text — false positive rates on legitimate human writing are documented","No transparency into model architecture, training data composition, or validation methodology despite '99% accuracy' claims","Maximum 1000 words per submission; longer documents require manual splitting via separate 'Split Tool'","No batch processing, bulk upload, or asynchronous processing — single-document, synchronous submission only","Detection model is proprietary with no published papers or independent third-party validation of accuracy claims","Unknown latency and no SLA guarantees; unsuitable for time-sensitive or mission-critical workflows"],"requires":["Web browser with internet connectivity","Plain text input (no PDF, DOCX, or other document formats supported)","Text length between 1 and 1000 words per submission"],"input_types":["plain text (copy-paste via web form)"],"output_types":["percentage score (AI vs human confidence)","binary classification label (HUMAN Written vs AI/GPT Generated)","numerical readability score"],"categories":["safety-moderation","content-authenticity-verification"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_zerogpt__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.sentence.level.ai.content.highlighting.with.color.coding","name":"sentence-level-ai-content-highlighting-with-color-coding","description":"Breaks down submitted text into individual sentences and applies color-coded visual highlighting to indicate the likelihood that each sentence was AI-generated. Yellow indicates uncertain/mixed content, orange indicates likely AI-generated, and red indicates high confidence of AI generation. This granular analysis allows users to identify specific portions of a document that trigger AI detection signals, enabling targeted editorial review or revision rather than binary document-level verdicts.","intents":["Identify which specific sentences in a document appear to be AI-generated for targeted revision","Understand the distribution of AI-generated content across a document rather than a single overall score","Highlight suspicious passages for human reviewers to investigate further"],"best_for":["Educators reviewing student submissions to pinpoint where AI assistance may have been used","Content editors performing detailed line-by-line review of potentially hybrid human/AI content","Compliance officers documenting specific passages that triggered AI detection for audit trails"],"limitations":["Color-coding is visual-only and not exportable as structured data — no machine-readable sentence-level confidence scores provided","Sentence boundary detection methodology is unknown; may mishandle complex punctuation, abbreviations, or multi-clause sentences","No ability to customize color thresholds or adjust sensitivity per sentence type (e.g., technical vs narrative)","Highlighting is transient (web-based only) — no option to export annotated document or save highlighting for later review","Accuracy of sentence-level classification is not independently validated; may produce false positives on legitimate human writing"],"requires":["Web browser with JavaScript enabled for interactive highlighting","Text submitted through web form interface"],"input_types":["plain text with sentence-level structure"],"output_types":["HTML-rendered text with color-coded sentence highlighting","visual classification per sentence (yellow/orange/red)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_zerogpt__cap_2","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.readability.scoring.with.revision.suggestions","name":"readability-scoring-with-revision-suggestions","description":"Calculates a numerical readability score for submitted text and generates revision suggestions for content and phrasing. The readability metric appears to have an inverse relationship with sentence complexity (longer, more complex sentences lower the score), and revision suggestions are provided alongside the AI detection results. The mechanism for generating suggestions is undisclosed — whether rule-based, template-driven, or model-generated is unknown.","intents":["Assess the readability of text independently of AI detection to improve overall writing quality","Receive actionable suggestions for rephrasing or content improvement","Correlate readability metrics with AI detection confidence to identify stylistically suspicious content"],"best_for":["Content creators and editors seeking to improve writing clarity alongside AI detection","Educators using readability as a secondary signal of writing authenticity (e.g., unusually high readability may indicate AI generation)","Non-native English speakers looking for phrasing improvement suggestions"],"limitations":["Readability scoring methodology is completely undisclosed — no reference to standard metrics like Flesch-Kincaid, SMOG, or Gunning Fog Index","Revision suggestions are generic and not customizable by domain, audience, or writing style","No explanation provided for why specific suggestions are made or how they improve readability","Suggestions appear to be static/template-driven rather than context-aware; no evidence of personalization based on document purpose","Readability score is presented without context (no grade level, target audience, or industry benchmark provided)","Unknown whether readability scoring is independent of AI detection or derived from the same model"],"requires":["Text submitted through web form interface","Plain text input"],"input_types":["plain text"],"output_types":["numerical readability score","text-based revision suggestions for content and phrasing"],"categories":["text-generation-language","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_zerogpt__cap_3","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.multi.ai.model.detection.coverage","name":"multi-ai-model-detection-coverage","description":"Claims to detect AI-generated text from multiple large language models including ChatGPT, Gemini, and other GPT variants. The detection engine is trained to recognize stylistic and linguistic patterns specific to different AI models, allowing users to identify not just whether text is AI-generated, but potentially which model generated it. However, the specific models supported, detection accuracy per model, and methodology for model-specific detection are undisclosed.","intents":["Determine which AI model (ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.) may have generated a piece of text","Understand the prevalence of different AI models in submitted content","Detect AI content regardless of which LLM was used to generate it"],"best_for":["Academic institutions tracking which AI tools students are using","Content platforms monitoring for specific AI model usage patterns","Researchers studying the prevalence and characteristics of different LLM outputs"],"limitations":["Supported models are listed as 'ChatGPT, Gemini' with vague reference to 'all versions of GPT models, including GPT-5' (which does not exist as of knowledge cutoff), suggesting marketing language rather than technical precision","No mention of detection support for Claude, Llama, Mistral, or other open-source LLMs","Accuracy per model is unknown; overall '99% accuracy' claim does not specify per-model performance or false positive rates","No methodology disclosed for distinguishing between different AI models — whether based on statistical fingerprinting, fine-tuned classifiers, or other approaches","No documentation of how model-specific detection degrades with paraphrasing or editing","Unknown whether model identification is returned as a separate output or inferred from confidence scores"],"requires":["Text generated by one of the supported AI models","Plain text input through web form"],"input_types":["plain text (potentially AI-generated by ChatGPT, Gemini, or other GPT variants)"],"output_types":["binary AI/human classification","confidence percentage","implied model identification (undisclosed output format)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_zerogpt__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.web.form.based.text.submission.with.example.buttons","name":"web-form-based-text-submission-with-example-buttons","description":"Provides a simple web-based interface for text submission via copy-paste, with pre-filled example buttons for common scenarios (HUMAN, CHATGPT, GEMINI, HUMAN+AI). Users can click example buttons to populate the text field with sample content, or paste their own text directly. The interface is designed for minimal friction and no authentication, allowing immediate access to detection without account creation or login.","intents":["Quickly test the detector with example content before submitting real documents","Understand how the detector classifies different types of content (pure human, pure AI, hybrid)","Submit text for analysis without creating an account or providing personal information"],"best_for":["Non-technical users unfamiliar with APIs or command-line tools","Educators and content moderators who need quick, ad-hoc detection without integration","Users testing the tool before deciding whether to integrate it into workflows"],"limitations":["No batch upload or bulk processing — single document submission only","No document format support (PDF, DOCX, etc.) — plain text only via copy-paste","Example buttons are static and may not represent real-world content distribution or edge cases","No session persistence or history — each submission is independent; no ability to compare results across multiple submissions","No API or programmatic access to the detection engine from the web form interface","Text must be manually split if exceeding 1000 words; no automatic chunking or multi-part submission workflow"],"requires":["Web browser with internet connectivity","No login or authentication required","JavaScript enabled for interactive form functionality"],"input_types":["plain text via copy-paste","pre-filled example text via button click"],"output_types":["detection results displayed on same page (percentage, classification, highlighting, readability score)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_zerogpt__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.text.splitting.tool.for.documents.exceeding.word.limit","name":"text-splitting-tool-for-documents-exceeding-word-limit","description":"Provides a separate 'Split Tool' utility that allows users to manually divide documents longer than 1000 words into smaller chunks suitable for individual submission to the detector. The tool appears to be a simple text chunking interface that helps users break longer documents into multiple submissions, each within the 1000-word limit. This is a workaround for the hard input size constraint rather than a native capability to handle long documents.","intents":["Process documents longer than 1000 words by splitting them into multiple submissions","Maintain document structure and context when analyzing long-form content","Avoid losing content due to the 1000-word submission limit"],"best_for":["Educators reviewing long student essays or research papers","Content moderators analyzing multi-page documents or articles","Users with documents that naturally exceed 1000 words"],"limitations":["Manual splitting required — no automatic chunking or intelligent paragraph-aware splitting","No context preservation across chunks — each split submission is analyzed independently without awareness of surrounding content","Sentence-level highlighting and readability scores are computed per chunk, not across the full document","No aggregation of results across chunks — users must manually correlate results from multiple submissions","Splitting is a workaround, not a native capability — indicates architectural limitation rather than intentional design","No guidance on optimal chunk size or splitting strategy (e.g., paragraph boundaries vs arbitrary word count)"],"requires":["Web browser with internet connectivity","Document longer than 1000 words","Manual effort to split and re-submit content"],"input_types":["plain text document (any length)"],"output_types":["split text chunks (each ≤1000 words) ready for individual submission"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_zerogpt__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.free.tier.access.without.authentication.or.payment","name":"free-tier-access-without-authentication-or-payment","description":"Provides completely free access to the core AI detection functionality via web form without requiring login, account creation, email verification, or payment information. Users can immediately submit text and receive detection results without any authentication barrier. The free tier includes sentence-level highlighting, readability scoring, and revision suggestions. Specific limits on free tier usage (e.g., submissions per day, monthly quota) are not disclosed in available documentation.","intents":["Test the AI detector without committing to a paid subscription or creating an account","Conduct occasional, ad-hoc AI detection without ongoing costs","Recommend the tool to others without requiring them to sign up or pay"],"best_for":["Individual educators and content creators with low-volume, occasional detection needs","Organizations evaluating the tool before committing to paid integration or API access","Users in regions or institutions with limited budgets for content moderation tools"],"limitations":["Free tier usage limits are completely undisclosed — unknown whether there are daily submission limits, monthly quotas, or rate limiting","No API access mentioned for free tier — integration and batch processing likely require paid plan","No documentation of what features or word limits are available on free tier vs paid tiers","Pricing page content was not captured in available documentation, making it impossible to determine upgrade path or cost","No guarantee of free tier permanence — tool could transition to freemium or paid-only model","Unknown whether free tier data is retained, used for model training, or sold to third parties"],"requires":["Web browser with internet connectivity","No login, email, or payment information required"],"input_types":["plain text via web form"],"output_types":["detection results (percentage, classification, highlighting, readability, suggestions)"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_zerogpt__cap_7","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.undisclosed.proprietary.detection.model.with.unvalidated.accuracy.claims","name":"undisclosed-proprietary-detection-model-with-unvalidated-accuracy-claims","description":"Employs an undisclosed proprietary machine learning model trained on 'massive amounts of data from different sources' using 'combinations of machine learning algorithms alongside natural language processing techniques.' The model claims '99% accuracy' but provides no methodology for accuracy measurement, no confusion matrix, no false positive/negative rates, and no independent third-party validation. The specific model architecture, training data composition, fine-tuning approach, and model name/version are completely undisclosed, making independent verification impossible.","intents":["Detect AI-generated text using a proprietary model claimed to achieve high accuracy","Rely on a detection engine backed by 'published highly reputable papers' (referenced but not provided)","Use a tool that claims to be 'backed by several in-house experiments' for validation"],"best_for":["Users willing to accept unvalidated accuracy claims for low-stakes content screening","Organizations conducting first-pass filtering before human review (where false positives are acceptable)","Users who prioritize ease of use over technical transparency or independent validation"],"limitations":["No published papers or academic validation provided despite claims of being 'backed by several in-house experiments and published highly reputable papers'","No model architecture disclosed (transformer type, layer count, attention mechanisms, etc.)","No training data composition disclosed (size, sources, data cleaning methodology, class balance)","No methodology for '99% accuracy' claim — no test set description, evaluation metrics, or confusion matrix","No independent third-party validation or peer review of accuracy claims","Unknown robustness to adversarial inputs, paraphrasing, prompt injection, or other evasion techniques","Unknown generalization across domains (technical, medical, legal, creative writing, etc.)","Unknown performance on non-English text or code-mixed content","Proprietary model prevents reproducibility, auditing, or alternative implementations"],"requires":["Trust in vendor's unvalidated accuracy claims","Acceptance of black-box detection without transparency into methodology"],"input_types":["plain text"],"output_types":["percentage confidence score","binary classification (AI vs human)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_zerogpt__cap_8","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.api.integration.capability.with.undisclosed.specification","name":"api-integration-capability-with-undisclosed-specification","description":"ZeroGPT mentions 'seamlessly integrate ZeroGPT into your existing workflows, applications, and systems' via API, but the API documentation is truncated in available sources. No endpoints, authentication method, rate limits, request/response format, SDKs, or pricing structure are disclosed. The API capability is claimed but not substantively documented, making it impossible to assess integration feasibility or technical requirements.","intents":["Integrate AI detection into custom applications or workflows programmatically","Automate detection for high-volume content screening via API calls","Build detection into content management systems, learning management systems, or moderation pipelines"],"best_for":["Developers building custom applications requiring AI detection","Enterprise organizations needing to integrate detection into existing systems","Teams requiring batch processing or high-volume automated screening"],"limitations":["API documentation is completely unavailable in provided sources — no endpoints, methods, or parameters documented","No authentication method specified (API key, OAuth, JWT, etc.)","No rate limits, quota, or pricing disclosed","No SDK availability mentioned for any programming language","No request/response format documentation (JSON, XML, etc.)","No error handling or status code documentation","No SLA, uptime guarantee, or performance metrics disclosed","Unknown whether API supports batch processing or only single-document submissions","Unknown whether API supports the same features as web interface (sentence-level highlighting, readability scoring, etc.)","No information on data retention, privacy, or compliance (GDPR, HIPAA, etc.) for API submissions"],"requires":["API key or authentication credentials (method unknown)","Documentation of API endpoints and request format (not provided)","Programming language SDK or HTTP client library"],"input_types":["unknown (likely JSON with text field)"],"output_types":["unknown (likely JSON with detection results)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_zerogpt__cap_9","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.hybrid.human.ai.content.detection.and.classification","name":"hybrid-human-ai-content-detection-and-classification","description":"Supports detection and classification of content that is a mixture of human-written and AI-generated text (labeled as 'HUMAN+AI' in example buttons). The system can identify documents that contain both human and AI content, rather than treating all content as purely one or the other. However, the methodology for detecting and scoring hybrid content is undisclosed, and no documentation explains how the percentage score is calculated when content is mixed.","intents":["Identify documents that combine human-written and AI-generated content","Detect when students or writers use AI to augment or edit human-written work","Understand the proportion of AI-generated content in hybrid documents"],"best_for":["Educators detecting when students use AI to edit or refine their own work","Content moderators identifying partially AI-generated content that might otherwise pass as human-written","Organizations tracking the prevalence of hybrid human/AI content in submissions"],"limitations":["Methodology for detecting hybrid content is completely undisclosed","Unknown how the system distinguishes between human-written content and AI-generated content within the same document","Unknown whether hybrid detection uses sentence-level analysis or document-level heuristics","No documentation of accuracy for hybrid content detection — '99% accuracy' claim does not specify performance on mixed content","Unknown how the percentage score is calculated for hybrid content (e.g., proportion of AI sentences, weighted by length, etc.)","No ability to customize detection sensitivity for hybrid content or adjust thresholds","Unknown whether the system can identify which portions of a document are AI-generated vs human-written in hybrid content"],"requires":["Text that contains both human-written and AI-generated content","Plain text input through web form"],"input_types":["plain text with mixed human and AI content"],"output_types":["percentage score indicating proportion of AI content","binary or multi-class classification (HUMAN, AI, HUMAN+AI)","sentence-level highlighting indicating which portions are AI-generated"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":40,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Web browser with internet connectivity","Plain text input (no PDF, DOCX, or other document formats supported)","Text length between 1 and 1000 words per submission","Web browser with JavaScript enabled for interactive highlighting","Text submitted through web form interface","Plain text input","Text generated by one of the supported AI models","Plain text input through web form","No login or authentication required","JavaScript enabled for interactive form functionality"],"failure_modes":["Accuracy degrades significantly on paraphrased, edited, or lightly modified AI text — false positive rates on legitimate human writing are documented","No transparency into model architecture, training data composition, or validation methodology despite '99% accuracy' claims","Maximum 1000 words per submission; longer documents require manual splitting via separate 'Split Tool'","No batch processing, bulk upload, or asynchronous processing — single-document, synchronous submission only","Detection model is proprietary with no published papers or independent third-party validation of accuracy claims","Unknown latency and no SLA guarantees; unsuitable for time-sensitive or mission-critical workflows","Color-coding is visual-only and not exportable as structured data — no machine-readable sentence-level confidence scores provided","Sentence boundary detection methodology is unknown; may mishandle complex punctuation, abbreviations, or multi-clause sentences","No ability to customize color thresholds or adjust sensitivity per sentence type (e.g., technical vs narrative)","Highlighting is transient (web-based only) — no option to export annotated document or save highlighting for later review","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.72,"ecosystem":0.2,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:34.118Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.552Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=zerogpt","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=zerogpt"}},"signature":"7ngTU+gzFPEvLLeCiskg3BEKaPaCl0eeT+YncoJKahde1bmNrgjRyyn/EoDO4Y6aOl/EmngrfEEGWfCvnzsyDQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T00:12:50.247Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/zerogpt","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/zerogpt","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=zerogpt","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}