{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-yourgoal","slug":"yourgoal","name":"Yourgoal","type":"agent","url":"https://github.com/pj4533/yourgoal/?utm_source=awesome-ai-agents","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/yourgoal","categories":["ai-agents"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-yourgoal__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.task.decomposition.and.prioritization.loop","name":"task-decomposition-and-prioritization-loop","description":"Implements a BabyAGI-style autonomous task loop that decomposes high-level goals into executable subtasks, prioritizes them in a queue, and iteratively executes them using an LLM backbone. The system maintains a task list, executes the highest-priority task, generates new subtasks based on results, and re-prioritizes the queue in each iteration. This creates a self-improving agent that can tackle complex multi-step objectives without explicit human orchestration.","intents":["Build an autonomous agent that breaks down complex goals into manageable subtasks","Create a system that learns and refines task priorities based on execution results","Implement goal-oriented automation that doesn't require predefined workflows"],"best_for":["Swift developers building autonomous agents for macOS/iOS","Teams prototyping BabyAGI-style systems in native Swift","Developers wanting lightweight agent loops without Python dependencies"],"limitations":["Task decomposition quality depends entirely on LLM capability — no built-in validation of task coherence","No persistent task storage — all tasks exist in memory, lost on restart unless explicitly saved","Single-threaded execution model limits parallelization of independent subtasks","No built-in error recovery or task retry logic for failed executions"],"requires":["Swift 5.5+","macOS 10.15+ or iOS 13+","API key for OpenAI or compatible LLM provider","Network connectivity for LLM API calls"],"input_types":["text (goal description)","structured task definitions"],"output_types":["task execution results (text)","generated subtasks (structured)","prioritized task queue (structured)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-yourgoal__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.llm.agnostic.task.execution.engine","name":"llm-agnostic-task-execution-engine","description":"Abstracts LLM provider interactions through a pluggable interface that supports multiple API backends (OpenAI, Anthropic, local models). Each task execution sends the current task context and previous results to the LLM, receives structured responses, and parses them into executable actions. The engine handles prompt templating, token management, and response parsing without coupling to a specific model provider.","intents":["Execute tasks using different LLM providers without changing agent code","Switch between OpenAI, Anthropic, or local models based on cost/latency tradeoffs","Maintain compatibility as new LLM APIs emerge"],"best_for":["Teams evaluating multiple LLM providers for agent workloads","Developers building cost-optimized agents that can fallback between providers","Organizations with multi-model strategies (GPT-4 for complex tasks, cheaper models for simple ones)"],"limitations":["No automatic prompt optimization for different model families — same prompt sent to all providers","Response parsing assumes consistent JSON/structured output format across providers, which may fail with model-specific quirks","No built-in token counting or cost estimation per provider","Latency differences between providers not abstracted — caller must handle variable response times"],"requires":["Swift 5.5+","API credentials for at least one LLM provider","Network access to LLM endpoints"],"input_types":["task description (text)","execution context (structured)","previous results (text/structured)"],"output_types":["parsed task results (structured)","generated subtasks (structured)","execution status (text)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-yourgoal__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.iterative.task.result.synthesis","name":"iterative-task-result-synthesis","description":"Processes execution results from completed tasks and synthesizes them into new subtasks or goal refinements. The system analyzes what was accomplished, identifies gaps or dependencies, and generates follow-up tasks that move toward the original goal. This creates a feedback loop where each task's output informs the next task's design, enabling emergent problem-solving without explicit branching logic.","intents":["Automatically generate follow-up tasks based on what previous tasks accomplished","Refine goal understanding as the agent learns more about the problem domain","Create adaptive workflows that respond to intermediate results"],"best_for":["Open-ended problem solving where the solution path isn't predetermined","Research or exploration tasks that benefit from iterative refinement","Agents that need to adapt their approach based on real-world feedback"],"limitations":["No mechanism to detect infinite loops or circular task dependencies — agent can get stuck regenerating the same tasks","Synthesis quality depends on LLM's ability to understand context — loses fidelity over many iterations as context window fills","No built-in goal convergence detection — agent may never recognize when goal is sufficiently achieved","Task synthesis is greedy (local optimization) rather than globally optimal"],"requires":["Swift 5.5+","LLM provider with sufficient context window (8k+ tokens recommended)","Task execution results in parseable format"],"input_types":["task execution results (text/structured)","original goal (text)","execution history (structured)"],"output_types":["new subtasks (structured)","refined goal statement (text)","progress assessment (text)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-yourgoal__cap_3","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.priority.queue.task.scheduling","name":"priority-queue-task-scheduling","description":"Maintains an ordered task queue where tasks are ranked by priority (computed by the LLM or heuristics) and executed in priority order. After each task execution, the queue is re-evaluated and re-prioritized based on new information. This allows the agent to dynamically shift focus toward the most impactful remaining tasks rather than executing a static sequence.","intents":["Execute tasks in order of impact rather than creation order","Dynamically shift focus when new high-priority tasks are discovered","Avoid wasting compute on low-impact tasks when better alternatives emerge"],"best_for":["Resource-constrained environments where task prioritization saves compute","Agents working on goals with many possible solution paths","Systems that need to adapt to changing external priorities"],"limitations":["Priority computation adds latency to each iteration (LLM call required to re-rank)","No built-in fairness guarantees — low-priority tasks can starve indefinitely","Priority heuristics are LLM-dependent and may not reflect actual task importance","No support for task dependencies — can't enforce that task B must run after task A"],"requires":["Swift 5.5+","LLM provider for priority computation","Task queue data structure (built-in or custom)"],"input_types":["task list (structured)","execution context (structured)","priority criteria (text/structured)"],"output_types":["prioritized task queue (ordered list)","next task to execute (structured)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-yourgoal__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.goal.context.management","name":"goal-context-management","description":"Maintains the original goal statement and execution context throughout the agent loop, passing them to each task execution and synthesis step. The system tracks what has been attempted, what succeeded, and what failed, building a coherent narrative of progress toward the goal. This context prevents task drift and enables the LLM to make informed decisions about next steps.","intents":["Keep the agent focused on the original goal despite task decomposition","Provide LLM with full context of what's been tried to avoid redundant work","Enable the agent to recognize when the goal has been achieved"],"best_for":["Long-running agents that need to maintain coherence over many iterations","Multi-step goals where context loss would cause task drift","Systems where explainability of agent decisions is important"],"limitations":["Context window limitations — as execution history grows, older context is lost or truncated","No automatic context summarization — full history is passed to LLM, increasing token usage","Context is in-memory only — lost on agent restart unless explicitly persisted","No built-in deduplication of context — redundant information may be repeated across iterations"],"requires":["Swift 5.5+","LLM provider with sufficient context window","Structured storage for goal and execution history"],"input_types":["original goal (text)","execution history (structured)","current task results (text/structured)"],"output_types":["contextualized task prompt (text)","progress summary (text)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-yourgoal__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.swift.native.async.task.orchestration","name":"swift-native-async-task-orchestration","description":"Uses Swift's async/await concurrency model to orchestrate the task loop, with structured concurrency for managing task execution, LLM API calls, and result synthesis. Each step in the loop is an async function, enabling clean error handling, cancellation support, and potential future parallelization of independent tasks without callback hell.","intents":["Build responsive agents that don't block the main thread","Enable cancellation of long-running agent operations","Prepare the codebase for future parallelization of independent tasks"],"best_for":["macOS/iOS applications where UI responsiveness is critical","Swift developers familiar with async/await patterns","Teams building production agents that need cancellation and error handling"],"limitations":["Requires Swift 5.5+ — not compatible with older Swift versions","Async/await adds complexity compared to synchronous code","Error propagation through async chains can be verbose","Debugging async task execution is harder than synchronous code"],"requires":["Swift 5.5+","macOS 10.15+ or iOS 13+ (async/await support)","Understanding of Swift concurrency model"],"input_types":["task definitions (structured)","execution parameters (structured)"],"output_types":["task results (structured)","execution status (text)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-yourgoal__cap_6","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.memory.resident.task.state.management","name":"memory-resident-task-state-management","description":"Stores all task state (definitions, results, status, priority) in memory using Swift data structures (arrays, dictionaries, custom types). The system maintains a single source of truth for the task queue and execution history during the agent's lifetime. State updates are synchronous and immediate, with no persistence layer by default.","intents":["Quickly access and modify task state without database overhead","Maintain a coherent view of agent progress during execution","Prototype agents without worrying about persistence infrastructure"],"best_for":["Short-lived agents that complete within a single session","Prototyping and experimentation where persistence isn't critical","Resource-constrained environments where database overhead is unacceptable"],"limitations":["All state is lost on agent restart — no recovery mechanism","Memory usage grows unbounded as tasks accumulate — no automatic cleanup","No concurrent access control — multiple threads accessing state simultaneously will cause data corruption","No audit trail or undo capability — state changes are not logged","Scaling to thousands of tasks will cause memory pressure and slow lookups"],"requires":["Swift 5.5+","Sufficient RAM for task state (depends on task count and size)","Single-threaded or carefully synchronized access patterns"],"input_types":["task definitions (structured)","execution results (structured)"],"output_types":["task state (structured)","execution history (structured)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Swift 5.5+","macOS 10.15+ or iOS 13+","API key for OpenAI or compatible LLM provider","Network connectivity for LLM API calls","API credentials for at least one LLM provider","Network access to LLM endpoints","LLM provider with sufficient context window (8k+ tokens recommended)","Task execution results in parseable format","LLM provider for priority computation","Task queue data structure (built-in or custom)"],"failure_modes":["Task decomposition quality depends entirely on LLM capability — no built-in validation of task coherence","No persistent task storage — all tasks exist in memory, lost on restart unless explicitly saved","Single-threaded execution model limits parallelization of independent subtasks","No built-in error recovery or task retry logic for failed executions","No automatic prompt optimization for different model families — same prompt sent to all providers","Response parsing assumes consistent JSON/structured output format across providers, which may fail with model-specific quirks","No built-in token counting or cost estimation per provider","Latency differences between providers not abstracted — caller must handle variable response times","No mechanism to detect infinite loops or circular task dependencies — agent can get stuck regenerating the same tasks","Synthesis quality depends on LLM's ability to understand context — loses fidelity over many iterations as context window fills","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.24,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.28,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:04.690Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:10.321Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=yourgoal","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=yourgoal"}},"signature":"62wk1mR1r2iFsvF9OxrRqo5kzZNWDiV3KDPIKOB1Nq1sGmxmU9jRwDLwtarmD/iV5I9neSY9XaGoBzAtTfPxCw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T07:34:26.841Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/yourgoal","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/yourgoal","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=yourgoal","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}