{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-workgpt","slug":"workgpt","name":"WorkGPT","type":"framework","url":"https://github.com/team-openpm/workgpt","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/workgpt","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-workgpt__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.schema.based.api.function.calling.with.llm.routing","name":"schema-based api function calling with llm routing","description":"WorkGPT enables LLMs to invoke arbitrary APIs by converting OpenAPI/JSON schemas into function definitions that the model can call. The framework parses API specifications, generates function signatures, and routes LLM-selected function calls to actual HTTP endpoints with parameter binding and response handling. This allows agents to dynamically discover and invoke external services without hardcoded integrations.","intents":["I want my LLM agent to call REST APIs without writing custom integration code for each endpoint","I need to expose my API surface to an LLM agent via schema-driven function discovery","I want to let the model decide which API to call based on user intent and available schemas"],"best_for":["teams building LLM agents that need to interact with multiple REST APIs","developers creating workflow automation tools powered by language models","API providers wanting to expose their services to AI agents"],"limitations":["Requires well-formed OpenAPI/JSON schemas — malformed specs will cause function calling failures","No built-in request signing or OAuth2 flow handling — requires pre-authenticated API keys","Schema complexity directly impacts token usage and model latency; deeply nested schemas increase context overhead","Limited error recovery — failed API calls return raw HTTP errors without automatic retry logic"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","OpenAI API key or compatible LLM provider","OpenAPI 3.0+ or JSON schema specification for target APIs","Network access to target API endpoints"],"input_types":["OpenAPI specification (JSON/YAML)","JSON schema definitions","Natural language user queries","API endpoint URLs with authentication credentials"],"output_types":["Function call results (JSON)","API response data","Structured agent actions with parameters"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-workgpt__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.multi.step.agent.orchestration.with.tool.selection","name":"multi-step agent orchestration with tool selection","description":"WorkGPT implements an agentic loop that iteratively prompts the LLM to select from available tools/APIs, executes the chosen action, and feeds results back into the model for next-step planning. The framework manages conversation state, tracks tool invocation history, and implements stop conditions (max iterations, goal completion). This enables complex workflows where the model autonomously chains multiple API calls to accomplish user objectives.","intents":["I want my agent to autonomously decide which APIs to call in sequence to complete a task","I need to track what tools my agent has used and why it selected them","I want to set guardrails on agent behavior (max API calls, timeout limits)"],"best_for":["developers building autonomous workflow agents","teams implementing multi-step task automation with LLMs","builders creating AI assistants that need to reason about tool selection"],"limitations":["No built-in memory persistence — agent state is ephemeral unless explicitly saved to external storage","Token usage grows linearly with conversation history; long-running agents require context pruning strategies","Determinism is limited by LLM sampling — same inputs may produce different tool selections across runs","No native support for parallel tool execution — all API calls are sequential"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","LLM provider with function calling support (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Defined set of available tools/APIs with schemas","User intent or goal specification"],"input_types":["User query or task description","Available tool/API schemas","System prompts and instructions","Previous conversation history"],"output_types":["Final task result","Tool execution trace (sequence of API calls)","Agent reasoning/explanation","Structured action history"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-workgpt__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.api.response.parsing.and.context.injection","name":"api response parsing and context injection","description":"WorkGPT automatically parses API responses (JSON, XML, plain text) and injects them back into the LLM context for further reasoning. The framework handles response formatting, truncation for large payloads, and type conversion to ensure the model receives usable data. This enables the agent to reason about API results and decide on subsequent actions based on actual response content.","intents":["I want the agent to understand API responses and use them to make decisions about next steps","I need to handle large API responses without overwhelming the model's context window","I want to transform API responses into a format the LLM can reason about"],"best_for":["teams building agents that need to interpret and act on API data","developers creating data-driven workflows with LLMs","builders implementing conditional logic based on API response content"],"limitations":["No built-in response schema validation — malformed API responses may cause parsing errors","Large responses are truncated to fit context window, potentially losing important data","No automatic response caching — repeated API calls with identical parameters will be re-fetched","Limited support for streaming responses — designed for request-response patterns"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","API endpoints that return structured data (JSON preferred)","Sufficient LLM context window for response injection"],"input_types":["API response data (JSON, XML, plain text)","Response schema definitions","Truncation/formatting rules"],"output_types":["Formatted response text","Parsed structured data","Context-injected prompt","Truncated response summaries"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-workgpt__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.prompt.templating.and.instruction.management","name":"prompt templating and instruction management","description":"WorkGPT provides a templating system for constructing agent prompts that include available tools, instructions, and context. The framework manages system prompts, tool descriptions, and user input formatting to ensure the LLM receives well-structured instructions for tool selection and reasoning. This enables consistent agent behavior and makes it easy to modify instructions without changing core agent logic.","intents":["I want to customize how the agent is instructed to use available tools","I need to inject dynamic context (user info, API keys, constraints) into agent prompts","I want to version and test different prompt strategies for my agent"],"best_for":["teams experimenting with different agent prompt strategies","developers building customizable AI agents","builders implementing domain-specific agent behaviors"],"limitations":["No built-in prompt optimization — requires manual iteration to find effective instructions","Template variables are simple string substitution — no conditional logic in templates","No A/B testing framework — comparing prompt strategies requires external tooling","Prompt injection vulnerabilities possible if user input is not sanitized before injection"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Template syntax understanding (Jinja2 or similar)","Clear definition of agent instructions and tool descriptions"],"input_types":["Prompt templates (text with variables)","Tool descriptions and schemas","User queries and context","System instructions"],"output_types":["Formatted prompts ready for LLM","Rendered instruction text","Tool descriptions with examples"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-workgpt__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.llm.provider.abstraction.and.model.switching","name":"llm provider abstraction and model switching","description":"WorkGPT abstracts away provider-specific API differences through a unified interface, allowing agents to switch between OpenAI, Anthropic, and other LLM providers without code changes. The framework handles provider-specific function calling formats, parameter mapping, and response parsing. This enables portability and cost optimization by allowing runtime model selection.","intents":["I want to switch between different LLM providers without rewriting my agent code","I need to use different models for different tasks (fast model for simple queries, powerful model for complex reasoning)","I want to compare costs and performance across LLM providers"],"best_for":["teams building LLM-agnostic agents","developers optimizing for cost or latency across providers","builders implementing multi-model strategies"],"limitations":["Not all providers support identical function calling formats — some features may be provider-specific","Provider API rate limits and quotas are not abstracted — requires manual rate limiting","Model capabilities vary significantly — a prompt optimized for GPT-4 may underperform on Claude","Cost tracking requires manual logging — no built-in cost aggregation across providers"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","API keys for target LLM providers","Provider-specific SDK or HTTP client"],"input_types":["Provider configuration (API key, model name, parameters)","Agent prompts and tool schemas","User queries"],"output_types":["LLM responses","Function calls","Model metadata (tokens used, latency)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-workgpt__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.error.handling.and.api.failure.recovery","name":"error handling and api failure recovery","description":"WorkGPT implements error handling for API failures, timeouts, and malformed responses, with configurable retry strategies and fallback behaviors. The framework catches HTTP errors, network timeouts, and parsing failures, then either retries the request or informs the agent of the failure for alternative action selection. This improves agent robustness when dealing with unreliable or slow APIs.","intents":["I want my agent to retry failed API calls instead of giving up immediately","I need to handle API timeouts gracefully without crashing the agent","I want the agent to understand when an API call failed and try a different approach"],"best_for":["teams building production agents that interact with external APIs","developers implementing resilient workflow automation","builders handling unreliable or rate-limited API services"],"limitations":["Retry logic is basic exponential backoff — no sophisticated circuit breaker patterns","No built-in request deduplication — retries may cause duplicate side effects","Timeout configuration is global — no per-endpoint timeout customization","Error messages are passed to the LLM as-is — may confuse the model or consume tokens"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Configurable retry parameters (max retries, backoff strategy)","Network access to APIs with potential failure modes"],"input_types":["API requests with timeout and retry configuration","HTTP error responses","Network exceptions"],"output_types":["Retry attempts with backoff","Error messages for agent reasoning","Fallback responses or failure indicators"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-workgpt__cap_6","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.api.authentication.and.credential.management","name":"api authentication and credential management","description":"WorkGPT supports multiple authentication methods (API keys, OAuth2, basic auth, custom headers) and manages credentials securely without exposing them in prompts or logs. The framework handles credential injection into API requests and supports environment variable-based configuration for secure credential storage. This enables agents to authenticate with protected APIs while maintaining security.","intents":["I want my agent to authenticate with APIs that require API keys or OAuth tokens","I need to manage credentials securely without hardcoding them in agent code","I want to rotate credentials without redeploying the agent"],"best_for":["teams building production agents with access to protected APIs","developers implementing secure credential management","builders handling sensitive API access in multi-tenant environments"],"limitations":["No built-in credential rotation — requires external secret management system","OAuth2 flow support is limited — complex flows may require custom implementation","Credentials are stored in memory — no encryption at rest","No audit logging of credential usage — difficult to track which APIs were accessed with which credentials"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Environment variables or secure credential store","API authentication method specification (key type, header format)"],"input_types":["Credential configuration (API key, token, username/password)","Authentication method specification","API endpoint URLs"],"output_types":["Authenticated API requests","Authorization headers","Token refresh responses"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-workgpt__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.execution.tracing.and.logging","name":"agent execution tracing and logging","description":"WorkGPT logs all agent actions, API calls, and LLM responses for debugging and monitoring. The framework captures tool selection reasoning, API request/response pairs, and execution timing, making it easy to understand agent behavior and diagnose failures. Logs can be exported for analysis or integrated with external monitoring systems.","intents":["I want to understand why my agent made a specific decision or API call","I need to debug agent failures by reviewing the execution trace","I want to monitor agent performance and identify bottlenecks"],"best_for":["teams debugging complex agent behaviors","developers monitoring production agents","builders analyzing agent decision-making patterns"],"limitations":["Verbose logging can consume significant disk space for long-running agents","No built-in log aggregation — requires external tools for centralized logging","Sensitive data (API responses, credentials) may be logged — requires careful configuration","Logging overhead adds latency to agent execution"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Logging configuration (level, format, destination)","Optional: external logging service (CloudWatch, Datadog, etc.)"],"input_types":["Agent execution events","API requests and responses","LLM prompts and completions","Tool selection decisions"],"output_types":["Structured logs (JSON or text)","Execution traces","Performance metrics","Debugging information"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-workgpt__cap_8","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.api.discovery.and.dynamic.schema.loading","name":"tool/api discovery and dynamic schema loading","description":"WorkGPT can dynamically load API schemas from OpenAPI endpoints, files, or registries, allowing agents to discover available tools at runtime without hardcoding tool definitions. The framework parses schemas, extracts function signatures, and updates available tools without restarting the agent. This enables flexible agent configurations and integration with API catalogs.","intents":["I want my agent to discover available APIs dynamically without hardcoding tool definitions","I need to add new APIs to my agent without code changes or restarts","I want to load API schemas from a central registry or catalog"],"best_for":["teams building flexible agent platforms with dynamic tool discovery","developers integrating with API marketplaces or catalogs","builders implementing multi-tenant agents with per-tenant API access"],"limitations":["Schema parsing errors can cause agent failures — requires robust error handling","Large numbers of available tools increase token usage and model latency","No built-in schema validation — malformed schemas may cause function calling failures","Dynamic schema loading adds startup latency"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","OpenAPI 3.0+ specification or JSON schema","Network access to schema endpoints or file system access"],"input_types":["OpenAPI specification URLs or file paths","API registry endpoints","Schema update events"],"output_types":["Parsed function definitions","Available tool list","Updated agent capabilities"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-workgpt__cap_9","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.parameter.validation.and.type.coercion","name":"parameter validation and type coercion","description":"WorkGPT validates function parameters against schema definitions and coerces types (string to integer, array formatting, etc.) to match API expectations. The framework checks required parameters, validates against constraints (min/max, enum values), and provides clear error messages when validation fails. This prevents invalid API calls and improves agent reliability.","intents":["I want to prevent my agent from making invalid API calls due to incorrect parameter types","I need to validate parameters against API schema constraints before calling the API","I want clear error messages when the agent provides invalid parameters"],"best_for":["teams building robust agents that interact with strict APIs","developers preventing invalid API calls and associated errors","builders implementing parameter validation without custom code"],"limitations":["Complex type coercion (nested objects, custom types) may fail silently","Validation errors are reported to the LLM — may confuse the model or consume tokens","No support for conditional parameter requirements — all constraints are static","Enum validation is case-sensitive — may reject valid values with different casing"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Well-defined API schemas with type and constraint information","Type coercion rules for common conversions"],"input_types":["Function parameters from LLM","API schema definitions with constraints","Type information and validation rules"],"output_types":["Validated parameters","Type-coerced values","Validation error messages"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":25,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Python 3.8+","OpenAI API key or compatible LLM provider","OpenAPI 3.0+ or JSON schema specification for target APIs","Network access to target API endpoints","LLM provider with function calling support (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Defined set of available tools/APIs with schemas","User intent or goal specification","API endpoints that return structured data (JSON preferred)","Sufficient LLM context window for response injection","Template syntax understanding (Jinja2 or similar)"],"failure_modes":["Requires well-formed OpenAPI/JSON schemas — malformed specs will cause function calling failures","No built-in request signing or OAuth2 flow handling — requires pre-authenticated API keys","Schema complexity directly impacts token usage and model latency; deeply nested schemas increase context overhead","Limited error recovery — failed API calls return raw HTTP errors without automatic retry logic","No built-in memory persistence — agent state is ephemeral unless explicitly saved to external storage","Token usage grows linearly with conversation history; long-running agents require context pruning strategies","Determinism is limited by LLM sampling — same inputs may produce different tool selections across runs","No native support for parallel tool execution — all API calls are sequential","No built-in response schema validation — malformed API responses may cause parsing errors","Large responses are truncated to fit context window, potentially losing important data","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.3,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:04.690Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:10.321Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=workgpt","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=workgpt"}},"signature":"bzklHUjRl5siCD0QWXuDhRcPN/lL1Sx0Jq/LRuHX5NIJUOk7thoqvIc8JPVa/68Dajhz1n28qjOVS5i8qtuTDw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T16:54:16.456Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/workgpt","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/workgpt","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=workgpt","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}