{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_workflow","slug":"workflow","name":"Workflow","type":"product","url":"https://www.workflow.design","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/workflow","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.link.based.asset.annotation.with.automatic.context.capture","name":"link-based asset annotation with automatic context capture","description":"Enables reviewers to comment directly on design assets (websites, images, videos, PDFs, Figma files) via shareable links without requiring account signup. When a comment is placed, the system automatically captures a screenshot of the asset state, browser metadata (name, resolution, device type), and timestamp, storing this context alongside the comment for asynchronous reference. Implementation uses browser-based canvas rendering for point-and-click annotation positioning and server-side screenshot capture to preserve visual state at comment time.","intents":["collect design feedback from non-technical clients without forcing them to create accounts","preserve visual context of feedback by capturing what reviewers saw when they commented","eliminate email/Slack feedback fragmentation by centralizing all comments on a single asset","track which device/browser configuration a reviewer was using when they spotted an issue"],"best_for":["freelance web designers working with non-technical clients","small creative agencies managing multiple client feedback rounds","product teams collecting stakeholder feedback on live website implementations"],"limitations":["does not support single-page applications (React, Vue SPAs, Google Docs) — only static or server-rendered sites","screenshot capture is static snapshot only — does not preserve dynamic state like hover effects, animations, or scroll-dependent rendering","no support for password-protected sites beyond basic HTTP auth","video feedback file size limits unknown — no documentation on storage quotas or streaming approach"],"requires":["modern web browser (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)","internet connection for asset upload and reviewer access","shareable URL or link generation capability on Workflow platform"],"input_types":["live website URLs (Squarespace, Webflow, Framer, WordPress, custom builds, v0, Lovable)","Figma design links","image files (format unspecified)","video files (format unspecified)","PDF documents","presentation files","30+ other media types (unspecified)"],"output_types":["structured comment objects with metadata (timestamp, commenter identity, canvas coordinates, screenshot attachment)","device/browser context data","version history snapshots"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","collaboration-feedback"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_1","uri":"capability://image.visual.video.feedback.recording.with.embedded.playback.and.timestamp.specific.comments","name":"video feedback recording with embedded playback and timestamp-specific comments","description":"Allows reviewers to record video feedback (voice + screen/camera capture) directly within the platform without external tools, with automatic playback controls and the ability to attach timestamp-specific comments to video frames. The system stores video files (storage mechanism and size limits unknown) and enables designers to scrub through recordings while leaving comments tied to specific moments, creating a temporal feedback trail. Implementation likely uses browser MediaRecorder API for client-side capture and server-side video storage with frame-indexed comment metadata.","intents":["capture nuanced feedback that's difficult to express in text (tone, emphasis, visual demonstration)","enable reviewers to show exactly what they mean by pointing at screen regions while speaking","create an asynchronous video record of feedback that designers can review multiple times without scheduling sync calls"],"best_for":["remote teams avoiding synchronous feedback meetings","designers who prefer verbal feedback over written comments","complex design reviews requiring visual demonstration of issues"],"limitations":["video file storage limits unknown — no documentation on maximum file size, duration, or total storage per project","unclear if video is streamed or downloaded — impacts bandwidth and playback latency","no mention of video transcription or AI-powered summary extraction","timestamp-specific comment indexing mechanism unknown — unclear how precisely comments map to video frames"],"requires":["modern web browser with MediaRecorder API support (Chrome 49+, Firefox 25+, Safari 14.1+)","microphone and/or camera access permissions","sufficient bandwidth for video upload"],"input_types":["audio stream from microphone","video stream from camera or screen capture","timestamp markers for comment attachment"],"output_types":["video file (format unspecified)","playback control metadata","timestamp-indexed comment objects"],"categories":["image-visual","collaboration-feedback"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_10","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.pre.release.ai.error.detection.for.accessibility.typography.and.responsiveness","name":"pre-release ai error detection for accessibility, typography, and responsiveness","description":"Planned feature (marked 'soon' on pricing page) that will automatically detect design issues including accessibility violations, typography inconsistencies, and mobile responsiveness problems. Implementation details are completely unknown — no information on model architecture, detection algorithms, false positive rates, or rollout timeline. This feature is NOT currently available and should not be considered when evaluating the product.","intents":["automatically flag accessibility issues before handoff to development","catch typography inconsistencies across designs without manual review","identify responsive design breakpoints that weren't tested"],"best_for":["teams wanting automated design QA without hiring dedicated QA roles","designers wanting to improve accessibility compliance automatically","agencies managing high-volume projects where manual QA is bottleneck"],"limitations":["NOT YET IMPLEMENTED — marked 'soon' with no timeline or availability date","detection accuracy unknown — no information on false positive/negative rates","scope unclear — 'check mobile responsiveness' could mean viewport testing, image scaling, or layout reflow detection","no information on which accessibility standards are checked (WCAG 2.0, 2.1, 3.0?)","no information on typography rules (font pairing, size hierarchy, contrast?)","no information on how detections are surfaced (separate AI panel, inline annotations, separate report?)"],"requires":["feature availability (currently unavailable)","asset type compatibility unknown"],"input_types":["design asset (type compatibility unknown)"],"output_types":["error detection results (format unknown)","severity levels (unknown if provided)","remediation suggestions (unknown if provided)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_11","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.password.protected.site.support.with.browser.based.authentication","name":"password-protected site support with browser-based authentication","description":"Enables feedback collection on password-protected websites by supporting HTTP Basic Authentication and other browser-native authentication methods, allowing reviewers to access gated sites without exposing credentials in Workflow. Implementation likely uses browser-level credential handling or proxy-based authentication, though details are not documented.","intents":["collect feedback on staging environments and password-protected sites","maintain security by not storing or transmitting credentials through Workflow","enable feedback on pre-launch or private client sites"],"best_for":["teams managing staging environment feedback","agencies collecting feedback on pre-launch sites","clients wanting to review work before public launch"],"limitations":["authentication method support unknown — unclear if only HTTP Basic Auth or also OAuth, form-based login, etc.","credential handling mechanism unknown — unclear if credentials are stored, cached, or re-entered per session","no mention of multi-factor authentication support","no mention of session timeout or credential expiration"],"requires":["password-protected website with supported authentication method","free or paid subscription"],"input_types":["password-protected website URL","authentication credentials (method-dependent)"],"output_types":["authenticated access to protected site","feedback collection on protected content"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_12","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.numbered.comment.sequencing.for.reference.and.discussion","name":"numbered comment sequencing for reference and discussion","description":"Automatically assigns sequential numbers to comments as they are created, enabling designers and reviewers to reference specific feedback items in discussions (e.g., 'address comment #5 first'). Implementation uses auto-incrementing comment IDs with display formatting, reducing ambiguity when discussing feedback verbally or in chat. This is a core feature available on both free and paid tiers.","intents":["reference specific feedback items in conversations without copying comment text","create clear discussion threads around numbered feedback items","reduce ambiguity when multiple people are discussing feedback simultaneously"],"best_for":["teams discussing feedback in Slack, email, or video calls","remote teams needing clear reference points for feedback discussion","high-volume feedback scenarios where comment count is large"],"limitations":["numbering is sequential by creation time — no custom numbering or grouping","no mention of comment permalinks or deep linking to specific numbered comments","numbering is project-specific — unclear if numbers reset per version or are global"],"requires":["free or paid subscription","at least one comment on a project"],"input_types":["comment creation"],"output_types":["sequential comment number (e.g., #1, #2, #3)","comment reference for discussion"],"categories":["text-generation-language","collaboration-feedback"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.version.history.and.round.based.feedback.tracking","name":"version history and round-based feedback tracking","description":"Maintains a version history of design assets and organizes feedback into discrete rounds, allowing designers to track how feedback evolved across iterations and reviewers to see what changed between versions. The system stores snapshots of assets at each version point and associates comments with specific versions, enabling comparison of feedback across rounds. Implementation uses server-side version storage with version-indexed comment metadata, though version comparison UI (side-by-side diff view) is marked as 'coming soon' and not yet available.","intents":["track feedback across multiple design iterations without losing context from earlier rounds","understand which feedback was addressed in each version update","prevent duplicate feedback by showing reviewers what changed since their last review"],"best_for":["iterative design workflows with multiple feedback rounds","teams managing design revisions across weeks or months","clients who need to see their feedback impact on subsequent versions"],"limitations":["version comparison (side-by-side diff view) is not yet implemented — marked 'soon', so designers cannot visually compare versions in-tool","unclear how version snapshots are stored — impacts storage costs and retrieval speed","no mention of version rollback or revert functionality","no API for programmatic version management"],"requires":["paid tier subscription (Kanban board view and client portals are paid-only, version history availability on free tier unknown)","multiple asset uploads to create version history"],"input_types":["updated asset files (same format as original)","version metadata (optional description, date)"],"output_types":["version list with timestamps and asset snapshots","version-indexed comment collections","version comparison data (not yet available in UI)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.kanban.board.view.for.feedback.organization.and.prioritization","name":"kanban board view for feedback organization and prioritization","description":"Provides a paid-tier kanban board interface for organizing comments into customizable columns (e.g., 'To Review', 'In Progress', 'Done'), enabling designers to prioritize and track feedback action items. The system allows drag-and-drop movement of comments between columns and likely persists column state server-side. This is a paid-only feature, unavailable on the free tier, and implementation details (column customization, automation rules, filtering) are not documented.","intents":["visualize feedback workload and prioritize which issues to address first","track progress on addressing feedback across a project","communicate feedback status to clients via shared board view"],"best_for":["teams managing high-volume feedback across multiple projects","agencies tracking feedback status for client reporting","designers who prefer visual task management over comment lists"],"limitations":["paid-only feature — not available on free tier, forcing upgrade decision to use kanban","column customization options unknown — unclear if columns are predefined or user-configurable","no mention of automation rules (e.g., auto-move to 'Done' when comment is resolved)","no mention of filtering or sorting within kanban view","no integration with external project management tools (Monday.com, Asana, Jira)"],"requires":["paid subscription ($16/month or $12.80/month yearly)","at least one project with comments to populate board"],"input_types":["comment objects from feedback collection","drag-and-drop column assignments"],"output_types":["kanban board state (column assignments, card order)","visual feedback workload summary"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.client.portal.with.guided.onboarding.and.approval.workflows","name":"client portal with guided onboarding and approval workflows","description":"Provides a paid-tier branded client portal where non-technical clients can access projects, review feedback, and explicitly approve designs via an approval button without navigating the full Workflow interface. The system includes guided tours to onboard clients unfamiliar with design feedback tools, reducing explanation burden. Implementation likely uses role-based access control (client vs. designer views) and server-side approval state tracking, though portal customization options (branding, custom domains) are not documented.","intents":["give clients a simplified interface focused only on their project without exposing internal team features","create explicit approval checkpoints so designers know when clients have signed off on designs","reduce support burden by providing guided tours that explain how to use the feedback tool"],"best_for":["agencies managing multiple client projects with non-technical stakeholders","freelancers who want to appear more professional with branded client portals","teams needing explicit approval records for compliance or handoff documentation"],"limitations":["paid-only feature — not available on free tier","portal customization options unknown — unclear if designers can customize branding, colors, or domain","approval workflow is binary (approve/not approve) — no conditional approval or approval with notes","no mention of approval audit trail or timestamp records","no integration with contract management or payment systems"],"requires":["paid subscription ($16/month or $12.80/month yearly)","at least one project to share with clients"],"input_types":["project link shared with client","approval button click"],"output_types":["approval state (approved/pending)","approval timestamp","client portal view (simplified UI)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.comment.filtering.and.organization.by.page.and.screen.size","name":"comment filtering and organization by page and screen size","description":"Enables designers to filter and organize comments by page (for multi-page assets like websites or presentations) and screen size (for responsive design feedback), reducing cognitive load when reviewing large volumes of feedback. Implementation uses database queries to index comments by page metadata and viewport dimensions, allowing fast filtering without re-rendering the entire comment list. This is a core feature available on both free and paid tiers.","intents":["quickly find all feedback for a specific page in a multi-page design","isolate mobile-specific feedback from desktop feedback to address responsive issues separately","reduce context switching when addressing feedback for one screen size at a time"],"best_for":["web designers managing feedback across multiple pages or breakpoints","teams reviewing responsive designs with feedback from multiple device types","designers with high-volume feedback who need to batch-process by category"],"limitations":["filtering is limited to page and screen size — no filtering by commenter, date, or comment type","screen size detection mechanism unknown — unclear if it uses viewport dimensions, device type, or both","no saved filter presets — designers must re-apply filters each time","no bulk actions on filtered comments (e.g., mark all mobile feedback as 'done')"],"requires":["multi-page asset or responsive design with feedback from multiple screen sizes","free or paid subscription"],"input_types":["page identifier (URL path, slide number, etc.)","screen size/viewport dimensions"],"output_types":["filtered comment list","comment count by page/screen size"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.comment.pause.and.approval.state.management","name":"comment pause and approval state management","description":"Allows designers to pause new comments on a project (reviewers can view existing feedback but cannot add new comments) and explicitly mark designs as approved via an approval button, creating clear handoff checkpoints. Implementation uses server-side state flags (paused: boolean, approved: boolean) with permission checks on comment creation endpoints. Both features are available on free and paid tiers.","intents":["lock feedback collection when a design round is complete to prevent scope creep","create explicit approval records so designers know when clients have signed off","prevent accidental feedback after a design has been handed off to development"],"best_for":["teams with strict feedback collection windows","agencies needing approval records for client handoff","designers managing multiple concurrent projects who need to close feedback loops"],"limitations":["pause is all-or-nothing — no granular control (e.g., pause comments from specific reviewers)","approval is binary — no conditional approval or approval with conditions","no approval audit trail documented — unclear if approval timestamp and approver identity are recorded","no notification system for approval state changes"],"requires":["free or paid subscription","at least one project with comments"],"input_types":["pause toggle (true/false)","approval button click"],"output_types":["pause state (paused/active)","approval state (approved/pending)","approval timestamp (if recorded)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_7","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.figma.plugin.integration.for.design.native.feedback.collection","name":"figma plugin integration for design-native feedback collection","description":"Provides a Figma plugin (details unknown) that enables designers to collect feedback directly within Figma without leaving the design tool, likely syncing comments back to Workflow's central feedback hub. Implementation details are not documented — unclear if the plugin creates comments in Figma natively, opens Workflow in a sidebar, or uses an API bridge. This feature is mentioned but not detailed on the product website.","intents":["collect feedback on Figma designs without switching to external tool","keep design feedback in design tool context where designers already work","sync Figma feedback with other asset feedback in Workflow's central hub"],"best_for":["design teams using Figma as primary design tool","teams wanting to centralize feedback from Figma and other assets in one place","designers who prefer not to leave Figma during feedback collection"],"limitations":["plugin implementation unknown — unclear if it's a native Figma comment wrapper or separate integration","no documentation on how Figma comments sync with Workflow comments","unclear if plugin supports all Figma features (components, prototypes, design tokens)","no mention of two-way sync (Workflow comments back to Figma)","availability on free vs. paid tier unknown"],"requires":["Figma account and design file","Figma plugin installed (free or paid, unclear)","Workflow account"],"input_types":["Figma design file","comment data from Figma plugin"],"output_types":["comment objects in Workflow","synced feedback across Figma and other assets"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_8","uri":"capability://image.visual.chrome.extension.for.live.website.overlay.and.pixel.perfect.feedback","name":"chrome extension for live website overlay and pixel-perfect feedback","description":"Provides a Chrome extension ('Pixel Perfect' plugin) that overlays design mockups on live websites, enabling designers to compare implementation against design and collect feedback on pixel-perfect alignment. Implementation likely uses browser extension APIs to inject overlay layers and capture screenshots of the comparison state. This feature is mentioned but not detailed, and its relationship to the main Workflow feedback tool is unclear.","intents":["visually compare live website implementation against design mockups without manual screenshot comparison","identify pixel-perfect alignment issues between design and development","collect feedback on implementation fidelity without leaving the browser"],"best_for":["web designers reviewing development implementations","QA teams checking pixel-perfect alignment","design-to-development handoff workflows"],"limitations":["extension functionality unknown — unclear if it's a design overlay tool, screenshot comparison tool, or feedback collection tool","unclear how overlay data integrates with main Workflow feedback system","no mention of supported design file formats (Figma, Adobe XD, Sketch, etc.)","no mention of responsive design support (does overlay work across breakpoints?)","availability on free vs. paid tier unknown"],"requires":["Chrome browser","Chrome extension installed","live website URL","design mockup file (format unknown)"],"input_types":["live website URL","design mockup (format unknown)"],"output_types":["overlay comparison view","screenshot of comparison (possibly with feedback annotations)"],"categories":["image-visual","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_workflow__cap_9","uri":"capability://image.visual.multi.asset.media.support.with.unified.feedback.interface","name":"multi-asset media support with unified feedback interface","description":"Supports feedback collection across 30+ asset types (websites, Figma, images, videos, PDFs, presentations, newsletters, etc.) through a unified commenting interface, allowing teams to manage feedback for diverse creative assets in one tool. Implementation uses asset-type-agnostic comment storage with asset-specific rendering engines for each media type. This is a core feature available on both free and paid tiers.","intents":["manage feedback for all creative assets (not just designs) in one centralized location","reduce tool fragmentation by using one feedback tool for websites, images, videos, and documents","maintain consistent feedback workflows across different asset types"],"best_for":["creative teams working across multiple asset types (web, print, video, etc.)","agencies managing diverse client projects with different deliverable formats","teams wanting to consolidate feedback tools"],"limitations":["30+ supported asset types are not enumerated — unclear which formats are supported","single-page applications explicitly unsupported (React, Vue, Google Docs)","no mention of asset size limits (video resolution, image dimensions, PDF page count)","no mention of storage quotas or per-project limits","rendering quality and performance unknown for complex assets (high-res images, long videos)"],"requires":["free or paid subscription","asset file or URL"],"input_types":["website URLs (Squarespace, Webflow, Framer, WordPress, custom, v0, Lovable)","Figma design links","image files","video files","PDF documents","presentation files","newsletter files","30+ other unspecified formats"],"output_types":["unified comment objects with asset-type metadata","asset-specific rendering (website iframe, image canvas, video player, PDF viewer, etc.)"],"categories":["image-visual","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":39,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["modern web browser (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)","internet connection for asset upload and reviewer access","shareable URL or link generation capability on Workflow platform","modern web browser with MediaRecorder API support (Chrome 49+, Firefox 25+, Safari 14.1+)","microphone and/or camera access permissions","sufficient bandwidth for video upload","feature availability (currently unavailable)","asset type compatibility unknown","password-protected website with supported authentication method","free or paid subscription"],"failure_modes":["does not support single-page applications (React, Vue SPAs, Google Docs) — only static or server-rendered sites","screenshot capture is static snapshot only — does not preserve dynamic state like hover effects, animations, or scroll-dependent rendering","no support for password-protected sites beyond basic HTTP auth","video feedback file size limits unknown — no documentation on storage quotas or streaming approach","video file storage limits unknown — no documentation on maximum file size, duration, or total storage per project","unclear if video is streamed or downloaded — impacts bandwidth and playback latency","no mention of video transcription or AI-powered summary extraction","timestamp-specific comment indexing mechanism unknown — unclear how precisely comments map to video frames","NOT YET IMPLEMENTED — marked 'soon' with no timeline or availability date","detection accuracy unknown — no information on false positive/negative rates","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.2833333333333333,"quality":0.6799999999999999,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:34.117Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.562Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=workflow","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=workflow"}},"signature":"rb01D1wef8sfy/119n8wGRHdiP/IB7igruF8UbB/V6TV1IKJloWvig5gAec03dxD3WlgTM0wpPywaAPGpeBgBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T05:07:04.611Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/workflow","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/workflow","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=workflow","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}