{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_winn","slug":"winn","name":"Winn","type":"product","url":"https://winn.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/winn","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_winn__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.visual.workflow.builder.with.drag.and.drop.orchestration","name":"visual workflow builder with drag-and-drop orchestration","description":"Provides a graphical interface for constructing automation workflows without code, using a node-and-edge graph model where users connect action blocks (triggers, conditions, transformations, integrations) in sequence or parallel branches. The builder likely compiles visual workflows into an intermediate representation (DAG or similar) that executes against a runtime engine, abstracting away API complexity and authentication management for connected tools.","intents":["I want to build a multi-step automation connecting 3+ tools without writing code","I need to visualize the flow of data between systems before execution","I want to add conditional logic and branching to my automation without touching code"],"best_for":["non-technical team members and business analysts building automations","teams wanting to reduce onboarding time for automation creation","organizations prioritizing accessibility over advanced customization"],"limitations":["visual builders typically have lower expressiveness ceiling than code-based approaches — complex conditional logic or custom transformations may require workarounds","node-based interfaces can become cluttered with >15-20 steps, reducing readability","debugging visual workflows often requires execution logs rather than step-through debugging"],"requires":["web browser with modern JavaScript support","account with Winn platform","API credentials for third-party tools being integrated"],"input_types":["trigger events (webhooks, schedules, manual invocation)","data from connected integrations","user-defined parameters and variables"],"output_types":["workflow execution logs","data passed to downstream actions","side effects in connected systems (API calls, database updates)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_winn__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.tool.task.orchestration.and.batching","name":"multi-tool task orchestration and batching","description":"Executes sequences of actions across multiple integrated services with built-in support for batching operations (e.g., processing 100 records in parallel chunks), conditional branching based on previous step outputs, and error handling/retry logic. The runtime likely maintains execution context across steps, mapping outputs from one action as inputs to subsequent actions, with support for loops and aggregation patterns.","intents":["I want to process a batch of 500 records through 3 different APIs in parallel without hitting rate limits","I need to retry failed steps automatically with exponential backoff","I want to aggregate results from multiple API calls and pass them to a final consolidation step"],"best_for":["teams automating data pipelines across SaaS tools","organizations needing reliable batch processing without building custom infrastructure","workflows with 5+ sequential or parallel steps"],"limitations":["batching performance depends on third-party API rate limits — Winn cannot exceed the slowest service's throughput","no built-in distributed execution — all orchestration likely runs on Winn's infrastructure, creating a single point of failure for critical workflows","execution timeout limits (typically 5-30 minutes per workflow run) may not suit long-running data transformations"],"requires":["Winn account with workflow execution quota","API credentials and rate limit documentation for each integrated service","understanding of the target services' API response formats"],"input_types":["arrays or paginated datasets","trigger payloads with batch parameters","configuration for batch size and parallelism"],"output_types":["aggregated results from multiple API calls","execution summary with success/failure counts","error logs for failed batch items"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_winn__cap_10","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.workflow.performance.analytics.and.optimization.insights","name":"workflow performance analytics and optimization insights","description":"Analyzes workflow execution history to provide insights on performance (average execution time, success rate, bottlenecks), cost (API calls per run, estimated spend), and reliability (failure patterns, most common errors). May include recommendations for optimization (e.g., 'parallelize these steps to reduce execution time', 'batch these API calls to reduce cost'). Likely aggregates metrics across multiple workflow runs to identify trends.","intents":["I want to understand which steps in my workflow are slowest","I want to see how much this automation is costing me in API calls","I want to identify patterns in workflow failures to improve reliability"],"best_for":["teams running high-volume automations where cost/performance matters","organizations wanting to optimize automation ROI","teams with multiple workflows wanting to identify optimization opportunities"],"limitations":["analytics require sufficient execution history — new workflows may not have enough data for meaningful insights","cost estimation depends on accurate API pricing data — may not reflect actual spend if pricing has changed","optimization recommendations are likely generic — may not account for business constraints or specific requirements"],"requires":["Winn account with analytics enabled","sufficient workflow execution history (typically 10+ runs)"],"input_types":["workflow execution logs and metrics","API pricing configuration"],"output_types":["performance metrics (execution time, throughput, success rate)","cost analysis (API calls, estimated spend)","optimization recommendations","trend analysis over time"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_winn__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.native.team.collaboration.on.automation.workflows","name":"native team collaboration on automation workflows","description":"Enables multiple team members to view, edit, approve, and comment on automation workflows within a shared workspace, with version control and audit trails tracking who changed what and when. Likely implements role-based access control (RBAC) to restrict editing or execution permissions, and may include approval workflows where changes require sign-off before deployment.","intents":["I want my team to review and approve automations before they go live","I need to see who made changes to a workflow and when, for compliance reasons","I want to collaborate on building a workflow with a colleague in real-time or asynchronously"],"best_for":["teams of 3+ people managing automations across departments","organizations with compliance requirements (audit trails, approval workflows)","companies wanting to reduce knowledge silos around automation ownership"],"limitations":["real-time collaboration may have latency or conflict resolution issues if multiple users edit simultaneously","approval workflows add process overhead — simple automations may not justify the extra step","RBAC granularity unknown — may not support fine-grained permissions (e.g., 'can execute but not edit')"],"requires":["Winn workspace with multiple user seats","team members with active Winn accounts","defined roles and permissions structure"],"input_types":["workflow definitions","user comments and annotations","approval decisions"],"output_types":["audit logs with timestamps and user attribution","versioned workflow snapshots","approval status and history"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_winn__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.third.party.integration.marketplace.with.authentication.abstraction","name":"third-party integration marketplace with authentication abstraction","description":"Provides pre-built connectors to external SaaS platforms (e.g., Salesforce, Slack, Google Sheets, Stripe) with built-in OAuth/API key management, eliminating the need for users to manually handle authentication. Each connector likely exposes a standardized interface (action/trigger definitions) that maps to the underlying service's API, with Winn handling credential storage, token refresh, and rate limit management.","intents":["I want to connect to Salesforce without managing OAuth tokens manually","I need to trigger a workflow when a new Slack message arrives in a specific channel","I want to write data to Google Sheets as part of my automation without hardcoding API calls"],"best_for":["teams using popular SaaS tools (Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Stripe, etc.)","organizations wanting to avoid custom API integration code","non-technical users needing to connect systems without API knowledge"],"limitations":["marketplace is reportedly smaller than Zapier (5,000+ apps) or Make (1,000+ apps) — niche or newer tools may not have connectors","connector feature parity with native APIs unknown — some integrations may not expose all available API endpoints","custom integrations likely require manual API setup or custom code, negating the no-code advantage"],"requires":["Winn account","active account with the target SaaS platform","appropriate API permissions/scopes for the integration"],"input_types":["OAuth authorization flows","API credentials (keys, tokens)","trigger/action configuration parameters"],"output_types":["authenticated API calls to third-party services","data returned from integrated services","webhook payloads from triggers"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_winn__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.workflow.execution.monitoring.and.logging","name":"workflow execution monitoring and logging","description":"Tracks execution history of all workflow runs with detailed logs showing input/output at each step, execution duration, error messages, and retry attempts. Provides a dashboard or log viewer where users can inspect failed runs, understand why a step failed, and manually retry or debug. Likely includes alerting for failed executions (email, Slack, webhook) and metrics on workflow reliability.","intents":["I want to see why a workflow failed and which step caused the error","I need to get alerted immediately if a critical automation stops working","I want to track how long each step takes to identify performance bottlenecks"],"best_for":["teams running mission-critical automations that require visibility","organizations needing to troubleshoot failures quickly","teams wanting to optimize workflow performance over time"],"limitations":["log retention period unknown — logs may be purged after 30-90 days, limiting historical analysis","no built-in log aggregation with external systems (e.g., Datadog, Splunk) — requires manual export or webhook integration","debugging is reactive (viewing logs after failure) rather than proactive (step-through debugging)"],"requires":["Winn account with execution history enabled","configured alerting channels (email, Slack, webhook) for notifications"],"input_types":["workflow execution events","step input/output data","error messages and stack traces"],"output_types":["execution logs with timestamps","error summaries and root cause indicators","performance metrics (duration, throughput)","alert notifications"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_winn__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.scheduled.and.event.triggered.workflow.execution","name":"scheduled and event-triggered workflow execution","description":"Supports multiple trigger types for initiating workflows: time-based schedules (cron-like expressions for recurring runs), event-based triggers (webhooks, API calls, third-party service events like 'new Slack message'), and manual invocation. The runtime likely maintains a scheduler service that evaluates cron expressions and fires triggers at specified times, and a webhook receiver that listens for incoming events and queues workflow executions.","intents":["I want to run a daily report generation workflow at 9 AM every weekday","I want to trigger a workflow whenever a new lead is added to Salesforce","I want to manually kick off a workflow from a button in Slack"],"best_for":["teams automating recurring tasks (daily reports, weekly syncs)","event-driven workflows responding to system changes","organizations wanting to reduce manual task initiation"],"limitations":["schedule precision typically limited to minute-level granularity — sub-minute scheduling not supported","webhook triggers may have latency (seconds to minutes) depending on Winn's infrastructure load","timezone handling for scheduled workflows may be complex if team spans multiple regions"],"requires":["Winn account with scheduler enabled","for webhooks: ability to configure webhook URLs in third-party services","for schedules: understanding of cron syntax or UI-based schedule builder"],"input_types":["cron expressions or schedule definitions","webhook payloads from external services","manual trigger parameters"],"output_types":["scheduled workflow executions at specified times","event-driven workflow invocations with payload data","execution confirmation/status"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_winn__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.conditional.logic.and.branching.with.data.mapping","name":"conditional logic and branching with data mapping","description":"Allows workflows to branch based on conditions evaluated against step outputs (e.g., 'if status == completed, send email; else, log error'). Supports data mapping/transformation between steps, where users can extract fields from API responses and pass them to subsequent actions. Likely uses a simple expression language or visual condition builder to evaluate conditions without requiring code.","intents":["I want to send different notifications based on the result of an API call","I need to extract a specific field from a JSON response and use it in the next step","I want to skip certain steps if a condition isn't met"],"best_for":["workflows with decision logic (if/else branching)","teams needing to transform or filter data between steps","non-technical users building conditional automations without code"],"limitations":["visual condition builders often struggle with complex boolean logic (nested AND/OR conditions) — may require code for advanced use cases","data mapping is typically limited to simple field extraction — complex transformations (aggregations, calculations) may not be supported","no built-in support for regex or advanced string manipulation in data mapping"],"requires":["understanding of the data structure being evaluated (JSON schema, field names)","Winn workflow with multiple steps to branch between"],"input_types":["step output data (JSON, structured records)","condition expressions (visual or text-based)","field mapping definitions"],"output_types":["branched workflow paths based on condition evaluation","transformed/mapped data passed to downstream steps","execution logs showing which branch was taken"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_winn__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.workflow.versioning.and.rollback","name":"workflow versioning and rollback","description":"Maintains version history of workflow definitions, allowing users to view previous versions, compare changes between versions, and rollback to a prior version if needed. Likely stores each version as a snapshot of the workflow DAG and configuration, with metadata tracking who made changes and when. Rollback likely creates a new version rather than destructively overwriting history.","intents":["I accidentally broke a workflow and need to revert to the last known good version","I want to see what changed in a workflow between yesterday and today","I need to compare two versions of a workflow to understand the differences"],"best_for":["teams iterating on automations and needing safety nets","organizations with change management requirements","workflows that are frequently updated and need audit trails"],"limitations":["version history may have retention limits (e.g., keep last 30 versions) — very old versions may be purged","rollback is typically a manual operation — no automatic rollback on failure","version comparison UI may be limited to text diffs rather than visual workflow diffs"],"requires":["Winn account with versioning enabled","workflow with multiple versions in history"],"input_types":["workflow definition changes","user actions (save, update, delete)"],"output_types":["version history list with timestamps and authors","version comparison (diff view)","rollback confirmation and new version creation"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_winn__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.error.handling.and.retry.policies","name":"error handling and retry policies","description":"Provides configurable error handling strategies for individual steps or entire workflows, including automatic retries with exponential backoff, fallback actions (e.g., 'if this API fails, try this alternative'), and error notifications. Users can define retry limits, backoff intervals, and conditions for when to retry (e.g., only retry on timeout, not on 403 Forbidden). Likely implements circuit breaker patterns to prevent cascading failures.","intents":["I want a failed API call to retry automatically up to 3 times with increasing delays","I want to be notified if a step fails after all retries are exhausted","I want to define different error handling for different steps (retry some, skip others)"],"best_for":["workflows integrating with unreliable or rate-limited APIs","mission-critical automations requiring high reliability","teams wanting to reduce manual intervention for transient failures"],"limitations":["retry policies are typically step-level, not workflow-level — complex error recovery scenarios may require custom logic","exponential backoff can significantly increase workflow execution time for flaky APIs","no built-in support for circuit breakers or bulkhead patterns — cascading failures may still occur"],"requires":["Winn workflow with error-prone steps","understanding of which errors are transient (safe to retry) vs permanent"],"input_types":["error types (timeout, rate limit, server error, etc.)","retry policy configuration (max attempts, backoff interval)","fallback action definitions"],"output_types":["automatic retries with exponential backoff","fallback action execution on failure","error notifications and logs"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_winn__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.workflow.templates.and.reusable.components","name":"workflow templates and reusable components","description":"Provides pre-built workflow templates for common automation patterns (e.g., 'sync Salesforce to Google Sheets', 'send Slack notifications on new leads') that users can instantiate and customize. May also support reusable sub-workflows or components that can be embedded in multiple workflows, reducing duplication and improving maintainability. Templates likely include pre-configured integrations and logic that users can modify.","intents":["I want to quickly set up a common automation without building from scratch","I want to create a reusable workflow component that multiple teams can use","I want to standardize how my team builds certain types of automations"],"best_for":["teams building similar automations repeatedly","organizations wanting to standardize automation patterns","non-technical users wanting to start with a working example"],"limitations":["template library is likely limited compared to Zapier's thousands of pre-built zaps","templates may not cover niche use cases — custom workflows still required for unique scenarios","reusable components may have limited parameterization — complex customization may require editing the component itself"],"requires":["Winn account","access to template library","for custom components: ability to create and share workflows"],"input_types":["template selection and customization parameters","component definitions and parameters"],"output_types":["instantiated workflow from template","reusable component available for embedding in other workflows"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":40,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["web browser with modern JavaScript support","account with Winn platform","API credentials for third-party tools being integrated","Winn account with workflow execution quota","API credentials and rate limit documentation for each integrated service","understanding of the target services' API response formats","Winn account with analytics enabled","sufficient workflow execution history (typically 10+ runs)","Winn workspace with multiple user seats","team members with active Winn accounts"],"failure_modes":["visual builders typically have lower expressiveness ceiling than code-based approaches — complex conditional logic or custom transformations may require workarounds","node-based interfaces can become cluttered with >15-20 steps, reducing readability","debugging visual workflows often requires execution logs rather than step-through debugging","batching performance depends on third-party API rate limits — Winn cannot exceed the slowest service's throughput","no built-in distributed execution — all orchestration likely runs on Winn's infrastructure, creating a single point of failure for critical workflows","execution timeout limits (typically 5-30 minutes per workflow run) may not suit long-running data transformations","analytics require sufficient execution history — new workflows may not have enough data for meaningful insights","cost estimation depends on accurate API pricing data — may not reflect actual spend if pricing has changed","optimization recommendations are likely generic — may not account for business constraints or specific requirements","real-time collaboration may have latency or conflict resolution issues if multiple users edit simultaneously","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.72,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:34.117Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.553Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=winn","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=winn"}},"signature":"efH4IoLooayufBjV4dXyuLd30Z86Pvxt1ZGXeWD3J2JTr//DlMdBvCkzLoaDK5BJomOsg76DzGY81Ke1qpqBDQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T18:45:51.102Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/winn","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/winn","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=winn","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}