{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-vitest-llm-reporter","slug":"vitest-llm-reporter","name":"vitest-llm-reporter","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/hansjm10/vitest-llm-reporter#readme","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/vitest-llm-reporter","categories":["testing-quality"],"tags":["vitest","reporter","llm","ai","testing","structured-output"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-vitest-llm-reporter__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.structured.test.result.serialization.for.llm.consumption","name":"structured test result serialization for llm consumption","description":"Transforms Vitest's native test execution output into a machine-readable JSON or text format optimized for LLM parsing, eliminating verbose formatting and ANSI color codes that confuse language models. The reporter intercepts Vitest's test lifecycle hooks (onTestEnd, onFinish) and serializes results with consistent field ordering, normalized error messages, and hierarchical test suite structure to enable reliable downstream LLM analysis without preprocessing.","intents":["I want to feed test results directly into an LLM for automated failure analysis without manual parsing","I need test output that an AI agent can reliably parse to generate fix suggestions or root cause analysis","I want to eliminate noise from standard test reporters so LLMs focus on semantic test data"],"best_for":["AI-assisted debugging workflows where LLMs analyze test failures","autonomous test repair agents that need structured input","teams building LLM-powered CI/CD pipelines for test triage"],"limitations":["Does not capture real-time test execution progress — only final results after all tests complete","No support for custom test metadata beyond Vitest's native fields (duration, error, status)","Output size scales linearly with test count; large test suites (1000+ tests) may exceed LLM context windows"],"requires":["Vitest 0.30.0 or higher","Node.js 14.0+","Test suite using Vitest as test runner"],"input_types":["Vitest test execution events","test metadata (name, file path, duration, error stack)"],"output_types":["JSON (structured test results)","plain text (human-readable summary)","custom format via reporter configuration"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-vitest-llm-reporter__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.hierarchical.test.suite.structure.mapping","name":"hierarchical test suite structure mapping","description":"Organizes test results into a nested tree structure that mirrors the test file hierarchy and describe-block nesting, enabling LLMs to understand test organization and scope relationships. The reporter builds this hierarchy by tracking describe-block entry/exit events and associating individual test results with their parent suite context, preserving semantic relationships that flat test lists would lose.","intents":["I want an LLM to understand which tests belong to which feature or module","I need to query test results by suite hierarchy to analyze failure patterns across related tests","I want to generate targeted fix suggestions that account for test organization and shared setup"],"best_for":["large test suites with deep nesting (3+ levels of describe blocks)","LLM agents that need to understand test scope and dependencies","teams analyzing test failure patterns by feature or module"],"limitations":["Hierarchy depth is limited by Vitest's describe-block nesting; deeply nested suites (10+ levels) may produce verbose output","Does not capture dynamic test generation or parameterized test relationships","Sibling test ordering within a suite is preserved but not explicitly indexed"],"requires":["Vitest 0.30.0+","test files using describe() blocks for organization"],"input_types":["Vitest describe-block lifecycle events","test result objects with file path and suite context"],"output_types":["nested JSON object with suite/test hierarchy","indented text representation of test tree"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-vitest-llm-reporter__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.error.stack.trace.normalization.and.extraction","name":"error stack trace normalization and extraction","description":"Parses and normalizes test failure stack traces into a structured format that removes framework noise, extracts file paths and line numbers, and presents error messages in a form LLMs can reliably parse. The reporter processes raw error objects from Vitest, strips internal framework frames, identifies the first user-code frame, and formats the stack in a consistent structure with separated message, file, line, and code context fields.","intents":["I want an LLM to extract the actual error location and cause without parsing verbose stack traces","I need to generate fix suggestions that reference exact file locations and line numbers","I want to filter out framework noise so LLMs focus on user code"],"best_for":["LLM-powered test failure diagnosis and fix generation","automated root cause analysis of test failures","CI/CD pipelines that feed test errors to AI agents"],"limitations":["Source maps are not automatically resolved; transpiled code stack traces may reference generated code, not source","Async stack traces may be truncated or incomplete depending on Node.js version and async context preservation","Custom error types with non-standard stack formats may not parse correctly"],"requires":["Vitest 0.30.0+","Node.js 14.0+ (for Error.captureStackTrace support)"],"input_types":["Error objects from failed test assertions","stack trace strings from Vitest"],"output_types":["structured error object with message, file, line, column, code context","normalized stack trace array with frame objects"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-vitest-llm-reporter__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.test.duration.and.performance.metrics.collection","name":"test duration and performance metrics collection","description":"Captures and aggregates test execution timing data (per-test duration, suite duration, total runtime) and formats it for LLM analysis of performance patterns. The reporter hooks into Vitest's timing events, calculates duration deltas, and includes timing data in the output structure, enabling LLMs to identify slow tests, performance regressions, or timing-related flakiness.","intents":["I want an LLM to identify which tests are slow and suggest optimization strategies","I need to detect performance regressions by comparing test durations across runs","I want to analyze test execution patterns to optimize CI/CD pipeline parallelization"],"best_for":["performance-aware test analysis and optimization","LLM agents that need to reason about test speed and efficiency","CI/CD systems analyzing test suite performance trends"],"limitations":["Timing precision is limited to millisecond resolution; sub-millisecond variations are not captured","Does not account for system load or resource contention; timing data is relative to execution environment","Parallel test execution timing may be misleading if tests run concurrently"],"requires":["Vitest 0.30.0+","high-resolution timer support (available in Node.js 14+)"],"input_types":["Vitest test lifecycle events with timestamps","test execution start/end events"],"output_types":["duration field in milliseconds per test","aggregate timing statistics (min, max, mean, total)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-vitest-llm-reporter__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.configurable.output.format.and.verbosity.control","name":"configurable output format and verbosity control","description":"Provides configuration options to customize the reporter's output format (JSON, text, custom), verbosity level (minimal, standard, verbose), and field inclusion, allowing users to optimize output for specific LLM contexts or token budgets. The reporter uses a configuration object to control which fields are included, how deeply nested structures are serialized, and whether to include optional metadata like file paths or error context.","intents":["I want to minimize token usage by stripping unnecessary fields from test output","I need to customize output format to match my LLM's expected input schema","I want to control verbosity to fit test results within LLM context windows"],"best_for":["teams with strict LLM token budgets or context window constraints","custom LLM pipelines with specific output format requirements","developers optimizing reporter output for different LLM models"],"limitations":["Configuration options are static per test run; cannot dynamically adjust verbosity during execution","Custom format templates require manual schema definition; no built-in format presets beyond JSON/text","Reducing verbosity may lose information needed for comprehensive failure analysis"],"requires":["Vitest 0.30.0+","configuration file or inline reporter options"],"input_types":["reporter configuration object","verbosity level setting","field inclusion/exclusion list"],"output_types":["JSON (configurable schema)","plain text (configurable format)","custom format (user-defined template)"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-vitest-llm-reporter__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.test.status.classification.and.filtering","name":"test status classification and filtering","description":"Categorizes test results into discrete status classes (passed, failed, skipped, todo) and enables filtering or highlighting of specific status categories in output. The reporter maps Vitest's test state to standardized status values and optionally filters output to include only relevant statuses, reducing noise for LLM analysis of specific failure types.","intents":["I want to focus LLM analysis on only failed tests, ignoring passing tests","I need to distinguish between skipped tests and actual failures for triage","I want to identify todo/pending tests that may need attention"],"best_for":["failure-focused LLM analysis and fix generation","test triage workflows that prioritize by status","CI/CD systems that need to distinguish failure types"],"limitations":["Status filtering is applied at output time; does not affect test execution","Does not capture intermediate test states (e.g., tests that passed after retry)","Custom test status values (beyond Vitest's standard set) are not supported"],"requires":["Vitest 0.30.0+","test status information from Vitest"],"input_types":["Vitest test state (passed, failed, skipped, todo)","status filter configuration"],"output_types":["filtered test results by status","status summary counts"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-vitest-llm-reporter__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.file.path.and.source.location.mapping","name":"file path and source location mapping","description":"Extracts and normalizes file paths and source locations for each test, enabling LLMs to reference exact test file locations and line numbers. The reporter captures file paths from Vitest's test metadata, normalizes paths (absolute to relative), and includes line number information for each test, allowing LLMs to generate file-specific fix suggestions or navigate to test definitions.","intents":["I want an LLM to generate fix suggestions that reference exact file paths and line numbers","I need to map test failures back to source code for automated remediation","I want to enable IDE integration that jumps to failing tests"],"best_for":["LLM-powered code generation and fix suggestions","IDE integration and navigation features","automated test repair and remediation workflows"],"limitations":["Line numbers are relative to test file, not to describe-block or test definition within file","Absolute paths are normalized to relative paths; path normalization may differ across operating systems","Does not capture source map information for transpiled code"],"requires":["Vitest 0.30.0+","test files with accessible file system paths"],"input_types":["Vitest test file metadata","test definition location information"],"output_types":["file path (relative or absolute)","line number and column information","source location object with file, line, column"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-vitest-llm-reporter__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.test.assertion.message.extraction.and.formatting","name":"test assertion message extraction and formatting","description":"Parses and extracts assertion messages from failed tests, normalizing them into a structured format that LLMs can reliably interpret. The reporter processes assertion error messages, separates expected vs actual values, and formats them consistently to enable LLMs to understand assertion failures without parsing verbose assertion library output.","intents":["I want an LLM to understand what assertion failed and why without parsing assertion library syntax","I need to extract expected vs actual values for automated fix generation","I want to normalize assertion messages across different assertion libraries"],"best_for":["LLM-powered test failure diagnosis and fix generation","automated assertion repair and test rewriting","assertion-focused failure analysis"],"limitations":["Assertion message parsing is heuristic-based; complex or custom assertion messages may not parse correctly","Does not support all assertion libraries; primarily optimized for Vitest's built-in assertions","Expected vs actual extraction may fail for non-standard assertion formats"],"requires":["Vitest 0.30.0+","test assertions using Vitest's assertion API"],"input_types":["assertion error messages from failed tests","error stack traces with assertion context"],"output_types":["structured assertion object with message, expected, actual","normalized assertion message string"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":29,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Vitest 0.30.0 or higher","Node.js 14.0+","Test suite using Vitest as test runner","Vitest 0.30.0+","test files using describe() blocks for organization","Node.js 14.0+ (for Error.captureStackTrace support)","high-resolution timer support (available in Node.js 14+)","configuration file or inline reporter options","test status information from Vitest","test files with accessible file system paths"],"failure_modes":["Does not capture real-time test execution progress — only final results after all tests complete","No support for custom test metadata beyond Vitest's native fields (duration, error, status)","Output size scales linearly with test count; large test suites (1000+ tests) may exceed LLM context windows","Hierarchy depth is limited by Vitest's describe-block nesting; deeply nested suites (10+ levels) may produce verbose output","Does not capture dynamic test generation or parameterized test relationships","Sibling test ordering within a suite is preserved but not explicitly indexed","Source maps are not automatically resolved; transpiled code stack traces may reference generated code, not source","Async stack traces may be truncated or incomplete depending on Node.js version and async context preservation","Custom error types with non-standard stack formats may not parse correctly","Timing precision is limited to millisecond resolution; sub-millisecond variations are not captured","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.1366982975977851,"quality":0.26,"ecosystem":0.5800000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-22T08:08:13.652Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":1164,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=vitest-llm-reporter","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=vitest-llm-reporter"}},"signature":"vRieEiUwxNXSdvdmKIA0vkk8ZlOKh21EpxcXeSARauRXKpUFK2qwLEgVXIpAU+3DyGxxAIfU2ubIw3fFUVGxBg==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T19:46:20.970Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/vitest-llm-reporter","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/vitest-llm-reporter","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=vitest-llm-reporter","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}