{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-user-feedback","slug":"user-feedback","name":"User Feedback","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/mrexodia/user-feedback-mcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/user-feedback","categories":["mcp-servers","app-builders","automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-user-feedback__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.human.in.the.loop.feedback.collection.via.mcp.protocol","name":"human-in-the-loop feedback collection via mcp protocol","description":"Implements a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes a standardized interface for AI agents (Cline, Cursor) to pause execution and request human feedback before proceeding. The server acts as a bridge between the agent's decision-making loop and the human operator, using MCP's tool-calling mechanism to invoke feedback requests that block agent execution until a human response is received.","intents":["I want my AI agent to ask me for approval before executing risky operations like file deletions or API calls","I need to inject human judgment into autonomous agent workflows at critical decision points","I want to review and validate agent reasoning before it takes irreversible actions"],"best_for":["developers building autonomous agents in Cline or Cursor who need safety guardrails","teams implementing human-in-the-loop AI workflows where agent autonomy must be bounded","solo developers prototyping AI agents who want interactive debugging and validation"],"limitations":["Blocks agent execution synchronously — no timeout mechanism means hung agents if human never responds","No built-in persistence of feedback history or audit trail across sessions","Single-threaded feedback collection — cannot handle concurrent feedback requests from multiple agent instances","Requires manual integration into agent prompt/system design — no automatic detection of decision points"],"requires":["MCP-compatible client (Cline, Cursor, or custom MCP client)","Node.js 16+ (typical for MCP servers)","Network connectivity between agent and MCP server (local or remote)"],"input_types":["text (feedback prompt/question from agent)","structured data (optional context or options for human to choose from)"],"output_types":["text (human response/approval)","structured data (human decision with metadata)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-user-feedback__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.blocking.feedback.request.with.agent.execution.pause","name":"blocking feedback request with agent execution pause","description":"Exposes a tool that agents can invoke to request human feedback, which synchronously blocks the agent's execution loop until the human provides a response. The MCP server queues the feedback request, displays it to the human operator (via stdout, IDE UI, or connected interface), waits for input, and returns the human's decision back to the agent to resume execution.","intents":["I want to pause my agent mid-execution and ask the human operator a yes/no question before proceeding","I need to show the human operator the current state and get approval to continue","I want to implement a confirmation step for high-risk operations like code deletion or API calls"],"best_for":["developers implementing safety checkpoints in autonomous code agents","teams building interactive AI workflows where human oversight is mandatory at certain steps","prototyping scenarios where agent behavior needs real-time human validation"],"limitations":["Synchronous blocking design means agent cannot perform other work while waiting for feedback","No timeout or fallback mechanism — if human never responds, agent hangs indefinitely","Feedback interface depends on client implementation — may not have rich UI in all MCP clients","No built-in support for multi-option feedback (only binary approval/rejection implied)"],"requires":["MCP client with tool-calling support (Cline, Cursor)","Human operator actively monitoring the agent (cannot be fully automated)","Bidirectional communication channel between MCP server and human interface"],"input_types":["text (feedback question/prompt from agent)"],"output_types":["text (human response: approval, rejection, or custom instruction)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-user-feedback__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.tool.registration.and.schema.exposure","name":"mcp tool registration and schema exposure","description":"Registers feedback-related tools with the MCP protocol's tool registry, exposing their schemas (name, description, parameters) to the connected client so the agent can discover and invoke them. The server implements MCP's tool-definition interface, allowing clients like Cline to understand what feedback tools are available and how to call them with proper parameter validation.","intents":["I want my agent to discover what feedback tools are available without hardcoding tool names","I need the MCP client to validate feedback request parameters before sending them to the server","I want to document feedback tool capabilities in a machine-readable format that clients can parse"],"best_for":["MCP server developers implementing custom tools for agents","teams building extensible agent frameworks where tool discovery is dynamic","developers integrating multiple MCP servers and needing tool introspection"],"limitations":["Tool schemas are static at server startup — cannot dynamically add/remove tools at runtime","Schema validation is client-side — server has no guarantee client validated parameters correctly","No versioning mechanism for tool schemas — breaking changes require server restart"],"requires":["MCP protocol compliance (v1.0+)","Client support for tool-definition introspection","Proper JSON schema definition for tool parameters"],"input_types":["JSON (tool schema definitions)"],"output_types":["JSON (tool registry with schemas)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-user-feedback__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.agent.to.human.communication.bridge.via.mcp","name":"agent-to-human communication bridge via mcp","description":"Acts as a communication intermediary between the AI agent and the human operator, translating agent feedback requests into human-readable prompts and returning human responses back to the agent in a format the agent can process. The server manages the bidirectional message flow, ensuring context is preserved and responses are properly formatted for agent consumption.","intents":["I want the agent to communicate with me in natural language about its decisions and ask for guidance","I need to send instructions back to the agent based on my feedback without re-running the entire workflow","I want to see what the agent is thinking and why it's asking for approval"],"best_for":["developers building interactive AI workflows where agent reasoning must be transparent","teams implementing collaborative human-AI coding sessions","solo developers debugging agent behavior by seeing its decision points in real-time"],"limitations":["No built-in context management — agent must include full context in each feedback request","Message format is unstructured text — no schema for standardizing feedback questions across different agents","No conversation history — each feedback request is isolated, no multi-turn dialogue support","Latency depends on human response time — cannot optimize for speed"],"requires":["MCP client with message-passing support","Human operator available to read and respond to prompts","Clear communication protocol between agent and server (agent must format requests properly)"],"input_types":["text (agent feedback request)"],"output_types":["text (human response)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-user-feedback__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.integration.with.cline.and.cursor.agent.environments","name":"integration with cline and cursor agent environments","description":"Provides native integration with Cline and Cursor's agent execution environments by implementing the MCP protocol that these tools natively support. The server can be registered as an MCP server in these IDEs' configuration, allowing agents running in Cline/Cursor to automatically discover and invoke feedback tools without custom client code.","intents":["I want to add human-in-the-loop feedback to my Cline agent without modifying the agent code","I need Cursor to ask me for approval before executing risky operations","I want to use the same feedback mechanism across multiple AI code editors"],"best_for":["Cline and Cursor users who want to add safety checkpoints to agent workflows","developers building agent-based coding assistants in popular IDEs","teams standardizing on MCP-based tool ecosystems for AI agents"],"limitations":["Only works with MCP-compatible clients (Cline, Cursor, custom MCP clients) — not compatible with other agent frameworks","Requires manual configuration in IDE settings to register the MCP server","No built-in UI in Cline/Cursor for rich feedback interfaces — limited to text-based prompts","Depends on Cline/Cursor's MCP implementation — breaking changes in their MCP support could break integration"],"requires":["Cline 0.x+ or Cursor with MCP support","MCP server running and accessible (local or remote)","IDE configuration to register the MCP server endpoint"],"input_types":["text (feedback request from Cline/Cursor agent)"],"output_types":["text (human response)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":27,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"moderate","permissions":["MCP-compatible client (Cline, Cursor, or custom MCP client)","Node.js 16+ (typical for MCP servers)","Network connectivity between agent and MCP server (local or remote)","MCP client with tool-calling support (Cline, Cursor)","Human operator actively monitoring the agent (cannot be fully automated)","Bidirectional communication channel between MCP server and human interface","MCP protocol compliance (v1.0+)","Client support for tool-definition introspection","Proper JSON schema definition for tool parameters","MCP client with message-passing support"],"failure_modes":["Blocks agent execution synchronously — no timeout mechanism means hung agents if human never responds","No built-in persistence of feedback history or audit trail across sessions","Single-threaded feedback collection — cannot handle concurrent feedback requests from multiple agent instances","Requires manual integration into agent prompt/system design — no automatic detection of decision points","Synchronous blocking design means agent cannot perform other work while waiting for feedback","No timeout or fallback mechanism — if human never responds, agent hangs indefinitely","Feedback interface depends on client implementation — may not have rich UI in all MCP clients","No built-in support for multi-option feedback (only binary approval/rejection implied)","Tool schemas are static at server startup — cannot dynamically add/remove tools at runtime","Schema validation is client-side — server has no guarantee client validated parameters correctly","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.6,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:04.050Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:15.503Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=user-feedback","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=user-feedback"}},"signature":"sINqPNd4M3OI56slielrRTElYkbVYwyCYtIlvknHGM1mM6zJMOVoQCbqswWlprtvN2PdhYXqMDUEWAkBpK8SDQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T20:01:58.646Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/user-feedback","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/user-feedback","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=user-feedback","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}