{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_troj-ai","slug":"troj-ai","name":"Troj.ai","type":"product","url":"https://www.troj.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/troj-ai","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_troj-ai__cap_0","uri":"capability://security.real.time.model.threat.detection","name":"real-time model threat detection","description":"Monitors deployed ML models for active security threats including prompt injection attacks, model poisoning attempts, and adversarial inputs. Provides continuous scanning of model inputs and behaviors to identify malicious patterns in real-time.","intents":["I need to detect when someone is trying to manipulate my AI model through prompt injection","I want to know immediately if my model is being attacked or poisoned with malicious data","I need to identify adversarial inputs targeting my production models before they cause damage"],"best_for":["Enterprise ML teams with models in production","Organizations handling sensitive data where model compromise is high-risk","Companies deploying LLMs or foundation models at scale"],"limitations":["Requires integration with existing model infrastructure","Effectiveness depends on threat signature database and detection algorithms","May have latency overhead on model inference"],"requires":["Deployed ML model or LLM in production environment","API access or integration capability with model serving infrastructure","Baseline understanding of expected model behavior"],"input_types":["model inputs/prompts","request metadata","model inference logs"],"output_types":["threat alerts","risk scores","attack classification"],"categories":["security","ai-safety"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_troj-ai__cap_1","uri":"capability://security.prompt.injection.attack.prevention","name":"prompt injection attack prevention","description":"Detects and blocks prompt injection attempts that try to override model instructions or extract sensitive information. Analyzes incoming prompts for malicious patterns and injection techniques before they reach the model.","intents":["I want to prevent attackers from jailbreaking my LLM through prompt injection","I need to stop users from extracting system prompts or training data through manipulation","I want to ensure my model follows its intended instructions despite adversarial inputs"],"best_for":["Organizations deploying customer-facing LLM applications","Companies with proprietary system prompts or instructions","Teams concerned about data extraction through prompt manipulation"],"limitations":["May produce false positives blocking legitimate complex queries","Sophisticated injection techniques may evade detection","Requires continuous updates as new attack patterns emerge"],"requires":["LLM or conversational AI model in production","Integration point before prompts reach the model","Defined system instructions or guardrails to protect"],"input_types":["user prompts","conversation history","system instructions"],"output_types":["injection risk assessment","blocked/flagged prompts","sanitized prompts"],"categories":["security","ai-safety"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_troj-ai__cap_10","uri":"capability://security.model.access.control.enforcement","name":"model access control enforcement","description":"Enforces fine-grained access controls on model deployments, restricting who can access, modify, or query models. Logs all access attempts for audit purposes.","intents":["I want to control who can access my proprietary AI models","I need to prevent unauthorized modifications to my models","I want to track who is using my models and when"],"best_for":["Organizations with proprietary or sensitive models","Teams managing multiple models with different access levels","Enterprises with strict data governance requirements"],"limitations":["May add latency to model access","Requires integration with identity management systems","Complex access policies can be difficult to manage"],"requires":["Identity and access management system","Model serving infrastructure","Access policy definitions","Logging and audit infrastructure"],"input_types":["user identity","access requests","access policies"],"output_types":["access grants/denials","access logs","audit trails"],"categories":["security","access-control"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_troj-ai__cap_11","uri":"capability://security.security.incident.reporting","name":"security incident reporting","description":"Generates detailed incident reports documenting threats detected, actions taken, and impact assessment. Provides executive summaries and technical details for different stakeholders.","intents":["I need to report security incidents to my leadership team","I want to document incidents for post-incident analysis","I need to communicate security status to stakeholders"],"best_for":["Security teams and incident response coordinators","Executive leadership and board members","Organizations with formal incident management processes"],"limitations":["Report quality depends on underlying threat detection","May require manual investigation for complex incidents","Reporting formats may need customization"],"requires":["Threat detection and incident data","Report template definitions","Incident classification system"],"input_types":["threat alerts","incident logs","response actions","impact assessments"],"output_types":["incident reports","executive summaries","technical analysis documents"],"categories":["security","reporting"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_troj-ai__cap_2","uri":"capability://security.model.poisoning.detection","name":"model poisoning detection","description":"Identifies attempts to corrupt model training data or inject malicious data into model retraining pipelines. Monitors data quality and detects anomalies that indicate poisoning attacks before they degrade model performance.","intents":["I need to detect when someone is trying to corrupt my training data","I want to catch malicious data injection before it affects model performance","I need to verify data integrity in my continuous retraining pipeline"],"best_for":["ML teams with continuous retraining or fine-tuning pipelines","Organizations using external data sources for model updates","Companies in adversarial environments where data poisoning is a concern"],"limitations":["Requires baseline of clean data for comparison","Subtle poisoning attacks may be difficult to distinguish from legitimate data drift","Performance impact on data ingestion pipelines"],"requires":["Access to training data pipeline","Historical baseline of clean training data","Model retraining or fine-tuning processes","Data quality monitoring infrastructure"],"input_types":["training data samples","data source logs","model performance metrics"],"output_types":["poisoning alerts","anomalous data flags","data quality reports"],"categories":["security","ai-safety","data-quality"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_troj-ai__cap_3","uri":"capability://security.adversarial.input.detection","name":"adversarial input detection","description":"Identifies adversarial examples and edge-case inputs designed to fool or degrade model performance. Detects inputs that are statistically unusual or crafted to exploit model vulnerabilities.","intents":["I want to know when my model is receiving adversarial examples","I need to identify inputs that could cause model failures or unexpected behavior","I want to protect my model from carefully crafted attack inputs"],"best_for":["Computer vision models in production","Safety-critical ML applications (autonomous systems, medical AI)","Organizations concerned about model robustness"],"limitations":["Adversarial detection is computationally expensive","New adversarial techniques may not be detected","High false positive rates possible depending on model domain"],"requires":["Baseline distribution of normal inputs","Model architecture or inference logs","Computational resources for anomaly detection"],"input_types":["model inputs (images, text, structured data)","input metadata","model prediction confidence scores"],"output_types":["adversarial risk scores","flagged inputs","input anomaly reports"],"categories":["security","ai-safety"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_troj-ai__cap_4","uri":"capability://compliance.compliance.audit.trail.generation","name":"compliance audit trail generation","description":"Automatically generates and maintains audit logs documenting all model access, modifications, threat detections, and security incidents. Creates compliance-ready documentation for regulated industries.","intents":["I need to prove to regulators that my AI models are secure and monitored","I want automated audit trails for compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, or SOC 2","I need to document all security incidents and responses for regulatory review"],"best_for":["Healthcare organizations using AI models","Financial services firms with AI systems","Any enterprise in regulated industries deploying AI","Organizations preparing for AI audits or compliance reviews"],"limitations":["Audit trail volume can be large and require storage","Compliance requirements vary by jurisdiction and industry","May not cover all regulatory requirements automatically"],"requires":["Integration with model monitoring systems","Threat detection and security event data","Compliance framework specifications","Audit log storage and retention infrastructure"],"input_types":["security events","model access logs","threat detection alerts","system changes"],"output_types":["audit reports","compliance documentation","incident logs","regulatory-ready reports"],"categories":["compliance","governance","security"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_troj-ai__cap_5","uri":"capability://security.model.vulnerability.assessment","name":"model vulnerability assessment","description":"Scans deployed models for known vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and security weaknesses. Provides assessment reports identifying specific risks and remediation recommendations.","intents":["I want to know what security vulnerabilities my AI models have","I need to assess if my model deployment is secure before going to production","I want recommendations for fixing security issues in my models"],"best_for":["ML teams before production deployment","Security teams responsible for AI infrastructure","Organizations conducting security assessments","Teams managing multiple models across environments"],"limitations":["Assessment is point-in-time; vulnerabilities emerge over time","May not catch novel or zero-day vulnerabilities","Requires model metadata and configuration access"],"requires":["Model architecture and configuration details","Model serving infrastructure information","Access to model dependencies and libraries","Vulnerability database or knowledge base"],"input_types":["model files","configuration files","dependency lists","deployment specifications"],"output_types":["vulnerability reports","risk assessments","remediation recommendations","severity ratings"],"categories":["security","governance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_troj-ai__cap_6","uri":"capability://security.model.behavior.anomaly.detection","name":"model behavior anomaly detection","description":"Monitors model outputs and behavior patterns to detect unexpected changes that may indicate compromise, drift, or degradation. Compares current behavior against established baselines.","intents":["I want to know if my model's behavior has changed unexpectedly","I need to detect if my model has been compromised or modified","I want to catch model performance degradation before users notice"],"best_for":["Teams managing models in continuous production","Organizations with mission-critical AI systems","Companies concerned about model tampering"],"limitations":["Requires establishing accurate behavioral baselines","Legitimate model updates may trigger false alarms","Difficult to distinguish between drift and attacks"],"requires":["Historical model output data","Established baseline of normal behavior","Continuous model inference monitoring","Statistical analysis capabilities"],"input_types":["model predictions","prediction confidence scores","model outputs","performance metrics"],"output_types":["anomaly alerts","behavior change reports","deviation metrics","baseline comparisons"],"categories":["security","monitoring","ai-safety"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_troj-ai__cap_7","uri":"capability://security.threat.intelligence.integration","name":"threat intelligence integration","description":"Integrates with threat intelligence feeds and security databases to identify known attack patterns and emerging threats targeting AI models. Updates detection rules based on latest threat information.","intents":["I want to know about new threats targeting AI models in my industry","I need my security system to stay current with emerging attack techniques","I want to leverage industry threat intelligence for my model protection"],"best_for":["Enterprise security teams","Organizations in high-threat environments","Teams wanting to stay ahead of emerging AI threats"],"limitations":["Threat intelligence quality varies by source","Lag time between threat discovery and intelligence availability","May require subscription to threat intelligence services"],"requires":["Integration with threat intelligence platforms","Threat intelligence feeds or APIs","Capability to update detection rules dynamically"],"input_types":["threat intelligence feeds","attack pattern databases","security advisories"],"output_types":["updated threat signatures","threat alerts","intelligence reports"],"categories":["security","threat-intelligence"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_troj-ai__cap_8","uri":"capability://security.incident.response.automation","name":"incident response automation","description":"Automatically responds to detected threats by triggering predefined actions such as blocking inputs, isolating models, alerting teams, or rolling back changes. Reduces response time to security incidents.","intents":["I want my system to automatically block attacks without waiting for human intervention","I need to isolate compromised models quickly to prevent damage","I want to automatically alert my security team when threats are detected"],"best_for":["Organizations with 24/7 model operations","Teams with limited security staff","Mission-critical AI systems where response time is critical"],"limitations":["Automated responses may block legitimate traffic","Requires careful tuning to avoid over-reaction","May need manual review for certain incident types"],"requires":["Threat detection system integration","Defined incident response playbooks","Access to model serving infrastructure","Notification and alerting systems"],"input_types":["threat alerts","incident severity levels","threat classifications"],"output_types":["automated actions (blocks, isolations)","incident notifications","response logs"],"categories":["security","incident-response"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_troj-ai__cap_9","uri":"capability://compliance.compliance.requirement.mapping","name":"compliance requirement mapping","description":"Maps security controls and monitoring capabilities to specific regulatory requirements (HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2, etc.). Identifies compliance gaps and provides guidance on meeting regulatory standards.","intents":["I need to understand which regulations apply to my AI models","I want to know if my security controls meet regulatory requirements","I need to document how my AI system complies with HIPAA/GDPR/SOC 2"],"best_for":["Compliance officers and legal teams","Healthcare and financial services organizations","Companies preparing for regulatory audits","Organizations operating across multiple jurisdictions"],"limitations":["Compliance requirements change frequently","Interpretation of regulations can be subjective","Does not replace legal or compliance expertise"],"requires":["Knowledge of applicable regulations","Security control inventory","Compliance framework definitions"],"input_types":["security controls list","regulatory framework specifications","audit findings"],"output_types":["compliance gap reports","control-to-requirement mappings","remediation guidance"],"categories":["compliance","governance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":44,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Deployed ML model or LLM in production environment","API access or integration capability with model serving infrastructure","Baseline understanding of expected model behavior","LLM or conversational AI model in production","Integration point before prompts reach the model","Defined system instructions or guardrails to protect","Identity and access management system","Model serving infrastructure","Access policy definitions","Logging and audit infrastructure"],"failure_modes":["Requires integration with existing model infrastructure","Effectiveness depends on threat signature database and detection algorithms","May have latency overhead on model inference","May produce false positives blocking legitimate complex queries","Sophisticated injection techniques may evade detection","Requires continuous updates as new attack patterns emerge","May add latency to model access","Requires integration with identity management systems","Complex access policies can be difficult to manage","Report quality depends on underlying threat detection","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.648Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.540Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=troj-ai","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=troj-ai"}},"signature":"h5BnK0/z13JC+E3D8HUDIMUwgqbdI1aHW+E+4OlwViqc9OE876WwbZx2mMVb9q63bnKDoL1g9PxbDuzo62P0CQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T10:42:32.296Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/troj-ai","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/troj-ai","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=troj-ai","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}