{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-traceloop-instrumentation-mcp","slug":"traceloop-instrumentation-mcp","name":"@traceloop/instrumentation-mcp","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/traceloop/openllmetry-js/tree/main/packages/instrumentation-mcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/traceloop-instrumentation-mcp","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["opentelemetry","nodejs","tracing","mcp","model-context-protocol"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-traceloop-instrumentation-mcp__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.opentelemetry.based.mcp.server.request.tracing","name":"opentelemetry-based mcp server request tracing","description":"Instruments MCP server lifecycle events (initialization, request handling, response generation) by hooking into OpenTelemetry's span creation and attribute assignment APIs. Captures server-side MCP protocol messages as structured spans with automatic context propagation, enabling distributed tracing of tool calls and resource access patterns across LLM applications without modifying application code.","intents":["Trace MCP server requests end-to-end to identify performance bottlenecks in tool execution","Correlate MCP server activity with LLM model calls for full observability of agent workflows","Debug tool integration failures by inspecting MCP protocol message flow and error states","Monitor which MCP resources and tools are accessed most frequently in production"],"best_for":["Node.js developers building LLM agents with MCP server integrations","Teams operating multi-agent systems requiring distributed tracing across tool boundaries","DevOps/SRE teams implementing observability for LLM application infrastructure"],"limitations":["Requires explicit OpenTelemetry exporter configuration — does not auto-export traces without downstream collector setup","MCP protocol-specific instrumentation only; does not trace client-side MCP consumer logic","Span cardinality can explode with high-volume tool calls unless sampling policies are configured","No built-in filtering of sensitive data in MCP messages — requires custom span processors for PII redaction"],"requires":["Node.js 14.0.0 or higher","@opentelemetry/api package (peer dependency)","@opentelemetry/sdk-node or equivalent tracer provider","MCP server implementation using standard Node.js patterns"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Server initialization configuration","Tool/resource request payloads"],"output_types":["OpenTelemetry spans with attributes","Structured trace data compatible with OTLP exporters","Span context for correlation across service boundaries"],"categories":["automation-workflow","observability"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-traceloop-instrumentation-mcp__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.automatic.mcp.server.lifecycle.span.creation","name":"automatic mcp server lifecycle span creation","description":"Automatically creates OpenTelemetry spans for MCP server lifecycle events (startup, shutdown, request/response cycles) by wrapping the MCP server's event handlers and message processing logic. Captures timing, error states, and protocol-level metadata without requiring developers to manually instrument each server method.","intents":["Measure MCP server startup and shutdown latency to optimize initialization","Track request-to-response latency for individual tool calls and resource queries","Capture error events and exception details in MCP protocol handling","Correlate server-side timing with client-side LLM latency for end-to-end performance analysis"],"best_for":["Teams deploying MCP servers in production and needing automatic performance monitoring","Developers debugging slow tool execution without access to MCP server source code","Organizations standardizing on OpenTelemetry for all observability"],"limitations":["Lifecycle span creation is automatic but attribute enrichment requires custom span processors","Does not capture internal MCP server processing details — only message boundaries","Span overhead adds ~1-2ms per MCP request in typical configurations","Requires MCP server to be compatible with Node.js event emitter patterns"],"requires":["Node.js 14.0.0 or higher","@opentelemetry/api and @opentelemetry/sdk-node","MCP server instance with standard event emitter interface"],"input_types":["MCP server events (initialize, shutdown, request)","Request/response message objects"],"output_types":["OpenTelemetry spans with lifecycle event names","Span attributes: duration, status, error details"],"categories":["automation-workflow","observability"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-traceloop-instrumentation-mcp__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.mcp.tool.call.request.response.span.attribution","name":"mcp tool call request/response span attribution","description":"Captures MCP tool invocation requests and responses as distinct spans with semantic attributes (tool name, resource type, input parameters, output size, execution status). Automatically extracts and attaches protocol-level metadata to spans, enabling queries like 'which tools are slowest' or 'which resources fail most often' without custom parsing logic.","intents":["Identify which MCP tools or resources are performance bottlenecks in agent workflows","Analyze tool call failure patterns and error rates by tool type","Correlate tool execution time with LLM token generation latency","Build dashboards showing tool usage distribution and success rates"],"best_for":["Data engineers and ML ops teams analyzing LLM agent performance","Developers optimizing tool selection and caching strategies","Teams building observability dashboards for multi-tool LLM systems"],"limitations":["Attribute extraction is limited to MCP protocol fields — does not infer semantic meaning from tool inputs/outputs","Large tool responses (>1MB) may be truncated in span attributes to avoid cardinality explosion","Does not track tool call nesting or dependency chains — each call is a flat span","Requires tool names to be consistent across calls for effective aggregation"],"requires":["Node.js 14.0.0 or higher","@opentelemetry/api","MCP server with standard tool/resource request/response format"],"input_types":["MCP tool call requests (JSON-RPC method invocations)","Tool response payloads"],"output_types":["OpenTelemetry spans with tool-specific attributes","Structured span data for analytics and dashboarding"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-traceloop-instrumentation-mcp__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.context.propagation.across.mcp.server.boundaries","name":"context propagation across mcp server boundaries","description":"Propagates OpenTelemetry trace context (trace ID, span ID, baggage) across MCP server request/response boundaries using standard W3C Trace Context headers embedded in MCP protocol messages. Enables correlation of spans across multiple MCP servers and LLM service calls, maintaining causal relationships in distributed tracing.","intents":["Trace a single LLM agent request through multiple MCP servers and tool calls","Correlate logs and metrics from different services using trace IDs","Reconstruct the full execution path of a complex multi-tool agent workflow","Debug issues that span multiple MCP server instances"],"best_for":["Teams running distributed MCP server architectures with multiple tool providers","Organizations using centralized observability platforms (Datadog, New Relic, Jaeger)","Developers building complex agent workflows with cross-service dependencies"],"limitations":["Trace context propagation requires explicit header injection in MCP messages — not automatic for all transport types","Baggage propagation is limited by MCP protocol message size constraints","Context is lost if MCP servers do not preserve trace headers in responses","No built-in support for context propagation across async/queue-based MCP transports"],"requires":["Node.js 14.0.0 or higher","@opentelemetry/api with W3C Trace Context support","MCP servers configured to preserve trace context headers"],"input_types":["MCP request messages with W3C Trace Context headers","OpenTelemetry trace context objects"],"output_types":["MCP response messages with propagated trace context","Correlated spans across service boundaries"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-traceloop-instrumentation-mcp__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.mcp.error.and.exception.span.recording","name":"mcp error and exception span recording","description":"Automatically captures MCP protocol errors, server exceptions, and tool execution failures as span events and status codes. Records error details (error code, message, stack trace) in OpenTelemetry span attributes and events, enabling error-driven observability and alerting without custom error handling code.","intents":["Monitor MCP server error rates and failure modes in production","Alert on specific error types (e.g., tool not found, resource access denied)","Correlate MCP errors with LLM model errors for root cause analysis","Build error dashboards and SLO tracking for tool availability"],"best_for":["SRE teams managing MCP server reliability and uptime","Developers debugging tool integration failures","Teams implementing error budgets and SLO tracking for LLM systems"],"limitations":["Error details are limited to MCP protocol error responses — does not capture internal server exceptions unless explicitly logged","Sensitive error information (e.g., API keys in error messages) is not automatically redacted","Error span recording adds ~0.5-1ms overhead per failed request","No built-in error deduplication — high-frequency errors can create span cardinality issues"],"requires":["Node.js 14.0.0 or higher","@opentelemetry/api","MCP server with standard error response format"],"input_types":["MCP error responses (JSON-RPC error objects)","Server exception objects"],"output_types":["OpenTelemetry spans with error status and events","Structured error data for alerting and dashboarding"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-traceloop-instrumentation-mcp__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.integration.with.openllmetry.js.ecosystem","name":"integration with openllmetry-js ecosystem","description":"Integrates seamlessly with other openllmetry-js instrumentation packages (LLM model calls, vector stores, databases) to provide unified observability across the entire LLM application stack. Shares common span naming conventions, attribute schemas, and exporter configurations, enabling single-pane-of-glass tracing for complex agent systems.","intents":["Correlate MCP tool calls with LLM model invocations in a single trace view","Use consistent span naming and attributes across all LLM system components","Configure a single OpenTelemetry exporter for all application observability","Build unified dashboards showing LLM, tool, and infrastructure metrics together"],"best_for":["Teams using multiple openllmetry-js packages in the same application","Organizations standardizing on openllmetry-js for LLM observability","Developers building complex agent systems with multiple tool and model integrations"],"limitations":["Requires all instrumentation packages to be compatible versions — version mismatches can cause span context loss","Shared exporter configuration must be set up correctly or spans may be lost","No automatic conflict resolution if multiple packages instrument the same code path","Ecosystem integration is Node.js only — no Python or other language support"],"requires":["Node.js 14.0.0 or higher","@opentelemetry/api and @opentelemetry/sdk-node","Other openllmetry-js instrumentation packages (e.g., @traceloop/instrumentation-openai)"],"input_types":["OpenTelemetry tracer provider configuration","Span context from other instrumentation packages"],"output_types":["Unified trace data with correlated spans across all LLM system components"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":40,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"moderate","permissions":["Node.js 14.0.0 or higher","@opentelemetry/api package (peer dependency)","@opentelemetry/sdk-node or equivalent tracer provider","MCP server implementation using standard Node.js patterns","@opentelemetry/api and @opentelemetry/sdk-node","MCP server instance with standard event emitter interface","@opentelemetry/api","MCP server with standard tool/resource request/response format","@opentelemetry/api with W3C Trace Context support","MCP servers configured to preserve trace context headers"],"failure_modes":["Requires explicit OpenTelemetry exporter configuration — does not auto-export traces without downstream collector setup","MCP protocol-specific instrumentation only; does not trace client-side MCP consumer logic","Span cardinality can explode with high-volume tool calls unless sampling policies are configured","No built-in filtering of sensitive data in MCP messages — requires custom span processors for PII redaction","Lifecycle span creation is automatic but attribute enrichment requires custom span processors","Does not capture internal MCP server processing details — only message boundaries","Span overhead adds ~1-2ms per MCP request in typical configurations","Requires MCP server to be compatible with Node.js event emitter patterns","Attribute extraction is limited to MCP protocol fields — does not infer semantic meaning from tool inputs/outputs","Large tool responses (>1MB) may be truncated in span attributes to avoid cardinality explosion","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.5826928315077575,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.55,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:04:47.472Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":40967,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=traceloop-instrumentation-mcp","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=traceloop-instrumentation-mcp"}},"signature":"kcVJO8ZFaL9GerlbYgj0qEyDHz6xCFYXBOi3qUf2gXF3eaypQi7HZYhHWv17c1QU1q3Iu0liMTgMFrTbkq7ADA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T01:50:51.744Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/traceloop-instrumentation-mcp","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/traceloop-instrumentation-mcp","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=traceloop-instrumentation-mcp","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}