{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"testim","slug":"testim","name":"Testim","type":"agent","url":"https://www.testim.io","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/testim","categories":["testing-quality"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"testim__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.ai.powered.smart.element.locator.generation.with.self.healing","name":"ai-powered smart element locator generation with self-healing","description":"Uses machine learning to automatically identify and generate resilient element locators that adapt when application UI changes. The system learns element characteristics beyond traditional XPath/CSS selectors, creating custom locators that survive DOM restructuring, CSS class changes, and layout modifications without manual test updates. Self-healing automatically detects locator failures and applies learned patterns to find alternative element identifiers.","intents":["I want tests that don't break when the app's UI changes slightly","I need to reduce maintenance overhead from constantly updating element selectors","I want locators that work across dynamic applications with frequently changing layouts"],"best_for":["QA teams managing large test suites against rapidly evolving web applications","enterprises with high UI churn (frequent redesigns, A/B testing, dynamic content)","teams lacking deep XPath/CSS expertise who want robust selectors automatically"],"limitations":["Self-healing effectiveness depends on element semantic consistency — if elements are completely removed/restructured, healing may fail","ML model training requires baseline test execution history; new applications may have lower healing accuracy initially","Healing suggestions are presented post-failure; does not prevent test flakiness in first execution after UI change","Locator learning is application-specific; patterns don't transfer across different apps"],"requires":["Active Testim account with Web or Mobile product","Target application must be accessible via browser or mobile device","Baseline test execution to train locator models (minimum 1-2 test runs)"],"input_types":["DOM elements (web)","UI elements (mobile iOS/Android)","Salesforce Lightning components"],"output_types":["Custom locator selectors (proprietary format)","Self-healing suggestions with confidence scores","Comparison screenshots showing old vs. new element locations"],"categories":["automation-workflow","machine-learning-locators"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__cap_1","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.codeless.test.authoring.with.ai.assisted.test.generation","name":"codeless test authoring with ai-assisted test generation","description":"Provides a browser-based visual test recorder that captures user interactions (clicks, form fills, navigation) without writing code, combined with an AI agent that can generate entire test flows from natural language descriptions. The recorder creates step-based test cases with built-in actions (click, type, assert, wait) that execute against target applications. AI agents can autonomously build tests by interpreting natural language requirements and translating them into executable test steps.","intents":["I want non-technical QA staff to create and maintain tests without learning code","I need to quickly generate test cases from user story descriptions or acceptance criteria","I want to reduce test creation time from hours to minutes for common workflows"],"best_for":["QA teams with mixed technical backgrounds (manual testers + developers)","organizations scaling test automation without hiring engineers","rapid prototyping and MVP testing where speed matters more than code reusability"],"limitations":["Codeless tests are locked into Testim platform; no export to standard test frameworks (Selenium, Cypress, Playwright)","Complex conditional logic, loops, and data-driven testing require switching to code mode or manual step configuration","AI-generated tests may require manual review and refinement; agent doesn't understand business context or edge cases","Recorder captures exact interactions; refactoring recorded tests into reusable components requires manual effort","No version control integration for test code (tests stored in Testim SaaS only)"],"requires":["Testim Web or Mobile product subscription","Target application accessible via browser or mobile device","For AI agent: natural language description of test scenario (no special syntax required)"],"input_types":["User interactions (clicks, typing, navigation)","Natural language test descriptions","Pre-built step templates (Salesforce-specific actions)"],"output_types":["Step-based test cases (Testim proprietary format)","Executable test flows with assertions","Test reports with pass/fail status and screenshots"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__cap_10","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.test.data.management.and.parameterization.for.data.driven.testing","name":"test data management and parameterization for data-driven testing","description":"Enables test parameterization using external data sources (CSV, Excel, JSON, databases) to run the same test with multiple data sets. Supports data-driven testing patterns where test steps are executed with different input values and assertions are validated against expected outputs. Includes test data isolation to prevent data conflicts across parallel test executions.","intents":["I want to test the same workflow with multiple user inputs without duplicating tests","I need to validate my app against a large dataset without manual test creation","I want to run parallel tests without data conflicts"],"best_for":["teams testing forms, search, and filtering with multiple input combinations","data-intensive applications requiring comprehensive input validation","organizations wanting to reduce test duplication through parameterization"],"limitations":["Data source integration details are not publicly documented; supported formats and connection methods are unclear","Data isolation mechanism is not specified; unclear how Testim prevents data conflicts in parallel execution","Complex data transformations (joins, aggregations) are not supported; requires pre-processing external data","Test data cleanup after execution is not mentioned; may require manual cleanup or custom scripts","Large datasets (>10k rows) may have performance implications; execution time scales with data volume"],"requires":["Testim Web or Mobile product subscription","External data source (CSV, Excel, JSON, database) with test data","Test configured to accept parameterized inputs"],"input_types":["CSV/Excel files with test data rows","JSON arrays with test parameters","Database queries returning test data","API responses with test data"],"output_types":["Test execution results per data row (pass/fail)","Parameterized test reports (results grouped by data set)","Data-driven failure analysis (which data values caused failures)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__cap_11","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.test.result.reporting.and.artifact.capture.with.video.recording","name":"test result reporting and artifact capture with video recording","description":"Captures comprehensive test execution artifacts including screenshots, videos, DOM snapshots, and network logs. Generates detailed test reports with pass/fail status, execution time, and step-by-step results. Videos record entire test execution for post-mortem analysis and debugging. Artifacts are stored and accessible for compliance, debugging, and stakeholder review.","intents":["I need video proof of test execution for compliance and debugging","I want to share test results with non-technical stakeholders","I need detailed execution artifacts to diagnose test failures"],"best_for":["regulated industries requiring execution proof and audit trails","teams needing to communicate test results to stakeholders","QA teams debugging complex test failures"],"limitations":["Video storage and retention policies are not specified; may have automatic deletion after N days","Video quality and frame rate are not specified; may be compressed for storage efficiency","Network logs capture is limited; does not include backend API calls or database queries","DOM snapshots are web-only; mobile tests have limited artifact capture","Artifact storage is in Testim SaaS; data residency cannot be guaranteed for compliance-sensitive applications","Large test suites with video recording may incur significant storage costs (pricing not public)"],"requires":["Testim Web or Mobile product subscription","Test execution with artifact capture enabled"],"input_types":["Test execution events (step start/end, assertion results)","UI interactions (screenshots, video frames)","Network requests (HTTP headers, response bodies)"],"output_types":["Test execution videos (MP4 or similar format)","Screenshots per test step","DOM snapshots (HTML structure at key points)","Network logs (HTTP requests/responses)","Test reports (HTML, PDF, JSON)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__cap_12","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.accessibility.testing.for.web.applications","name":"accessibility testing for web applications","description":"Includes automated accessibility testing for web applications to validate WCAG 2.1 compliance (levels A, AA, AAA). Detects common accessibility issues (missing alt text, color contrast, keyboard navigation, ARIA attributes) during test execution. Provides accessibility reports with remediation suggestions for identified issues.","intents":["I need to ensure my web app is accessible to users with disabilities","I want to validate WCAG 2.1 compliance without manual accessibility audits","I need to identify and fix accessibility issues early in development"],"best_for":["web applications targeting broad user audiences including users with disabilities","organizations with accessibility compliance requirements (government, enterprise)","teams wanting to shift accessibility testing left into development"],"limitations":["Accessibility testing is web-only; mobile and Salesforce products do not include accessibility validation","Automated testing catches common issues but misses complex accessibility problems (logical heading hierarchy, form labeling context)","WCAG compliance level (A, AA, AAA) is not specified; unclear which level Testim validates","Accessibility reports are generated by Testim; cannot be customized for industry-specific requirements","Manual accessibility review is still required for comprehensive compliance; automated testing is not sufficient alone"],"requires":["Testim Web product subscription","Web application with HTML/CSS/JavaScript (standard web technologies)"],"input_types":["Web application UI elements","HTML structure and ARIA attributes","CSS styling (color, contrast, layout)"],"output_types":["Accessibility violation reports (missing alt text, color contrast issues, etc.)","WCAG 2.1 compliance status","Remediation suggestions (how to fix identified issues)","Accessibility metrics (% of pages compliant)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.cross.browser.and.cross.device.parallel.test.execution","name":"cross-browser and cross-device parallel test execution","description":"Executes test suites simultaneously across multiple browser versions (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge), operating systems (Windows, macOS, Linux), and mobile devices (iOS, Android) using a cloud-hosted execution grid. Tests run in parallel on hundreds of device configurations, with results aggregated and compared for consistency. Supports both Testim-hosted infrastructure and third-party Selenium grids for on-premise execution.","intents":["I need to verify my app works consistently across all major browsers and devices","I want to run full test suites in minutes instead of hours by parallelizing across devices","I need to test on real iOS/Android devices without maintaining physical device labs"],"best_for":["web applications requiring broad browser compatibility (B2C, SaaS platforms)","mobile apps targeting multiple OS versions and device types","teams without budget or space for physical device labs"],"limitations":["Testim-hosted grid locations are not publicly disclosed; data residency cannot be guaranteed for compliance-sensitive applications","Parallel execution pricing scales with number of concurrent tests; high parallelization requires premium tier (pricing not public)","Third-party grid integration requires Selenium Grid compatibility; custom device grids need manual setup and maintenance","Mobile device grid limited to virtual devices for Flutter/React Native; native iOS/Android testing requires Testim's managed device pool","Cross-device result comparison is visual/functional only; performance metrics (load time, memory) not included in standard execution"],"requires":["Testim Web or Mobile product subscription","For third-party grids: Selenium Grid 3.x+ or compatible device grid","Target application must be accessible from Testim execution infrastructure (public URL or VPN tunnel)"],"input_types":["Test suites (Testim format)","Device/browser configuration matrix (Chrome v120, Safari v17, iOS 17, Android 14, etc.)","Optional: custom Selenium Grid endpoint"],"output_types":["Parallel execution results (pass/fail per device)","Aggregated test reports with device-specific screenshots","Comparison matrices showing consistency across browsers/devices","Failure logs with device-specific error details"],"categories":["automation-workflow","testing-infrastructure"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.salesforce.native.test.automation.with.metadata.powered.locators","name":"salesforce-native test automation with metadata-powered locators","description":"Provides specialized test authoring and execution for Salesforce Lightning applications using Salesforce metadata to generate intelligent locators. Tests leverage Salesforce object/field metadata, custom components, and Lightning design system elements to create locators that survive Salesforce updates. Includes pre-built test steps for common Salesforce workflows (record creation, field updates, list views, reports) and integrates with Salesforce preview releases for early testing.","intents":["I need to test Salesforce customizations and extensions without brittle XPath selectors","I want to test my Salesforce changes before they go live in production","I need pre-built test templates for common Salesforce operations to speed up test creation"],"best_for":["Salesforce administrators and developers testing custom configurations","enterprises with complex Salesforce implementations requiring regression testing","teams needing to validate Salesforce updates don't break customizations"],"limitations":["Requires Salesforce org access and metadata visibility; cannot test against Salesforce instances with restricted API access","Pre-release testing depends on Salesforce release cycle; early testing window is limited to Salesforce preview releases","Metadata-powered locators only work for standard/custom Salesforce components; third-party AppExchange components may require fallback to XPath","Test execution against production Salesforce orgs requires careful data isolation; no built-in data rollback or sandboxing","Salesforce-specific test steps are Lightning-only; Classic UI support is limited or absent"],"requires":["Testim Web product subscription with Salesforce specialization","Active Salesforce org (sandbox or production) with API access enabled","Salesforce user account with appropriate permissions (test execution user)"],"input_types":["Salesforce metadata (objects, fields, custom components)","Salesforce Lightning UI interactions","Pre-built Salesforce action templates"],"output_types":["Salesforce-specific test cases with metadata-based locators","Test execution results against Salesforce orgs","Data change logs (records created/modified during test execution)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","domain-specific-testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.mobile.app.test.automation.for.native.and.cross.platform.frameworks","name":"mobile app test automation for native and cross-platform frameworks","description":"Enables test authoring and execution for native iOS/Android apps, hybrid apps (Cordova, Ionic), and cross-platform frameworks (Flutter, React Native). Supports both cloud-hosted virtual device execution and local device connections. Tests interact with native UI elements, handle platform-specific gestures (swipe, pinch, long-press), and validate app behavior across device types, OS versions, and screen sizes.","intents":["I need to test my iOS and Android apps without maintaining physical device labs","I want to verify my app works on different device sizes and OS versions","I need to test cross-platform apps (Flutter, React Native) consistently across platforms"],"best_for":["mobile app development teams testing native and cross-platform applications","QA teams without budget for physical device infrastructure","enterprises requiring broad device/OS coverage for consumer mobile apps"],"limitations":["Local device testing limited to one parallel test per connected device; additional capacity requires cloud execution or device purchase","Virtual device execution may not catch hardware-specific issues (camera, sensors, GPS, Bluetooth)","Flutter/React Native testing uses virtual devices only; native iOS/Android can use physical devices via Testim's managed pool","App installation and setup on devices requires manual configuration or custom scripts; no built-in app deployment pipeline","Gesture recognition (swipe, pinch) is simulated; may not perfectly replicate real user touch behavior on physical devices","Background process testing and app lifecycle events (backgrounding, resuming) have limited support"],"requires":["Testim Mobile product subscription","For local testing: iOS device (jailbreak not required) or Android device (USB debugging enabled)","For cloud testing: app binary (IPA for iOS, APK for Android) or access to app store","For Flutter/React Native: app built for testing (debug build)"],"input_types":["Native iOS/Android apps (IPA, APK)","Hybrid apps (Cordova, Ionic)","Cross-platform apps (Flutter, React Native)","Mobile UI interactions (tap, swipe, pinch, long-press, text input)"],"output_types":["Mobile test cases with native element locators","Test execution results with device-specific screenshots/videos","Crash logs and app performance metrics","Device-specific test reports (iOS 17 vs. iOS 16, etc.)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","mobile-testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.intelligent.test.failure.analysis.with.root.cause.suggestions","name":"intelligent test failure analysis with root cause suggestions","description":"Automatically analyzes test failures by comparing execution logs, screenshots, and DOM snapshots to identify root causes. Uses ML to categorize failures (element not found, assertion failed, timeout, network error, app crash) and suggests remediation steps. Generates side-by-side comparison screenshots showing expected vs. actual UI state, enabling rapid debugging without manual log inspection.","intents":["I need to quickly understand why tests failed without digging through logs","I want suggestions on how to fix failing tests instead of manual debugging","I need to distinguish between test issues and application bugs"],"best_for":["QA teams with large test suites experiencing frequent failures","teams lacking deep debugging expertise who need automated root cause analysis","organizations wanting to reduce time-to-fix for test failures"],"limitations":["Root cause analysis is heuristic-based; complex failures involving multiple systems (backend, network, database) may not be accurately diagnosed","Suggestions are based on pattern matching; novel failure modes not seen in training data may receive generic recommendations","Comparison screenshots are visual only; does not analyze network requests, database state, or backend logs","Analysis latency depends on test execution logs size; large test suites with verbose logging may have delayed analysis","False positives possible: may suggest test fixes when actual issue is application bug"],"requires":["Testim Web or Mobile product subscription","Failed test execution with captured logs and screenshots","Baseline execution history for pattern matching (minimum 5-10 failed test runs)"],"input_types":["Test execution logs (Testim format)","Screenshots (expected and actual)","DOM snapshots (web tests)","App crash logs (mobile tests)"],"output_types":["Root cause categorization (element not found, assertion failed, timeout, etc.)","Remediation suggestions (update locator, adjust timeout, check assertion logic)","Comparison screenshots with annotations","Failure trend analysis (recurring vs. one-time failures)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.test.impact.analysis.and.coverage.mapping.with.sealights.integration","name":"test impact analysis and coverage mapping with sealights integration","description":"Integrates with SeaLights quality intelligence platform to map test execution to code coverage and identify which tests validate which code paths. Enables test impact analysis to determine which tests should run after code changes, reducing test execution time by running only affected tests. Provides visibility into untested code areas and test redundancy.","intents":["I want to run only the tests affected by my code changes to speed up CI/CD","I need to identify untested code areas to improve coverage","I want to eliminate redundant tests that validate the same code paths"],"best_for":["development teams with large test suites wanting to optimize CI/CD pipeline execution time","organizations focused on code coverage metrics and quality gates","teams practicing continuous integration with frequent code commits"],"limitations":["SeaLights integration requires separate SeaLights license and setup; adds complexity to testing infrastructure","Coverage mapping accuracy depends on instrumentation quality; may miss coverage for dynamically loaded code or reflection-based execution","Test impact analysis is code-change-based; does not account for configuration changes, environment variables, or data-driven variations","Integration is read-only from Testim perspective; cannot modify SeaLights configuration from Testim UI","Coverage data latency: may take minutes to hours for coverage data to propagate from test execution to SeaLights"],"requires":["Testim Web or Mobile product subscription","SeaLights account and agent installed in CI/CD pipeline","Source code instrumentation with SeaLights agent (language-specific: Java, .NET, Node.js, Python, etc.)"],"input_types":["Test execution results from Testim","Code coverage data from SeaLights","Git diff or code change metadata"],"output_types":["Test impact analysis (list of affected tests per code change)","Code coverage reports (lines/branches covered by test suite)","Coverage gaps (untested code areas)","Test redundancy analysis (tests validating same code paths)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__cap_7","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.activity.audit.logging.and.compliance.reporting","name":"activity audit logging and compliance reporting","description":"Captures detailed audit logs of all test authoring, execution, and result activities including user actions, test modifications, execution timestamps, and result changes. Generates compliance reports for regulatory requirements (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR). Provides role-based access control to restrict test visibility and modification based on user permissions.","intents":["I need to prove test execution and results for compliance audits","I want to track who modified tests and when for change management","I need to restrict test access to authorized users only"],"best_for":["regulated industries (healthcare, finance, pharma) requiring audit trails","enterprises with strict change management and compliance requirements","teams needing to demonstrate test execution for regulatory audits"],"limitations":["Audit logs are stored in Testim SaaS; data residency cannot be guaranteed for compliance-sensitive applications","Log retention period is not specified; may have automatic purging after N days","Compliance reports are generated by Testim; cannot be customized for industry-specific requirements","Role-based access control is basic; no fine-grained permissions (e.g., read-only vs. execute-only)","Audit logs do not include test execution environment details (OS, browser version) needed for some compliance frameworks"],"requires":["Testim Web or Mobile product subscription (audit logging may be premium-tier feature)","User accounts with defined roles (admin, tester, viewer, etc.)"],"input_types":["User actions (login, test creation, test execution, result review)","Test modifications (step changes, assertion updates, locator changes)","Test execution events (start, end, pass/fail)"],"output_types":["Audit logs (timestamped activity records)","Compliance reports (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR templates)","User activity reports (who did what and when)","Test execution history with user attribution"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__cap_8","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.test.management.and.insights.dashboard.with.trend.analysis","name":"test management and insights dashboard with trend analysis","description":"Provides centralized dashboard for viewing test suite status, execution trends, failure rates, and test coverage metrics. Displays pass/fail trends over time, identifies flaky tests, and highlights high-failure areas. Enables filtering by test suite, environment, browser/device, and date range for targeted analysis. Integrates execution data across web, mobile, and Salesforce tests into unified reporting.","intents":["I want a single view of test suite health across all my applications","I need to identify flaky tests that fail intermittently","I want to track test execution trends and improvement over time"],"best_for":["QA managers and test leads needing visibility into test suite health","teams tracking quality metrics and test effectiveness","organizations wanting to identify high-risk areas requiring more testing"],"limitations":["Dashboard metrics are aggregated; does not provide individual test performance details (execution time per test)","Flakiness detection is statistical; requires minimum number of test runs to identify patterns (threshold not specified)","Trend analysis is historical only; does not predict future failures or suggest preventive actions","Filtering and drill-down capabilities are limited; cannot create custom dashboards or export raw data","Real-time updates may have latency; dashboard may not reflect latest execution results immediately"],"requires":["Testim Web or Mobile product subscription","Minimum test execution history (1-2 weeks of data for meaningful trends)"],"input_types":["Test execution results (pass/fail, execution time, device/browser)","Test metadata (test name, suite, environment)","Execution timestamps"],"output_types":["Dashboard visualizations (pass/fail trends, failure rate charts)","Flaky test reports (tests with inconsistent results)","Coverage metrics (tests per suite, devices tested)","Trend analysis (improvement/degradation over time)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.ci.cd.pipeline.integration.with.test.orchestration","name":"ci/cd pipeline integration with test orchestration","description":"Integrates with CI/CD systems (Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure Pipelines) to trigger test execution on code commits, pull requests, or scheduled intervals. Provides webhooks and APIs for test orchestration, result reporting, and pipeline gating (fail builds if tests fail). Supports test result aggregation and reporting back to version control systems for visibility in pull request reviews.","intents":["I want tests to run automatically when code is committed","I need to block deployments if tests fail","I want test results visible in pull request reviews"],"best_for":["development teams practicing continuous integration and continuous deployment","organizations with automated deployment pipelines requiring test gates","teams wanting to shift testing left into development workflow"],"limitations":["CI/CD integration details are not publicly documented; specific webhook formats, API endpoints, and authentication methods are unknown","Test result reporting back to version control (GitHub, GitLab) is not explicitly confirmed; may require custom scripting","Pipeline gating is basic; cannot define conditional test execution based on code change type or test criticality","Test execution latency in CI/CD context is not specified; may add significant time to pipeline if tests run sequentially","Parallel test execution in CI/CD requires premium tier; pricing and capacity limits are not public"],"requires":["Testim Web or Mobile product subscription","CI/CD system with webhook or API support (Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure Pipelines, etc.)","API key or authentication token for Testim integration"],"input_types":["Git commit/pull request events","Scheduled triggers (cron-based)","Manual pipeline triggers"],"output_types":["Test execution status (pass/fail)","Test result reports (JUnit XML, JSON)","Build pass/fail status for pipeline gating","Pull request comments with test results (if supported)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"testim__headline","uri":"capability://testing.quality.ai.powered.test.automation.platform","name":"ai-powered test automation platform","description":"Testim is an AI-powered end-to-end test automation platform that enables developers to create, execute, and maintain tests with smart element locators and self-healing capabilities, streamlining the testing process for web and mobile applications.","intents":["best AI test automation tool","test automation platform for web applications","AI-driven testing solutions","codeless test creation tools","automated testing for mobile apps"],"best_for":["teams looking for codeless testing solutions","developers needing cross-browser testing"],"limitations":["may require human oversight for complex scenarios"],"requires":["internet connection","cloud access"],"input_types":["natural language test descriptions"],"output_types":["automated test results","error reports"],"categories":["testing-quality"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":58,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Active Testim account with Web or Mobile product","Target application must be accessible via browser or mobile device","Baseline test execution to train locator models (minimum 1-2 test runs)","Testim Web or Mobile product subscription","Target application accessible via browser or mobile device","For AI agent: natural language description of test scenario (no special syntax required)","External data source (CSV, Excel, JSON, database) with test data","Test configured to accept parameterized inputs","Test execution with artifact capture enabled","Testim Web product subscription"],"failure_modes":["Self-healing effectiveness depends on element semantic consistency — if elements are completely removed/restructured, healing may fail","ML model training requires baseline test execution history; new applications may have lower healing accuracy initially","Healing suggestions are presented post-failure; does not prevent test flakiness in first execution after UI change","Locator learning is application-specific; patterns don't transfer across different apps","Codeless tests are locked into Testim platform; no export to standard test frameworks (Selenium, Cypress, Playwright)","Complex conditional logic, loops, and data-driven testing require switching to code mode or manual step configuration","AI-generated tests may require manual review and refinement; agent doesn't understand business context or edge cases","Recorder captures exact interactions; refactoring recorded tests into reusable components requires manual effort","No version control integration for test code (tests stored in Testim SaaS only)","Data source integration details are not publicly documented; supported formats and connection methods are unclear","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.7,"quality":0.9,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.28,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:28.696Z","last_scraped_at":null,"last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=testim","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=testim"}},"signature":"36+EYSHyhRQ/LGlGNJIW41SrYFj7tgHnYevcrVf8YLH/xuCnhDPEn3Vtg/6+vts2gY+AZ21/jM7jUKMqpiHiCg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T03:02:29.884Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/testim","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/testim","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=testim","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}