{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tecton","slug":"tecton","name":"Tecton","type":"platform","url":"https://www.tecton.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/tecton","categories":["data-pipelines","deployment-infra"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tecton__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.streaming.and.batch.feature.pipeline.orchestration","name":"streaming-and-batch-feature-pipeline-orchestration","description":"Unified orchestration engine that manages both real-time streaming pipelines (for sub-second feature computation) and batch pipelines (for historical feature backfills and scheduled updates) within a single declarative framework. Handles data ingestion from multiple sources (Kafka, S3, databases), applies transformations via SQL or Python, and materializes features to the feature store with automatic schema management and lineage tracking.","intents":["I need to compute features from streaming events in real-time while also backfilling historical data for model training","I want to define feature transformations once and have them execute in both batch and streaming contexts without code duplication","I need to orchestrate complex multi-stage pipelines with dependencies, retries, and monitoring across heterogeneous data sources"],"best_for":["ML teams building real-time recommendation or fraud detection systems requiring sub-second feature latency","data engineers managing feature engineering at scale across batch and streaming workloads","organizations migrating from ad-hoc feature scripts to production-grade feature platforms"],"limitations":["Streaming pipelines require compatible message brokers (Kafka, Kinesis) — custom event sources require adapter development","Batch pipeline scheduling depends on external orchestrators (Airflow, Spark) — no native scheduling engine included","Complex stateful transformations (windowed aggregations, sessionization) require careful tuning to avoid state explosion in streaming mode","Cross-pipeline dependencies must be explicitly defined — implicit ordering is not inferred"],"requires":["Python 3.8+ or SQL dialect compatible with target compute engine","Access to data sources (Kafka, S3, Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery, etc.)","Compute infrastructure (Spark, Flink, or cloud-native streaming service)","Feature store backend (Tecton-managed or self-hosted)"],"input_types":["streaming events (Kafka topics, Kinesis streams, Pub/Sub)","batch data (S3, HDFS, data warehouse tables)","SQL transformations","Python UDFs"],"output_types":["materialized features in feature store","feature metadata and lineage","pipeline execution logs and metrics"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tecton__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.millisecond.latency.feature.serving.with.caching","name":"millisecond-latency-feature-serving-with-caching","description":"Online feature store with sub-millisecond serving latency achieved through distributed in-memory caching (Redis-backed), request batching, and pre-computed feature materialization. Serves features via low-latency APIs (gRPC, REST) with automatic cache invalidation, staleness detection, and fallback to batch features when online values are unavailable. Supports point-in-time correctness for training-serving consistency.","intents":["I need to serve features to real-time ML models with <10ms latency to meet SLA requirements for online predictions","I want to ensure training and serving use the same feature values to prevent training-serving skew","I need to handle cache misses gracefully without degrading prediction latency when online features are unavailable"],"best_for":["real-time ML systems (fraud detection, recommendation engines, dynamic pricing) with strict latency budgets","teams requiring point-in-time correctness for regulatory compliance or model debugging","high-throughput serving scenarios (>10k requests/second) where network round-trips dominate latency"],"limitations":["Millisecond latency claims depend on cache hit rates — cold cache or network-distant clients may see 50-200ms latency","In-memory caching requires sufficient Redis capacity — feature sets larger than available memory require tiered caching or feature selection","Point-in-time correctness requires timestamp-aware feature lookups — non-timestamped features cannot guarantee consistency","Fallback to batch features introduces staleness — batch refresh frequency must be tuned per use case"],"requires":["Redis cluster or managed Redis service (AWS ElastiCache, Azure Cache, GCP Memorystore)","Feature definitions with explicit materialization strategy (online, batch, or both)","Client SDK or gRPC/REST integration in prediction service","Monitoring infrastructure to track cache hit rates and serving latency"],"input_types":["entity keys (user ID, transaction ID, etc.)","timestamps (for point-in-time lookups)","batch feature requests"],"output_types":["feature vectors (JSON, Protobuf, or Arrow format)","metadata (feature freshness, cache status)","serving latency metrics"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tecton__cap_10","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.feature.store.integration.with.ml.frameworks","name":"feature-store-integration-with-ml-frameworks","description":"Native integrations with popular ML frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch, scikit-learn, XGBoost) that enable seamless feature loading during training and inference. Provides dataset loaders that automatically fetch features with point-in-time correctness, handles batch fetching for training efficiency, and supports distributed training across multiple machines. Includes utilities for feature normalization and preprocessing.","intents":["I want to load features directly into my training pipeline without writing custom data loading code","I need to ensure my training and serving use identical feature preprocessing and normalization","I want to train models on large feature sets without loading all data into memory"],"best_for":["ML engineers building models with Tecton features","teams using popular ML frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch, scikit-learn)","organizations requiring reproducible training with consistent feature loading"],"limitations":["Framework integrations are limited to popular libraries — custom frameworks require manual feature loading","Distributed training support depends on framework capabilities — not all frameworks support distributed feature loading","Feature normalization is limited to standard techniques — domain-specific preprocessing requires custom code","Large feature sets may exceed memory limits — requires careful batch size tuning and distributed training setup"],"requires":["ML framework (TensorFlow, PyTorch, scikit-learn, XGBoost, etc.)","Python 3.8+ with Tecton SDK","Access to feature store","Training data specifications (entity keys, date ranges)"],"input_types":["entity keys and timestamps for feature lookup","training dataset specifications","feature normalization parameters"],"output_types":["feature tensors/arrays ready for model training","feature metadata (names, types, statistics)","preprocessing parameters for serving"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tecton__cap_11","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.feature.store.api.with.sdk.and.rest.endpoints","name":"feature-store-api-with-sdk-and-rest-endpoints","description":"Comprehensive API surface for feature store operations including Python SDK for programmatic access, REST endpoints for language-agnostic integration, and gRPC for high-performance serving. Supports feature retrieval (online and batch), feature definition management, monitoring queries, and governance operations. Includes client libraries for popular languages and automatic request batching for efficiency.","intents":["I want to fetch features from my prediction service using a simple API call without managing feature store infrastructure","I need to integrate feature store operations into my data pipeline using REST or gRPC","I want to manage feature definitions programmatically without using the web UI"],"best_for":["prediction services requiring low-latency feature retrieval","data pipelines integrating with feature store for feature engineering","teams using multiple programming languages that need language-agnostic access"],"limitations":["REST API has higher latency than gRPC — suitable for <1k requests/second, gRPC recommended for higher throughput","Request batching adds complexity — must be explicitly enabled and tuned per use case","API rate limiting may apply — high-volume serving requires careful quota management","SDK updates may lag behind platform features — cutting-edge features may only be available via REST/gRPC"],"requires":["API key or OAuth credentials for authentication","Python 3.8+ for SDK or HTTP client for REST","Network access to feature store endpoints","Feature store account and feature definitions"],"input_types":["entity keys (for feature retrieval)","feature names or IDs","timestamps (for point-in-time lookups)","feature definitions (for management operations)"],"output_types":["feature values (JSON, Protobuf, Arrow)","feature metadata and schemas","operation status and error messages"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tecton__cap_2","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.declarative.feature.definition.with.schema.inference","name":"declarative-feature-definition-with-schema-inference","description":"Domain-specific language (DSL) for defining features as reusable, versioned entities with automatic schema inference, type validation, and metadata extraction. Features are defined once with SQL or Python transformations, source data lineage, and serving requirements (online/batch/both), then automatically compiled to pipeline code and registered in a centralized feature registry with versioning and deprecation tracking.","intents":["I want to define features declaratively without writing boilerplate pipeline code for each feature","I need to track feature lineage, ownership, and dependencies to understand data quality issues and prevent breaking changes","I want to reuse feature definitions across multiple models and teams without duplicating transformation logic"],"best_for":["data science teams that want to focus on feature logic rather than infrastructure code","organizations with many models sharing common features (e.g., user, product, transaction features)","teams requiring feature governance and lineage for regulatory compliance or debugging"],"limitations":["DSL expressiveness is limited to SQL and Python — complex custom transformations may require raw pipeline code","Schema inference works best for structured data — unstructured data (images, text) requires manual schema definition","Feature registry becomes a bottleneck if not properly indexed — large feature catalogs (>10k features) may have slow discovery","Version management requires discipline — unused feature versions accumulate and must be manually deprecated"],"requires":["Python 3.8+ for SDK or web UI access to Tecton platform","SQL knowledge for transformation definitions","Git integration for feature definition version control","Access to data sources for schema inference"],"input_types":["SQL transformation definitions","Python transformation code","Data source schemas (inferred or manual)","Feature metadata (owner, tags, SLAs)"],"output_types":["feature registry entries with versioning","compiled pipeline code","feature lineage graphs","schema definitions with type validation"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tecton__cap_3","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.feature.store.monitoring.and.data.quality.validation","name":"feature-store-monitoring-and-data-quality-validation","description":"Automated monitoring system that tracks feature freshness, data quality metrics (null rates, distribution shifts, schema violations), and pipeline health in real-time. Detects anomalies via statistical baselines and custom rules, triggers alerts on SLA violations (e.g., stale features, failed pipelines), and provides dashboards for feature health visibility. Integrates with external monitoring tools (Datadog, Prometheus) via metrics export.","intents":["I need to detect when features become stale or corrupt before they impact model predictions","I want to understand data quality issues (missing values, outliers, distribution shifts) and trace them back to source data","I need to set SLAs for feature freshness and get alerted when pipelines miss deadlines"],"best_for":["production ML teams operating models with strict uptime requirements","data quality engineers responsible for feature pipeline reliability","organizations with regulatory requirements for data lineage and quality auditing"],"limitations":["Anomaly detection relies on historical baselines — new features without history cannot be monitored until baseline is established (typically 1-2 weeks)","Custom data quality rules require manual definition — automatic rule generation is not supported","Monitoring overhead adds latency to pipelines — complex validation rules may increase feature computation time by 10-20%","Alert fatigue is common if thresholds are not carefully tuned — false positives require manual threshold adjustment"],"requires":["Feature definitions with explicit freshness SLAs","Historical feature data for baseline computation","External monitoring backend (optional: Datadog, Prometheus, CloudWatch)","Alert routing configuration (email, Slack, PagerDuty)"],"input_types":["feature values (for distribution analysis)","pipeline execution logs","custom validation rules (SQL or Python)","SLA definitions (freshness, completeness, uniqueness)"],"output_types":["data quality metrics and dashboards","anomaly alerts and notifications","feature health reports","lineage-based root cause analysis"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tecton__cap_4","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.feature.governance.and.access.control","name":"feature-governance-and-access-control","description":"Centralized governance layer that enforces role-based access control (RBAC) on features, tracks feature ownership and stewardship, manages feature deprecation workflows, and logs all feature access for compliance auditing. Integrates with identity providers (LDAP, OAuth) and supports fine-grained permissions (read, write, delete) at the feature set level with approval workflows for sensitive features.","intents":["I need to ensure only authorized teams can access sensitive features (e.g., customer PII-derived features)","I want to track who owns each feature and enforce deprecation workflows to prevent orphaned features","I need to audit all feature access for compliance with data governance policies"],"best_for":["large organizations with multiple teams sharing features and strict data governance requirements","regulated industries (finance, healthcare) requiring feature access auditing and compliance tracking","teams managing sensitive features derived from PII or confidential data"],"limitations":["RBAC enforcement adds latency to feature serving — permission checks may add 5-10ms per request","Approval workflows for feature access require manual review — cannot be fully automated","Audit logging generates large volumes of data — retention policies must be carefully managed to control storage costs","Integration with external identity providers requires network connectivity — offline access is not supported"],"requires":["Identity provider integration (LDAP, OAuth, SAML)","Feature ownership definitions (team, individual, or service account)","Access control policies (role definitions, permission mappings)","Audit log storage and retention policy"],"input_types":["user/service account identity","feature access requests","ownership and stewardship metadata","deprecation notices"],"output_types":["access control decisions (allow/deny)","audit logs with timestamps and user context","governance reports and compliance dashboards","deprecation workflow notifications"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tecton__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.training.serving.consistency.with.point.in.time.lookups","name":"training-serving-consistency-with-point-in-time-lookups","description":"Mechanism that ensures training datasets and serving features use identical feature values by implementing point-in-time (PIT) lookups that retrieve features as they existed at a specific historical timestamp. Automatically handles feature versioning, backfill timing, and timestamp alignment across multiple feature sources to prevent training-serving skew caused by feature updates or late-arriving data.","intents":["I need to ensure my training data and production predictions use the same feature values to prevent model performance degradation","I want to debug model performance issues by reconstructing the exact features used during training","I need to handle late-arriving data without corrupting historical training datasets"],"best_for":["teams operating models in production where training-serving skew causes performance issues","regulated industries requiring reproducible model training and audit trails","systems with late-arriving data (e.g., delayed transaction confirmations, asynchronous enrichment)"],"limitations":["PIT lookups require timestamp-aware feature storage — non-timestamped features cannot participate in PIT consistency","Storage overhead increases significantly with feature versioning — must maintain multiple versions of each feature value","PIT lookups are slower than direct feature retrieval — typical latency increase is 20-50% due to version lookup overhead","Handling late-arriving data requires careful timestamp semantics — event time vs processing time confusion can cause subtle bugs"],"requires":["Feature definitions with explicit timestamp columns","Versioned feature storage backend (Tecton-managed or compatible)","Training dataset generation that captures timestamps for each example","Serving code that passes timestamps to feature lookups"],"input_types":["entity keys with associated timestamps","feature definitions with timestamp semantics","training dataset specifications with timestamp ranges"],"output_types":["training datasets with PIT-correct features","serving features with timestamp metadata","consistency validation reports"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tecton__cap_6","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.feature.discovery.and.catalog.search","name":"feature-discovery-and-catalog-search","description":"Searchable feature registry that enables discovery of existing features via full-text search, metadata filtering (owner, tags, data source), and lineage browsing. Provides feature documentation, usage statistics (which models use each feature), and recommendations for similar features to prevent duplication. Integrates with IDEs and notebooks via SDK for inline feature discovery.","intents":["I want to find existing features before building new ones to avoid duplication and reuse proven transformations","I need to understand which models depend on a feature before deprecating it","I want to discover features related to my current task (e.g., all user-based features) without manual browsing"],"best_for":["large organizations with hundreds or thousands of features where discovery is a bottleneck","data science teams that frequently build new models and want to maximize feature reuse","organizations with distributed teams that lack institutional knowledge of available features"],"limitations":["Search quality depends on feature documentation — poorly documented features are hard to discover","Usage statistics require instrumentation of all model training and serving — incomplete instrumentation gives misleading results","Recommendation engine may suggest irrelevant features if metadata is sparse or inconsistent","Catalog becomes stale if feature definitions are not kept in sync with actual implementations"],"requires":["Feature registry with complete metadata (owner, tags, documentation)","Model tracking integration to capture feature usage","Search infrastructure (Elasticsearch or similar)","SDK or web UI access for discovery"],"input_types":["search queries (text, filters, lineage)","feature metadata and documentation","model training/serving logs"],"output_types":["search results with relevance ranking","feature details and lineage graphs","usage statistics and recommendations","documentation and ownership information"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tecton__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.multi.source.feature.joining.with.consistency.guarantees","name":"multi-source-feature-joining-with-consistency-guarantees","description":"Automatic feature joining engine that combines features from multiple sources (streaming, batch, real-time APIs) with configurable join strategies (left join, inner join, outer join) and consistency guarantees. Handles schema alignment, type coercion, and missing value imputation automatically. Supports time-windowed joins for streaming features and manages join key cardinality to prevent data explosion.","intents":["I need to combine features from Kafka streams, S3 batch data, and real-time APIs without manual join logic","I want to ensure features from different sources are aligned on timestamps and keys to prevent data quality issues","I need to handle missing features gracefully without breaking the entire feature vector"],"best_for":["teams combining features from heterogeneous sources (data warehouse, streaming, APIs)","real-time ML systems that require features from multiple domains (user, product, context)","organizations with complex feature dependencies across multiple teams"],"limitations":["Join performance degrades with high-cardinality join keys — many-to-many joins can cause data explosion","Time-windowed joins require careful window size tuning — too small windows miss relevant data, too large windows increase latency","Schema alignment is automatic only for simple types — complex nested types require manual mapping","Missing value imputation uses simple strategies (zero, mean, forward-fill) — domain-specific imputation requires custom logic"],"requires":["Feature definitions with explicit join keys and timestamps","Compatible data sources (Kafka, S3, databases, APIs)","Join strategy configuration (join type, window size, cardinality limits)","Compute infrastructure to execute joins (Spark, Flink)"],"input_types":["feature sets from multiple sources","join key definitions","join strategy specifications","timestamp and window configurations"],"output_types":["joined feature vectors","join statistics (cardinality, missing rates)","data quality metrics for joined features"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tecton__cap_8","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.feature.backfill.and.historical.data.generation","name":"feature-backfill-and-historical-data-generation","description":"Batch processing system that generates historical feature values for training dataset creation by replaying feature pipelines over historical data with point-in-time correctness. Supports incremental backfills (only computing missing date ranges), parallel execution across date ranges for performance, and automatic handling of late-arriving data. Integrates with data warehouses (Snowflake, BigQuery) for efficient backfill execution.","intents":["I need to generate training datasets with historical features for model development without manual data wrangling","I want to backfill new features into existing datasets without recomputing all historical data","I need to handle late-arriving data that arrives after the original backfill date"],"best_for":["teams building training datasets from feature pipelines","organizations adding new features to existing models and needing historical values","systems with late-arriving data that requires periodic backfill updates"],"limitations":["Backfill performance depends on data warehouse query efficiency — complex transformations may take hours for large date ranges","Incremental backfills require careful state management — overlapping backfill jobs can cause data inconsistencies","Late-arriving data handling requires replay of historical pipelines — cannot be fully automated without manual intervention","Storage costs for backfilled features can be significant — retention policies must be carefully managed"],"requires":["Feature pipeline definitions with historical data availability","Data warehouse or data lake with historical raw data","Compute resources for parallel backfill execution (Spark, BigQuery, Snowflake)","Storage for backfilled feature data"],"input_types":["feature definitions","date ranges for backfill","historical raw data","late-arriving data specifications"],"output_types":["backfilled feature datasets","backfill execution logs and metrics","data quality reports for backfilled features"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tecton__cap_9","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.real.time.feature.computation.with.low.latency.aggregations","name":"real-time-feature-computation-with-low-latency-aggregations","description":"Streaming feature computation engine that performs low-latency aggregations (sum, count, average, percentiles) over time windows (tumbling, sliding, session windows) on streaming data. Supports stateful operations with automatic state management, handles out-of-order events, and materializes results to the online feature store with sub-second latency. Integrates with Kafka, Kinesis, and Pub/Sub for event ingestion.","intents":["I need to compute real-time aggregations (user activity counts, transaction sums) for immediate use in online predictions","I want to handle out-of-order events without losing data or corrupting aggregations","I need to compute multiple time windows (1-minute, 1-hour, 1-day) efficiently without duplicate computation"],"best_for":["real-time ML systems requiring aggregated features (fraud detection, recommendation engines)","teams processing high-volume event streams (>10k events/second) with strict latency requirements","systems with out-of-order or late-arriving events that require careful handling"],"limitations":["State management overhead increases with window size and cardinality — large state can cause memory pressure and slow recovery","Out-of-order event handling requires buffering — buffer size must be tuned to balance latency and correctness","Multiple time windows require separate computations — no automatic optimization for overlapping windows","Exactly-once semantics require careful checkpoint management — failure recovery can cause temporary feature staleness"],"requires":["Streaming data source (Kafka, Kinesis, Pub/Sub)","Streaming compute engine (Flink, Spark Streaming, or cloud-native service)","State backend for checkpoint management (RocksDB, S3, GCS)","Online feature store for materialization"],"input_types":["streaming events with timestamps","window specifications (size, slide, grace period)","aggregation definitions (SQL or Python UDFs)"],"output_types":["aggregated feature values","feature freshness metadata","streaming computation metrics (latency, throughput)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tecton__headline","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.enterprise.feature.platform.for.automated.feature.engineering.in.real.time.ml.applications","name":"enterprise feature platform for automated feature engineering in real-time ml applications","description":"Tecton is an enterprise feature platform that automates feature engineering, providing real-time and batch feature pipelines, a feature store, and governance for production ML systems, making it essential for organizations looking to streamline their ML workflows.","intents":["best enterprise feature platform","feature engineering for real-time ML","automated feature pipelines for machine learning","feature store solutions for production ML","real-time feature management tools"],"best_for":["enterprises needing real-time ML capabilities"],"limitations":[],"requires":[],"input_types":[],"output_types":[],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":57,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Python 3.8+ or SQL dialect compatible with target compute engine","Access to data sources (Kafka, S3, Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery, etc.)","Compute infrastructure (Spark, Flink, or cloud-native streaming service)","Feature store backend (Tecton-managed or self-hosted)","Redis cluster or managed Redis service (AWS ElastiCache, Azure Cache, GCP Memorystore)","Feature definitions with explicit materialization strategy (online, batch, or both)","Client SDK or gRPC/REST integration in prediction service","Monitoring infrastructure to track cache hit rates and serving latency","ML framework (TensorFlow, PyTorch, scikit-learn, XGBoost, etc.)","Python 3.8+ with Tecton SDK"],"failure_modes":["Streaming pipelines require compatible message brokers (Kafka, Kinesis) — custom event sources require adapter development","Batch pipeline scheduling depends on external orchestrators (Airflow, Spark) — no native scheduling engine included","Complex stateful transformations (windowed aggregations, sessionization) require careful tuning to avoid state explosion in streaming mode","Cross-pipeline dependencies must be explicitly defined — implicit ordering is not inferred","Millisecond latency claims depend on cache hit rates — cold cache or network-distant clients may see 50-200ms latency","In-memory caching requires sufficient Redis capacity — feature sets larger than available memory require tiered caching or feature selection","Point-in-time correctness requires timestamp-aware feature lookups — non-timestamped features cannot guarantee consistency","Fallback to batch features introduces staleness — batch refresh frequency must be tuned per use case","Framework integrations are limited to popular libraries — custom frameworks require manual feature loading","Distributed training support depends on framework capabilities — not all frameworks support distributed feature loading","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.7,"quality":0.9,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:28.696Z","last_scraped_at":null,"last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=tecton","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=tecton"}},"signature":"+WuYW6kdU+jFIlsgT+GSZtcFCIT37gMD7stXZAIXbcNmLgw2GRNq8HZ098j2eK7ZuxlRToRKhvLCNHsMZ/HyBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T22:04:42.507Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/tecton","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/tecton","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=tecton","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}