{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_swe-lens","slug":"swe-lens","name":"SWE Lens","type":"product","url":"https://www.swelens.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/swe-lens","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_0","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.resume.to.skill.profile.extraction","name":"resume-to-skill-profile extraction","description":"Automatically parses resume documents and extracts structured technical skills, experience level, and competency areas. Converts unstructured resume text into a standardized skill profile for comparison against job requirements.","intents":["I want to quickly understand what technical skills a candidate has without manually reading their resume","I need to standardize how we capture and categorize candidate skills across all applicants","I want to identify skill gaps between what a candidate has and what the role requires"],"best_for":["technical recruiters","engineering hiring managers","talent acquisition teams at tech companies"],"limitations":["requires well-formatted, complete resumes","may miss non-traditional experience or self-taught skills not explicitly documented","accuracy depends on resume clarity and detail"],"requires":["resume document (PDF, DOCX, or text)","job description or skill taxonomy for comparison"],"input_types":["resume (PDF, DOCX, text)"],"output_types":["structured skill profile (JSON/database format)","skill-to-requirement mapping"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_1","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.github.portfolio.technical.assessment","name":"github-portfolio-technical-assessment","description":"Analyzes a candidate's GitHub profile and public repositories to evaluate code quality, project complexity, contribution patterns, and technical depth. Provides insights into actual coding ability beyond what resumes claim.","intents":["I want to see what a candidate can actually build, not just what they claim on their resume","I need to assess code quality and engineering practices from real projects","I want to understand a candidate's technical growth trajectory and learning patterns"],"best_for":["engineering hiring managers","technical recruiters evaluating software engineers","companies prioritizing demonstrated ability over credentials"],"limitations":["only works if candidate has public GitHub profile with meaningful contributions","may not reflect team collaboration skills or ability to work with legacy code","open source contributions may not represent commercial software engineering practices"],"requires":["GitHub profile URL","public repositories with sufficient commit history"],"input_types":["GitHub profile URL"],"output_types":["code quality assessment","project complexity analysis","contribution pattern report","technical skill inference"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_10","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.batch.candidate.processing","name":"batch-candidate-processing","description":"Processes multiple candidate profiles simultaneously, extracting skills, running assessments, and generating rankings across entire candidate pools. Enables efficient screening of large volumes of applicants.","intents":["I want to screen 100+ candidates quickly instead of one at a time","I need to process an entire applicant pool through the same evaluation framework","I want to generate a ranked candidate list from a large pool automatically"],"best_for":["companies with high engineering hiring volume","recruiters managing large candidate pools","teams running bulk hiring campaigns"],"limitations":["batch processing quality depends on data consistency across candidates","may be slower for very large pools (1000+)","requires standardized input format"],"requires":["multiple candidate profiles/resumes","batch processing configuration"],"input_types":["batch resume uploads","candidate data in bulk format"],"output_types":["ranked candidate list","bulk assessment results","screening report"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_11","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.role.specific.skill.weighting","name":"role-specific-skill-weighting","description":"Customizes evaluation criteria and skill importance based on specific job requirements. Weights different technical skills differently depending on role (e.g., frontend vs. backend vs. DevOps), ensuring relevant skill matching.","intents":["I want to evaluate candidates differently for frontend vs. backend roles","I need to prioritize certain skills over others for this specific position","I want to match candidates to the right role based on their skill strengths"],"best_for":["companies with diverse engineering roles","hiring managers with specific technical needs","teams hiring across multiple specializations"],"limitations":["requires clear definition of role-specific requirements","may miss candidates with transferable skills from different domains","weighting must be maintained and updated"],"requires":["detailed job description with skill priorities","role-specific evaluation criteria"],"input_types":["job description (structured)","skill weighting parameters"],"output_types":["role-specific candidate scores","skill relevance ranking","role-fit assessment"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_12","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.candidate.comparison.and.benchmarking","name":"candidate-comparison-and-benchmarking","description":"Enables side-by-side comparison of multiple candidates across standardized metrics and skill dimensions. Provides benchmarking against role requirements and peer candidates to inform decision-making.","intents":["I want to compare two candidates head-to-head to make a hiring decision","I need to see how this candidate compares to others in the pool","I want to benchmark candidates against the ideal profile for this role"],"best_for":["hiring managers making final decisions","recruiters narrowing down shortlists","teams evaluating multiple strong candidates"],"limitations":["comparison is only as good as underlying assessment data","may oversimplify complex hiring decisions","doesn't account for intangible factors"],"requires":["multiple candidate profiles","standardized evaluation metrics"],"input_types":["candidate profiles (structured)","comparison parameters"],"output_types":["side-by-side comparison","strength/weakness analysis","recommendation"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_2","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.coding.assessment.performance.evaluation","name":"coding-assessment-performance-evaluation","description":"Integrates with coding platforms (LeetCode, HackerRank, etc.) to pull and analyze candidate coding challenge results, solution quality, and problem-solving approach. Evaluates algorithmic thinking and practical coding ability.","intents":["I want to see how a candidate performs on standardized coding challenges","I need to compare candidates fairly using objective coding assessment metrics","I want to understand a candidate's problem-solving speed and code efficiency"],"best_for":["technical recruiters","engineering teams hiring for algorithm-heavy roles","companies using standardized coding assessments"],"limitations":["only reflects performance on specific coding platforms","may not correlate with real-world engineering tasks or system design ability","requires candidate to have completed assessments on integrated platforms"],"requires":["candidate's coding platform account (LeetCode, HackerRank, etc.)","permission to access assessment results"],"input_types":["coding platform profile/API data"],"output_types":["assessment score analysis","problem-solving metrics","code efficiency report","performance percentile ranking"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_3","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.skill.gap.identification","name":"skill-gap-identification","description":"Compares candidate's extracted skills and experience against job requirements to identify missing competencies, experience gaps, and areas where candidate exceeds requirements. Highlights both deficiencies and strengths relative to the role.","intents":["I want to know which required skills a candidate is missing","I need to identify if a candidate is overqualified or underqualified for this role","I want to see which skill gaps are critical vs. nice-to-have"],"best_for":["hiring managers","technical recruiters","talent acquisition teams"],"limitations":["accuracy depends on quality of job description and candidate profile data","cannot assess soft skills or cultural fit","may not account for transferable skills from different domains"],"requires":["structured candidate skill profile","detailed job description with required skills"],"input_types":["candidate skill profile (structured)","job requirements (structured or text)"],"output_types":["gap analysis report","skill match percentage","critical vs. optional gap breakdown"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_4","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.candidate.ranking.and.scoring","name":"candidate-ranking-and-scoring","description":"Generates a standardized score or ranking for candidates based on aggregated technical qualifications, skill matches, and assessment performance. Enables objective comparison across candidate pool.","intents":["I want to rank candidates objectively without recruiter bias","I need a quick way to identify top candidates from a large pool","I want to standardize how we compare candidates across different hiring rounds"],"best_for":["recruiters screening large candidate pools","hiring managers making shortlist decisions","companies with high engineering hiring volume"],"limitations":["scoring is only as good as input data quality","cannot capture intangible qualities like leadership potential or cultural fit","may disadvantage non-traditional candidates with incomplete digital footprints"],"requires":["candidate skill profiles","assessment results","job requirements","weighting criteria for scoring"],"input_types":["candidate profiles (structured)","assessment scores","job requirements"],"output_types":["candidate ranking/score","comparative analysis","shortlist recommendations"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_5","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.ats.integration.and.sync","name":"ats-integration-and-sync","description":"Connects with existing Applicant Tracking Systems to automatically pull candidate data, push analysis results, and maintain synchronized candidate records. Enables workflow integration without manual data entry.","intents":["I want to use SWE Lens without disrupting our existing ATS workflow","I need candidate analysis results automatically updated in our ATS","I want to avoid duplicate data entry between systems"],"best_for":["mid-to-large tech companies with established ATS systems","recruiting teams with existing workflows"],"limitations":["integration quality depends on ATS API capabilities","may require IT setup and configuration","limited to ATS systems with available integrations"],"requires":["ATS system with API access","integration setup/configuration","API credentials"],"input_types":["ATS candidate data (via API)"],"output_types":["analysis results synced to ATS","candidate profiles updated in ATS"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_6","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.bias.reduction.standardized.evaluation","name":"bias-reduction-standardized-evaluation","description":"Applies data-driven, standardized evaluation frameworks to candidate assessment, reducing subjective recruiter bias. Ensures consistent evaluation criteria across all candidates regardless of background or presentation.","intents":["I want to reduce unconscious bias in our hiring process","I need to ensure all candidates are evaluated using the same criteria","I want to improve diversity in our engineering hires by removing subjective judgment"],"best_for":["companies committed to fair hiring practices","organizations with diversity and inclusion goals","teams wanting to standardize evaluation"],"limitations":["cannot eliminate bias entirely if training data is biased","may still disadvantage candidates from non-traditional backgrounds","requires buy-in from hiring team to follow standardized process"],"requires":["standardized evaluation framework","consistent candidate data quality","hiring team commitment to data-driven decisions"],"input_types":["candidate profiles (structured)","job requirements"],"output_types":["standardized evaluation scores","bias-reduced ranking","evaluation consistency report"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_7","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.candidate.profile.enrichment","name":"candidate-profile-enrichment","description":"Aggregates data from multiple sources (resume, GitHub, coding platforms, LinkedIn-like profiles) into a comprehensive candidate profile. Creates a 360-degree view of candidate's technical qualifications and experience.","intents":["I want a complete picture of a candidate from all available sources","I need to see how different data sources align or contradict each other","I want one unified candidate profile instead of checking multiple platforms"],"best_for":["technical recruiters","hiring managers wanting comprehensive candidate view","companies using multiple assessment platforms"],"limitations":["only as complete as available public data and candidate-provided information","requires candidate to have presence on multiple platforms","may include outdated information if profiles aren't regularly updated"],"requires":["resume","GitHub profile","coding assessment accounts","other public profile URLs"],"input_types":["resume (text/PDF)","GitHub URL","coding platform URLs","portfolio links"],"output_types":["unified candidate profile (structured)","multi-source data integration","profile completeness score"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_8","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.experience.level.classification","name":"experience-level-classification","description":"Automatically categorizes candidates into experience levels (junior, mid-level, senior, staff) based on years of experience, project complexity, technical depth, and contribution patterns. Provides standardized seniority assessment.","intents":["I want to quickly understand if a candidate is junior, mid, or senior level","I need to match candidates to appropriate role levels","I want to identify high-potential junior candidates vs. experienced hires"],"best_for":["recruiters managing multiple role levels","hiring managers making level-appropriate matches","companies with structured career progression"],"limitations":["classification may not account for domain-specific expertise or specialized skills","can be inaccurate for career-switchers or non-traditional paths","relies on accurate historical data"],"requires":["candidate experience data","project/contribution history","skill assessment results"],"input_types":["candidate profile (structured)","GitHub contribution data","assessment results"],"output_types":["experience level classification","seniority score","level justification/breakdown"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_swe-lens__cap_9","uri":"capability://hr.recruiting.cultural.fit.indicator.assessment","name":"cultural-fit-indicator-assessment","description":"Analyzes candidate background, project choices, collaboration patterns, and other signals to infer potential cultural fit with the organization. Provides indicators of alignment with company values and team dynamics.","intents":["I want to understand if a candidate will fit with our team culture","I need to identify candidates who share our company values","I want to predict how well a candidate will collaborate with our team"],"best_for":["hiring managers","recruiters at companies with strong cultures","teams prioritizing team fit"],"limitations":["cultural fit assessment is inherently subjective and prone to homogeneity bias","may disadvantage candidates from different backgrounds","cannot reliably predict interpersonal dynamics","requires clear articulation of company culture/values"],"requires":["candidate background information","company culture/values definition","team dynamics data"],"input_types":["candidate profile (structured)","company culture parameters"],"output_types":["cultural fit score","alignment indicators","potential friction areas"],"categories":["hr-recruiting","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":45,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["resume document (PDF, DOCX, or text)","job description or skill taxonomy for comparison","GitHub profile URL","public repositories with sufficient commit history","multiple candidate profiles/resumes","batch processing configuration","detailed job description with skill priorities","role-specific evaluation criteria","multiple candidate profiles","standardized evaluation metrics"],"failure_modes":["requires well-formatted, complete resumes","may miss non-traditional experience or self-taught skills not explicitly documented","accuracy depends on resume clarity and detail","only works if candidate has public GitHub profile with meaningful contributions","may not reflect team collaboration skills or ability to work with legacy code","open source contributions may not represent commercial software engineering practices","batch processing quality depends on data consistency across candidates","may be slower for very large pools (1000+)","requires standardized input format","requires clear definition of role-specific requirements","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.648Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.541Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=swe-lens","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=swe-lens"}},"signature":"SiFS9Hm0I5kpfDyy5/69oKTm8lgq6gW9s9+17CiWPy3ak6n180KmwK/CJx2cC4hHZ/tnuWmRDzdjjmqcNbD0DA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T03:41:38.803Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/swe-lens","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/swe-lens","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=swe-lens","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}