{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_strut","slug":"strut","name":"Strut","type":"product","url":"https://strut.so","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/strut","categories":["text-writing"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_strut__cap_0","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.ai.assisted.content.generation.with.contextual.writing.suggestions","name":"ai-assisted content generation with contextual writing suggestions","description":"Generates writing suggestions and completes partial content by analyzing the current document context and user intent. The system maintains awareness of document structure, tone, and previously written sections to provide contextually relevant suggestions rather than generic completions. Integration with LLM APIs (likely OpenAI or similar) enables real-time suggestion generation as users type or request rewrites.","intents":["I need help completing this paragraph while maintaining my existing tone and style","Generate alternative phrasings for this section that sound more professional","Expand this outline into full prose without losing my original voice","Get writing suggestions that understand what I've already written in this document"],"best_for":["Freelance writers struggling with writer's block or pacing","Content teams producing high-volume long-form content","Non-native English speakers needing real-time writing assistance"],"limitations":["Suggestions may not preserve unique voice or brand guidelines without explicit training","No persistent style profile across documents — each document starts fresh","Latency depends on LLM API response time; typically 2-5 seconds for full suggestions","Limited to text-based suggestions; no semantic understanding of domain-specific terminology without custom training"],"requires":["Active internet connection for LLM API calls","User account with Strut (free tier available)","Minimum document length of ~50 words for contextual suggestions to be effective"],"input_types":["plain text","partial sentences or paragraphs","document outline or structure"],"output_types":["suggested text completions","alternative phrasings","expanded prose from outline"],"categories":["text-generation-language","writing-assistance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_strut__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.drag.and.drop.content.block.reorganization.with.structural.preservation","name":"drag-and-drop content block reorganization with structural preservation","description":"Enables non-linear rearrangement of document sections through a visual block-based interface where users can drag content units (paragraphs, sections, or outline items) to new positions. The system preserves internal formatting, links, and metadata during moves while automatically updating cross-references and table of contents if present. Built on a block-based document model (similar to Notion or Roam) rather than traditional linear text editing.","intents":["Reorganize my essay structure without manually cutting and pasting text","Experiment with different section orders to find the best narrative flow","Move entire subsections with their nested content intact","Visually see my document structure and rearrange it like index cards"],"best_for":["Writers working on non-linear content (essays, reports, long-form articles)","Teams collaborating on structured documents where section order frequently changes","Outlining-first writers who need to convert outline structure into prose"],"limitations":["Block-based model may not suit documents requiring precise character-level formatting control","Drag-and-drop performance degrades with documents exceeding 500+ blocks","No automatic conflict resolution if multiple users drag the same block simultaneously","Cross-references and internal links require manual verification after major reorganizations"],"requires":["Modern browser with HTML5 drag-and-drop API support (Chrome 4+, Firefox 3.6+, Safari 3.1+)","Document must be structured as discrete blocks (not imported as plain text without parsing)"],"input_types":["structured document blocks","outline hierarchies","nested sections"],"output_types":["reorganized document structure","updated table of contents","preserved formatting and metadata"],"categories":["automation-workflow","document-organization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_strut__cap_10","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.ai.powered.grammar.and.style.checking.with.contextual.suggestions","name":"ai-powered grammar and style checking with contextual suggestions","description":"Analyzes document text for grammatical errors, style issues, and clarity problems using NLP and rule-based checking. Provides inline suggestions for corrections with explanations of why the change is recommended. Learns from user corrections to improve suggestion accuracy over time. Supports multiple language variants (US English, British English, etc.) and style guides (AP, Chicago, MLA).","intents":["Find and fix grammar and spelling errors in my document","Get suggestions for improving sentence clarity and readability","Ensure my writing follows a specific style guide","Understand why a particular phrasing is incorrect or suboptimal"],"best_for":["Non-native English writers seeking real-time grammar assistance","Content teams maintaining consistent style across documents","Editors and proofreaders looking for automated pre-screening","Students writing academic papers with specific style requirements"],"limitations":["Grammar checking is rule-based and may produce false positives for intentional stylistic choices or dialect variations","Contextual understanding is limited; may not recognize correct usage in ambiguous sentences","Style guide support is limited to major guides (AP, Chicago, MLA); custom style guides not supported","Learning from user corrections requires significant data collection and may not generalize well"],"requires":["Document text in English (other languages have limited support)","Minimum 20 words for meaningful grammar checking","User account with Strut"],"input_types":["document text","language variant selection (optional)","style guide selection (optional)"],"output_types":["grammar and style suggestions","correction explanations","style guide compliance report"],"categories":["text-generation-language","writing-assistance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_strut__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.real.time.collaborative.editing.with.presence.awareness.and.conflict.resolution","name":"real-time collaborative editing with presence awareness and conflict resolution","description":"Enables multiple users to edit the same document simultaneously with live cursor positions, selection highlighting, and automatic conflict resolution. Uses operational transformation (OT) or CRDT (Conflict-free Replicated Data Type) algorithms to merge concurrent edits from multiple users without requiring manual conflict resolution. Presence indicators show which users are currently viewing/editing and their cursor positions in real-time.","intents":["Co-write a document with a colleague in real-time without version conflicts","See where my collaborator is editing and what they're typing as it happens","Have multiple people edit different sections simultaneously without overwriting each other's work","Maintain a single source of truth for collaborative documents without manual merging"],"best_for":["Content teams producing collaborative long-form content (reports, articles, guides)","Freelancers working with editors or clients who need to provide real-time feedback","Remote teams requiring synchronous collaboration without context-switching to separate tools"],"limitations":["Conflict resolution algorithm may produce unexpected results if users edit overlapping text simultaneously (e.g., both editing the same sentence)","Presence awareness adds ~100-200ms latency per update due to server round-trip","No built-in version history or branching — all edits are merged into a single timeline","Real-time sync requires persistent WebSocket connection; offline editing not supported"],"requires":["Stable internet connection with WebSocket support","All collaborators must have active Strut accounts","Browser with WebSocket API support (all modern browsers)","Server-side infrastructure to manage concurrent edits and presence state"],"input_types":["text edits from multiple users","cursor position updates","selection ranges"],"output_types":["merged document state","presence indicators","conflict-resolved text"],"categories":["automation-workflow","collaboration-tools"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_strut__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.ai.powered.content.rewriting.and.tone.adjustment","name":"ai-powered content rewriting and tone adjustment","description":"Analyzes selected text and generates alternative versions with different tones, styles, or purposes (e.g., formal to casual, technical to accessible, passive to active voice). The system uses prompt engineering and LLM fine-tuning to understand tone parameters and apply them consistently across rewrites. Users can select predefined tone profiles or define custom tone guidelines that persist across rewrites.","intents":["Rewrite this paragraph to sound more professional/casual/friendly","Convert this technical explanation into language a non-expert can understand","Change the tone of my entire document to match a specific brand voice","Generate multiple tone variations so I can choose the best one"],"best_for":["Content creators managing multiple brand voices or audience segments","Non-native writers needing help with tone and register","Marketing teams producing content for different audience personas","Editors working with writers who struggle with tone consistency"],"limitations":["Tone detection is heuristic-based; may misidentify intended tone in sarcastic or ironic text","Rewrites may alter meaning or introduce subtle inaccuracies, requiring manual review","Limited to predefined tone profiles unless user provides detailed custom guidelines","No awareness of domain-specific terminology; may oversimplify technical content when converting to 'accessible' tone"],"requires":["Selected text of minimum 20 words for meaningful rewrite","LLM API access (included in free tier)","User account with Strut"],"input_types":["selected text passages","tone profile names or descriptions","custom tone guidelines (optional)"],"output_types":["rewritten text with adjusted tone","multiple tone variations","tone analysis of original text"],"categories":["text-generation-language","writing-assistance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_strut__cap_4","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.document.outline.generation.and.structure.suggestion","name":"document outline generation and structure suggestion","description":"Analyzes document content or user-provided topic and automatically generates hierarchical outlines with suggested section headings, subsections, and logical flow. Uses NLP to identify natural topic boundaries in existing text or generates outline structure from scratch based on topic analysis. Outlines are editable and can be converted directly into document structure with placeholder content.","intents":["Generate an outline for a topic I want to write about","Analyze my existing draft and suggest a better structure","Create a hierarchical outline that I can expand into full prose","Get suggestions for sections I might be missing in my current outline"],"best_for":["Writers experiencing structural paralysis or unsure how to organize ideas","Students writing research papers or essays who need help with structure","Content teams producing standardized content types (guides, tutorials, reports)","Outline-first writers who want AI suggestions before drafting"],"limitations":["Generated outlines reflect common patterns and may not suit niche or specialized content","No awareness of audience expertise level; suggestions may be too basic or too advanced","Outline generation is deterministic based on topic; limited customization of structure depth or breadth","May suggest redundant sections if topic has overlapping concepts"],"requires":["Topic description or existing document content (minimum 100 words for analysis)","LLM API access","User account with Strut"],"input_types":["topic description or keywords","existing document text","content type specification (e.g., 'tutorial', 'research paper')"],"output_types":["hierarchical outline with headings","suggested section descriptions","document structure template"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","writing-assistance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_strut__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.collaborative.feedback.and.commenting.with.threaded.discussion","name":"collaborative feedback and commenting with threaded discussion","description":"Enables reviewers to leave inline comments on specific text passages with threaded discussion, allowing authors and reviewers to discuss changes without modifying the document directly. Comments are anchored to specific text ranges and persist even if surrounding text is edited. Supports comment resolution workflow where comments can be marked as addressed, creating an audit trail of feedback incorporation.","intents":["Leave feedback on a colleague's draft without directly editing their work","Have a discussion about a specific sentence or paragraph with the author","Track which feedback has been addressed and which is still pending","See the history of feedback and how it was incorporated into the document"],"best_for":["Editorial teams with formal review workflows","Freelancers receiving client feedback on drafts","Academic collaborations requiring documented feedback trails","Content teams with multiple review stages"],"limitations":["Comments anchored to text may become orphaned or misaligned if surrounding text is heavily edited","No automatic notification system for comment replies; users must check manually or rely on email integration","Comment threads can become unwieldy with many back-and-forth exchanges; no threading depth limit","No permission model for comment visibility; all collaborators see all comments"],"requires":["All participants must have Strut accounts with edit or comment permissions","Stable internet connection for real-time comment updates","Browser with support for text range selection and anchoring"],"input_types":["text selection for comment anchoring","comment text","comment resolution status"],"output_types":["threaded comment discussions","comment audit trail","feedback incorporation status"],"categories":["automation-workflow","collaboration-tools"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_strut__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.writing.analytics.and.readability.metrics","name":"writing analytics and readability metrics","description":"Analyzes document text to compute readability metrics (Flesch-Kincaid grade level, reading time, word count, sentence complexity) and provides writing quality insights (passive voice percentage, adverb usage, repetition detection). Metrics update in real-time as users write and can be filtered by section or time period. Provides comparative benchmarks against target audience reading level.","intents":["Check if my writing is at the right reading level for my target audience","See how long it will take someone to read my document","Identify sections with overly complex sentences that need simplification","Track how my writing metrics change as I revise"],"best_for":["Content creators optimizing for specific audience reading levels","Marketing teams ensuring content matches brand guidelines","Educators teaching writing skills with quantitative feedback","Non-native writers seeking objective writing quality metrics"],"limitations":["Readability metrics are language-specific; only English is fully supported","Metrics don't account for domain-specific terminology or technical jargon that may be appropriate despite high complexity scores","Real-time metric computation adds ~50-100ms latency per keystroke on large documents","Comparative benchmarks are based on general audience data; may not reflect niche audience preferences"],"requires":["Document text in English (other languages have limited support)","Minimum 50 words for meaningful metrics","User account with Strut"],"input_types":["document text","target audience specification (optional)","section filters (optional)"],"output_types":["readability scores and metrics","writing quality insights","comparative benchmarks","metric trends over time"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","writing-assistance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_strut__cap_7","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.template.based.document.creation.with.ai.customization","name":"template-based document creation with ai customization","description":"Provides pre-built document templates for common writing types (blog posts, reports, guides, proposals) that users can select and customize. Templates include suggested structure, placeholder content, and tone guidelines. AI can customize templates by filling in placeholders based on user input (topic, audience, purpose) and adjusting tone/style parameters. Customized templates become starting points for drafting.","intents":["Start writing a blog post without staring at a blank page","Create a professional report template customized for my specific topic","Generate a proposal outline that matches my company's standard format","Get a template that's already structured for my content type"],"best_for":["Content teams producing high-volume standardized content","Freelancers who want to maintain consistent structure across client projects","Non-professional writers who benefit from structural scaffolding","Organizations with brand guidelines that need to be reflected in document structure"],"limitations":["Templates are generic and may not fit specialized or niche content types","Customization is limited to predefined parameters; complex customization requires manual editing","No version control for templates; updates to template library affect all documents created from old versions","Template selection is manual; no recommendation system for suggesting appropriate templates"],"requires":["User account with Strut","Selection of appropriate template from library","Basic input for template customization (topic, audience, etc.)"],"input_types":["template selection","customization parameters (topic, audience, tone)","placeholder content specifications"],"output_types":["customized document template","structured outline with placeholders","tone-adjusted template content"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_strut__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.user.permission.management.and.access.control","name":"multi-user permission management and access control","description":"Manages document access permissions with granular role-based controls (view-only, comment-only, edit, admin). Permissions can be assigned to individual users or groups and can be time-limited or revoked at any time. Access logs track who accessed the document and when. Supports public sharing with optional password protection or link expiration.","intents":["Share a draft with specific people for feedback without giving them edit access","Give a client view-only access to see my progress without letting them edit","Revoke access to a document after a project is complete","Track who has accessed my document and when"],"best_for":["Freelancers managing client access to work-in-progress documents","Teams with formal document governance requirements","Organizations handling sensitive or confidential content","Projects requiring audit trails of document access"],"limitations":["No granular field-level permissions; all-or-nothing access to document content","Permission changes don't retroactively affect already-downloaded copies of documents","No role hierarchy; custom roles require manual configuration","Access logs may not capture all access patterns (e.g., cached content viewed offline)"],"requires":["User account with Strut (admin role for managing permissions)","Email addresses or user IDs for permission assignment","Stable internet connection for permission updates to propagate"],"input_types":["user or group identifiers","permission role (view, comment, edit, admin)","time-based constraints (optional)"],"output_types":["permission assignments","access logs","sharing links with optional protection"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_strut__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.version.history.and.document.revision.tracking","name":"version history and document revision tracking","description":"Maintains complete version history of document changes with timestamps and user attribution. Users can view previous versions, compare changes between versions (diff view), and restore to any previous version. Automatic snapshots are created at regular intervals or manually by users. Version history is searchable by date, user, or change type.","intents":["See what changed in my document since yesterday","Restore my document to an earlier version if I made a mistake","Compare two versions to see exactly what was edited","Track who made which changes and when"],"best_for":["Teams collaborating on documents where change tracking is important","Writers who want to experiment with edits and easily revert","Organizations with compliance requirements for document audit trails","Projects with multiple review cycles requiring version comparison"],"limitations":["Version history storage grows linearly with document size and edit frequency; large documents may have storage limits","Diff view may be difficult to read for documents with extensive formatting or structural changes","No branching or merging; version history is linear","Automatic snapshots may not capture all intermediate states if users edit very frequently"],"requires":["User account with Strut","Stable internet connection for version sync","Sufficient storage quota for version history"],"input_types":["document edits (automatic capture)","manual snapshot triggers","version selection for comparison or restore"],"output_types":["version list with metadata","diff view between versions","restored document state"],"categories":["automation-workflow","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":41,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Active internet connection for LLM API calls","User account with Strut (free tier available)","Minimum document length of ~50 words for contextual suggestions to be effective","Modern browser with HTML5 drag-and-drop API support (Chrome 4+, Firefox 3.6+, Safari 3.1+)","Document must be structured as discrete blocks (not imported as plain text without parsing)","Document text in English (other languages have limited support)","Minimum 20 words for meaningful grammar checking","User account with Strut","Stable internet connection with WebSocket support","All collaborators must have active Strut accounts"],"failure_modes":["Suggestions may not preserve unique voice or brand guidelines without explicit training","No persistent style profile across documents — each document starts fresh","Latency depends on LLM API response time; typically 2-5 seconds for full suggestions","Limited to text-based suggestions; no semantic understanding of domain-specific terminology without custom training","Block-based model may not suit documents requiring precise character-level formatting control","Drag-and-drop performance degrades with documents exceeding 500+ blocks","No automatic conflict resolution if multiple users drag the same block simultaneously","Cross-references and internal links require manual verification after major reorganizations","Grammar checking is rule-based and may produce false positives for intentional stylistic choices or dialect variations","Contextual understanding is limited; may not recognize correct usage in ambiguous sentences","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.72,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.648Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.559Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=strut","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=strut"}},"signature":"lk0uN0tcb65lYdxEc2YGhXpao6+1ZhOMUM/e1iYm2GqlPCCHUUZIOtr5fgRy6HHv/mUluYSuGgdpuNVu4FwODA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T12:09:10.659Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/strut","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/strut","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=strut","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}