{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-sqlite","slug":"sqlite","name":"SQLite","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/servers-archived/tree/main/src/sqlite","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/sqlite","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-sqlite__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.compliant.sqlite.query.execution.with.schema.introspection","name":"mcp-compliant sqlite query execution with schema introspection","description":"Exposes SQLite databases as MCP tools that LLMs can invoke directly, implementing the Model Context Protocol specification for standardized tool discovery and invocation. The server implements MCP's tool registry pattern, allowing clients to discover available SQL operations (read, write, schema inspection) and execute them with type-safe argument passing through JSON-RPC 2.0 transport. Schema introspection is built-in, enabling the LLM to understand table structures, column types, and constraints before constructing queries.","intents":["I want Claude or another LLM to query my SQLite database directly without writing custom API code","I need my AI agent to discover available tables and schemas automatically before executing queries","I want to expose multiple SQLite databases to an LLM through a single standardized interface"],"best_for":["AI application developers building LLM agents that need database access","Teams integrating Claude Desktop with local SQLite databases","Builders prototyping AI-driven business intelligence tools"],"limitations":["Archived and unmaintained — no security patches or bug fixes since archival","No built-in query result pagination — large result sets must be handled by client","No transaction support or rollback mechanisms exposed through MCP interface","Single-threaded execution model may cause blocking on concurrent requests","No query timeout enforcement — long-running queries can hang the server"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","SQLite 3.x (typically bundled with Python)","MCP client implementation (e.g., Claude Desktop, custom MCP client)","Read/write access to SQLite database file on filesystem"],"input_types":["SQL query strings (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE)","Database file path (string)","Query parameters (JSON objects for parameterized queries)"],"output_types":["Query result rows (JSON array of objects)","Schema metadata (table names, column definitions, types)","Execution status (success/error with error messages)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-sqlite__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.parameterized.sql.query.execution.with.injection.protection","name":"parameterized sql query execution with injection protection","description":"Supports parameterized SQL queries using SQLite's parameter binding mechanism (? placeholders and named parameters), preventing SQL injection attacks by separating query structure from data values. The server accepts query templates and parameter arrays/objects, binding them through sqlite3's native prepared statement API before execution. This ensures user-supplied data is treated as literal values, not executable SQL code.","intents":["I want to safely pass user input to SQL queries without worrying about injection attacks","I need to execute the same query template multiple times with different parameter values","I want the LLM to construct queries safely using parameterized placeholders"],"best_for":["Security-conscious teams building LLM agents with database access","Applications handling untrusted input from users or external sources","Developers who want to avoid manual SQL escaping and sanitization"],"limitations":["Parameter binding only works for data values, not table/column names — dynamic schema queries require different approach","No support for complex parameter types (arrays, nested objects) — must be flattened to scalar values","Archived implementation may not reflect latest SQLite security best practices"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","SQLite 3.x","MCP client that supports passing arrays/objects as tool arguments"],"input_types":["SQL query template string (with ? or :name placeholders)","Parameter array (for positional parameters) or object (for named parameters)"],"output_types":["Query result rows (JSON array)","Execution status with row count affected (for INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-sqlite__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.database.schema.discovery.and.metadata.exposure","name":"database schema discovery and metadata exposure","description":"Automatically introspects SQLite database structure and exposes table names, column definitions, data types, constraints, and indexes as discoverable metadata through MCP tools. The server queries SQLite's internal schema tables (sqlite_master, pragma table_info, pragma index_info) to build a complete picture of the database structure, enabling LLMs to understand what data is available before constructing queries.","intents":["I want the LLM to know what tables and columns exist in my database without me describing them","I need to expose database schema information so the AI can construct valid queries automatically","I want to list all available tables and their column types before executing a query"],"best_for":["Teams building AI agents that need to explore unfamiliar databases","Applications where database schema changes frequently and must be reflected in LLM context","Developers prototyping business intelligence tools that need dynamic schema awareness"],"limitations":["Schema introspection adds latency (~10-50ms per database depending on size) to initial discovery","No support for custom metadata or business logic annotations — only raw SQLite schema","Views and virtual tables may not be fully introspected depending on SQLite version","No caching of schema metadata — each discovery request re-queries the database"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","SQLite 3.x with pragma support enabled","Read access to database file"],"input_types":["Database file path (string)","Optional: table name filter (string)"],"output_types":["Table list (array of table names)","Column metadata (array of objects with name, type, constraints, nullable)","Index information (array of index definitions)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-sqlite__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.database.file.management.with.isolated.connections","name":"multi-database file management with isolated connections","description":"Supports connecting to and querying multiple SQLite database files within a single MCP server instance, maintaining separate connection pools and transaction contexts for each database. The server accepts database file paths as parameters and manages connection lifecycle (open, query, close) per database, preventing cross-database interference and enabling isolation of data access patterns.","intents":["I want to query multiple SQLite databases from a single LLM agent without running separate servers","I need to keep data from different databases isolated while allowing the LLM to access both","I want to switch between different SQLite files dynamically based on user input"],"best_for":["Multi-tenant applications where each tenant has a separate SQLite database","Data analysis workflows that need to correlate data across multiple database files","Teams managing multiple project databases that need unified LLM access"],"limitations":["No cross-database joins or transactions — each database is isolated","File path must be provided for each query, adding overhead and complexity","No connection pooling optimization — each query may open/close connections","Archived implementation may not handle concurrent access to same database file safely"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","SQLite 3.x","Read/write access to all database files on filesystem","Proper file path handling for the operating system (Windows vs Unix paths)"],"input_types":["Database file path (string, absolute or relative)","SQL query string","Query parameters (optional)"],"output_types":["Query results (JSON array)","Error messages if file not found or inaccessible"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-sqlite__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.read.write.transaction.support.with.explicit.commit.rollback.control","name":"read-write transaction support with explicit commit/rollback control","description":"Enables INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE operations through the MCP interface with explicit transaction control, using SQLite's autocommit mode and manual commit/rollback semantics. The server executes write operations and commits them to the database file, with error handling that can trigger rollback on failure. This allows LLMs to perform data modifications while maintaining ACID guarantees at the SQLite level.","intents":["I want the LLM to insert or update records in my SQLite database","I need to ensure that failed operations don't leave the database in an inconsistent state","I want to track how many rows were affected by an INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE operation"],"best_for":["AI agents that need to modify data (not just read it) in response to user requests","Applications where LLM-driven data entry or corrections are needed","Systems that need audit trails of data modifications made by AI"],"limitations":["No explicit transaction batching — each MCP call is a separate transaction","No rollback capability exposed through MCP interface — commits are immediate","Concurrent write access from multiple clients may cause database locks","No transaction isolation level control — uses SQLite's default serializable isolation","Archived implementation may not handle write conflicts or lock timeouts gracefully"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","SQLite 3.x","Write access to database file","Proper file locking support on the filesystem"],"input_types":["SQL INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statement","Query parameters (for parameterized writes)"],"output_types":["Row count affected (integer)","Last inserted row ID (for INSERT operations)","Error message if write fails"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-sqlite__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.protocol.transport.and.tool.schema.validation","name":"mcp protocol transport and tool schema validation","description":"Implements the Model Context Protocol specification for server-side tool exposure, using JSON-RPC 2.0 as the transport layer and defining tool schemas that describe available operations, required arguments, and return types. The server registers database operations as MCP tools with formal schemas, enabling clients to validate arguments before sending requests and to display tool information in UI. This follows MCP's standardized tool discovery and invocation patterns.","intents":["I want my LLM client to discover what database operations are available without hardcoding them","I need type-safe argument validation before executing database queries","I want to expose database operations through a standardized protocol that works with any MCP client"],"best_for":["Teams building MCP-compatible clients (Claude Desktop, custom applications)","Developers who want to follow MCP standards for tool exposure","Organizations standardizing on MCP for LLM tool integration"],"limitations":["Archived implementation may not reflect latest MCP specification updates","JSON-RPC 2.0 transport adds serialization overhead (~1-5ms per request)","Tool schema validation is client-side responsibility — server doesn't enforce it","No built-in authentication or authorization at MCP protocol level"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","MCP SDK for Python (or equivalent JSON-RPC 2.0 implementation)","MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, custom MCP client)"],"input_types":["MCP tool call requests (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Tool arguments matching declared schema"],"output_types":["MCP tool response (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Tool schema definitions (JSON Schema format)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":25,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Python 3.8+","SQLite 3.x (typically bundled with Python)","MCP client implementation (e.g., Claude Desktop, custom MCP client)","Read/write access to SQLite database file on filesystem","SQLite 3.x","MCP client that supports passing arrays/objects as tool arguments","SQLite 3.x with pragma support enabled","Read access to database file","Read/write access to all database files on filesystem","Proper file path handling for the operating system (Windows vs Unix paths)"],"failure_modes":["Archived and unmaintained — no security patches or bug fixes since archival","No built-in query result pagination — large result sets must be handled by client","No transaction support or rollback mechanisms exposed through MCP interface","Single-threaded execution model may cause blocking on concurrent requests","No query timeout enforcement — long-running queries can hang the server","Parameter binding only works for data values, not table/column names — dynamic schema queries require different approach","No support for complex parameter types (arrays, nested objects) — must be flattened to scalar values","Archived implementation may not reflect latest SQLite security best practices","Schema introspection adds latency (~10-50ms per database depending on size) to initial discovery","No support for custom metadata or business logic annotations — only raw SQLite schema","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:04.049Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:18.053Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=sqlite","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=sqlite"}},"signature":"yyksI/6r9BJZGB9VLPfrBOb6u9/DsJl8fW7kF3NhcakCLCrf5DqizUI+YGEGEKMlxDd/jcZoHMOpjABKvOuOBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T23:37:15.331Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/sqlite","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/sqlite","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=sqlite","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}