{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_sixty","slug":"sixty","name":"Sixty","type":"product","url":"https://sixty.app","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/sixty","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_sixty__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.behavioral.pattern.learning.email.prioritization","name":"behavioral-pattern-learning email prioritization","description":"Analyzes your historical email interactions (open rates, response times, sender frequency, content engagement) using machine learning to build a personalized priority model that ranks incoming messages by relevance to your workflow. The system continuously retrains on new interactions, adapting its prioritization weights as your communication patterns evolve, rather than using static rules or generic importance signals.","intents":["I want my inbox to automatically surface the emails that actually matter to me without manual filtering rules","I need the system to learn which senders and topics I engage with most and deprioritize noise accordingly","I want AI that gets smarter about my priorities the longer I use it, not just on day one"],"best_for":["busy professionals with 50+ emails daily who have established communication patterns","knowledge workers whose email importance varies by context and sender relationship","teams wanting inbox intelligence without manual rule configuration"],"limitations":["requires minimum historical email data (typically 2-4 weeks) to establish reliable patterns; new users see generic prioritization initially","cannot distinguish between similar senders or contexts if email metadata is sparse (no subject lines, forwarded chains)","prioritization model retraining latency may cause 1-2 hour delays before new behavior patterns are reflected"],"requires":["email account with IMAP/POP3 or OAuth2 integration (Gmail, Outlook, etc.)","minimum 100+ historical emails for initial model training","active email usage for at least 2 weeks to establish baseline patterns"],"input_types":["email metadata (sender, recipient, subject, timestamp, read status)","email body content (for semantic analysis of importance signals)","user interaction signals (open/click/response time, archive, delete, forward)"],"output_types":["prioritized email list with relevance scores (0-100)","ranked inbox view with visual priority indicators","engagement metrics dashboard showing learned patterns"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","machine-learning","personalization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sixty__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.optimal.send.time.recommendation.engine","name":"optimal-send-time recommendation engine","description":"Analyzes historical email response patterns (recipient open times, reply latency, engagement windows) to suggest when you should send outgoing messages for maximum likelihood of prompt response. The system models recipient-specific response windows and contextual factors (day of week, time of day, message type) to generate personalized send-time recommendations that maximize engagement probability.","intents":["I want to know the best time to send an email to a specific person to get a faster response","I need to schedule follow-ups at times when recipients are most likely to engage","I want to avoid sending messages during times when they typically don't respond"],"best_for":["sales professionals and account managers optimizing outreach timing","project managers coordinating across time zones and team availability","anyone managing high-volume outbound communication where response time matters"],"limitations":["recommendations are probabilistic and based on historical patterns; cannot account for unexpected schedule changes or vacations","requires bidirectional email history with recipients (both sent and received messages) to build reliable models","accuracy degrades for new contacts with minimal interaction history (< 5 prior exchanges)","timezone handling may be imprecise if recipient's local time is not explicitly configured"],"requires":["email account with full sent/received message history accessible","minimum 10+ prior email exchanges with a recipient to generate recommendations","timezone information for recipients (auto-detected from email headers or manual configuration)"],"input_types":["historical sent/received email timestamps","recipient response latency data","email metadata (sender, recipient, subject, day/time sent)"],"output_types":["send-time recommendation with confidence score (0-100%)","optimal time window (e.g., 'Tuesday 9-11 AM recipient timezone')","alternative time slots ranked by engagement probability"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","data-processing-analysis","personalization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sixty__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.relationship.context.extraction.and.contact.enrichment","name":"relationship-context extraction and contact enrichment","description":"Automatically extracts and aggregates relationship metadata from email threads (communication frequency, last contact date, shared topics, interaction sentiment) to build a lightweight contact profile that surfaces relevant context when you interact with that person. The system parses email content to identify key discussion topics, project associations, and relationship strength signals without requiring manual CRM data entry.","intents":["I want to see a quick summary of my relationship with someone before replying to their email","I need to know when I last contacted someone and what we discussed","I want to identify which contacts I've neglected and should follow up with"],"best_for":["sales professionals and business development roles managing large contact networks","executives and managers maintaining relationships across many stakeholders","anyone who needs relationship context without maintaining a separate CRM system"],"limitations":["relationship profiles are read-only summaries; no two-way sync with external CRM systems (Salesforce, HubSpot, etc.)","topic extraction relies on email content analysis and may miss implicit context or inside jokes/references","sentiment analysis is basic and may misclassify sarcasm, forwarded content, or quoted text","no support for phone calls, meetings, or non-email interactions—purely email-derived signals"],"requires":["email account with accessible message history (minimum 10+ emails per contact for meaningful profiles)","email content parsing capability (requires IMAP/POP3 full message access, not just headers)"],"input_types":["email thread content and metadata","sender/recipient information","email timestamps and frequency data"],"output_types":["contact profile card with relationship summary","last contact date and communication frequency metrics","extracted topics/projects associated with contact","relationship strength indicator (active, dormant, etc.)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","data-processing-analysis","personalization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sixty__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.intelligent.email.threading.and.conversation.grouping","name":"intelligent email threading and conversation grouping","description":"Automatically groups related emails into coherent conversation threads using subject line analysis, participant matching, and semantic similarity of email bodies to reconstruct logical discussion flows. The system handles edge cases like forwarded chains, CC/BCC participants, and subject line mutations to present a unified view of multi-party conversations that may have fragmented across multiple email threads.","intents":["I want to see all related emails about a project grouped together, even if they have different subject lines","I need to follow a conversation that was forwarded or CC'd to new people","I want to collapse long email chains to see the conversation flow without reading every reply"],"best_for":["professionals managing complex multi-threaded projects with many participants","teams with forwarding-heavy communication patterns","anyone using email as a de facto project management tool"],"limitations":["grouping accuracy depends on consistent participant sets and subject line conventions; may incorrectly merge unrelated emails with similar subjects","does not handle implicit context (e.g., 'the thing we discussed' without explicit reference) or cross-thread references","performance degrades with very large mailboxes (100k+ emails) due to O(n²) similarity comparisons","no support for merging conversations that should have been separate but share participants"],"requires":["email account with full message access (headers and body content)","email client or integration that supports custom thread grouping display"],"input_types":["email subject lines","participant lists (To, From, CC, BCC)","email body content (for semantic similarity)","email timestamps and In-Reply-To headers"],"output_types":["grouped conversation threads with unified view","conversation metadata (participants, date range, message count)","flattened or collapsed thread display options"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sixty__cap_4","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.follow.up.reminder.and.task.extraction.from.email","name":"follow-up reminder and task extraction from email","description":"Automatically detects action items and follow-up obligations embedded in email text using NLP-based pattern matching (e.g., 'please send me', 'let me know by Friday', 'follow up next week') and creates reminders or task entries without manual intervention. The system extracts deadline signals, responsible parties, and task context to generate actionable reminders timed to when follow-up is needed.","intents":["I want automatic reminders for emails that require a response or action from me","I need to extract deadlines and action items from emails without manually creating tasks","I want to track who owes me something and when they should follow up"],"best_for":["professionals with high email volume who frequently miss follow-ups","teams coordinating work across email without a dedicated task management system","anyone who uses email as their primary task tracking mechanism"],"limitations":["action item detection relies on explicit language patterns; misses implicit obligations or context-dependent tasks","deadline extraction may fail for vague timeframes ('soon', 'ASAP', 'when you get a chance') without explicit dates","cannot distinguish between tasks assigned to you vs. tasks you're delegating to others without explicit language markers","no integration with external task management systems (Todoist, Asana, etc.) in base product"],"requires":["email account with accessible message content","NLP model trained on task/action item patterns (requires model hosting or API access)"],"input_types":["email body content","email metadata (sender, recipient, timestamp)","email subject line"],"output_types":["extracted task/action item with description","deadline date (if detected)","responsible party (you or sender)","reminder notification at appropriate time"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sixty__cap_5","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.email.draft.composition.assistance.with.tone.style.matching","name":"email draft composition assistance with tone/style matching","description":"Analyzes your historical email writing patterns (vocabulary, sentence structure, formality level, signature style) to generate draft suggestions that match your personal communication style. The system learns your tone preferences from sent emails and applies them to suggested replies or new compositions, maintaining consistency in how you communicate with different recipients.","intents":["I want AI to draft emails that sound like me, not generic or overly formal","I need to maintain consistent tone and style across all my outbound communication","I want composition assistance that adapts to different recipient relationships (formal vs. casual)"],"best_for":["professionals who send high-volume email and want faster composition","non-native English speakers who want style guidance","anyone who wants to maintain consistent brand voice in email communication"],"limitations":["style matching requires significant historical email data (100+ sent emails) to establish reliable patterns","cannot adapt tone based on email context or emotional state; uses only historical patterns","may amplify problematic communication patterns if your historical emails contain them","recipient-specific tone adaptation is limited without explicit relationship metadata"],"requires":["email account with accessible sent message history (minimum 50+ sent emails)","language model for draft generation (requires API access or local model hosting)"],"input_types":["historical sent email content","email metadata (recipient, subject, timestamp)","draft prompt or partial email text"],"output_types":["suggested email draft with your writing style","alternative phrasings with tone variations","style consistency score"],"categories":["text-generation-language","personalization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sixty__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.calendar.aware.email.scheduling.and.conflict.detection","name":"calendar-aware email scheduling and conflict detection","description":"Integrates with your calendar to detect scheduling conflicts, meeting context, and availability windows when composing or reviewing emails. The system suggests optimal times to send emails based on when you'll have time to handle responses, and flags emails that reference meetings or deadlines that appear on your calendar to provide contextual awareness.","intents":["I want to know if an email I'm about to send will create scheduling conflicts or require action during busy periods","I need context about meetings mentioned in emails without switching to my calendar app","I want to avoid sending emails right before meetings or during times when I can't respond"],"best_for":["busy professionals with heavily scheduled calendars","managers coordinating across multiple time zones and meeting schedules","anyone who wants email and calendar context unified in one view"],"limitations":["requires calendar integration (Google Calendar, Outlook, etc.); limited to supported calendar providers","cannot access private meeting details if calendar entries lack descriptive titles","meeting context extraction is limited to calendar event titles and times; no access to meeting notes or agendas","timezone handling depends on accurate calendar configuration; may fail for all-day events or floating time windows"],"requires":["calendar account (Google Calendar, Outlook, Apple Calendar, etc.) with OAuth2 integration","email account with calendar sync enabled","calendar read permissions for conflict detection"],"input_types":["calendar events (title, time, duration, attendees)","email metadata (sender, recipient, timestamp, content)","email body content (for meeting reference extraction)"],"output_types":["scheduling conflict warnings","meeting context cards linked to related emails","availability windows for email response","suggested send times based on calendar availability"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sixty__cap_7","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.spam.and.low.priority.email.filtering.with.learning","name":"spam and low-priority email filtering with learning","description":"Automatically identifies and filters spam, promotional emails, and low-priority messages using a combination of content analysis, sender reputation, and your personal engagement history. The system learns from your archive/delete patterns to refine filtering rules over time, moving emails to appropriate folders without requiring manual rule configuration.","intents":["I want spam and promotional emails automatically filtered without manually creating rules","I need the system to learn what I consider low-priority and filter accordingly","I want to recover inbox space by automatically organizing non-critical emails"],"best_for":["professionals with high email volume who want inbox focus","anyone receiving significant promotional or marketing email","teams wanting to reduce noise without complex filter rule maintenance"],"limitations":["filtering accuracy depends on consistent user behavior (archive/delete patterns); may misclassify emails if your behavior changes","cannot distinguish between legitimate transactional emails and unwanted notifications without explicit training","false positives may cause important emails to be filtered to spam folder; requires periodic review","no whitelist/blacklist management in base product; relies on learned patterns"],"requires":["email account with folder/label support (Gmail, Outlook, etc.)","minimum 2-4 weeks of email activity to establish baseline filtering patterns"],"input_types":["email content (subject, body, sender)","email metadata (sender reputation, domain, headers)","user engagement signals (open, click, archive, delete)"],"output_types":["filtered email list with spam/low-priority emails removed","automatic folder/label assignment (Spam, Promotions, etc.)","filtering confidence scores"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sixty__cap_8","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.email.search.and.retrieval.with.semantic.understanding","name":"email search and retrieval with semantic understanding","description":"Enables natural language search across your email archive using semantic understanding rather than keyword matching, allowing you to find emails by meaning, topic, or context even if you don't remember exact wording. The system indexes email content and metadata to support queries like 'emails about the Q4 budget discussion' or 'messages where someone asked me for feedback' without requiring exact phrase matching.","intents":["I want to find emails by what they're about, not by exact keywords I remember","I need to search across conversations about a topic that may use different terminology","I want to retrieve context from past discussions without manually browsing through folders"],"best_for":["professionals with large email archives (10k+ emails) who need fast retrieval","anyone who struggles to remember exact email wording or keywords","teams managing institutional knowledge stored in email threads"],"limitations":["semantic search requires embedding generation for all emails; initial indexing may take hours for large mailboxes","search accuracy depends on email content quality; sparse or poorly written emails may not be retrievable","no support for complex boolean queries or date range filtering in semantic mode","embedding-based search may return semantically similar but contextually irrelevant results"],"requires":["email account with full message access","embedding model for semantic indexing (requires API access or local model hosting)","sufficient storage for email embeddings (typically 1-2GB for 100k emails)"],"input_types":["email body content","email metadata (sender, recipient, subject, timestamp)","natural language search query"],"output_types":["ranked list of semantically relevant emails","relevance scores for each result","highlighted context snippets from matching emails"],"categories":["search-retrieval","data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sixty__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.batch.email.processing.and.bulk.action.automation","name":"batch email processing and bulk action automation","description":"Enables automated processing of multiple emails based on rules or patterns you define, allowing bulk operations like archiving, labeling, or responding to similar emails without individual action. The system can apply learned patterns to groups of emails (e.g., 'archive all promotional emails from this sender' or 'auto-respond to meeting requests with your availability') to reduce manual email management overhead.","intents":["I want to automatically handle recurring email patterns without processing each one individually","I need to bulk-archive or label emails that match certain criteria","I want to auto-respond to common email types (meeting requests, newsletters, etc.) with templated responses"],"best_for":["professionals with high-volume repetitive email patterns","teams managing shared inboxes or delegated email responsibilities","anyone who wants to reduce time spent on routine email management"],"limitations":["bulk actions are irreversible; no undo capability for large-scale operations","rule matching may have false positives if criteria are too broad; requires careful rule definition","auto-response templates cannot adapt to email-specific context; limited to static or simple variable substitution","no support for conditional logic or complex rule chains in base product"],"requires":["email account with folder/label and rule support","rule definition interface or API for specifying bulk action criteria"],"input_types":["email metadata (sender, subject, content patterns)","user-defined rule criteria (sender domain, subject keywords, etc.)","response templates or action specifications"],"output_types":["bulk action confirmation with affected email count","applied labels/folders or sent responses","rule execution logs"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":40,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["email account with IMAP/POP3 or OAuth2 integration (Gmail, Outlook, etc.)","minimum 100+ historical emails for initial model training","active email usage for at least 2 weeks to establish baseline patterns","email account with full sent/received message history accessible","minimum 10+ prior email exchanges with a recipient to generate recommendations","timezone information for recipients (auto-detected from email headers or manual configuration)","email account with accessible message history (minimum 10+ emails per contact for meaningful profiles)","email content parsing capability (requires IMAP/POP3 full message access, not just headers)","email account with full message access (headers and body content)","email client or integration that supports custom thread grouping display"],"failure_modes":["requires minimum historical email data (typically 2-4 weeks) to establish reliable patterns; new users see generic prioritization initially","cannot distinguish between similar senders or contexts if email metadata is sparse (no subject lines, forwarded chains)","prioritization model retraining latency may cause 1-2 hour delays before new behavior patterns are reflected","recommendations are probabilistic and based on historical patterns; cannot account for unexpected schedule changes or vacations","requires bidirectional email history with recipients (both sent and received messages) to build reliable models","accuracy degrades for new contacts with minimal interaction history (< 5 prior exchanges)","timezone handling may be imprecise if recipient's local time is not explicitly configured","relationship profiles are read-only summaries; no two-way sync with external CRM systems (Salesforce, HubSpot, etc.)","topic extraction relies on email content analysis and may miss implicit context or inside jokes/references","sentiment analysis is basic and may misclassify sarcasm, forwarded content, or quoted text","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.72,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.096Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.559Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=sixty","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=sixty"}},"signature":"GtGYuNrs+JnFcnFCcIUY1c4CjAll8fqpyG1bkXgEjlBN6xh8GVnfv1YzV8XGgwlbOftHyR9i+8gY/wvt5zw0Bg==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T04:26:08.826Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/sixty","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/sixty","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=sixty","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}