{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_sitescripter","slug":"sitescripter","name":"Sitescripter","type":"product","url":"https://www.sitescripter.co","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/sitescripter","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_sitescripter__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.visual.workflow.builder.for.web.automation","name":"visual workflow builder for web automation","description":"Provides a drag-and-drop interface for constructing browser automation sequences without code, using a node-based graph system where users connect action blocks (click, type, extract, wait) to define control flow. The builder likely compiles these visual workflows into executable scripts that interact with the browser DOM and JavaScript runtime, abstracting away Selenium/Puppeteer complexity behind a visual abstraction layer.","intents":["I need to automate clicking through forms and filling fields without writing JavaScript","I want to build a workflow that repeats every day without touching code","I need to chain multiple browser actions together visually to see the flow"],"best_for":["non-technical marketers automating repetitive web tasks","solo operators managing content monitoring workflows","small teams without dedicated automation engineers"],"limitations":["visual abstraction may hide performance bottlenecks — complex workflows with many sequential waits can exceed timeout thresholds","limited conditional logic compared to code-based automation — branching on complex page states requires workarounds","no built-in debugging tools for inspecting intermediate workflow state during execution"],"requires":["modern web browser (Chrome, Firefox, Edge)","internet connection for cloud-based workflow execution","target website must not have aggressive anti-bot detection"],"input_types":["visual node configuration","CSS selectors or XPath for element targeting","text input for form fields","wait duration parameters"],"output_types":["workflow execution logs","extracted data from web pages","screenshots of automation steps"],"categories":["automation-workflow","no-code-automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sitescripter__cap_1","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.intelligent.content.summarization.from.web.pages","name":"intelligent content summarization from web pages","description":"Extracts and summarizes text content from web pages using NLP-based text reduction, likely leveraging extractive or abstractive summarization models to condense articles, blog posts, or product pages into key points. The system probably integrates with the automation workflow to trigger summarization on extracted content, storing summaries for competitive intelligence or content monitoring use cases.","intents":["I want to automatically pull competitor blog posts and get summaries without reading full articles","I need to monitor industry news sites and extract key insights daily","I want to extract product descriptions and auto-summarize them for comparison"],"best_for":["competitive intelligence teams tracking market changes","content marketers monitoring industry publications","product managers doing market research at scale"],"limitations":["summarization quality degrades on highly technical or domain-specific content without fine-tuning","may lose nuance or context in aggressive compression ratios (>70% reduction)","struggles with multi-column layouts or sidebar content — may include irrelevant text in summary"],"requires":["target page must have extractable text content (not image-only or heavily JavaScript-rendered)","reasonable page load time (<10 seconds) for content extraction to complete"],"input_types":["web page URL","HTML content from extracted page","summarization length parameter (words or percentage)"],"output_types":["summarized text","key points list","structured metadata (title, source, date)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sitescripter__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.scheduled.web.task.execution.with.cron.like.triggers","name":"scheduled web task execution with cron-like triggers","description":"Enables workflows to run on recurring schedules (daily, weekly, hourly) using a scheduling engine that manages task queuing and execution timing. The system likely stores workflow definitions and execution history, with a background job processor that invokes the automation at specified intervals, handling retries and logging execution results for audit trails.","intents":["I want to run a data collection workflow every morning at 9 AM without manual intervention","I need to check competitor prices daily and log changes over time","I want to monitor a form submission queue and process entries hourly"],"best_for":["teams running recurring data collection tasks","marketers monitoring competitive landscapes on fixed schedules","operations teams automating daily reporting workflows"],"limitations":["scheduling precision is typically ±5 minutes depending on queue load — not suitable for sub-minute timing requirements","no built-in backoff strategy for rate-limited APIs — failed executions may not retry intelligently","execution history retention likely limited to 30-90 days without paid archival"],"requires":["workflow must be stable and idempotent (safe to retry without side effects)","target websites must tolerate repeated automated access without blocking"],"input_types":["cron expression or UI-based schedule selector","workflow definition","execution parameters (timezone, retry count)"],"output_types":["execution timestamp and status","workflow result data","error logs and retry history"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sitescripter__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.dom.based.element.targeting.and.interaction","name":"dom-based element targeting and interaction","description":"Allows users to select and interact with specific web page elements using CSS selectors, XPath, or visual point-and-click selection tools. The system records element identifiers and interaction types (click, type, hover, scroll) and replays them during automation, with built-in resilience to handle minor DOM structure changes through selector fallback strategies.","intents":["I need to click a button that changes its ID dynamically but has a stable class name","I want to fill a form field that might be in different positions on different pages","I need to extract text from a table cell without hardcoding its exact position"],"best_for":["users automating interactions with dynamic web applications","teams working with multiple similar pages with varying DOM structures","marketers handling form-heavy workflows"],"limitations":["selector brittleness — if target website redesigns, selectors may break and require manual repair","no built-in visual regression detection — can't automatically detect when page layout changes","XPath expressions can be slow on large DOMs (>5000 elements) due to traversal overhead"],"requires":["target element must be in the DOM (not dynamically rendered after page load without explicit wait)","user must have basic understanding of CSS selectors or XPath, or use visual selection tool"],"input_types":["CSS selector string","XPath expression","visual point-and-click coordinates","element attribute filters (class, id, data-*)"],"output_types":["element reference for interaction","extracted text or attribute values","element position and dimensions"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sitescripter__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.data.extraction.and.structured.output.formatting","name":"data extraction and structured output formatting","description":"Extracts data from web pages and formats it into structured outputs (CSV, JSON, tables) that can be exported or piped to downstream systems. The system likely uses a combination of DOM selectors and pattern matching to identify data fields, with optional data cleaning and normalization rules applied before output generation.","intents":["I want to scrape product listings and export them as CSV for analysis","I need to extract contact information from multiple websites and combine into a single JSON file","I want to monitor price changes and log them in a structured format for trend analysis"],"best_for":["data analysts building datasets from web sources","marketers extracting lead information at scale","researchers collecting structured data from multiple websites"],"limitations":["no built-in data validation — garbage input produces garbage output without schema enforcement","extraction rules are brittle to page layout changes — requires manual rule updates when target site redesigns","no deduplication logic — repeated extractions may produce duplicate records without explicit filtering"],"requires":["target data must be in HTML/text form (not embedded in images or PDFs)","data structure must be consistent across pages or require per-page extraction rules"],"input_types":["DOM selectors for data fields","extraction patterns (regex or field mapping)","output format specification (CSV headers, JSON schema)"],"output_types":["CSV files","JSON objects or arrays","structured tables","database inserts"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sitescripter__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.workflow.error.handling.and.retry.logic","name":"workflow error handling and retry logic","description":"Provides configurable error handling strategies including retry attempts with exponential backoff, conditional branching on failure, and fallback actions when primary steps fail. The system likely tracks error types (timeout, selector not found, network error) and allows users to define different recovery paths based on error classification.","intents":["I want my workflow to retry if a page doesn't load instead of failing immediately","I need to handle cases where a button might not exist and take an alternative action","I want to log errors and send notifications when a workflow fails after retries"],"best_for":["teams running critical automation workflows that must be resilient","users automating against unreliable or rate-limited websites","operations teams needing detailed failure diagnostics"],"limitations":["retry logic doesn't distinguish between transient and permanent failures — may waste time retrying unrecoverable errors","exponential backoff can cause long delays (>5 minutes) for workflows with many retry attempts","no built-in circuit breaker pattern — won't stop retrying if target service is down"],"requires":["workflow must be idempotent or include deduplication logic to handle retry side effects"],"input_types":["retry count configuration","backoff strategy (linear, exponential, fixed)","error type classification rules","fallback action definitions"],"output_types":["execution status (success, failed, retried)","error logs with timestamps","retry attempt history"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sitescripter__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.step.workflow.composition.and.control.flow","name":"multi-step workflow composition and control flow","description":"Enables users to chain multiple automation steps together with conditional logic, loops, and parallel execution paths. The system uses a directed acyclic graph (DAG) or state machine to represent workflow structure, allowing users to define dependencies between steps and control flow based on step outputs or external conditions.","intents":["I want to loop through a list of URLs and perform the same actions on each","I need to run different steps based on whether a page contains certain content","I want to execute multiple independent tasks in parallel to save time"],"best_for":["users building complex multi-step automation sequences","teams automating workflows with conditional logic","operations teams managing data pipelines with multiple stages"],"limitations":["parallel execution may cause race conditions if steps share state — requires careful workflow design","loop constructs may timeout if iteration count is large (>1000 iterations) without pagination","conditional logic is limited to simple comparisons — complex business logic requires workarounds"],"requires":["workflow steps must have clear input/output contracts for composition","users must understand basic control flow concepts (loops, conditionals, dependencies)"],"input_types":["step definitions (action, selector, parameters)","control flow operators (if/then/else, for loop, parallel)","variable bindings and data passing between steps"],"output_types":["workflow execution trace","step-by-step results","final workflow output"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sitescripter__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.browser.session.management.and.state.persistence","name":"browser session management and state persistence","description":"Maintains browser session state across workflow steps, including cookies, local storage, and authentication tokens, allowing workflows to maintain logged-in sessions and preserve page state between actions. The system likely uses headless browser instances (Chromium/Firefox) with session snapshots to enable resuming workflows or debugging from specific points.","intents":["I want to log into a website once and then perform multiple actions without re-authenticating","I need to maintain shopping cart state across multiple steps","I want to preserve form data if a step fails and resume from that point"],"best_for":["users automating authenticated workflows","teams working with stateful web applications","marketers managing multi-step form submissions"],"limitations":["session persistence may violate website terms of service if used for account takeover or unauthorized access","cookie expiration during long-running workflows can cause authentication failures mid-execution","no built-in session encryption — sensitive tokens may be exposed in logs or snapshots"],"requires":["target website must support cookie-based or token-based authentication","workflow must not trigger security alerts that force re-authentication"],"input_types":["authentication credentials (username/password or API token)","session configuration (cookie policy, timeout duration)"],"output_types":["authenticated session handle","session state snapshot","authentication status"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sitescripter__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.workflow.monitoring.and.execution.logging","name":"workflow monitoring and execution logging","description":"Tracks workflow execution history with detailed logs including step-by-step results, timing information, and error messages. The system likely provides a dashboard showing workflow status, execution trends, and failure patterns, with alerting capabilities for failed runs or performance degradation.","intents":["I want to see if my daily automation ran successfully and what data it collected","I need to debug why a workflow failed and see exactly which step broke","I want to get notified when a workflow fails so I can investigate"],"best_for":["operations teams managing critical automation workflows","users debugging workflow failures","teams needing audit trails for compliance"],"limitations":["log retention is likely limited to 30-90 days without paid archival — historical analysis requires export","no built-in log analysis or anomaly detection — requires manual review of logs","alerting may have latency (5-15 minutes) before notifications are sent"],"requires":["workflow must be executed at least once to generate logs","email or webhook endpoint for alert notifications"],"input_types":["workflow execution ID","log filtering criteria (date range, status, step name)"],"output_types":["execution logs with timestamps","step-by-step results and timing","error messages and stack traces","performance metrics"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_sitescripter__cap_9","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.integration.with.external.apis.and.webhooks","name":"integration with external apis and webhooks","description":"Allows workflows to call external APIs and receive webhook notifications, enabling integration with downstream systems like CRM, email services, or data warehouses. The system likely provides a generic HTTP request builder with support for authentication methods (API keys, OAuth) and response parsing, allowing users to send extracted data to external services without custom code.","intents":["I want to send extracted data to my CRM automatically after collection","I need to trigger a workflow when an external service sends a webhook notification","I want to call a custom API endpoint to process extracted data"],"best_for":["teams integrating automation with existing business systems","users building data pipelines that feed into analytics platforms","marketers connecting automation to CRM and email tools"],"limitations":["no built-in retry logic for failed API calls — requires manual configuration of backoff strategies","authentication management is manual — no built-in OAuth token refresh","webhook security relies on basic authentication (API keys) — no mutual TLS or advanced security"],"requires":["target API must be publicly accessible or accessible from Sitescripter's IP range","API documentation or schema to configure request/response mapping","API key or authentication credentials"],"input_types":["API endpoint URL","HTTP method (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE)","request headers and body","authentication credentials","webhook configuration (URL, event types)"],"output_types":["API response data","HTTP status code","response parsing results"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":40,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["modern web browser (Chrome, Firefox, Edge)","internet connection for cloud-based workflow execution","target website must not have aggressive anti-bot detection","target page must have extractable text content (not image-only or heavily JavaScript-rendered)","reasonable page load time (<10 seconds) for content extraction to complete","workflow must be stable and idempotent (safe to retry without side effects)","target websites must tolerate repeated automated access without blocking","target element must be in the DOM (not dynamically rendered after page load without explicit wait)","user must have basic understanding of CSS selectors or XPath, or use visual selection tool","target data must be in HTML/text form (not embedded in images or PDFs)"],"failure_modes":["visual abstraction may hide performance bottlenecks — complex workflows with many sequential waits can exceed timeout thresholds","limited conditional logic compared to code-based automation — branching on complex page states requires workarounds","no built-in debugging tools for inspecting intermediate workflow state during execution","summarization quality degrades on highly technical or domain-specific content without fine-tuning","may lose nuance or context in aggressive compression ratios (>70% reduction)","struggles with multi-column layouts or sidebar content — may include irrelevant text in summary","scheduling precision is typically ±5 minutes depending on queue load — not suitable for sub-minute timing requirements","no built-in backoff strategy for rate-limited APIs — failed executions may not retry intelligently","execution history retention likely limited to 30-90 days without paid archival","selector brittleness — if target website redesigns, selectors may break and require manual repair","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.72,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.096Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.559Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=sitescripter","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=sitescripter"}},"signature":"De6eGRle4Tquh5Kq6p2QPV8a4WFraIRf1Pt9OLplNEkRtmosOzmoQpOLn8IA0Z/NyOmNPJxMS6jKb4cJe7mrDA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T15:51:56.162Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/sitescripter","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/sitescripter","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=sitescripter","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}