{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_signapse","slug":"signapse","name":"Signapse","type":"product","url":"https://www.signapse.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/signapse","categories":["chatbots-assistants"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_signapse__cap_0","uri":"capability://image.visual.real.time.sign.language.video.to.text.translation","name":"real-time sign language video-to-text translation","description":"Processes live video streams using computer vision models to detect hand poses, finger positions, and body movements, then maps these skeletal keypoints to sign language lexicon entries and grammatical structures. The system performs continuous frame-by-frame analysis with temporal context aggregation to disambiguate signs that share similar hand shapes but differ in movement or position, outputting translated text in real-time with latency typically under 500ms per frame.","intents":["Enable deaf signers to communicate with non-signing participants in video calls without manual interpretation","Provide real-time captioning of sign language content for accessibility in live events or broadcasts","Allow organizations to offer inclusive communication without hiring professional interpreters for every interaction"],"best_for":["Organizations hosting virtual meetings with deaf/hard-of-hearing participants","Accessibility teams building inclusive communication platforms","Educational institutions serving deaf students in remote learning environments"],"limitations":["Accuracy degrades significantly in low-light conditions (below 300 lux) due to reduced hand visibility","Performance varies by regional sign language variant (ASL vs BSL vs LSF) — model must be trained/fine-tuned per language","Fast signing speeds (>2 signs per second) cause frame-to-frame keypoint tracking loss, reducing accuracy below 70%","Requires clear camera angle with hands fully visible — side angles or partial occlusion cause 15-30% accuracy drop","No support for simultaneous two-handed signs with complex finger spelling sequences"],"requires":["Webcam or video input device with minimum 30 FPS capture rate","Minimum 720p resolution for reliable hand pose detection","Adequate lighting (300+ lux) for consistent keypoint detection","Network bandwidth of 2+ Mbps for real-time processing if cloud-based"],"input_types":["video stream (RTMP, WebRTC, or local camera feed)","video file (MP4, WebM, MOV)"],"output_types":["text (real-time captions)","structured JSON with confidence scores per translated sign","SRT/VTT subtitle files for recorded content"],"categories":["image-visual","accessibility"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_signapse__cap_1","uri":"capability://image.visual.multi.language.sign.language.variant.support.with.regional.adaptation","name":"multi-language sign language variant support with regional adaptation","description":"Maintains separate trained models or model variants for different sign language systems (ASL, BSL, LSF, etc.), with the ability to switch between variants based on user selection or automatic detection. Each variant model encodes region-specific grammar, sign vocabulary, and non-manual markers (facial expressions, body position) that differ across sign language communities, allowing accurate translation across linguistic boundaries.","intents":["Support international teams where participants use different sign language variants","Provide accurate translation for users whose native sign language differs from the default model","Enable platform expansion into new geographic markets without retraining from scratch"],"best_for":["Multinational organizations with geographically distributed deaf employees","International educational platforms serving deaf students across regions","Global accessibility initiatives targeting multiple sign language communities"],"limitations":["Each new sign language variant requires separate model training with native signer datasets (typically 10,000+ hours of video)","Cross-variant translation accuracy is lower than within-variant due to grammatical structure differences","No automatic detection of sign language variant — requires manual user selection or pre-configuration","Rare or emerging sign language variants lack sufficient training data for model development"],"requires":["User selection of sign language variant (ASL, BSL, LSF, etc.) at setup","Separate trained model weights for each supported variant (storage overhead ~500MB per variant)","Native signer community input for validation and quality assurance per variant"],"input_types":["video stream with user-specified sign language variant"],"output_types":["text in corresponding spoken language (English for ASL, British English for BSL, French for LSF, etc.)","metadata indicating detected variant confidence"],"categories":["image-visual","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_signapse__cap_2","uri":"capability://image.visual.non.manual.marker.recognition.and.integration","name":"non-manual marker recognition and integration","description":"Detects and interprets non-manual signals (facial expressions, head tilts, shoulder raises, body leans) that carry grammatical and semantic meaning in sign language, integrating these signals into the translation output. The system uses facial landmark detection and body pose estimation to recognize expressions like raised eyebrows (indicating questions), furrowed brows (negation), or head shakes, then combines these with hand sign recognition to produce contextually accurate translations.","intents":["Capture the full linguistic content of sign language including grammatical markers that are expressed non-manually","Distinguish between similar hand signs that differ only in non-manual markers (e.g., question vs statement)","Provide more natural and contextually accurate translations that preserve the signer's intent"],"best_for":["Applications requiring high-fidelity sign language translation for nuanced communication","Educational contexts where grammatical accuracy is critical","Professional interpreting scenarios where tone and intent must be preserved"],"limitations":["Facial expression recognition is culture-dependent and may misinterpret expressions across different deaf communities","Requires full face visibility — masks, sunglasses, or partial face occlusion breaks non-manual detection","Lighting conditions that affect facial feature visibility (shadows, backlighting) reduce non-manual marker accuracy by 20-40%","Cannot distinguish between intentional non-manual markers and natural facial movements (e.g., blinking vs intentional eye widening)"],"requires":["Full face visibility in camera frame","Adequate frontal lighting (300+ lux) for facial landmark detection","Video resolution of 720p+ for reliable facial feature extraction"],"input_types":["video stream with signer's face and upper body visible"],"output_types":["annotated text with grammatical markers indicated (e.g., [QUESTION], [NEGATION])","structured JSON with confidence scores for detected non-manual markers"],"categories":["image-visual","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_signapse__cap_3","uri":"capability://image.visual.video.quality.and.environmental.condition.adaptation","name":"video quality and environmental condition adaptation","description":"Dynamically adjusts model inference parameters and confidence thresholds based on detected video quality metrics (resolution, frame rate, lighting levels, motion blur). The system analyzes incoming frames for environmental factors and automatically applies preprocessing (contrast enhancement, noise reduction, frame interpolation) or reduces inference speed to maintain accuracy when conditions are suboptimal, with fallback to lower-accuracy but faster models when real-time performance is critical.","intents":["Maintain usable translation accuracy across varying lighting and camera conditions without requiring manual recalibration","Gracefully degrade performance in poor conditions rather than failing completely","Optimize latency vs accuracy trade-off based on detected environmental constraints"],"best_for":["Deployments in uncontrolled environments (home offices, outdoor settings, varying lighting)","Applications requiring robust performance across diverse hardware and network conditions","Real-time communication scenarios where some latency is acceptable but complete failure is not"],"limitations":["Preprocessing overhead adds 50-150ms latency per frame in poor lighting conditions","Accuracy floor exists below certain environmental thresholds (e.g., <100 lux) where no preprocessing recovers sufficient signal","Automatic quality detection may misidentify intentional motion blur (fast signing) as environmental noise, triggering unnecessary preprocessing","No user feedback mechanism to correct misdetected environmental conditions"],"requires":["Real-time video analysis capability (GPU or optimized CPU inference)","Preprocessing pipeline for image enhancement (contrast, noise reduction)","Multiple model variants optimized for different latency/accuracy trade-offs"],"input_types":["video stream with variable quality characteristics"],"output_types":["text translation with quality confidence score","metadata indicating detected environmental conditions and applied preprocessing"],"categories":["image-visual","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_signapse__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.integration.with.video.conferencing.platforms.via.api.or.plugin","name":"integration with video conferencing platforms via api or plugin","description":"Provides SDKs, plugins, or API endpoints that integrate sign language translation into existing video conferencing systems (Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, etc.) either as native plugins or through WebRTC stream interception. The integration captures the video stream from the conferencing platform, processes it through the translation engine, and injects translated captions back into the meeting interface or sends them to a separate caption display, maintaining synchronization with the video stream.","intents":["Enable sign language translation within existing video conferencing workflows without requiring users to switch platforms","Provide automatic captioning for deaf participants in meetings without manual interpreter involvement","Integrate accessibility as a native feature of communication platforms rather than as a separate tool"],"best_for":["Enterprise teams using Zoom, Teams, or Google Meet who need to support deaf employees","Educational institutions integrating accessibility into existing learning management systems","Platform providers building accessibility features into their communication tools"],"limitations":["Platform-specific integrations required for each conferencing system — no universal standard for caption injection","WebRTC stream interception may violate platform terms of service or require special permissions","Latency introduced by translation pipeline (typically 500ms-2s) creates noticeable delay between signing and caption appearance","Caption display placement and formatting varies by platform, potentially obscuring important UI elements","Requires API access or plugin framework support from the conferencing platform — not all platforms expose necessary hooks"],"requires":["API key or OAuth credentials for target conferencing platform","Platform-specific SDK or plugin framework (Zoom Apps, Teams extensions, Google Meet plugins)","Network bandwidth sufficient for simultaneous video processing and conferencing (3+ Mbps)","Server-side processing capability if cloud-based, or GPU on client device if local processing"],"input_types":["video stream from conferencing platform","platform-specific metadata (participant info, meeting context)"],"output_types":["caption text injected into platform UI","SRT/VTT subtitle stream","structured JSON with timing and confidence metadata"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_signapse__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.batch.video.processing.and.subtitle.generation","name":"batch video processing and subtitle generation","description":"Processes recorded video files in batch mode to generate complete subtitle tracks (SRT, VTT, or WebVTT format) with frame-accurate timing. The system analyzes the entire video file sequentially, accumulating sign recognition results over longer temporal windows than real-time processing allows, enabling higher accuracy through post-processing and context aggregation. Output includes timing metadata, confidence scores per subtitle segment, and optional speaker identification if multiple signers are present.","intents":["Generate accessible captions for recorded sign language content (lectures, presentations, videos)","Create searchable transcript archives of sign language meetings or events","Batch process large video libraries without real-time latency constraints"],"best_for":["Content creators and educators publishing sign language videos","Organizations archiving recorded meetings and events for accessibility","Platforms providing on-demand video content to deaf audiences"],"limitations":["Processing time scales linearly with video length — a 1-hour video may require 10-30 minutes of processing depending on hardware","Batch processing cannot correct errors in real-time, requiring manual review and editing of generated subtitles","Timing accuracy depends on consistent frame rate — variable frame rate videos may produce misaligned subtitles","No support for multiple simultaneous signers in the same frame — only single-signer videos process reliably"],"requires":["Video file in supported format (MP4, WebM, MOV, AVI)","Minimum 720p resolution for reliable processing","Storage space for output subtitle files (typically <1MB per hour of video)","Processing time of 10-30 minutes per hour of video (varies by hardware)"],"input_types":["video file (MP4, WebM, MOV, AVI)","optional: metadata about signers or context"],"output_types":["SRT subtitle file","VTT/WebVTT subtitle file","JSON with frame-level timing and confidence scores","searchable transcript text"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_signapse__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.confidence.scoring.and.translation.uncertainty.quantification","name":"confidence scoring and translation uncertainty quantification","description":"Assigns confidence scores to each translated sign or phrase, indicating the model's certainty in the translation based on pose detection quality, temporal consistency, and lexicon matching. The system provides per-word or per-phrase confidence metrics that allow downstream applications to flag uncertain translations for manual review, highlight ambiguous segments, or adjust UI presentation (e.g., showing uncertain captions in a different color). Confidence is computed from multiple signals: hand pose detection confidence, temporal smoothness of keypoint tracking, and lexicon match probability.","intents":["Allow applications to identify and flag uncertain translations for manual review or human interpretation","Enable users to understand which parts of a translation are reliable vs uncertain","Support quality assurance workflows where only high-confidence translations are automatically used"],"best_for":["Critical communication scenarios (medical, legal, emergency) where translation accuracy must be verified","Quality assurance teams reviewing and validating automated translations","Applications where uncertain translations should trigger human interpreter involvement"],"limitations":["Confidence scores reflect model uncertainty, not ground truth accuracy — a high-confidence wrong translation is still wrong","Confidence thresholds must be calibrated per sign language variant and use case, requiring domain expertise","No standardized confidence score interpretation — different models may use different scales or calculation methods","Confidence scores may be overconfident in common errors (e.g., consistently misidentifying similar signs with high confidence)"],"requires":["Calibration data to establish confidence thresholds for acceptable accuracy levels","Downstream application logic to handle low-confidence segments (e.g., flag for review, request human interpretation)"],"input_types":["video stream with pose detection results"],"output_types":["text translation with per-word or per-phrase confidence scores (0.0-1.0)","structured JSON with confidence metadata and uncertainty indicators","flagged segments for manual review"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_signapse__cap_7","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.user.feedback.and.continuous.model.improvement.pipeline","name":"user feedback and continuous model improvement pipeline","description":"Collects user corrections and feedback on generated translations, storing them in a structured format with metadata (video segment, original pose data, user correction, user expertise level). This feedback is aggregated and used to identify systematic errors, retrain or fine-tune models on common failure cases, and track model performance over time. The system may implement active learning to prioritize collection of feedback on uncertain or edge-case translations.","intents":["Improve model accuracy over time by learning from real-world usage and user corrections","Identify systematic errors or blind spots in the model that require retraining","Build a dataset of real-world sign language variations for future model improvements"],"best_for":["Long-term product development teams committed to continuous model improvement","Organizations with access to large numbers of deaf users who can provide feedback","Platforms where model accuracy directly impacts user satisfaction and retention"],"limitations":["Feedback collection requires user effort and engagement — most users won't proactively correct translations","Feedback quality varies widely — non-expert corrections may introduce noise into training data","Privacy concerns: storing video segments and corrections raises data protection and consent issues","Retraining cycles are slow (weeks to months) — feedback doesn't immediately improve live system performance","Feedback bias: users are more likely to correct obvious errors than subtle mistakes, skewing the training signal"],"requires":["User interface for submitting corrections and feedback","Data storage and versioning system for feedback and model iterations","Retraining pipeline and infrastructure for periodic model updates","Privacy and consent mechanisms for storing video data and user corrections","Expertise in data quality assessment and feedback filtering"],"input_types":["user corrections to generated translations","optional: user expertise level (deaf native signer, interpreter, etc.)","optional: video segment and pose data associated with correction"],"output_types":["aggregated feedback statistics","identified error patterns and systematic issues","retrained model weights","performance metrics tracking improvement over time"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_signapse__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.accessibility.compliance.and.audit.logging","name":"accessibility compliance and audit logging","description":"Maintains detailed logs of all translation sessions including timestamps, participants, translation accuracy metrics, and system performance characteristics. The system generates compliance reports demonstrating accessibility feature usage, translation quality statistics, and incident logs for regulatory or organizational auditing. Logs are structured to support accessibility compliance frameworks (WCAG, ADA, EN 301 549) and can be exported in standardized formats for third-party audit.","intents":["Demonstrate compliance with accessibility regulations and organizational accessibility commitments","Track accessibility feature usage and impact on user engagement","Investigate translation failures or quality issues for root cause analysis"],"best_for":["Enterprise organizations subject to accessibility compliance requirements (ADA, WCAG)","Educational institutions required to document accessibility accommodations","Platforms undergoing accessibility audits or certifications"],"limitations":["Logging adds overhead to real-time processing — may increase latency by 50-100ms per session","Detailed logging creates large data volumes (100MB+ per 100 hours of video) requiring significant storage","Privacy concerns: logging video data or detailed translation records raises GDPR/CCPA compliance issues","Compliance frameworks vary by jurisdiction — a single system cannot satisfy all regulatory requirements","Audit logs are only useful if reviewed and acted upon — passive logging without analysis provides limited value"],"requires":["Structured logging infrastructure (e.g., ELK stack, CloudWatch, Datadog)","Data retention policies compliant with privacy regulations","Audit report generation templates aligned with target compliance frameworks","Access controls to limit who can view sensitive accessibility logs"],"input_types":["translation session metadata (participants, duration, quality metrics)","system performance data (latency, error rates, resource usage)"],"output_types":["structured audit logs (JSON, CSV)","compliance reports (PDF, HTML)","usage statistics and dashboards","incident reports for failed translations"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":39,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Webcam or video input device with minimum 30 FPS capture rate","Minimum 720p resolution for reliable hand pose detection","Adequate lighting (300+ lux) for consistent keypoint detection","Network bandwidth of 2+ Mbps for real-time processing if cloud-based","User selection of sign language variant (ASL, BSL, LSF, etc.) at setup","Separate trained model weights for each supported variant (storage overhead ~500MB per variant)","Native signer community input for validation and quality assurance per variant","Full face visibility in camera frame","Adequate frontal lighting (300+ lux) for facial landmark detection","Video resolution of 720p+ for reliable facial feature extraction"],"failure_modes":["Accuracy degrades significantly in low-light conditions (below 300 lux) due to reduced hand visibility","Performance varies by regional sign language variant (ASL vs BSL vs LSF) — model must be trained/fine-tuned per language","Fast signing speeds (>2 signs per second) cause frame-to-frame keypoint tracking loss, reducing accuracy below 70%","Requires clear camera angle with hands fully visible — side angles or partial occlusion cause 15-30% accuracy drop","No support for simultaneous two-handed signs with complex finger spelling sequences","Each new sign language variant requires separate model training with native signer datasets (typically 10,000+ hours of video)","Cross-variant translation accuracy is lower than within-variant due to grammatical structure differences","No automatic detection of sign language variant — requires manual user selection or pre-configuration","Rare or emerging sign language variants lack sufficient training data for model development","Facial expression recognition is culture-dependent and may misinterpret expressions across different deaf communities","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.67,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.096Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.559Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=signapse","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=signapse"}},"signature":"Q1yz21OEWlzRoWaLV6FaZ6xIhXk9npX3CtDPqsUIobwt+fDruFo3HoQM1HB0FVW5XPfWeSC+1uNkgpvKKtNlDQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-19T16:59:30.217Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/signapse","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/signapse","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=signapse","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}