{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-second","slug":"second","name":"Second","type":"product","url":"https://www.second.dev/","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/second","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"unknown","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-second__cap_0","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.automated.dependency.version.migration.with.ast.aware.refactoring","name":"automated dependency version migration with ast-aware refactoring","description":"Analyzes project dependency graphs and automatically generates code migrations when upgrading library versions. Uses abstract syntax tree (AST) parsing to identify breaking API changes, deprecated function calls, and signature modifications across multiple languages, then applies targeted refactoring rules to update call sites, imports, and configuration files without manual intervention.","intents":["I need to upgrade a major version of a critical dependency but don't want to manually fix hundreds of breaking changes across my codebase","I want to migrate from one library to a compatible alternative (e.g., lodash to native ES6) with confidence that all usages are updated correctly","I need to apply security patches that require API changes across my entire monorepo"],"best_for":["teams managing large codebases with many dependencies","developers maintaining open-source libraries with frequent major version releases","organizations running automated security compliance workflows"],"limitations":["Requires pre-defined migration rules for each library version pair — cannot handle entirely novel or undocumented API changes","May struggle with dynamic code patterns (eval, reflection, metaprogramming) that don't have static AST representation","Custom business logic intertwined with library calls may require manual review even after automated migration"],"requires":["Source code in supported language (JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Java, Go, or similar)","Access to dependency manifest files (package.json, requirements.txt, pom.xml, etc.)","Git repository or version control for change tracking and rollback"],"input_types":["source code files","dependency manifests","package lock files","migration rule definitions"],"output_types":["refactored source code","updated dependency manifests","migration report with change summary","git diff or patch files"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-second__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.framework.upgrade.orchestration.with.multi.file.dependency.coordination","name":"framework upgrade orchestration with multi-file dependency coordination","description":"Orchestrates complex, multi-step framework upgrades (e.g., React 17→18, Next.js 12→13, Django 3→4) by coordinating changes across interdependent files, configuration files, and transitive dependencies. Manages upgrade sequencing, handles cascading changes where one file's update triggers requirements in others, and validates consistency across the entire upgrade path.","intents":["I need to upgrade my Next.js app to the latest version but the upgrade touches pages, API routes, middleware, and config files in coordinated ways","I want to migrate my React class components to hooks and update all related state management patterns simultaneously","I need to upgrade my entire Django project including models, views, templates, and settings in the correct dependency order"],"best_for":["full-stack teams upgrading web frameworks with widespread codebase impact","startups moving quickly through framework versions and needing reliable automation","enterprises managing multiple applications on the same framework stack"],"limitations":["Upgrade paths must be pre-defined for each framework version pair — cannot infer upgrade logic from documentation alone","Custom middleware, plugins, or extensions may not be covered by standard upgrade rules","Requires understanding of project structure conventions (e.g., Next.js pages directory vs app directory) to apply rules correctly"],"requires":["Project using a supported framework (React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Django, Rails, etc.)","Consistent project structure following framework conventions","Ability to run tests post-migration to validate changes"],"input_types":["entire project source tree","framework configuration files","package/dependency files","test suites"],"output_types":["fully refactored project source","updated configuration files","migration changelog with affected files","test results and compatibility report"],"categories":["automation-workflow","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-second__cap_2","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.language.specific.code.pattern.transformation.with.rule.based.rewriting","name":"language-specific code pattern transformation with rule-based rewriting","description":"Applies language-specific transformation rules to modernize code patterns, enforce style standards, or adapt to new language features. Uses pattern matching and code rewriting engines to identify outdated idioms (e.g., var→const, callback→async-await, string concatenation→template literals) and automatically rewrite them while preserving semantics and comments.","intents":["I want to modernize my JavaScript codebase to use ES6+ features without manually rewriting hundreds of functions","I need to enforce a new coding standard (e.g., no var declarations, prefer const/let) across my entire team's codebase","I want to migrate from callback-based async patterns to async/await throughout my Node.js application"],"best_for":["teams standardizing code style across large codebases","developers modernizing legacy code to use current language features","organizations enforcing linting rules retroactively across existing projects"],"limitations":["Transformation rules are language-specific and must be defined for each pattern — cannot auto-discover patterns from linter rules","Complex nested patterns or context-dependent transformations may require manual rule authoring","Semantic-preserving transformations are limited to patterns that have unambiguous equivalents"],"requires":["Source code in supported language","Clear definition of source pattern and target pattern","Ability to parse and rewrite code in that language"],"input_types":["source code files","transformation rule definitions","linting configuration"],"output_types":["refactored source code","transformation report with statistics","before/after diffs"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-second__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.configuration.file.migration.and.schema.evolution","name":"configuration file migration and schema evolution","description":"Automatically migrates configuration files (JSON, YAML, TOML, etc.) when their schemas change due to library or framework updates. Handles nested structure transformations, renames deprecated keys, applies default values for new required fields, and validates the output against the new schema specification.","intents":["My Next.js config changed from next.config.js to a new format and I need to automatically convert my existing configuration","I'm upgrading Webpack and the configuration schema has changed significantly — I need to map old keys to new ones","I want to migrate from environment variables to a new .env schema format across all my deployment configurations"],"best_for":["DevOps teams managing configuration across multiple environments and versions","developers upgrading tools with breaking configuration changes","teams maintaining infrastructure-as-code with evolving schemas"],"limitations":["Requires explicit schema definitions for both old and new configuration formats","Custom or undocumented configuration options may not be handled automatically","Complex conditional logic in configurations may require manual intervention"],"requires":["Configuration files in supported format (JSON, YAML, TOML, etc.)","Schema definitions or migration rules for the configuration format","Knowledge of which configuration keys map to which new keys"],"input_types":["configuration files","schema definitions","migration mapping rules"],"output_types":["migrated configuration files","validation report","mapping summary showing which keys were transformed"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-second__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.batch.codebase.analysis.and.impact.assessment.before.migration","name":"batch codebase analysis and impact assessment before migration","description":"Scans an entire codebase to identify all usages of deprecated APIs, breaking changes, and compatibility issues before executing migrations. Generates detailed impact reports showing which files are affected, how many changes are needed, and potential risks or manual review requirements, enabling informed decision-making about upgrade feasibility.","intents":["Before I upgrade a critical dependency, I want to understand the full scope of changes required across my codebase","I need to estimate how much effort a framework upgrade will take and which parts of my code will be most affected","I want to identify which deprecated APIs my code is using so I can plan a phased migration strategy"],"best_for":["technical leads planning upgrade timelines and resource allocation","teams assessing risk before committing to major version upgrades","developers creating upgrade proposals with data-driven impact estimates"],"limitations":["Analysis accuracy depends on the completeness of migration rule definitions","Dynamic code patterns (reflection, eval, dynamic imports) may not be detected","False positives possible if analysis rules are too broad or context-unaware"],"requires":["Complete source code access","Dependency manifest files","Migration rule definitions for the upgrade path"],"input_types":["source code files","dependency manifests","migration rules"],"output_types":["impact report with file-by-file breakdown","statistics on number of changes needed","risk assessment and manual review flags","effort estimation"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-second__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.test.driven.migration.validation.with.automated.test.generation","name":"test-driven migration validation with automated test generation","description":"Automatically generates or adapts test cases to validate that migrations preserve application behavior. Runs tests before and after migration to detect regressions, generates new tests for migrated code patterns, and provides detailed reports on test coverage of migrated code to ensure confidence in the changes.","intents":["I want to ensure my migration didn't break anything — I need comprehensive test coverage of the changed code","I'm upgrading a library and want to automatically generate tests that verify the new API works correctly","I need to run my existing test suite before and after migration to catch any behavioral regressions"],"best_for":["teams with existing test suites who want to validate migrations","developers working on critical systems where regression risk is high","organizations requiring audit trails and validation reports for code changes"],"limitations":["Test generation quality depends on code structure and testability — tightly coupled code is harder to test automatically","Cannot generate tests for business logic that isn't explicitly encoded in the code","Requires test infrastructure and test runners to be compatible with the project"],"requires":["Existing test suite or test framework (Jest, pytest, unittest, etc.)","Ability to run tests in the project environment","Source code with reasonable testability"],"input_types":["source code before and after migration","existing test suite","test configuration"],"output_types":["test execution results","regression report","generated test cases","coverage analysis of migrated code"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-second__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.incremental.migration.with.staged.rollout.and.rollback.support","name":"incremental migration with staged rollout and rollback support","description":"Enables phased migrations by applying changes to selected files or modules first, validating them, and then progressively rolling out to the rest of the codebase. Maintains rollback capability at each stage, allowing teams to revert to previous versions if issues are discovered, and tracks migration state across multiple sessions.","intents":["I want to migrate my monorepo gradually, starting with less critical modules and working toward core services","I need to deploy a migration to production incrementally, validating each stage before moving to the next","If a migration causes issues, I want to be able to roll back specific files or modules without affecting the entire codebase"],"best_for":["teams managing large monorepos or microservices that can't afford full-codebase downtime","organizations with strict change management policies requiring staged rollouts","developers working on critical systems where risk mitigation is paramount"],"limitations":["Incremental migration may leave the codebase in an inconsistent state temporarily, requiring careful coordination","Some migrations have hard dependencies and cannot be staged — must be applied atomically","Rollback support requires maintaining multiple versions of migrated code in version control"],"requires":["Version control system with branching and merge capabilities","Ability to selectively apply migrations to subsets of the codebase","Test infrastructure to validate each stage"],"input_types":["source code","migration rules","stage definitions"],"output_types":["staged migration branches","rollout plan with validation checkpoints","rollback instructions"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-second__cap_7","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.multi.language.codebase.migration.with.cross.language.dependency.handling","name":"multi-language codebase migration with cross-language dependency handling","description":"Handles migrations in polyglot codebases where multiple languages are used (e.g., TypeScript frontend, Python backend, Go services). Understands cross-language dependencies and API contracts, ensuring that when a backend API changes, corresponding frontend code is updated to match, and vice versa.","intents":["I'm upgrading my Python backend API and need to automatically update all the TypeScript frontend code that calls it","My monorepo has services in multiple languages and I need to migrate a shared library that's used by all of them","I want to ensure that when I change a gRPC or REST API contract, all clients in different languages are updated consistently"],"best_for":["teams managing polyglot microservices architectures","organizations with multiple language ecosystems that need coordinated upgrades","developers maintaining shared APIs or libraries used across language boundaries"],"limitations":["Requires understanding of cross-language API contracts and how they're expressed (REST, gRPC, GraphQL, etc.)","Language-specific idioms and patterns may not translate cleanly across languages","Requires migration rules for each language pair, multiplying the number of rules needed"],"requires":["Source code in multiple supported languages","API contract definitions or interface specifications","Migration rules for each language and API type"],"input_types":["source code in multiple languages","API contract definitions","cross-language dependency mappings"],"output_types":["refactored code in all languages","updated API contracts","cross-language compatibility report"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":23,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Source code in supported language (JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Java, Go, or similar)","Access to dependency manifest files (package.json, requirements.txt, pom.xml, etc.)","Git repository or version control for change tracking and rollback","Project using a supported framework (React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Django, Rails, etc.)","Consistent project structure following framework conventions","Ability to run tests post-migration to validate changes","Source code in supported language","Clear definition of source pattern and target pattern","Ability to parse and rewrite code in that language","Configuration files in supported format (JSON, YAML, TOML, etc.)"],"failure_modes":["Requires pre-defined migration rules for each library version pair — cannot handle entirely novel or undocumented API changes","May struggle with dynamic code patterns (eval, reflection, metaprogramming) that don't have static AST representation","Custom business logic intertwined with library calls may require manual review even after automated migration","Upgrade paths must be pre-defined for each framework version pair — cannot infer upgrade logic from documentation alone","Custom middleware, plugins, or extensions may not be covered by standard upgrade rules","Requires understanding of project structure conventions (e.g., Next.js pages directory vs app directory) to apply rules correctly","Transformation rules are language-specific and must be defined for each pattern — cannot auto-discover patterns from linter rules","Complex nested patterns or context-dependent transformations may require manual rule authoring","Semantic-preserving transformations are limited to patterns that have unambiguous equivalents","Requires explicit schema definitions for both old and new configuration formats","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.26,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:04.049Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:10.321Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=second","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=second"}},"signature":"J5Jey4YyJDyxH6YVm2PRa/u73YG/qbjcKZg2JKtIE5vC1BN/9r+xObHL9OpLlUP/E9xKtg6Yv92WnFCAhwTfCA==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T03:40:10.712Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/second","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/second","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=second","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}