{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_scopeblind-protect-mcp","slug":"scopeblind-protect-mcp","name":"protect-mcp","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/ScopeBlind","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/scopeblind-protect-mcp","categories":["mcp-servers","code-review-security"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:scopeblind/protect-mcp"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_scopeblind-protect-mcp__cap_0","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.shadow.mode.request.logging.for.mcp.servers","name":"shadow-mode request logging for mcp servers","description":"Intercepts and logs all MCP protocol messages (requests, responses, errors) flowing through the gateway without blocking or modifying the actual execution path. Implements a transparent proxy pattern that sits between the MCP client and server, capturing full message payloads including tool calls, parameters, and responses for audit and debugging purposes without introducing latency into the critical path.","intents":["I need to audit what tools are being called and with what parameters without slowing down my MCP server","I want to debug MCP protocol interactions and see the full request/response cycle","I need compliance logging of all tool invocations for security or regulatory purposes"],"best_for":["teams deploying MCP servers in production environments requiring audit trails","developers debugging MCP client-server integration issues","organizations with compliance requirements for tool usage logging"],"limitations":["Shadow logging adds disk I/O overhead proportional to message volume — high-frequency tool calls may require log rotation strategy","No built-in log filtering or sampling — all messages logged regardless of sensitivity or size","Log storage location and retention policy must be managed externally"],"requires":["MCP server compatible with Node.js wrapper execution","Writable filesystem for log output","npx or npm installed for CLI execution"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC format)","tool invocation requests","server responses"],"output_types":["structured log files (format unspecified in docs)","audit trail of tool calls and parameters"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_scopeblind-protect-mcp__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.per.tool.access.control.policies","name":"per-tool access control policies","description":"Enforces granular authorization rules on a per-tool basis before MCP tool calls are executed, allowing administrators to define which tools are callable, by whom, and under what conditions. Implements a policy evaluation layer that intercepts tool invocation requests, matches them against a policy ruleset, and either permits or denies execution based on tool name, caller identity, or other contextual attributes.","intents":["I want to restrict certain dangerous tools (like file deletion) to only specific users or roles","I need to disable specific tools in production while keeping others enabled","I want to enforce tool access based on user identity or request context"],"best_for":["multi-tenant MCP deployments where different users need different tool access levels","organizations running MCP servers with mixed-sensitivity tools (some safe, some dangerous)","teams implementing role-based access control (RBAC) for AI tool usage"],"limitations":["Policy syntax and configuration format not documented in provided description — implementation details unknown","No built-in policy versioning or audit trail of policy changes","Policy evaluation adds latency to every tool invocation — performance impact scales with policy complexity","No dynamic policy reloading — policy changes may require server restart"],"requires":["MCP server running through protect-mcp wrapper","Policy configuration file or definition (format unknown)","Tool names must be known in advance to define policies"],"input_types":["tool invocation requests with tool name and parameters","caller identity or context (if supported)"],"output_types":["authorization decision (allow/deny)","audit log of policy decisions"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_scopeblind-protect-mcp__cap_2","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.ed25519.signed.receipt.generation.for.tool.invocations","name":"ed25519-signed receipt generation for tool invocations","description":"Generates cryptographically signed receipts for completed tool invocations using Ed25519 digital signatures, creating a tamper-proof audit trail that proves a specific tool was called with specific parameters at a specific time. Each receipt contains the tool invocation details and is signed with a private key, allowing verification that the receipt has not been modified and was issued by the authorized gateway.","intents":["I need cryptographic proof that a tool was invoked with specific parameters for compliance or dispute resolution","I want to create a tamper-proof audit trail that cannot be forged or modified","I need to verify that receipts from my MCP gateway are authentic and unmodified"],"best_for":["regulated industries (finance, healthcare, legal) requiring non-repudiation of tool usage","organizations with high-security requirements for AI tool invocation auditing","teams building compliance-focused AI systems where tool usage must be provably auditable"],"limitations":["Receipt generation adds cryptographic overhead to each tool invocation — Ed25519 signing is fast but not free","Requires secure key management for the Ed25519 private key — key compromise invalidates all receipt authenticity","Receipt format and verification procedure not documented — integration with external verification systems unclear","No built-in key rotation mechanism — key management must be handled externally"],"requires":["Ed25519 key pair (private key for signing, public key for verification)","Secure storage for the private key (environment variable, key management service, etc.)","Public key distribution mechanism for receipt verification"],"input_types":["tool invocation request with tool name, parameters, and execution result"],"output_types":["signed receipt containing invocation details and Ed25519 signature","receipt format (JSON, binary, etc. — unspecified)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_scopeblind-protect-mcp__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.protocol.gateway.wrapping.and.process.interception","name":"mcp protocol gateway wrapping and process interception","description":"Acts as a transparent wrapper around MCP server processes, intercepting the MCP protocol communication between client and server without requiring modifications to either endpoint. Implements a process-level proxy that launches the target MCP server as a child process and mediates all stdin/stdout communication, allowing policies and logging to be applied uniformly across any MCP server implementation.","intents":["I want to add security controls to an existing MCP server without modifying its code","I need to run multiple MCP servers behind a unified security gateway","I want to apply consistent logging and policy enforcement across heterogeneous MCP servers"],"best_for":["teams with legacy or third-party MCP servers that cannot be modified","organizations deploying multiple MCP servers and needing uniform security policies","developers who want to add security layers without forking or patching upstream MCP implementations"],"limitations":["Process wrapping adds startup latency and memory overhead for the gateway process itself","No support for MCP servers using non-standard communication channels (e.g., WebSocket, HTTP) — only stdin/stdout","Error handling and process lifecycle management (crashes, restarts) must be handled by the wrapper","Message buffering and ordering guarantees depend on the underlying process communication implementation"],"requires":["Node.js runtime (for the protect-mcp CLI)","Target MCP server executable or script","npx or npm for CLI invocation"],"input_types":["MCP server command and arguments","MCP protocol messages via stdin"],"output_types":["MCP protocol messages via stdout","logs and audit records"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_scopeblind-protect-mcp__cap_4","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.optional.receipt.verification.and.validation","name":"optional receipt verification and validation","description":"Provides mechanisms to verify the authenticity and integrity of Ed25519-signed receipts generated by the gateway, allowing external systems or auditors to confirm that a receipt was legitimately issued and has not been tampered with. Verification uses the public key corresponding to the gateway's signing key to validate the signature and confirm the receipt contents.","intents":["I need to verify that a receipt claiming to be from my MCP gateway is actually authentic","I want to integrate receipt verification into my compliance or audit systems","I need to detect if a receipt has been modified or forged"],"best_for":["compliance officers or auditors verifying tool usage records","external systems integrating with MCP gateway audit trails","organizations with multi-party verification requirements"],"limitations":["Verification procedure and API not documented — implementation details unknown","Requires access to the gateway's public key — key distribution and management must be handled separately","No built-in timestamp validation — receipt age or freshness cannot be verified without additional mechanisms","Verification is optional — no enforcement that receipts must be verified before acceptance"],"requires":["Ed25519 public key corresponding to the gateway's signing key","Receipt in the format generated by the gateway","Cryptographic library supporting Ed25519 verification"],"input_types":["signed receipt (format unspecified)","Ed25519 public key for verification"],"output_types":["verification result (valid/invalid)","extracted receipt contents if verification succeeds"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":31,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP server compatible with Node.js wrapper execution","Writable filesystem for log output","npx or npm installed for CLI execution","MCP server running through protect-mcp wrapper","Policy configuration file or definition (format unknown)","Tool names must be known in advance to define policies","Ed25519 key pair (private key for signing, public key for verification)","Secure storage for the private key (environment variable, key management service, etc.)","Public key distribution mechanism for receipt verification","Node.js runtime (for the protect-mcp CLI)"],"failure_modes":["Shadow logging adds disk I/O overhead proportional to message volume — high-frequency tool calls may require log rotation strategy","No built-in log filtering or sampling — all messages logged regardless of sensitivity or size","Log storage location and retention policy must be managed externally","Policy syntax and configuration format not documented in provided description — implementation details unknown","No built-in policy versioning or audit trail of policy changes","Policy evaluation adds latency to every tool invocation — performance impact scales with policy complexity","No dynamic policy reloading — policy changes may require server restart","Receipt generation adds cryptographic overhead to each tool invocation — Ed25519 signing is fast but not free","Requires secure key management for the Ed25519 private key — key compromise invalidates all receipt authenticity","Receipt format and verification procedure not documented — integration with external verification systems unclear","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.35,"ecosystem":0.5900000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:28.138Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:34.640Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=scopeblind-protect-mcp","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=scopeblind-protect-mcp"}},"signature":"hD9ZIgVpzJkerK+17WYspYbb7Hru6K2AqdgMc6AyVfbW1n5L5YYzwBfNVicgf5X/BhWC06cgqh6uQSDj/XUnDQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T12:55:06.710Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/scopeblind-protect-mcp","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/scopeblind-protect-mcp","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=scopeblind-protect-mcp","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}