{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_runsybil","slug":"runsybil","name":"RunSybil","type":"product","url":"https://www.runsybil.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/runsybil","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_runsybil__cap_0","uri":"capability://security.automated.vulnerability.scanning","name":"automated-vulnerability-scanning","description":"Automatically scans target systems and applications to identify security vulnerabilities without manual configuration of individual test cases. Uses AI to intelligently probe for common and emerging vulnerability classes across web applications, APIs, and network services.","intents":["I need to quickly identify vulnerabilities in our application before manual testing","I want to reduce the time spent on routine vulnerability discovery","I need to scan multiple targets efficiently across engagements"],"best_for":["penetration testing teams","security firms conducting rapid assessments","in-house security operations"],"limitations":["May miss complex multi-step vulnerability chains","Effectiveness depends on proper target configuration and access","Cannot replace human expertise for nuanced security analysis"],"requires":["Target system/application access","Network connectivity to targets","Proper authorization for penetration testing"],"input_types":["target URLs","IP addresses","application endpoints"],"output_types":["vulnerability reports","risk assessments","scan logs"],"categories":["security","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_runsybil__cap_1","uri":"capability://security.rapid.pentest.execution","name":"rapid-pentest-execution","description":"Orchestrates and executes complete penetration testing workflows in significantly compressed timeframes by automating reconnaissance, enumeration, exploitation attempts, and validation steps. Reduces engagement duration from weeks to days through intelligent test sequencing.","intents":["I need to complete security assessments faster without sacrificing quality","I want to reduce project timelines for client deliverables","I need to handle more engagements with the same team size"],"best_for":["penetration testing service providers","security consulting firms","enterprise security teams with high assessment volume"],"limitations":["Accelerated timelines may reduce depth of manual analysis","Requires proper scope definition to avoid false positives","Cannot fully automate business logic vulnerability testing"],"requires":["Clear engagement scope definition","Target system access and permissions","Integration with existing pentest workflows"],"input_types":["engagement scope documents","target system specifications","authorization credentials"],"output_types":["pentest reports","executive summaries","remediation recommendations"],"categories":["security","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_runsybil__cap_2","uri":"capability://security.intelligent.vulnerability.prioritization","name":"intelligent-vulnerability-prioritization","description":"Analyzes discovered vulnerabilities and ranks them by severity, exploitability, and business impact to help security teams focus remediation efforts on the most critical issues first. Provides context-aware risk scoring based on the target environment.","intents":["I need to know which vulnerabilities to fix first","I want to communicate risk clearly to development teams","I need to allocate remediation resources efficiently"],"best_for":["security teams managing large vulnerability backlogs","organizations with limited remediation resources","teams needing to justify security spending"],"limitations":["Prioritization depends on accurate vulnerability classification","May not account for organization-specific risk factors","Requires manual review for business context validation"],"requires":["Vulnerability scan results","Target system context and criticality information"],"input_types":["vulnerability data","system metadata","risk parameters"],"output_types":["prioritized vulnerability lists","risk scores","remediation roadmaps"],"categories":["security","analytics"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_runsybil__cap_3","uri":"capability://security.automated.exploitation.validation","name":"automated-exploitation-validation","description":"Automatically attempts to exploit discovered vulnerabilities to validate their exploitability and assess actual risk impact. Provides proof-of-concept demonstrations without requiring manual exploitation attempts by security professionals.","intents":["I need to confirm vulnerabilities are actually exploitable","I want to demonstrate real impact to stakeholders","I need to reduce time spent on manual exploitation testing"],"best_for":["penetration testers validating findings","security teams needing proof-of-concept evidence","organizations requiring impact assessment"],"limitations":["May trigger security alerts or cause system disruption","Cannot exploit vulnerabilities requiring social engineering","Limited to known exploitation techniques"],"requires":["Explicit authorization for exploitation attempts","Target system stability and backup procedures","Proper isolation or staging environment"],"input_types":["vulnerability details","target system information","exploitation parameters"],"output_types":["exploitation results","proof-of-concept evidence","impact assessments"],"categories":["security","testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_runsybil__cap_4","uri":"capability://security.ai.driven.reconnaissance","name":"ai-driven-reconnaissance","description":"Automatically gathers and correlates information about target systems, networks, and applications through intelligent reconnaissance techniques. Uses AI to identify relationships between discovered assets and potential attack surfaces without manual enumeration.","intents":["I need to map the target attack surface quickly","I want to discover hidden or overlooked assets","I need to understand system architecture and dependencies"],"best_for":["penetration testers starting new engagements","security teams assessing unfamiliar infrastructure","organizations with complex or distributed systems"],"limitations":["Reconnaissance quality depends on target exposure","May generate false positives in asset discovery","Cannot discover completely isolated or air-gapped systems"],"requires":["Network access to target environment","Proper authorization for reconnaissance activities"],"input_types":["target domain names","IP address ranges","system specifications"],"output_types":["asset inventories","network maps","attack surface reports"],"categories":["security","intelligence"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_runsybil__cap_5","uri":"capability://security.pentest.report.generation","name":"pentest-report-generation","description":"Automatically generates comprehensive penetration testing reports from scan results and findings, including executive summaries, detailed vulnerability descriptions, remediation recommendations, and risk metrics. Formats reports for stakeholder communication.","intents":["I need to create professional pentest reports quickly","I want to communicate findings clearly to non-technical stakeholders","I need consistent report formatting across engagements"],"best_for":["security consulting firms","penetration testing teams","organizations conducting internal assessments"],"limitations":["Generated reports may require manual customization","Cannot capture nuanced findings from manual testing","Report quality depends on underlying scan accuracy"],"requires":["Complete vulnerability scan and assessment data","Client information and engagement context"],"input_types":["vulnerability findings","scan results","assessment metadata"],"output_types":["PDF reports","executive summaries","detailed findings documents"],"categories":["security","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_runsybil__cap_6","uri":"capability://security.multi.engagement.orchestration","name":"multi-engagement-orchestration","description":"Manages and coordinates multiple concurrent penetration testing engagements, distributing testing workloads and maintaining consistency across different client assessments. Enables security teams to handle higher engagement volume with existing resources.","intents":["I need to manage multiple pentest projects simultaneously","I want to maximize team utilization across engagements","I need to maintain consistent testing standards across clients"],"best_for":["security consulting firms with high engagement volume","managed security service providers","large enterprise security operations"],"limitations":["Requires clear engagement scope separation","May increase complexity of credential and access management","Pricing may scale prohibitively with engagement count"],"requires":["Multiple target systems and engagement scopes","Proper access control and credential management","Integration with project management systems"],"input_types":["engagement specifications","client information","target system details"],"output_types":["engagement status reports","consolidated findings","resource utilization metrics"],"categories":["security","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_runsybil__cap_7","uri":"capability://security.integration.with.security.infrastructure","name":"integration-with-security-infrastructure","description":"Integrates with existing security tools, vulnerability management platforms, and SIEM systems to feed findings into established workflows. Enables automated data sharing and reduces manual data transfer between tools.","intents":["I need to integrate pentest findings into our vulnerability management system","I want to automate data flow between security tools","I need to maintain a single source of truth for security findings"],"best_for":["organizations with established security tool stacks","enterprises with mature security operations","teams using vulnerability management platforms"],"limitations":["Integration quality depends on API availability","May require custom configuration for specific environments","Data format compatibility issues possible"],"requires":["API access to target security platforms","Proper authentication and authorization credentials","Compatible security tool versions"],"input_types":["vulnerability findings","assessment results"],"output_types":["API calls","data feeds","integration logs"],"categories":["security","integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":43,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Target system/application access","Network connectivity to targets","Proper authorization for penetration testing","Clear engagement scope definition","Target system access and permissions","Integration with existing pentest workflows","Vulnerability scan results","Target system context and criticality information","Explicit authorization for exploitation attempts","Target system stability and backup procedures"],"failure_modes":["May miss complex multi-step vulnerability chains","Effectiveness depends on proper target configuration and access","Cannot replace human expertise for nuanced security analysis","Accelerated timelines may reduce depth of manual analysis","Requires proper scope definition to avoid false positives","Cannot fully automate business logic vulnerability testing","Prioritization depends on accurate vulnerability classification","May not account for organization-specific risk factors","Requires manual review for business context validation","May trigger security alerts or cause system disruption","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.77,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.095Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.543Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=runsybil","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=runsybil"}},"signature":"XcRpBWYEuLwEyudTx1Vy9drx2NJevPFtLsBrsAjyJGJA65zDmBy+bdIkjmO+e20DA1citmmTDDNa3F/CtyGUBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T02:38:12.526Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/runsybil","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/runsybil","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=runsybil","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}