{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2","slug":"rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2","name":"ThumbGate","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/rlhf-loop/mcp-memory-gateway-v2","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2","categories":["mcp-servers","deployment-infra","model-training","app-builders"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:rlhf-loop/mcp-memory-gateway-v2"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.structured.feedback.capture.and.validation","name":"structured feedback capture and validation","description":"This capability captures explicit structured feedback from AI coding agents and validates it against a rubric engine. It employs a systematic approach to ensure that feedback is not only collected but also assessed for quality and relevance, which is crucial for effective learning and adaptation. The validation process ensures that only high-quality feedback is used to inform future actions, enhancing the overall reliability of the system.","intents":["How can I ensure that the feedback from my AI coding agents is valid and structured?","What mechanisms are in place to validate the feedback my agents provide?","How do I capture and assess feedback from multiple AI models?"],"best_for":["teams implementing AI coding agents that require structured feedback mechanisms"],"limitations":["The validation process may introduce latency in feedback processing due to the rubric evaluation step."],"requires":["Node.js 18+","Access to the rubric engine API"],"input_types":["structured feedback data"],"output_types":["validated feedback reports"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","feedback-systems"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.auto.promotion.of.failure.patterns.to.prevention.rules","name":"auto-promotion of failure patterns to prevention rules","description":"This capability automatically promotes repeated failure patterns into prevention rules that are enforced via PreToolUse hooks. It analyzes historical failure data and converts it into actionable constraints that block tool calls matching these patterns before execution. This proactive approach minimizes the risk of recurring mistakes by establishing hard constraints based on past performance.","intents":["How can I prevent my AI agents from making the same mistakes repeatedly?","What mechanisms are in place to enforce rules based on historical failures?","How do I translate past failures into actionable constraints for my coding agents?"],"best_for":["developers looking to enhance the reliability of AI coding agents"],"limitations":["The system may require significant historical data to effectively identify and promote failure patterns."],"requires":["Node.js 18+","Historical failure data repository"],"input_types":["failure logs","historical data"],"output_types":["prevention rules","constraint reports"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","error-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.semantic.recall.via.lancedb.vectors","name":"semantic recall via lancedb vectors","description":"This capability supports semantic recall by utilizing LanceDB vectors for efficient retrieval of relevant information based on context. It leverages advanced vector storage and retrieval techniques to ensure that the most pertinent information is accessible to AI agents, enhancing their contextual understanding and response accuracy. This architecture allows for quick access to semantically similar data points, improving the overall performance of AI interactions.","intents":["How can I improve the contextual understanding of my AI agents?","What methods are available for retrieving semantically relevant information?","How do I implement vector-based recall in my AI systems?"],"best_for":["AI developers focusing on enhancing contextual interactions"],"limitations":["Performance may degrade with extremely large datasets due to vector retrieval times."],"requires":["LanceDB setup","Node.js 18+"],"input_types":["text queries","contextual data"],"output_types":["relevant information snippets","contextual data points"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","contextual-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.dpo.kto.export.for.downstream.fine.tuning","name":"dpo/kto export for downstream fine-tuning","description":"This capability facilitates the export of DPO (Data-Driven Policy Optimization) and KTO (Knowledge Transfer Optimization) data for downstream fine-tuning of AI models. It allows users to extract structured data that can be used to refine and optimize model performance based on specific use cases. This export functionality is crucial for teams looking to leverage feedback and performance data to enhance their AI systems continuously.","intents":["How can I fine-tune my AI models based on feedback data?","What methods are available for exporting optimization data for further use?","How do I implement DPO and KTO in my AI development process?"],"best_for":["data scientists and AI engineers focused on model optimization"],"limitations":["Requires a deep understanding of DPO/KTO concepts to effectively utilize the exported data."],"requires":["Node.js 18+","Access to DPO/KTO frameworks"],"input_types":["feedback data","performance metrics"],"output_types":["exported optimization data","fine-tuning datasets"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","model-optimization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.file.watcher.bridge.for.external.signal.ingestion","name":"file watcher bridge for external signal ingestion","description":"This capability includes a file watcher bridge that monitors external files for changes and ingests signals into the system. It uses a polling mechanism to detect modifications in specified files and triggers corresponding actions within the MCP Memory Gateway. This integration allows for real-time updates and responsiveness to external events, enhancing the adaptability of the AI coding agents.","intents":["How can I integrate external signals into my AI system?","What methods are available for monitoring file changes in real-time?","How do I set up a file watcher to trigger actions in my AI agents?"],"best_for":["developers needing real-time integration of external data"],"limitations":["Polling may introduce latency and is not suitable for high-frequency updates."],"requires":["Node.js 18+","File system access permissions"],"input_types":["file paths","external signals"],"output_types":["triggered actions","event notifications"],"categories":["automation-workflow","real-time-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":47,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 18+","Access to the rubric engine API","Historical failure data repository","LanceDB setup","Access to DPO/KTO frameworks","File system access permissions"],"failure_modes":["The validation process may introduce latency in feedback processing due to the rubric evaluation step.","The system may require significant historical data to effectively identify and promote failure patterns.","Performance may degrade with extremely large datasets due to vector retrieval times.","Requires a deep understanding of DPO/KTO concepts to effectively utilize the exported data.","Polling may introduce latency and is not suitable for high-frequency updates.","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39636518237712515,"quality":0.45,"ecosystem":0.5900000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.9,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:28.138Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:18:33.807Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2"}},"signature":"yKaY2wuEBNiak4+Ohavv8DwsM49CerSO8yrO0l+NxHZh7eaO2dfVb7MxQQZAn8HGQ+bqb9QWbz4pbGW9jcooAA==","signedAt":"2026-06-17T19:27:32.153Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=rlhf-loop-mcp-memory-gateway-v2","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}