{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"github-reworkd--agentgpt","slug":"reworkd--agentgpt","name":"AgentGPT","type":"agent","url":"https://agentgpt.reworkd.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/reworkd--agentgpt","categories":["ai-agents","deployment-infra"],"tags":["agent","agentgpt","agents","agi","ai","ai-agents","autogpt","baby-agi","gpt","langchain","llm","next","openai","t3","t3-stack"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"github-reworkd--agentgpt__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.browser.based.autonomous.agent.orchestration.with.goal.decomposition","name":"browser-based autonomous agent orchestration with goal decomposition","description":"Enables users to define high-level goals through a web UI, which are then autonomously decomposed into executable tasks by an AutonomousAgent class running on a FastAPI backend. The agent iteratively executes tasks, evaluates results, and adjusts its task queue based on feedback, implementing a closed-loop execution model with real-time state synchronization between Next.js frontend and Python backend via WebSocket or HTTP polling.","intents":["I want to create an AI agent that can break down a complex goal into subtasks and execute them autonomously","I need to monitor agent progress in real-time as it works toward a goal","I want to pause, resume, or modify an agent's task queue mid-execution"],"best_for":["developers building no-code/low-code agent platforms","teams prototyping autonomous workflow systems without backend infrastructure","non-technical users who want to deploy agents without writing code"],"limitations":["Agent execution is stateless across browser sessions — requires persistent backend storage for long-running agents","Task decomposition quality depends entirely on LLM prompt engineering; no built-in validation of task feasibility","No native support for distributed execution — all tasks run sequentially on single backend instance","Context window limitations mean complex goals with many subtasks may exceed token budgets mid-execution"],"requires":["Node.js 18+ for frontend (Next.js 13)","Python 3.9+ for backend (FastAPI)","OpenAI API key or compatible LLM provider","Browser with WebSocket support for real-time updates"],"input_types":["natural language goal description (text)","agent configuration parameters (JSON)","tool/capability definitions (structured)"],"output_types":["task execution logs (text)","agent state snapshots (JSON)","final goal completion status (structured)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-reworkd--agentgpt__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.provider.llm.integration.with.configurable.model.selection","name":"multi-provider llm integration with configurable model selection","description":"Abstracts LLM provider selection (OpenAI, Anthropic, local Ollama) through a configuration layer, allowing users to swap providers without code changes. The backend service layer handles provider-specific API formatting, token counting, and response parsing, with fallback mechanisms for provider failures. Configuration is managed through environment variables and runtime settings exposed in the UI.","intents":["I want to use different LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, local models) without rewriting agent logic","I need cost optimization by switching between expensive and cheaper models based on task complexity","I want to run agents offline using local LLM models like Ollama"],"best_for":["developers building LLM-agnostic agent platforms","teams evaluating multiple LLM providers for cost/performance tradeoffs","organizations with data residency requirements needing local model support"],"limitations":["Provider-specific features (vision, function calling) require conditional logic — no unified abstraction","Token counting varies by provider; no built-in mechanism to prevent mid-execution context overflow","Fallback logic is manual — no automatic retry with different provider if primary fails","Rate limiting and quota management delegated to individual provider SDKs"],"requires":["API keys for selected providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Environment variables: OPENAI_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, or OLLAMA_BASE_URL","Python requests library for HTTP calls to provider APIs"],"input_types":["provider configuration (JSON/env vars)","model identifier (string)","prompt text (string)"],"output_types":["LLM completion (text)","token usage metrics (structured)","provider-specific metadata (JSON)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-reworkd--agentgpt__cap_10","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.configuration.templating.and.reusability","name":"agent configuration templating and reusability","description":"Allows users to save successful agent configurations as templates that can be reused for similar tasks. Templates capture goal decomposition strategies, tool selections, and prompt customizations. Users can clone templates, modify parameters, and deploy new agents without rebuilding from scratch. Templates are stored in the backend and shared through the UI.","intents":["I want to save my agent configuration and reuse it for similar tasks","I need to share agent templates with my team","I want to create a library of domain-specific agent configurations"],"best_for":["teams running repetitive agent tasks","organizations building agent marketplaces","developers creating reusable agent patterns"],"limitations":["No versioning of templates — overwrites lose previous versions","Template parameters are not validated — invalid configurations may fail at runtime","No dependency tracking — templates may reference tools that are no longer available","Sharing is manual — no built-in template marketplace or discovery mechanism"],"requires":["Backend storage for templates (database)","Template serialization format (JSON)","UI for template management (create, edit, delete, clone)"],"input_types":["agent configuration (JSON)","template metadata (name, description, tags)","parameter definitions (schema)"],"output_types":["saved template (JSON)","template list (JSON array)","instantiated agent configuration (JSON)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-reworkd--agentgpt__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.real.time.agent.execution.monitoring.with.streaming.message.updates","name":"real-time agent execution monitoring with streaming message updates","description":"Streams agent execution progress to the frontend via ChatWindow and ChatMessage components, displaying task execution logs, intermediate results, and state transitions as they occur. Uses Zustand stores (messageStore) to manage message history and trigger React re-renders on each agent action. The backend publishes execution events that are consumed by the frontend through HTTP polling or WebSocket connections, creating a live execution dashboard.","intents":["I want to see what tasks my agent is currently executing in real-time","I need to understand why an agent failed by reviewing its execution logs","I want to interrupt or modify an agent's behavior based on intermediate results"],"best_for":["developers debugging agent behavior during development","non-technical users who need visibility into autonomous system actions","teams building agent monitoring dashboards"],"limitations":["Message history is stored in browser memory (Zustand) — lost on page refresh without persistence layer","Streaming updates add latency; polling-based updates may miss rapid state changes","No built-in filtering/search for long execution logs — UI becomes unwieldy with 100+ messages","ChatMessage component renders all messages in DOM — performance degrades with large execution histories"],"requires":["React 18+ (Next.js 13+)","Zustand store setup in frontend","Backend event publishing mechanism (HTTP endpoints or WebSocket)"],"input_types":["agent execution events (JSON)","task status updates (structured)","error messages (text)"],"output_types":["rendered message stream (React components)","message history (JSON array)","execution timeline (structured)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-reworkd--agentgpt__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.agent.tool.capability.registration.and.invocation.framework","name":"agent tool/capability registration and invocation framework","description":"Provides a schema-based tool registry where developers define available tools (web search, file operations, API calls) with JSON schemas describing inputs/outputs. The agent execution engine matches task requirements against registered tools, invokes them with appropriate parameters, and integrates results back into the task execution loop. Tools are implemented as Python functions in the backend with type hints that are automatically converted to JSON schemas for LLM consumption.","intents":["I want to extend my agent with custom tools (web search, database queries, API calls)","I need the agent to understand what tools are available and when to use them","I want to safely execute external operations (file I/O, API calls) with parameter validation"],"best_for":["developers building extensible agent platforms","teams integrating agents with existing APIs and services","organizations needing controlled tool execution with audit trails"],"limitations":["Tool schema generation from Python type hints is basic — complex nested types may not translate correctly to JSON schema","No built-in rate limiting or quota management per tool — relies on external service limits","Tool execution is synchronous — long-running operations block the agent task loop","Error handling is tool-specific — no unified error recovery strategy across tool types"],"requires":["Python 3.9+ with type hints","Tool implementation as FastAPI endpoints or Python functions","JSON schema definitions for tool inputs/outputs"],"input_types":["tool schema definitions (JSON)","tool invocation parameters (structured)","task context (text/structured)"],"output_types":["tool execution results (any type)","error messages (text)","execution metadata (JSON)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-reworkd--agentgpt__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.agent.state.persistence.and.session.management","name":"agent state persistence and session management","description":"Manages agent execution state across browser sessions using a combination of frontend Zustand stores (agentStore) and backend database persistence. Agent configuration, execution history, and task state are serialized to storage, enabling users to resume interrupted executions or review past agent runs. The system tracks agent lifecycle phases (created, running, paused, completed) with timestamps and status transitions.","intents":["I want to save my agent configuration and resume execution later","I need to review the execution history of past agent runs","I want to clone a successful agent configuration to run similar tasks"],"best_for":["teams running long-duration agent tasks that may be interrupted","organizations needing audit trails of agent actions","developers building agent templates and reusable configurations"],"limitations":["No built-in database — requires external storage (PostgreSQL, MongoDB) for production use","State serialization is manual — complex agent states may not round-trip correctly","No versioning of agent configurations — overwrites lose previous versions","Session recovery is not atomic — partial failures during state restoration may leave inconsistent state"],"requires":["Backend database (PostgreSQL recommended)","ORM or query builder (SQLAlchemy, Tortoise ORM)","Zustand store setup in frontend"],"input_types":["agent configuration (JSON)","execution state (structured)","task history (JSON array)"],"output_types":["persisted agent record (JSON)","execution history (JSON array)","state snapshots (structured)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-reworkd--agentgpt__cap_5","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.prompt.engineering.and.output.parsing.for.task.generation","name":"prompt engineering and output parsing for task generation","description":"Uses carefully crafted system prompts to guide the LLM in decomposing goals into structured tasks and parsing its own outputs into executable task objects. The backend maintains prompt templates that are injected with agent context (current goal, completed tasks, available tools) and sent to the LLM. Response parsing extracts task descriptions, required tools, and success criteria from unstructured LLM output using regex or structured parsing, with fallback to manual correction if parsing fails.","intents":["I want the agent to break down my goal into well-defined, executable subtasks","I need the agent to understand task dependencies and execution order","I want to customize how the agent reasons about task decomposition"],"best_for":["developers fine-tuning agent behavior for specific domains","teams building domain-specific agents (customer support, data analysis)","researchers experimenting with prompt engineering techniques"],"limitations":["Prompt quality directly impacts task decomposition — poor prompts lead to nonsensical tasks","Output parsing is brittle — LLM format deviations cause parsing failures with no graceful degradation","No A/B testing framework for prompt variants — optimization is manual trial-and-error","Prompt injection vulnerabilities if user goals are not sanitized before injection into prompts"],"requires":["LLM provider with sufficient context window (4K+ tokens)","Prompt templates stored in backend (hardcoded or database)","Output parsing logic (regex, JSON parsing, or custom parsers)"],"input_types":["user goal (text)","agent context (structured)","prompt template (text with placeholders)"],"output_types":["task list (JSON array)","task descriptions (text)","tool requirements (structured)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-reworkd--agentgpt__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.browser.native.agent.deployment.without.backend.infrastructure","name":"browser-native agent deployment without backend infrastructure","description":"Allows users to deploy agents directly from the web UI without managing servers, databases, or deployment pipelines. The platform provides a managed FastAPI backend that handles agent execution, with Docker containerization for self-hosted deployments. Users configure agents through the browser UI, and the system automatically provisions backend resources (or uses shared infrastructure) to run the agent. Configuration is stored in environment variables and Docker Compose files for reproducibility.","intents":["I want to deploy an agent without setting up servers or databases","I need to self-host agents on my own infrastructure for data privacy","I want to share my agent configuration with others in a reproducible format"],"best_for":["non-technical users deploying agents for the first time","teams with limited DevOps resources","organizations with data residency requirements needing self-hosted options"],"limitations":["Managed deployment has no SLA or uptime guarantees — suitable only for non-critical tasks","Self-hosted deployment requires Docker and Docker Compose knowledge","No built-in scaling — single backend instance handles all agent executions sequentially","Environment variable management is manual — no secrets management UI"],"requires":["Docker and Docker Compose (for self-hosted)","Environment variables for LLM API keys","Browser with JavaScript enabled"],"input_types":["agent configuration (UI form)","environment variables (text)","Docker Compose file (YAML)"],"output_types":["deployed agent endpoint (URL)","Docker image (container)","configuration snapshot (JSON)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-reworkd--agentgpt__cap_7","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agent.goal.refinement.and.user.feedback.integration","name":"agent goal refinement and user feedback integration","description":"Enables users to provide feedback on agent progress and refine goals mid-execution through the chat interface. The agent can ask clarifying questions, request user approval for risky actions, or adjust its task decomposition based on feedback. Feedback is captured through the ChatWindow UI and fed back into the agent's context for the next task iteration, creating a human-in-the-loop execution model.","intents":["I want to guide my agent toward better solutions by providing feedback","I need the agent to ask for approval before executing risky operations","I want to clarify ambiguous goals that the agent misunderstood"],"best_for":["teams using agents for high-stakes decisions (financial, legal)","developers building interactive agent systems","organizations requiring human oversight of autonomous systems"],"limitations":["Feedback integration is manual — no automatic detection of when feedback is needed","No structured feedback schema — agent must parse natural language feedback","Feedback latency blocks agent execution — synchronous wait for user input","No audit trail of feedback decisions — difficult to trace why agent made certain choices"],"requires":["Real-time communication channel (WebSocket or polling)","User interaction UI (ChatWindow component)","Backend logic to pause execution and wait for feedback"],"input_types":["user feedback (natural language text)","approval/rejection decisions (boolean)","goal refinements (text)"],"output_types":["updated agent context (structured)","revised task list (JSON)","execution continuation signal (boolean)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-reworkd--agentgpt__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.execution.error.handling.and.recovery.with.retry.logic","name":"agent execution error handling and recovery with retry logic","description":"Implements multi-level error handling: task-level retries with exponential backoff, tool invocation error recovery, and graceful degradation when tools fail. The AutonomousAgent class catches exceptions during task execution, logs them, and either retries the task with modified parameters or marks it as failed and continues with remaining tasks. Error context is preserved in execution logs for debugging.","intents":["I want my agent to retry failed tasks instead of giving up immediately","I need detailed error logs to understand why tasks failed","I want the agent to gracefully degrade when tools are unavailable"],"best_for":["developers building resilient agent systems","teams running agents in unreliable environments (poor network, flaky APIs)","organizations needing detailed execution audits"],"limitations":["Retry logic is hardcoded — no configuration for retry count, backoff strategy, or timeout thresholds","Error recovery is task-specific — no unified strategy across different error types","Exponential backoff may exceed total execution timeout for many retries","No circuit breaker pattern — repeated failures to same tool don't prevent further attempts"],"requires":["Exception handling in task execution code","Logging infrastructure (Python logging module)","Timeout configuration for task execution"],"input_types":["task execution request (structured)","error context (exception object)","retry parameters (count, backoff)"],"output_types":["retry decision (boolean)","error log entry (text)","task status update (structured)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-reworkd--agentgpt__cap_9","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.agent.performance.metrics.and.execution.analytics","name":"agent performance metrics and execution analytics","description":"Tracks agent execution metrics including task completion rate, average task duration, tool invocation frequency, and LLM token usage. Metrics are collected during execution and aggregated into dashboards showing agent efficiency and cost. The system stores execution metadata (timestamps, token counts, tool calls) in the backend for later analysis and optimization.","intents":["I want to understand how efficiently my agent is executing tasks","I need to track LLM API costs and optimize token usage","I want to identify bottlenecks in agent execution"],"best_for":["teams optimizing agent performance for production","organizations tracking AI infrastructure costs","developers benchmarking different agent configurations"],"limitations":["Metrics collection adds overhead to task execution","No built-in analytics dashboard — metrics are raw data requiring custom visualization","Token counting is provider-specific — no unified metric across different LLMs","No correlation analysis — difficult to identify which task types are most expensive"],"requires":["Metrics collection in task execution loop","Time measurement utilities (Python time module)","Token counting from LLM provider APIs","Backend storage for metrics (database or time-series DB)"],"input_types":["task execution events (structured)","LLM API responses (with token counts)","tool invocation records (structured)"],"output_types":["execution metrics (JSON)","cost estimates (numeric)","performance reports (structured)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":49,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 18+ for frontend (Next.js 13)","Python 3.9+ for backend (FastAPI)","OpenAI API key or compatible LLM provider","Browser with WebSocket support for real-time updates","API keys for selected providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Environment variables: OPENAI_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, or OLLAMA_BASE_URL","Python requests library for HTTP calls to provider APIs","Backend storage for templates (database)","Template serialization format (JSON)","UI for template management (create, edit, delete, clone)"],"failure_modes":["Agent execution is stateless across browser sessions — requires persistent backend storage for long-running agents","Task decomposition quality depends entirely on LLM prompt engineering; no built-in validation of task feasibility","No native support for distributed execution — all tasks run sequentially on single backend instance","Context window limitations mean complex goals with many subtasks may exceed token budgets mid-execution","Provider-specific features (vision, function calling) require conditional logic — no unified abstraction","Token counting varies by provider; no built-in mechanism to prevent mid-execution context overflow","Fallback logic is manual — no automatic retry with different provider if primary fails","Rate limiting and quota management delegated to individual provider SDKs","No versioning of templates — overwrites lose previous versions","Template parameters are not validated — invalid configurations may fail at runtime","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.8243268770120877,"quality":0.32,"ecosystem":0.75,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.28,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:22.063Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T13:57:06.483Z","last_commit":"2025-04-29T01:19:32Z"},"community":{"stars":36047,"forks":9365,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=reworkd--agentgpt","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=reworkd--agentgpt"}},"signature":"0swqci8yDLBsUNFDWIpEsiV0pQn6kwg+7G8EEkcE4L2wxLivxYlS05a1oiVDRU/UjBoKu73yKO2UUzmu0J/sCw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T07:50:18.934Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/reworkd--agentgpt","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/reworkd--agentgpt","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=reworkd--agentgpt","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}