{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-resona","slug":"resona","name":"resona","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/jcfischer/resona#readme","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/resona","categories":["rag-knowledge"],"tags":["embeddings","semantic-search","vector","lancedb","ollama","resona","ai","machine-learning"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-resona__cap_0","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.local.embedding.generation.with.ollama.integration","name":"local-embedding-generation-with-ollama-integration","description":"Generates semantic embeddings for text documents using local language models via Ollama integration, avoiding external API dependencies and enabling private, on-device embedding computation. The system abstracts embedding model selection and handles batch processing of text inputs through a unified interface that supports multiple embedding backends without code changes.","intents":["I want to embed my documents locally without sending data to external APIs","I need to switch between different embedding models without rewriting code","I want to batch-embed large document collections efficiently on my own hardware"],"best_for":["teams with privacy-sensitive data requiring on-premise processing","developers building RAG systems with offline requirements","researchers experimenting with different embedding models"],"limitations":["Embedding quality depends on local model selection and hardware; smaller models trade accuracy for speed","Requires Ollama service running locally, adding infrastructure complexity","No built-in distributed embedding across multiple machines","Batch processing speed limited by single-machine GPU/CPU resources"],"requires":["Ollama installed and running locally (ollama.ai)","Node.js 14+ or Python 3.8+","Sufficient disk space for embedding models (typically 500MB-7GB per model)","GPU recommended for reasonable embedding latency (CPU fallback available but slow)"],"input_types":["plain text","markdown","code snippets","document excerpts"],"output_types":["dense vector embeddings (float32 arrays)","embedding metadata (model name, dimensions, timestamp)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-resona__cap_1","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.vector.database.persistence.with.lancedb","name":"vector-database-persistence-with-lancedb","description":"Persists embeddings and associated metadata into LanceDB, a columnar vector database optimized for semantic search workloads. The system manages schema definition, index creation, and query optimization transparently, allowing developers to store and retrieve embeddings without direct database administration while maintaining ACID properties and efficient vector similarity operations.","intents":["I want to store embeddings persistently without managing database infrastructure","I need to query embeddings by similarity while also filtering by metadata","I want to scale from prototype to production without changing storage layer"],"best_for":["developers building semantic search features into applications","teams prototyping RAG systems with evolving data schemas","applications requiring local vector storage without cloud dependencies"],"limitations":["LanceDB is optimized for single-machine deployments; distributed queries across multiple instances require custom orchestration","No built-in replication or high-availability features","Vector index types limited to those supported by LanceDB (primarily IVF-based indexes)","Metadata filtering performance depends on index strategy; complex multi-field filters may require full table scans"],"requires":["LanceDB 0.1.0+ installed","Node.js 14+ or Python 3.8+","Local filesystem with sufficient space for vector indexes (typically 2-5x embedding data size)"],"input_types":["embedding vectors (float32 arrays)","metadata objects (JSON-serializable)","document identifiers"],"output_types":["persisted vector records","query result sets with similarity scores","metadata alongside embeddings"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-resona__cap_2","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.semantic.similarity.search.with.vector.queries","name":"semantic-similarity-search-with-vector-queries","description":"Executes semantic similarity searches by computing vector distance between query embeddings and stored document embeddings, returning ranked results based on cosine similarity or other distance metrics. The system handles query embedding generation, distance computation, and result ranking in a single operation, abstracting the mathematical complexity of vector similarity matching.","intents":["I want to find documents semantically similar to a query without keyword matching","I need to retrieve top-K most relevant documents from a large collection","I want to combine similarity search with metadata filtering (e.g., date range, category)"],"best_for":["developers building semantic search UIs or APIs","RAG systems needing document retrieval before LLM context injection","applications requiring concept-based search instead of keyword search"],"limitations":["Search quality depends entirely on embedding model quality; poor embeddings produce poor results regardless of search implementation","No built-in query expansion or synonym handling; single query vector may miss semantically equivalent phrasings","Metadata filtering is applied post-similarity-ranking, potentially missing relevant results if filter is too restrictive","No relevance feedback or learning-to-rank capabilities; results cannot be improved based on user interactions"],"requires":["Pre-computed embeddings stored in LanceDB","Query text to embed (same embedding model as stored documents)","Configured distance metric (cosine similarity, L2, etc.)"],"input_types":["query text (string)","optional metadata filter predicates","optional result limit (K)"],"output_types":["ranked result list with similarity scores","associated document metadata","embedding vectors (optional)"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-resona__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.batch.document.indexing.with.chunking","name":"batch-document-indexing-with-chunking","description":"Processes large document collections by splitting them into semantic chunks, embedding each chunk independently, and indexing all embeddings into the vector database in a single batch operation. The system handles document parsing, chunk boundary detection, and metadata association transparently, enabling efficient indexing of multi-document corpora without manual preprocessing.","intents":["I want to index an entire codebase or document collection without writing custom parsing logic","I need to split long documents into searchable chunks while preserving context","I want to associate metadata (source file, line number, author) with each indexed chunk"],"best_for":["developers building code search or documentation search features","teams indexing large knowledge bases or research paper collections","RAG systems requiring efficient document ingestion pipelines"],"limitations":["Chunk size and overlap strategy are fixed or limited to predefined options; no adaptive chunking based on document structure","No built-in handling of document format diversity (PDFs, Word docs, etc.); requires pre-conversion to text","Chunk boundary detection is heuristic-based (e.g., sentence/paragraph breaks), potentially splitting semantic units","No incremental indexing; re-indexing documents requires deleting and re-adding all chunks"],"requires":["Document collection in text-compatible format","Configured chunk size and overlap parameters","Embedding model running via Ollama","LanceDB instance for persistence"],"input_types":["text documents (plain text, markdown, code)","document metadata (filename, source, tags)","chunking configuration (chunk size, overlap)"],"output_types":["indexed chunks with embeddings","chunk-to-source-document mapping","metadata for each chunk (position, source file)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-resona__cap_4","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.metadata.filtering.with.vector.queries","name":"metadata-filtering-with-vector-queries","description":"Combines vector similarity search with structured metadata filtering, allowing queries to specify both semantic similarity requirements and metadata constraints (e.g., 'find similar documents from 2024 by author X'). The system evaluates metadata predicates alongside vector distance calculations, enabling precise retrieval that balances semantic relevance with structured data constraints.","intents":["I want to search semantically but limit results to a specific category or time range","I need to find similar documents only from a subset of my collection","I want to combine multiple metadata filters (AND/OR logic) with semantic search"],"best_for":["applications with rich metadata (tags, dates, authors, categories)","multi-tenant systems requiring per-user or per-organization data isolation","domain-specific search where metadata context is critical to relevance"],"limitations":["Metadata filtering is applied post-ranking, potentially missing relevant results if filter eliminates high-similarity matches","Complex nested metadata queries (e.g., 'documents where (category=A AND date>2024) OR (category=B AND author=X)') may require manual query composition","No full-text search on metadata fields; metadata filtering is exact-match or range-based only","Index performance degrades with high-cardinality metadata fields (e.g., unique IDs); filtering on such fields may trigger full table scans"],"requires":["Metadata stored alongside embeddings in LanceDB","Metadata schema defined at indexing time","Filter predicates expressed in LanceDB query syntax"],"input_types":["query text (for semantic embedding)","metadata filter predicates (JSON or DSL)","optional result limit"],"output_types":["filtered and ranked result list","similarity scores for each result","full metadata for each result"],"categories":["search-retrieval","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-resona__cap_5","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.multi.model.embedding.abstraction","name":"multi-model-embedding-abstraction","description":"Provides a pluggable embedding backend interface that abstracts away specific embedding model implementations, allowing applications to switch between different Ollama models or embedding providers without code changes. The system handles model initialization, error handling, and fallback logic transparently, enabling experimentation with different embedding strategies.","intents":["I want to experiment with different embedding models without rewriting my application","I need to switch from a slow but accurate model to a fast but less accurate model based on performance requirements","I want to support multiple embedding backends (Ollama, OpenAI, local models) with a unified interface"],"best_for":["researchers comparing embedding model performance","teams optimizing latency vs. accuracy tradeoffs","applications requiring flexible model selection at runtime"],"limitations":["Different embedding models produce vectors of different dimensions; switching models requires re-embedding all stored documents","No automatic model compatibility checking; incompatible model switches may silently produce poor search results","Embedding quality variance between models is not quantified; developers must manually benchmark","No built-in model versioning; tracking which model produced which embeddings requires manual metadata management"],"requires":["Embedding backend implementation (e.g., Ollama client)","Model configuration (model name, dimensions, distance metric)","Re-indexing capability if switching models"],"input_types":["embedding backend configuration","model identifier (e.g., 'nomic-embed-text')","text to embed"],"output_types":["embedding vectors","model metadata (dimensions, type)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-resona__cap_6","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.context.aware.rag.document.retrieval","name":"context-aware-rag-document-retrieval","description":"Retrieves semantically relevant documents from the vector database to augment LLM prompts, implementing the retrieval component of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines. The system handles query embedding, similarity search, and result formatting for LLM context injection, abstracting the mechanics of document retrieval from prompt engineering logic.","intents":["I want to augment my LLM prompts with relevant documents from my knowledge base","I need to retrieve the top-K most relevant documents for a user query before passing to an LLM","I want to build a question-answering system that grounds answers in my own documents"],"best_for":["developers building LLM-powered Q&A systems","teams implementing fact-grounded chatbots","applications requiring knowledge base integration with language models"],"limitations":["Retrieved documents are ranked by semantic similarity alone; no ranking by relevance to specific LLM tasks","No automatic context window management; developers must manually truncate results to fit LLM token limits","Retrieval quality depends on embedding model; poor embeddings produce poor context regardless of LLM quality","No built-in handling of conflicting or contradictory documents in retrieved context"],"requires":["Indexed document collection in vector database","Query text","Configured result limit (K) and similarity threshold","LLM integration (external; Resona handles retrieval only)"],"input_types":["user query (text)","optional metadata filters","result limit (K)"],"output_types":["ranked list of relevant documents","similarity scores","formatted context string (optional)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-resona__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.incremental.document.updates.with.versioning","name":"incremental-document-updates-with-versioning","description":"Manages updates to indexed documents by tracking document versions and updating associated embeddings without full re-indexing. The system maintains document-to-chunk mappings and enables selective re-embedding of modified sections, reducing computational overhead when document collections evolve.","intents":["I want to update a document in my index without re-embedding the entire collection","I need to track which version of a document produced which embeddings","I want to efficiently handle document deletions and modifications in my knowledge base"],"best_for":["applications with frequently-updated knowledge bases (wikis, documentation)","teams managing evolving document collections","systems requiring audit trails of document changes"],"limitations":["No automatic change detection; developers must explicitly mark documents as modified","Chunk-level updates require re-computing chunk boundaries, potentially changing chunk IDs and breaking external references","No built-in conflict resolution for concurrent document updates","Version history is not automatically pruned; old versions accumulate storage overhead"],"requires":["Document versioning metadata (version ID, timestamp)","Ability to identify changed sections of documents","LanceDB with update/delete support"],"input_types":["updated document content","document identifier","version metadata"],"output_types":["updated embeddings","version history","change log"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":26,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Ollama installed and running locally (ollama.ai)","Node.js 14+ or Python 3.8+","Sufficient disk space for embedding models (typically 500MB-7GB per model)","GPU recommended for reasonable embedding latency (CPU fallback available but slow)","LanceDB 0.1.0+ installed","Local filesystem with sufficient space for vector indexes (typically 2-5x embedding data size)","Pre-computed embeddings stored in LanceDB","Query text to embed (same embedding model as stored documents)","Configured distance metric (cosine similarity, L2, etc.)","Document collection in text-compatible format"],"failure_modes":["Embedding quality depends on local model selection and hardware; smaller models trade accuracy for speed","Requires Ollama service running locally, adding infrastructure complexity","No built-in distributed embedding across multiple machines","Batch processing speed limited by single-machine GPU/CPU resources","LanceDB is optimized for single-machine deployments; distributed queries across multiple instances require custom orchestration","No built-in replication or high-availability features","Vector index types limited to those supported by LanceDB (primarily IVF-based indexes)","Metadata filtering performance depends on index strategy; complex multi-field filters may require full table scans","Search quality depends entirely on embedding model quality; poor embeddings produce poor results regardless of search implementation","No built-in query expansion or synonym handling; single query vector may miss semantically equivalent phrasings","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05314789170422551,"quality":0.26,"ecosystem":0.6000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-22T08:08:13.653Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":170,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=resona","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=resona"}},"signature":"SSpnihyoZOsOOP7p83AWrNGN98MPkgS7+k4YYNaX8K2GIVzR8fAN8tq5m6MvYpPg/EKU/kqZgMybYbz9afffAg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T23:27:57.139Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/resona","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/resona","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=resona","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}