{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_research-studio","slug":"research-studio","name":"Research Studio","type":"product","url":"https://researchstudio.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/research-studio","categories":["data-analysis"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_research-studio__cap_0","uri":"capability://research.automated.qualitative.coding","name":"automated-qualitative-coding","description":"Automatically categorizes and tags qualitative data (interview transcripts, open-ended survey responses) into thematic codes without manual labeling. Uses AI to identify patterns and group similar responses together, reducing weeks of manual coding work.","intents":["I need to code hundreds of interview responses without spending weeks on it","I want to identify recurring themes in user feedback automatically","I need to organize qualitative data into meaningful categories quickly"],"best_for":["UX researchers","product managers","user research teams","market researchers"],"limitations":["May misclassify context-dependent or nuanced responses","Requires significant manual review for accuracy assurance","Works best with clear, straightforward language"],"requires":["unstructured text data (transcripts or survey responses)","sufficient volume of data for pattern recognition"],"input_types":["text","interview transcripts","survey responses"],"output_types":["coded categories","thematic tags","structured data"],"categories":["research","data-analysis","automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_research-studio__cap_1","uri":"capability://research.theme.extraction.from.text","name":"theme-extraction-from-text","description":"Identifies and extracts key themes, patterns, and insights from large volumes of unstructured text data. Surfaces the most important findings without requiring manual reading of every response.","intents":["I need to find the main themes in 500+ survey responses","What are the top insights hiding in my user feedback data?","I want to understand what users care about most from their own words"],"best_for":["product managers","UX researchers","marketing professionals","teams without dedicated research operations"],"limitations":["May miss subtle or implied themes","Struggles with sarcasm, irony, or indirect communication","Requires review to validate theme relevance"],"requires":["minimum volume of text data","relatively clear and coherent responses"],"input_types":["text","survey responses","interview transcripts","feedback comments"],"output_types":["theme summaries","insight reports","structured findings"],"categories":["research","data-analysis","insights"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_research-studio__cap_2","uri":"capability://research.sentiment.analysis.on.feedback","name":"sentiment-analysis-on-feedback","description":"Analyzes the emotional tone and sentiment of user feedback, survey responses, and interview data to classify responses as positive, negative, or neutral. Helps prioritize issues and understand user satisfaction.","intents":["I need to understand if users are happy or frustrated with our product","Which feedback is most critical or urgent based on sentiment?","I want to track sentiment trends across multiple feedback sources"],"best_for":["product managers","customer success teams","UX researchers","marketing teams"],"limitations":["Struggles with context-dependent sentiment (sarcasm, mixed feelings)","May misclassify nuanced or ambiguous statements","Requires manual review for accuracy in edge cases"],"requires":["text-based feedback data","sufficient context for accurate classification"],"input_types":["text","survey responses","interview transcripts","user comments"],"output_types":["sentiment labels","sentiment scores","sentiment distribution charts"],"categories":["research","data-analysis","sentiment-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_research-studio__cap_3","uri":"capability://research.insight.synthesis.and.reporting","name":"insight-synthesis-and-reporting","description":"Transforms raw coded data and extracted themes into structured, actionable insight reports. Generates summaries and visualizations that non-data-scientists can understand and act on immediately.","intents":["I need to present research findings to stakeholders in a clear format","How do I turn my analysis into actionable recommendations?","I want a professional report without needing SQL or data science skills"],"best_for":["product managers","UX researchers","non-technical team members","small agencies"],"limitations":["Limited customization compared to enterprise tools","May oversimplify complex findings","Dependent on quality of upstream analysis"],"requires":["coded or analyzed data","clear research objectives"],"input_types":["coded data","themes","sentiment data","structured findings"],"output_types":["insight reports","visualizations","summary documents","presentation-ready formats"],"categories":["research","reporting","visualization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_research-studio__cap_4","uri":"capability://research.data.import.and.organization","name":"data-import-and-organization","description":"Allows users to upload and organize qualitative and quantitative research data from various sources into a centralized workspace. Handles multiple data formats and prepares data for analysis.","intents":["I need to consolidate feedback from multiple sources in one place","How do I get my survey data into the analysis tool?","I want to organize my research data without manual data entry"],"best_for":["research teams","product managers","UX researchers"],"limitations":["Limited integration ecosystem compared to competitors","No direct connections to Slack, Jira, or design platforms","May require manual formatting for some data sources"],"requires":["research data files","supported file formats"],"input_types":["CSV","text files","survey exports","interview transcripts"],"output_types":["organized datasets","structured data collections"],"categories":["research","data-management","import"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_research-studio__cap_5","uri":"capability://research.comparative.analysis.across.segments","name":"comparative-analysis-across-segments","description":"Enables comparison of themes, sentiments, and insights across different user segments, demographics, or research groups. Helps identify how different audiences perceive products or features differently.","intents":["How do different user segments feel about this feature?","What themes emerge for power users vs. casual users?","I need to understand if feedback differs by demographic group"],"best_for":["product managers","UX researchers","marketing professionals","teams with segmented user bases"],"limitations":["Requires pre-segmented data","May not handle complex multi-dimensional segmentation","Needs sufficient data volume per segment for meaningful comparison"],"requires":["segmented or tagged data","multiple data groups to compare","clear segmentation criteria"],"input_types":["coded data","segmented feedback","tagged responses"],"output_types":["comparative reports","segment-specific insights","difference visualizations"],"categories":["research","data-analysis","comparison"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_research-studio__cap_6","uri":"capability://research.no.code.analysis.interface","name":"no-code-analysis-interface","description":"Provides a user-friendly interface designed for non-technical users to perform analysis without SQL, programming, or data science knowledge. Enables self-service research analysis for team members without specialized training.","intents":["I want to analyze research data without learning SQL or code","How can my non-technical team members do their own analysis?","I need a tool that doesn't require hiring a data analyst"],"best_for":["non-technical researchers","product managers","small teams","individual contributors","agencies without data science staff"],"limitations":["Less powerful than code-based analysis tools","May not support advanced statistical methods","Limited customization for complex analyses"],"requires":["basic research knowledge","no coding skills needed"],"input_types":["research data","user feedback"],"output_types":["analysis results","insights","reports"],"categories":["research","accessibility","user-interface"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_research-studio__cap_7","uri":"capability://research.freemium.project.analysis","name":"freemium-project-analysis","description":"Offers a free tier that allows users to conduct analysis on smaller research projects without payment. Enables testing and validation of the tool's capabilities before committing to paid plans.","intents":["I want to try this tool on a small project before paying","Can I analyze one survey without spending money?","I need a free option for my small research project"],"best_for":["individual researchers","small teams","agencies testing tools","budget-conscious organizations","freelancers"],"limitations":["Free tier has data volume or feature restrictions","May have limited export or integration options","Upgrade required for larger projects"],"requires":["small to medium research projects","willingness to upgrade for larger needs"],"input_types":["research data","feedback"],"output_types":["analysis results","insights"],"categories":["research","pricing","accessibility"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":43,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["unstructured text data (transcripts or survey responses)","sufficient volume of data for pattern recognition","minimum volume of text data","relatively clear and coherent responses","text-based feedback data","sufficient context for accurate classification","coded or analyzed data","clear research objectives","research data files","supported file formats"],"failure_modes":["May misclassify context-dependent or nuanced responses","Requires significant manual review for accuracy assurance","Works best with clear, straightforward language","May miss subtle or implied themes","Struggles with sarcasm, irony, or indirect communication","Requires review to validate theme relevance","Struggles with context-dependent sentiment (sarcasm, mixed feelings)","May misclassify nuanced or ambiguous statements","Requires manual review for accuracy in edge cases","Limited customization compared to enterprise tools","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.77,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.095Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.543Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=research-studio","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=research-studio"}},"signature":"k/06FmjfUXJqcGVRnzfutxaZhEZqRYYkhRysoYlsq9+F3lM+w4ktbk97S1hSGlPdAV79916t9IWuwIXr94SfBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T15:58:05.285Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/research-studio","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/research-studio","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=research-studio","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}