{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_reprompt","slug":"reprompt","name":"Reprompt","type":"product","url":"https://reprompt.dev","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/reprompt","categories":["prompt-engineering"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_reprompt__cap_0","uri":"capability://productivity.a.b.test.prompts.with.structured.comparison","name":"a/b test prompts with structured comparison","description":"Create and run controlled experiments comparing two or more prompt variants against the same input dataset to measure performance differences. Provides side-by-side results with quantitative metrics for objective comparison.","intents":["I want to know which prompt version performs better on my use case","I need to compare how different prompt structures affect output quality","I want to test prompt changes before deploying to production"],"best_for":["Product teams","ML engineers","LLM application developers"],"limitations":["Requires pre-existing dataset of test cases","Testing speed depends on LLM API latency"],"requires":["Test dataset with inputs","Connected LLM API credentials","Defined success metrics"],"input_types":["text prompts","test case datasets"],"output_types":["comparison metrics","performance reports"],"categories":["productivity","testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_reprompt__cap_1","uri":"capability://productivity.measure.prompt.performance.with.custom.metrics","name":"measure prompt performance with custom metrics","description":"Define and track custom evaluation metrics for prompt outputs such as accuracy, latency, cost, relevance, or domain-specific KPIs. Automatically calculates metrics across test runs to quantify prompt quality.","intents":["I need to measure if my prompt changes actually improve results","I want to track cost-per-request as I optimize prompts","I need to ensure prompt outputs meet quality thresholds"],"best_for":["Data-driven teams","Enterprise product managers","Cost-conscious organizations"],"limitations":["Metric definition requires upfront specification","Custom metrics may need manual evaluation setup"],"requires":["Defined evaluation criteria","Ground truth data or evaluation framework","Test dataset"],"input_types":["prompt outputs","evaluation rules","reference data"],"output_types":["metric scores","performance dashboards","statistical summaries"],"categories":["productivity","analytics"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_reprompt__cap_2","uri":"capability://productivity.maintain.prompt.version.control.and.history","name":"maintain prompt version control and history","description":"Track all iterations of prompts with version history, enabling teams to view changes over time, revert to previous versions, and understand the evolution of prompt optimization. Provides audit trail for compliance and collaboration.","intents":["I want to see what changed in my prompt between versions","I need to rollback to a previous prompt that was working better","I want to track who made changes to prompts and when"],"best_for":["Teams with multiple prompt engineers","Regulated industries","Organizations with governance requirements"],"limitations":["Version control is limited to Reprompt platform","No direct Git integration mentioned"],"requires":["Team workspace setup","User accounts with permissions"],"input_types":["prompt text","metadata"],"output_types":["version history","diff views","audit logs"],"categories":["productivity","collaboration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_reprompt__cap_3","uri":"capability://productivity.collaborate.on.prompt.optimization.across.teams","name":"collaborate on prompt optimization across teams","description":"Enable multiple team members to work together on prompt testing and refinement in a shared workspace. Non-technical stakeholders can participate in prompt evaluation without requiring API or coding knowledge.","intents":["I want my product team to help evaluate which prompt works best","I need non-technical stakeholders to review prompt outputs","I want to gather feedback from multiple team members on prompt quality"],"best_for":["Cross-functional teams","Organizations with non-technical stakeholders","Large enterprises"],"limitations":["Requires all team members to have platform access","Collaboration features may have learning curve"],"requires":["Team workspace","User accounts","Shared dataset access"],"input_types":["prompts","test results","feedback"],"output_types":["collaborative annotations","team decisions","consensus metrics"],"categories":["productivity","collaboration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_reprompt__cap_4","uri":"capability://productivity.test.prompts.across.multiple.llm.models","name":"test prompts across multiple llm models","description":"Run the same prompt variants against different language models (e.g., GPT-4, Claude, Llama) to compare performance and identify which model-prompt combination works best for your use case.","intents":["I want to know if my prompt works better with GPT-4 or Claude","I need to compare open-source vs proprietary models for my use case","I want to find the most cost-effective model-prompt combination"],"best_for":["Teams evaluating multiple LLM providers","Cost-optimization focused teams","Multi-model applications"],"limitations":["Requires API access to multiple LLM providers","Limited integrations at launch","Cross-model testing increases API costs"],"requires":["API credentials for multiple LLM providers","Test dataset","Budget for multiple API calls"],"input_types":["prompts","test cases","model selection"],"output_types":["cross-model comparison reports","performance matrices"],"categories":["productivity","testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_reprompt__cap_5","uri":"capability://productivity.organize.and.manage.test.datasets","name":"organize and manage test datasets","description":"Upload, store, and organize test datasets within the platform for reuse across multiple prompt experiments. Enables consistent evaluation of prompts against the same input data.","intents":["I want to store my test cases in one place for all prompt experiments","I need to reuse the same dataset across different prompt tests","I want to version control my test data alongside my prompts"],"best_for":["Teams running repeated experiments","Organizations with large test datasets","Data-driven teams"],"limitations":["Dataset management features may be basic","Large dataset handling performance unknown"],"requires":["Test data in structured format","Platform storage"],"input_types":["CSV","JSON","text files"],"output_types":["organized datasets","dataset metadata"],"categories":["productivity","data-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_reprompt__cap_6","uri":"capability://productivity.generate.performance.reports.and.insights","name":"generate performance reports and insights","description":"Automatically generate reports summarizing prompt test results, performance trends, and comparative analysis. Provides visualizations and insights to support decision-making on prompt selection.","intents":["I want to present prompt test results to stakeholders","I need to understand trends in prompt performance over time","I want to identify which prompt changes had the biggest impact"],"best_for":["Product managers","Executives","Teams presenting to stakeholders"],"limitations":["Report customization may be limited","Insights are based on defined metrics only"],"requires":["Completed test runs","Defined metrics"],"input_types":["test results","metric data"],"output_types":["PDF reports","dashboards","visualizations","statistical summaries"],"categories":["productivity","analytics"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_reprompt__cap_7","uri":"capability://productivity.manage.team.permissions.and.access.control","name":"manage team permissions and access control","description":"Control who can view, edit, and run prompt experiments through role-based access control. Enables secure collaboration with appropriate permission levels for different team members.","intents":["I want to restrict who can modify production prompts","I need to give read-only access to stakeholders","I want to control who can run expensive experiments"],"best_for":["Enterprise teams","Regulated industries","Large organizations"],"limitations":["Permission model may be basic","No mention of SSO or advanced auth"],"requires":["Team workspace","User management setup"],"input_types":["user roles","permission assignments"],"output_types":["access control policies","audit logs"],"categories":["productivity","security"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":44,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Test dataset with inputs","Connected LLM API credentials","Defined success metrics","Defined evaluation criteria","Ground truth data or evaluation framework","Test dataset","Team workspace setup","User accounts with permissions","Team workspace","User accounts"],"failure_modes":["Requires pre-existing dataset of test cases","Testing speed depends on LLM API latency","Metric definition requires upfront specification","Custom metrics may need manual evaluation setup","Version control is limited to Reprompt platform","No direct Git integration mentioned","Requires all team members to have platform access","Collaboration features may have learning curve","Requires API access to multiple LLM providers","Limited integrations at launch","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.41666666666666663,"quality":0.79,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.094Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.537Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=reprompt","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=reprompt"}},"signature":"z/LRv5v3Qv6tc0xT9/2CIGy4rLBxqG58vbMbXP6ggkVgovJYr3LTEZ09c5iNavkutKlcE7QUJvuzjSbYoJUyAw==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T09:09:29.287Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/reprompt","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/reprompt","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=reprompt","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}