{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_remy-security","slug":"remy-security","name":"Remy Security","type":"product","url":"https://remysec.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/remy-security","categories":["code-review-security"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_remy-security__cap_0","uri":"capability://security.automated.threat.modeling","name":"automated-threat-modeling","description":"Automatically identifies potential security threats and vulnerabilities in system architecture designs using AI-driven analysis. Generates threat models without requiring manual threat enumeration sessions.","intents":["I need to identify security threats in my system design without spending hours in threat modeling meetings","I want to ensure we've covered common attack vectors before implementation","I need to document potential threats for compliance and audit purposes"],"best_for":["engineering teams without dedicated security architects","startup security leads","mid-market organizations"],"limitations":["may miss context-specific or novel attack vectors","cannot identify industry-specific compliance threats","requires human validation for accuracy"],"requires":["system architecture documentation or design artifacts","access to Remy Security platform"],"input_types":["architecture diagrams","design documentation","system descriptions"],"output_types":["threat lists","vulnerability reports","STRIDE analysis"],"categories":["security","design"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_remy-security__cap_1","uri":"capability://security.stride.analysis.generation","name":"stride-analysis-generation","description":"Automatically performs STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) analysis on system designs. Categorizes identified threats according to STRIDE methodology.","intents":["I need to systematically analyze threats across all STRIDE categories","I want to ensure my threat model follows industry-standard security frameworks","I need to organize security findings in a structured, repeatable way"],"best_for":["teams familiar with STRIDE methodology","organizations requiring structured threat analysis","compliance-focused teams"],"limitations":["requires understanding of STRIDE framework to interpret results","may over-categorize or under-categorize threats"],"requires":["system architecture or design documentation","basic security knowledge to validate results"],"input_types":["architecture diagrams","system design documents"],"output_types":["STRIDE threat matrices","categorized threat lists","analysis reports"],"categories":["security","design"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_remy-security__cap_2","uri":"capability://security.vulnerability.remediation.guidance","name":"vulnerability-remediation-guidance","description":"Provides specific, actionable remediation recommendations for identified security vulnerabilities and architectural weaknesses. Generates context-aware fixes rather than generic compliance checklist items.","intents":["I found a vulnerability but don't know how to fix it in my specific architecture","I need concrete remediation steps I can hand to my development team","I want recommendations tailored to my system design, not generic security advice"],"best_for":["development teams implementing security fixes","engineering leads without security expertise","teams seeking practical remediation guidance"],"limitations":["recommendations may not account for all business constraints or legacy system limitations","may suggest solutions that conflict with existing architecture"],"requires":["identified vulnerabilities or security gaps","system architecture context"],"input_types":["vulnerability descriptions","system architecture details","threat analysis results"],"output_types":["remediation recommendations","implementation guidance","code patterns or architectural changes"],"categories":["security","design"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_remy-security__cap_3","uri":"capability://security.design.review.automation","name":"design-review-automation","description":"Automates the initial phases of security design reviews by analyzing architecture documents and identifying security gaps without manual review sessions. Reduces time spent on repetitive threat identification tasks.","intents":["I need to conduct security reviews faster without hiring additional security staff","I want to reduce the time engineers spend in security review meetings","I need to scale security reviews across multiple teams and projects"],"best_for":["engineering teams at scale","organizations with limited security resources","teams conducting frequent design reviews"],"limitations":["cannot fully replace human security architect expertise","may miss novel or context-specific threats","pricing scales poorly for large enterprises"],"requires":["system design documentation","integration with existing design workflows"],"input_types":["architecture diagrams","design documents","system specifications"],"output_types":["security review reports","vulnerability summaries","remediation checklists"],"categories":["security","productivity","design"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_remy-security__cap_4","uri":"capability://integration.documentation.format.integration","name":"documentation-format-integration","description":"Integrates with existing design documentation formats and workflows, allowing security analysis without requiring teams to change their current documentation practices or tools.","intents":["I want to add security reviews to our workflow without changing how we document designs","I need security analysis to work with our existing design tools and formats","I want minimal adoption friction when implementing security reviews"],"best_for":["teams with established design documentation practices","organizations seeking low-friction adoption","teams using standard design formats"],"limitations":["may have limited support for proprietary or custom documentation formats","integration depth varies by documentation tool"],"requires":["existing design documentation","supported documentation format"],"input_types":["design documents in standard formats","architecture diagrams"],"output_types":["annotated documents","security findings mapped to existing documentation"],"categories":["integration","productivity","design"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_remy-security__cap_5","uri":"capability://security.architectural.weakness.detection","name":"architectural-weakness-detection","description":"Identifies structural and architectural weaknesses in system designs that could lead to security vulnerabilities. Analyzes design patterns and system interactions for potential security flaws.","intents":["I need to find architectural flaws before they become expensive to fix in production","I want to understand how my system design could be exploited","I need to validate that my architecture follows security best practices"],"best_for":["architects and senior engineers","teams designing new systems","organizations conducting design reviews"],"limitations":["requires clear architecture documentation to be effective","may not identify weaknesses in poorly documented systems"],"requires":["detailed system architecture documentation","understanding of system components and interactions"],"input_types":["architecture diagrams","system design documents","component descriptions"],"output_types":["architectural weakness reports","design flaw analysis","improvement recommendations"],"categories":["security","design","architecture"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_remy-security__cap_6","uri":"capability://security.compliance.gap.identification","name":"compliance-gap-identification","description":"Identifies security and compliance gaps in system designs relative to regulatory requirements and industry standards. Highlights areas where designs may not meet compliance obligations.","intents":["I need to ensure my system design meets compliance requirements","I want to identify compliance gaps before audit or certification","I need to document compliance considerations in my design"],"best_for":["compliance-focused organizations","regulated industries","teams preparing for audits or certifications"],"limitations":["may miss industry-specific compliance nuances","requires accurate compliance requirement input","cannot replace professional compliance review"],"requires":["system architecture documentation","compliance framework or regulatory requirements"],"input_types":["architecture designs","compliance requirements","regulatory frameworks"],"output_types":["compliance gap reports","requirement mapping","remediation guidance"],"categories":["security","compliance","design"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":43,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["system architecture documentation or design artifacts","access to Remy Security platform","system architecture or design documentation","basic security knowledge to validate results","identified vulnerabilities or security gaps","system architecture context","system design documentation","integration with existing design workflows","existing design documentation","supported documentation format"],"failure_modes":["may miss context-specific or novel attack vectors","cannot identify industry-specific compliance threats","requires human validation for accuracy","requires understanding of STRIDE framework to interpret results","may over-categorize or under-categorize threats","recommendations may not account for all business constraints or legacy system limitations","may suggest solutions that conflict with existing architecture","cannot fully replace human security architect expertise","may miss novel or context-specific threats","pricing scales poorly for large enterprises","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.77,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.094Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.543Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=remy-security","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=remy-security"}},"signature":"ypd5ed3nw/bOrlx57qKo2sRaKl8Uj+AgHTb4RXoBlnUDk9Fi9JZlgMHA3Xr2dI9FBr5XZZ+UC3mNGMNQIPGuDg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T08:23:11.974Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/remy-security","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/remy-security","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=remy-security","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}