{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_relicx","slug":"relicx","name":"RelicX","type":"product","url":"https://relicx.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/relicx","categories":["automation","app-builders"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_relicx__cap_0","uri":"capability://testing.ai.powered.test.case.generation","name":"ai-powered test case generation","description":"Automatically generates functional test cases by analyzing application UI and user workflows without requiring manual test script writing. The system uses AI to understand application behavior and create meaningful test scenarios.","intents":["I want to quickly create test cases without writing code","I need to generate test coverage for my application rapidly","I want to reduce the time spent manually writing test scripts"],"best_for":["QA teams without automation engineers","non-technical QA staff","teams seeking rapid test coverage"],"limitations":["Generated tests may lack domain-specific business logic","AI may miss edge cases specific to application context","Test quality depends on application UI clarity"],"requires":["Access to application UI","Application in testable state","Basic understanding of testing goals"],"input_types":["web application UI","user workflow descriptions"],"output_types":["automated test cases","test scripts"],"categories":["testing","automation","no-code"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relicx__cap_1","uri":"capability://testing.visual.element.detection.and.intelligent.selector.generation","name":"visual element detection and intelligent selector generation","description":"Identifies UI elements using visual recognition and generates resilient selectors that adapt to UI changes rather than relying on brittle XPath or CSS selectors. This reduces test maintenance overhead when applications evolve.","intents":["I want tests that don't break when the UI changes slightly","I need to reduce time spent fixing broken selectors","I want more robust element identification than XPath"],"best_for":["teams with frequently changing UIs","applications with dynamic layouts","organizations seeking reduced test maintenance"],"limitations":["May struggle with highly dynamic or canvas-based UIs","Visual detection can be slower than traditional selectors","Requires clear visual distinction between elements"],"requires":["Visual access to application","Rendered UI elements","Sufficient contrast and visibility"],"input_types":["rendered web UI","visual elements"],"output_types":["intelligent selectors","element locators"],"categories":["testing","automation","UI-detection"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relicx__cap_10","uri":"capability://testing.performance.and.load.testing","name":"performance and load testing","description":"Measures application performance under various load conditions and identifies performance bottlenecks through automated testing, complementing functional test automation.","intents":["I want to test how my application performs under load","I need to identify performance bottlenecks","I want to ensure my application meets performance requirements"],"best_for":["teams with performance requirements","applications with high traffic expectations","organizations requiring SLA compliance"],"limitations":["Load testing infrastructure can be expensive","Results may vary based on test environment","Requires careful test design to be meaningful"],"requires":["Load testing infrastructure","Performance baselines","Test environment"],"input_types":["test scenarios","load profiles"],"output_types":["performance reports","bottleneck analysis","metrics"],"categories":["testing","performance","automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relicx__cap_2","uri":"capability://testing.no.code.test.automation.workflow.builder","name":"no-code test automation workflow builder","description":"Provides a visual interface for creating and orchestrating test automation workflows without writing code. Users can define test steps, conditions, and assertions through a graphical interface.","intents":["I want to build test automation without learning to code","I need non-technical team members to create automated tests","I want a visual way to design test workflows"],"best_for":["non-technical QA staff","organizations without automation engineers","teams prioritizing accessibility over code control"],"limitations":["May lack flexibility for complex conditional logic","Harder to version control compared to code-based tests","Limited ability to handle highly specialized testing scenarios"],"requires":["User familiarity with testing concepts","Access to RelicX platform","Target application access"],"input_types":["visual workflow definitions","UI interactions"],"output_types":["executable test workflows","test automation scripts"],"categories":["testing","automation","no-code"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relicx__cap_3","uri":"capability://testing.automated.test.maintenance.and.synchronization","name":"automated test maintenance and synchronization","description":"Monitors application changes and automatically updates test cases to remain synchronized with evolving UIs, reducing manual test maintenance. The system detects UI modifications and adapts tests accordingly.","intents":["I want tests to automatically adapt when my UI changes","I need to reduce time spent maintaining test suites","I want to prevent tests from breaking due to UI updates"],"best_for":["teams with rapidly evolving applications","organizations with limited QA resources","continuous deployment environments"],"limitations":["May not detect all UI changes accurately","Could introduce false positives in test updates","Requires continuous monitoring overhead"],"requires":["Continuous access to application","Change detection mechanisms","Test execution environment"],"input_types":["application UI changes","test execution results"],"output_types":["updated test cases","synchronization reports"],"categories":["testing","automation","maintenance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relicx__cap_4","uri":"capability://testing.cross.browser.and.multi.environment.test.execution","name":"cross-browser and multi-environment test execution","description":"Executes generated test cases across multiple browsers and environments simultaneously, providing comprehensive coverage without requiring separate test configurations for each environment.","intents":["I need to test my application across multiple browsers","I want to run tests in different environments without duplicating test cases","I need to ensure compatibility across platforms"],"best_for":["teams requiring broad compatibility testing","applications serving diverse user bases","organizations with multiple deployment environments"],"limitations":["Scaling costs increase with number of environments","May have latency in parallel execution","Some environment-specific issues may not be detected"],"requires":["Access to multiple browsers/environments","Test infrastructure","Network connectivity"],"input_types":["test cases","environment configurations"],"output_types":["test results per environment","compatibility reports"],"categories":["testing","automation","cross-browser"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relicx__cap_5","uri":"capability://testing.test.result.analysis.and.failure.diagnosis","name":"test result analysis and failure diagnosis","description":"Analyzes test execution results and provides insights into failure causes, helping teams understand why tests failed and what changed in the application. Includes visual comparisons and error categorization.","intents":["I need to understand why my tests are failing","I want to quickly diagnose issues without reviewing logs manually","I need to differentiate between application bugs and test issues"],"best_for":["QA teams debugging test failures","teams seeking faster root cause analysis","organizations with high test volume"],"limitations":["AI-generated diagnostics may be opaque","Complex failures may require manual investigation","False positives in failure categorization possible"],"requires":["Test execution data","Application state information","Visual snapshots"],"input_types":["test execution logs","screenshots","error messages"],"output_types":["failure analysis","diagnostic reports","visual comparisons"],"categories":["testing","analysis","debugging"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relicx__cap_6","uri":"capability://testing.test.data.generation.and.management","name":"test data generation and management","description":"Automatically generates realistic test data required for test execution, including user accounts, transactions, and other application-specific data without manual creation.","intents":["I need test data without manually creating it","I want realistic data that matches production patterns","I need to quickly set up test environments with proper data"],"best_for":["teams with complex data requirements","applications with large datasets","organizations seeking faster test environment setup"],"limitations":["Generated data may not capture all edge cases","Privacy concerns with realistic data generation","May require data schema understanding"],"requires":["Data schema information","Application database access","Data generation rules"],"input_types":["data schemas","generation rules","sample data"],"output_types":["test datasets","data fixtures"],"categories":["testing","data-management","automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relicx__cap_7","uri":"capability://testing.test.execution.scheduling.and.reporting","name":"test execution scheduling and reporting","description":"Schedules automated test execution on defined intervals and generates comprehensive reports on test results, coverage, and trends over time.","intents":["I want tests to run automatically on a schedule","I need visibility into test coverage and pass rates","I want historical trends of test performance"],"best_for":["teams with continuous integration pipelines","organizations needing regular test execution","teams requiring compliance reporting"],"limitations":["Scheduling complexity increases with environment count","Report generation can be resource-intensive","Historical data storage may have cost implications"],"requires":["Scheduling infrastructure","Test execution environment","Reporting database"],"input_types":["test cases","schedule definitions"],"output_types":["test reports","coverage metrics","trend analysis"],"categories":["testing","automation","reporting"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relicx__cap_8","uri":"capability://collaboration.team.collaboration.and.test.sharing","name":"team collaboration and test sharing","description":"Enables multiple team members to collaborate on test creation and maintenance through shared workspaces, version control, and commenting features.","intents":["I want my team to collaborate on test automation","I need to track who made changes to tests","I want to share test knowledge across the team"],"best_for":["distributed QA teams","organizations with multiple testers","teams requiring audit trails"],"limitations":["Collaboration features may have learning curve","Real-time collaboration can have latency","Permission management complexity increases with team size"],"requires":["Team accounts","Shared workspace access","Communication infrastructure"],"input_types":["test cases","user comments","change requests"],"output_types":["shared test artifacts","collaboration history","audit logs"],"categories":["collaboration","testing","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relicx__cap_9","uri":"capability://testing.api.and.integration.testing.automation","name":"api and integration testing automation","description":"Extends test automation capabilities to API endpoints and backend services, allowing teams to create automated tests for APIs alongside UI tests in a unified platform.","intents":["I want to test APIs without writing code","I need to validate backend services alongside UI tests","I want integrated testing across frontend and backend"],"best_for":["full-stack testing teams","applications with complex APIs","organizations seeking unified test platforms"],"limitations":["API testing may require technical knowledge","Complex authentication scenarios may be challenging","Performance testing capabilities may be limited"],"requires":["API documentation","API access","Authentication credentials"],"input_types":["API specifications","request/response examples"],"output_types":["API test cases","integration tests"],"categories":["testing","automation","API-testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":45,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Access to application UI","Application in testable state","Basic understanding of testing goals","Visual access to application","Rendered UI elements","Sufficient contrast and visibility","Load testing infrastructure","Performance baselines","Test environment","User familiarity with testing concepts"],"failure_modes":["Generated tests may lack domain-specific business logic","AI may miss edge cases specific to application context","Test quality depends on application UI clarity","May struggle with highly dynamic or canvas-based UIs","Visual detection can be slower than traditional selectors","Requires clear visual distinction between elements","Load testing infrastructure can be expensive","Results may vary based on test environment","Requires careful test design to be meaningful","May lack flexibility for complex conditional logic","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.094Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.543Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=relicx","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=relicx"}},"signature":"WiRoSVyhmZbok7cJ2PBBB2Kcl5kfbwWXXCw33elWSWN/XqPSfpGijcTV+4l1iSCt3BZtxpsugDRmT0l57fejBA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T14:35:43.743Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/relicx","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/relicx","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=relicx","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}