{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_releases-notes","slug":"releases-notes","name":"Releases Notes","type":"product","url":"https://www.releasesnotes.dev","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/releases-notes","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_releases-notes__cap_0","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.commit.to.release.notes.ai.summarization","name":"commit-to-release-notes ai summarization","description":"Analyzes a batch of GitHub commits within a specified version range and generates human-readable release note entries using LLM-based semantic understanding of code changes. The system parses commit messages, diffs, and metadata to extract meaningful summaries, grouping related changes and filtering noise. It infers feature categories (breaking changes, new features, bug fixes, performance improvements) from commit content and conventional commit patterns when present.","intents":["I want to automatically generate release notes from my last 50 commits without manually writing summaries","I need to quickly transform raw commit messages into polished, user-facing release documentation","I want to ensure release notes stay synchronized with actual code changes without manual sync overhead"],"best_for":["Development teams with consistent commit message hygiene using conventional commits or structured patterns","SaaS product teams releasing weekly or bi-weekly updates who want to eliminate manual documentation overhead","Open-source library maintainers managing frequent patch releases"],"limitations":["Output quality degrades significantly with poor commit message discipline—single-word commits or vague messages produce unintelligible summaries","No semantic understanding of code intent beyond commit text; refactors with poor commit messages may be misclassified or omitted","Cannot infer user-facing impact from internal refactoring commits without explicit documentation in commit body","Batch processing latency scales with commit volume; generating notes for 500+ commits may take 30-60 seconds"],"requires":["GitHub repository with read access via OAuth token or personal access token","Git history with at least 5-10 commits to summarize (single-commit releases produce minimal output)","Freemium account or paid subscription for API access"],"input_types":["GitHub commit metadata (message, author, timestamp, diff)","Version tags or branch references to define commit range","Optional: custom release notes template or tone preferences"],"output_types":["Markdown-formatted release notes","Categorized changelog (Features, Bug Fixes, Breaking Changes, Performance)","Plain text or HTML variants"],"categories":["text-generation-language","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_releases-notes__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.github.repository.integration.and.oauth.authentication","name":"github repository integration and oauth authentication","description":"Establishes secure OAuth 2.0 connection to GitHub, enabling read access to repository metadata, commit history, tags, and branch information without requiring users to manage API keys directly. The integration persists authentication state and handles token refresh automatically, allowing seamless multi-repository access from the Releases Notes dashboard.","intents":["I want to connect my GitHub repository without managing API keys or tokens manually","I need to authorize Releases Notes to read my private repository commits securely","I want to switch between multiple repositories without re-authenticating each time"],"best_for":["Individual developers and small teams using GitHub for version control","Organizations with GitHub Enterprise or GitHub.com accounts","Teams prioritizing OAuth-based security over personal access token management"],"limitations":["Requires GitHub account with repository owner or collaborator permissions; read-only access insufficient for some operations","OAuth token scope limited to public repository data and authenticated user's private repos; cannot access organization repos without explicit org-level permissions","Token refresh requires active session; offline access not supported","No support for GitHub Enterprise Server (on-premise) without custom integration"],"requires":["GitHub account (free or paid)","Repository with at least read access","Modern web browser with cookies enabled for session persistence"],"input_types":["GitHub OAuth authorization grant (via redirect flow)","Repository owner and name (e.g., 'owner/repo')"],"output_types":["OAuth access token (stored securely server-side)","Authenticated API session for subsequent requests","List of accessible repositories and branches"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_releases-notes__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.version.range.and.commit.filtering","name":"version range and commit filtering","description":"Allows users to specify a commit range for release note generation using multiple filtering methods: git tags (e.g., 'v1.0.0..v1.1.0'), branch references, commit count (last N commits), or date ranges. The system queries GitHub's commit API with these filters, returning only commits within the specified scope to avoid processing irrelevant history.","intents":["I want to generate release notes only for commits between two version tags","I need to create release notes for the last 30 commits since the last release","I want to generate release notes for commits merged in the last 7 days"],"best_for":["Teams using semantic versioning with git tags","Projects with frequent releases where manual range selection is tedious","Teams releasing on fixed schedules (weekly, bi-weekly) and filtering by date"],"limitations":["Tag-based filtering requires consistent tagging discipline; missing or malformed tags cause filtering to fail","Date-based filtering uses commit author date, not merge date; rebased commits may have stale timestamps","No support for filtering by commit author, file path, or custom metadata beyond standard git fields","Large commit ranges (1000+ commits) may exceed API rate limits or timeout"],"requires":["GitHub repository with at least one git tag or branch reference","Commit history accessible via GitHub API"],"input_types":["Git tag names (e.g., 'v1.0.0', 'v1.1.0')","Branch names (e.g., 'main', 'develop')","Commit count (integer, e.g., 50)","Date range (ISO 8601 format, e.g., '2024-01-01..2024-01-31')"],"output_types":["Filtered commit list with metadata","Commit count and date range summary"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_releases-notes__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.commit.categorization.and.changelog.structuring","name":"commit categorization and changelog structuring","description":"Automatically classifies commits into semantic categories (Features, Bug Fixes, Breaking Changes, Performance Improvements, Documentation, Chores, Dependencies) using pattern matching on commit messages and LLM-based intent detection. Groups related commits under each category and orders them by relevance, producing a structured changelog rather than a flat commit list.","intents":["I want my release notes automatically organized into Features, Bug Fixes, and Breaking Changes sections","I need to highlight breaking changes prominently so users don't miss them","I want to separate user-facing changes from internal refactoring and dependency updates"],"best_for":["Teams using conventional commits (feat:, fix:, breaking:) or similar structured message patterns","SaaS products and libraries where users need to quickly identify breaking changes","Teams with diverse commit message styles who want automatic normalization"],"limitations":["Categorization accuracy depends on commit message quality; commits without clear intent markers may be misclassified","No support for custom categories beyond the standard seven; teams with domain-specific categories must manually edit output","Breaking changes detection relies on explicit 'BREAKING CHANGE:' markers or 'breaking:' prefix; implicit breaking changes in code are not detected","Performance improvements and security fixes may be conflated if commit messages don't explicitly distinguish them"],"requires":["Commit messages with at least minimal structure (e.g., conventional commits format recommended but not required)"],"input_types":["Commit message text","Commit diff (optional, for semantic analysis)","Author metadata"],"output_types":["Categorized commit list with labels","Structured changelog with sections","Markdown or HTML formatted output"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_releases-notes__cap_4","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.release.notes.template.and.formatting.customization","name":"release notes template and formatting customization","description":"Provides pre-built and customizable templates for release note formatting, allowing users to control tone, structure, and branding elements. Templates define sections (header, feature list, breaking changes, footer), styling (Markdown, HTML, plain text), and optional metadata (release date, version number, author credits). Users can select a template or create custom templates with variable substitution.","intents":["I want my release notes to match my product's brand voice and visual style","I need to include custom sections like 'Known Issues' or 'Migration Guide' in every release","I want to automatically include release date, version number, and download links in a consistent format"],"best_for":["SaaS companies with brand guidelines and consistent release note formatting","Open-source projects maintaining a specific documentation style","Teams publishing release notes to multiple channels (blog, GitHub, email) with consistent formatting"],"limitations":["Template customization limited to pre-defined variables and sections; no support for conditional logic or loops","No WYSIWYG editor; templates require manual Markdown or HTML editing","Custom templates not shareable across team members without manual export/import","Limited to text-based formatting; no support for embedded images, tables, or complex layouts"],"requires":["Basic Markdown or HTML knowledge for custom template creation"],"input_types":["Template selection from library or custom template text","Variable values (version, release date, author, etc.)","Categorized commit data"],"output_types":["Formatted release notes in Markdown, HTML, or plain text","Template preview with sample data"],"categories":["text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_releases-notes__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.direct.release.notes.publishing.to.github","name":"direct release notes publishing to github","description":"Automatically publishes generated release notes directly to GitHub as release descriptions or draft pull requests, eliminating manual copy-paste workflows. The system creates or updates GitHub release objects with the generated content, optionally attaching release artifacts and setting publication status (draft vs. published).","intents":["I want to publish release notes directly to GitHub without manually copying and pasting","I need to create a GitHub release with generated notes and attach build artifacts","I want to create a draft release for review before publishing to users"],"best_for":["Teams using GitHub as their primary release distribution channel","Projects with automated CI/CD pipelines that trigger release creation","Teams wanting to keep release notes synchronized with GitHub releases"],"limitations":["Requires write access to repository; read-only tokens cannot publish releases","No support for publishing to multiple platforms (GitLab, Gitea, etc.) in single operation","Draft releases cannot be automatically promoted to published status; manual GitHub action required","Release artifacts must be uploaded separately; tool does not handle binary attachment"],"requires":["GitHub OAuth token with 'repo' scope (write access to releases)","Repository owner or collaborator permissions"],"input_types":["Generated release notes (Markdown or HTML)","Version tag or release name","Optional: release date, pre-release flag, draft status"],"output_types":["GitHub release object with notes as description","Release URL for sharing"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_releases-notes__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.commit.message.quality.analysis.and.warnings","name":"commit message quality analysis and warnings","description":"Scans commits in the selected range and flags commits with low-quality messages (single words, generic terms like 'fix' or 'update', missing context) that will produce poor release note summaries. Provides warnings and suggestions for improving commit message discipline, helping teams understand why release notes quality is degraded.","intents":["I want to understand why my release notes look poor and what commits are causing the problem","I need to identify team members with inconsistent commit message practices","I want to improve our commit hygiene before generating release notes"],"best_for":["Teams with inconsistent commit message discipline trying to improve practices","Engineering leads auditing code quality and documentation standards","Projects transitioning to conventional commits and needing visibility into current state"],"limitations":["Quality analysis is heuristic-based; cannot detect semantic issues in well-formatted but misleading messages","No integration with pre-commit hooks or CI/CD to enforce standards; warnings are informational only","Cannot retroactively improve existing commits; only identifies problems for future improvement","Suggestions are generic; no context-aware recommendations based on project domain"],"requires":["Commit history with at least 10 commits for meaningful analysis"],"input_types":["Commit message text","Commit metadata (author, date)"],"output_types":["Quality score (0-100) for commit range","List of problematic commits with specific issues","Suggestions for improvement"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_releases-notes__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.freemium.tier.with.usage.limits.and.quota.management","name":"freemium tier with usage limits and quota management","description":"Offers free tier with limited monthly release note generations (e.g., 5-10 per month) and paid tiers with higher quotas, enabling low-friction trial without requiring credit card. Tracks usage per user/organization and enforces soft limits with upgrade prompts rather than hard blocks.","intents":["I want to try Releases Notes on my side project without paying upfront","I need to understand pricing and upgrade path before committing to a paid plan","I want to see my current usage and remaining quota"],"best_for":["Solo developers and indie teams evaluating the tool","Small open-source projects with infrequent releases","Organizations piloting the tool before enterprise rollout"],"limitations":["Free tier quota may be insufficient for teams with weekly releases; upgrade required for frequent use","No granular quota management per team member; quota is per account/organization","Quota resets on calendar month, not rolling window; teams releasing at month-end may hit limits unexpectedly","No quota carryover; unused quota in free tier expires monthly"],"requires":["Releases Notes account (free signup)"],"input_types":["User account and subscription tier"],"output_types":["Usage dashboard with quota remaining","Upgrade prompts when approaching limits"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":41,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["GitHub repository with read access via OAuth token or personal access token","Git history with at least 5-10 commits to summarize (single-commit releases produce minimal output)","Freemium account or paid subscription for API access","GitHub account (free or paid)","Repository with at least read access","Modern web browser with cookies enabled for session persistence","GitHub repository with at least one git tag or branch reference","Commit history accessible via GitHub API","Commit messages with at least minimal structure (e.g., conventional commits format recommended but not required)","Basic Markdown or HTML knowledge for custom template creation"],"failure_modes":["Output quality degrades significantly with poor commit message discipline—single-word commits or vague messages produce unintelligible summaries","No semantic understanding of code intent beyond commit text; refactors with poor commit messages may be misclassified or omitted","Cannot infer user-facing impact from internal refactoring commits without explicit documentation in commit body","Batch processing latency scales with commit volume; generating notes for 500+ commits may take 30-60 seconds","Requires GitHub account with repository owner or collaborator permissions; read-only access insufficient for some operations","OAuth token scope limited to public repository data and authenticated user's private repos; cannot access organization repos without explicit org-level permissions","Token refresh requires active session; offline access not supported","No support for GitHub Enterprise Server (on-premise) without custom integration","Tag-based filtering requires consistent tagging discipline; missing or malformed tags cause filtering to fail","Date-based filtering uses commit author date, not merge date; rebased commits may have stale timestamps","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.36666666666666664,"quality":0.7300000000000001,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.094Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.551Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=releases-notes","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=releases-notes"}},"signature":"iBr+Etu8gJjFJylYNMGo8G4BF1ulBRCxjY1nX7QmXgUVm0FsvdF25fvzB5t44ByaLAh1jXhyo1InLX/vVkpaBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T16:44:28.284Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/releases-notes","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/releases-notes","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=releases-notes","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}