{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_relativity","slug":"relativity","name":"Relativity","type":"product","url":"https://www.relativity.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/relativity","categories":["research-search"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_0","uri":"capability://legal.ai.powered.predictive.document.coding","name":"ai-powered predictive document coding","description":"Automatically categorizes and codes documents based on learned patterns from human-reviewed samples, using machine learning to predict relevance, privilege, and responsiveness. Reduces manual review burden by identifying documents that match specified criteria without human intervention.","intents":["I need to quickly categorize thousands of documents without reviewing each one manually","I want to identify privileged communications automatically to protect attorney-client confidentiality","I need to predict which documents are responsive to discovery requests"],"best_for":["Large law firms handling complex litigation","Corporate legal departments with massive document collections","Litigation boutiques processing 100,000+ page cases"],"limitations":["Requires sufficient human-reviewed training samples to establish accurate patterns","Accuracy depends on consistency of initial coding decisions","May miss edge cases or novel document types not well-represented in training data"],"requires":["Large document corpus (minimum 10,000+ documents recommended)","Initial human coding sample for model training","Sufficient computing resources for model processing"],"input_types":["documents (native formats: PDF, DOCX, XLSX, MSG, etc.)","metadata fields","human coding decisions"],"output_types":["coded document classifications","confidence scores","privilege flags","responsiveness predictions"],"categories":["legal","productivity","data-processing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_1","uri":"capability://legal.large.scale.document.ingestion.and.processing","name":"large-scale document ingestion and processing","description":"Ingests and processes massive volumes of documents in native formats while preserving metadata integrity and creating searchable indices. Handles format conversion, deduplication, and metadata extraction without data loss.","intents":["I need to import hundreds of thousands of documents from various sources into a single searchable repository","I want to preserve original file metadata and avoid data corruption during import","I need to deduplicate documents across multiple data sources"],"best_for":["Enterprise law firms with complex data ecosystems","Corporate legal departments managing multi-source document collections","Cases involving multiple custodians and data repositories"],"limitations":["Processing time scales with document volume and complexity","Storage costs increase significantly with large collections","Some proprietary or legacy formats may require custom connectors"],"requires":["Sufficient storage infrastructure","Network bandwidth for bulk uploads","Source system access credentials","Relativity workspace configuration"],"input_types":["documents (PDF, DOCX, XLSX, MSG, PST, native email formats)","structured data (CSV, database exports)","metadata files","directory structures"],"output_types":["indexed document repository","metadata database","deduplication reports","import logs and error reports"],"categories":["legal","data-processing","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_10","uri":"capability://legal.deposition.and.trial.preparation.support","name":"deposition and trial preparation support","description":"Provides tools for organizing and retrieving documents during depositions and trial, including document linking, timeline creation, and quick-search capabilities. Enables attorneys to rapidly locate supporting documents during proceedings.","intents":["I need to quickly find documents to support witness testimony during a deposition","I want to create a timeline of events with supporting documents for trial presentation","I need to organize documents by witness or topic for cross-examination preparation"],"best_for":["Trial attorneys preparing for depositions and trial","Litigation teams managing witness preparation","Organizations with complex document-heavy cases"],"limitations":["Requires pre-organization and tagging of documents for effective use","Real-time search during proceedings depends on system responsiveness","Presentation features may be limited compared to dedicated trial software"],"requires":["Well-organized and tagged document collection","Metadata supporting timeline and witness organization","Reliable network connectivity during proceedings","User training on rapid retrieval techniques"],"input_types":["organized document collections","witness information and assignments","timeline data and date metadata","topic and issue classifications"],"output_types":["document retrieval results","timeline visualizations","witness-organized document sets","presentation-ready document packages"],"categories":["legal","productivity","research"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_11","uri":"capability://legal.compliance.and.regulatory.document.management","name":"compliance and regulatory document management","description":"Manages documents subject to regulatory requirements and compliance obligations, including retention policies, audit trails, and regulatory reporting. Tracks document lifecycle and ensures compliance with legal holds and preservation requirements.","intents":["I need to implement legal holds on documents related to pending litigation","I want to track document retention and deletion in compliance with regulatory requirements","I need to demonstrate compliance with document preservation obligations during discovery"],"best_for":["Corporate legal departments managing regulatory compliance","Organizations subject to industry-specific document retention rules","In-house counsel managing litigation holds"],"limitations":["Compliance requirements vary by jurisdiction and industry","Retention policy management requires ongoing updates","Audit trail maintenance requires significant storage"],"requires":["Clear retention and hold policies","Metadata fields for compliance tracking","Audit logging infrastructure","Regular compliance audits and updates"],"input_types":["document collections with creation/modification dates","legal hold notices","retention policy definitions","regulatory requirement specifications"],"output_types":["hold notifications and confirmations","retention reports","compliance audit trails","regulatory compliance certifications"],"categories":["legal","compliance","security"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_12","uri":"capability://legal.collaborative.review.workflow.management","name":"collaborative review workflow management","description":"Manages multi-reviewer document review workflows with task assignment, progress tracking, and quality control mechanisms. Supports parallel review by multiple team members with conflict resolution and consistency checking.","intents":["I need to assign documents to multiple reviewers and track their progress","I want to ensure consistency across reviewers through quality control sampling","I need to manage reviewer workload and balance document distribution"],"best_for":["Large review projects requiring multiple reviewers","Litigation teams managing distributed review teams","Organizations needing quality assurance in document review"],"limitations":["Workflow setup requires careful planning and configuration","Reviewer conflicts and inconsistencies require human resolution","Workflow changes mid-project can be disruptive"],"requires":["Clear review protocols and coding standards","Reviewer training and calibration","Quality control sampling procedures","Conflict resolution processes"],"input_types":["document collections","reviewer assignments","coding standards and protocols","quality control parameters"],"output_types":["task assignments and queues","progress reports and dashboards","quality control metrics","reviewer performance statistics","conflict reports"],"categories":["legal","productivity","collaboration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_2","uri":"capability://legal.full.text.and.advanced.document.search","name":"full-text and advanced document search","description":"Enables rapid searching across massive document collections using full-text indexing, Boolean operators, and field-specific queries. Supports complex search syntax for precise document retrieval and filtering.","intents":["I need to find specific documents or communications within a million-page collection","I want to search across multiple metadata fields simultaneously","I need to run complex Boolean queries to identify document patterns"],"best_for":["Litigation teams needing rapid document location","Legal analysts conducting targeted research","Discovery teams responding to specific requests"],"limitations":["Search performance may degrade with extremely large result sets","Complex queries require training to use effectively","Relevance ranking depends on search term specificity"],"requires":["Indexed document collection","User familiarity with search syntax","Appropriate access permissions"],"input_types":["search queries (text, Boolean operators, field specifications)","date ranges","metadata filters"],"output_types":["search results (ranked by relevance)","result counts","document previews","export lists"],"categories":["legal","research","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_3","uri":"capability://legal.privilege.and.confidentiality.protection","name":"privilege and confidentiality protection","description":"Identifies and flags privileged communications (attorney-client, work product) and confidential information through pattern recognition and metadata analysis. Maintains comprehensive audit trails of all access to sensitive materials.","intents":["I need to automatically identify privileged documents to prevent inadvertent disclosure","I want to track who accessed sensitive attorney-client communications","I need to redact or withhold privileged materials from production"],"best_for":["Law firms managing complex litigation with privilege concerns","Corporate legal departments handling sensitive communications","In-house counsel protecting work product"],"limitations":["Automated privilege detection requires training and may miss edge cases","Requires clear privilege protocols and consistent metadata tagging","Human review still necessary for complex privilege determinations"],"requires":["Clear privilege definitions and coding standards","Metadata fields for privilege designation","User authentication and permission controls","Audit logging infrastructure"],"input_types":["documents with privilege metadata","communication patterns","participant information","manual privilege designations"],"output_types":["privilege flags and designations","audit logs","privilege reports","redaction specifications"],"categories":["legal","security","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_4","uri":"capability://legal.granular.permission.and.access.control","name":"granular permission and access control","description":"Implements role-based access controls with fine-grained permissions at document, workspace, and field levels. Allows administrators to restrict access based on user roles, case assignments, and security clearances.","intents":["I need to ensure only authorized team members can access specific case documents","I want to restrict junior associates from viewing privileged materials","I need to control access to sensitive client information by department"],"best_for":["Large law firms with complex team structures","Corporate legal departments with multiple business units","Organizations handling multiple concurrent cases"],"limitations":["Complex permission hierarchies can be difficult to manage and audit","Overly restrictive permissions may hinder collaboration","Permission changes require administrative intervention"],"requires":["User authentication system","Role definitions and hierarchy","Administrative oversight","Regular permission audits"],"input_types":["user roles and assignments","case/matter assignments","security classifications","document sensitivity levels"],"output_types":["access control lists","permission matrices","access audit reports","denied access logs"],"categories":["legal","security","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_5","uri":"capability://legal.workspace.centric.case.organization","name":"workspace-centric case organization","description":"Organizes litigation data into dedicated workspaces with customizable layouts, views, and workflows. Allows teams to structure case information hierarchically and create matter-specific configurations.","intents":["I need a centralized hub for all documents and data related to a specific case","I want to customize how my team views and interacts with case information","I need to organize multiple cases with different document structures"],"best_for":["Multi-case law firms needing case segregation","Litigation teams with specialized workflows","Organizations managing cases with different discovery requirements"],"limitations":["Workspace setup requires significant configuration and planning","Switching between workspaces can be cumbersome for large organizations","Custom configurations may not be portable across cases"],"requires":["Administrative access to create workspaces","Clear case structure and information architecture planning","User training on workspace navigation"],"input_types":["case metadata","document collections","user assignments","workflow definitions"],"output_types":["organized workspace structure","customized views and dashboards","workflow automation rules","case-specific configurations"],"categories":["legal","productivity","organization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_6","uri":"capability://legal.native.format.document.review.and.annotation","name":"native format document review and annotation","description":"Enables review of documents in native formats with built-in annotation tools, highlighting, and commenting capabilities. Preserves document formatting and allows reviewers to mark up documents without creating copies.","intents":["I need to review documents while preserving their original formatting and layout","I want to annotate and highlight key passages without modifying the original file","I need to collaborate with team members on document review with shared annotations"],"best_for":["Document review teams requiring detailed analysis","Litigation teams needing collaborative markup","Cases with complex document formatting (spreadsheets, presentations)"],"limitations":["Native format rendering may be slower than converted formats","Some proprietary formats may not render perfectly","Annotation storage requires additional database capacity"],"requires":["Native format support for document types in collection","Sufficient processing power for format rendering","Annotation database infrastructure"],"input_types":["documents in native formats (DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, PDF, etc.)","annotation markup (highlights, comments, tags)"],"output_types":["annotated document views","annotation reports","marked-up document exports","review statistics"],"categories":["legal","productivity","collaboration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_7","uri":"capability://legal.legal.analytics.and.insights.generation","name":"legal analytics and insights generation","description":"Analyzes document collections to extract patterns, relationships, and insights relevant to case strategy. Generates visualizations and reports on communication networks, key players, and document distributions.","intents":["I need to understand communication patterns and relationships within a document collection","I want to identify key players and decision-makers from email and communication data","I need to analyze document distribution patterns to inform case strategy"],"best_for":["Litigation strategists planning case approach","Attorneys preparing for depositions and trial","Legal teams analyzing complex multi-party disputes"],"limitations":["Analytics quality depends on data completeness and metadata accuracy","Visualizations may become cluttered with very large networks","Insights require human interpretation and validation"],"requires":["Comprehensive document collection with metadata","Communication data (emails, messages) with participant information","Sufficient processing resources for analysis"],"input_types":["document collections","communication metadata (sender, recipient, date)","participant information","document classifications"],"output_types":["network visualizations","communication pattern reports","key player identification","timeline analyses","statistical summaries"],"categories":["legal","research","analytics"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_8","uri":"capability://legal.integration.with.external.legal.tools.and.systems","name":"integration with external legal tools and systems","description":"Connects with major legal software platforms, case management systems, and document repositories through APIs and native connectors. Enables seamless data flow between Relativity and other enterprise legal systems.","intents":["I need to sync case data between Relativity and our case management system","I want to import documents from our document management system without manual export/import","I need to export discovery materials to opposing counsel in required formats"],"best_for":["Law firms with complex legal technology stacks","Organizations using multiple specialized legal tools","Firms requiring automated data synchronization"],"limitations":["Integration setup requires technical expertise and may need custom development","Data mapping between systems can be complex and error-prone","API rate limits may affect real-time synchronization"],"requires":["API access and documentation for external systems","Technical resources for integration setup","Data mapping and transformation rules","Ongoing maintenance and monitoring"],"input_types":["API credentials and endpoints","data mapping specifications","document exports from external systems","case metadata from other platforms"],"output_types":["synchronized data in external systems","exported discovery materials","integration logs and error reports","data validation reports"],"categories":["legal","productivity","integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__cap_9","uri":"capability://legal.batch.document.export.and.production","name":"batch document export and production","description":"Exports large document collections in standardized formats required for discovery production (TIFF, PDF, native formats with load files). Handles batch processing of thousands of documents with consistent formatting and metadata.","intents":["I need to produce documents to opposing counsel in required TIFF format with load files","I want to export a subset of documents for specific discovery requests","I need to generate production sets with consistent numbering and metadata"],"best_for":["Litigation teams managing discovery production","Law firms responding to formal discovery requests","Organizations producing documents to multiple parties"],"limitations":["Large batch exports can consume significant processing resources","Export time scales with document volume and format complexity","Load file generation requires careful metadata mapping"],"requires":["Sufficient storage for export files","Processing capacity for batch operations","Clear production specifications and numbering schemes","Load file format definitions"],"input_types":["document selections or search results","production specifications (format, numbering, metadata)","load file templates","redaction specifications"],"output_types":["exported documents (TIFF, PDF, native formats)","load files (CSV, TXT, XML)","production reports","metadata summaries"],"categories":["legal","productivity","data-processing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_relativity__headline","uri":"capability://research.search.ai.driven.e.discovery.platform","name":"ai-driven e-discovery platform","description":"Relativity revolutionizes data discovery and case strategy with AI-driven technology, making it essential for large law firms and corporate legal departments managing complex litigation.","intents":["best AI e-discovery platform","AI tools for legal analytics","top software for document review in litigation","e-discovery solutions for large law firms","legal data management software for complex cases"],"best_for":["Large law firms","corporate legal departments","litigation boutiques"],"limitations":["high cost","steep learning curve"],"requires":["cloud access","legal document formats"],"input_types":["legal documents","metadata"],"output_types":["categorized documents","case strategy insights"],"categories":["research-search"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":52,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Large document corpus (minimum 10,000+ documents recommended)","Initial human coding sample for model training","Sufficient computing resources for model processing","Sufficient storage infrastructure","Network bandwidth for bulk uploads","Source system access credentials","Relativity workspace configuration","Well-organized and tagged document collection","Metadata supporting timeline and witness organization","Reliable network connectivity during proceedings"],"failure_modes":["Requires sufficient human-reviewed training samples to establish accurate patterns","Accuracy depends on consistency of initial coding decisions","May miss edge cases or novel document types not well-represented in training data","Processing time scales with document volume and complexity","Storage costs increase significantly with large collections","Some proprietary or legacy formats may require custom connectors","Requires pre-organization and tagging of documents for effective use","Real-time search during proceedings depends on system responsiveness","Presentation features may be limited compared to dedicated trial software","Compliance requirements vary by jurisdiction and industry","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.525,"quality":0.97,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.094Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.532Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=relativity","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=relativity"}},"signature":"91LBIKw9FARQqLfEq6wo0Ddqt8CDfNxmdQj4qsx/GZtkMmQ6ok3P9X9qsHTUjD87XNiy4zrXLtD3t77bdHNkCw==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T11:45:09.802Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/relativity","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/relativity","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=relativity","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}