{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_refactory","slug":"refactory","name":"Refactory","type":"product","url":"https://userefactory.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/refactory","categories":["code-review-security","testing-quality"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_refactory__cap_0","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.llm.powered.code.anti.pattern.detection.and.refactoring.suggestion","name":"llm-powered code anti-pattern detection and refactoring suggestion","description":"Analyzes submitted code snippets using a large language model to identify common anti-patterns, code smells, and modernization opportunities. The system prompts an LLM with the raw code input and structured refactoring guidelines, returning specific suggestions with explanations of why the refactoring improves code quality. This approach leverages the LLM's training on millions of code examples to recognize patterns without requiring rule-based heuristics or AST parsing.","intents":["I want to understand what's wrong with this code snippet and how to improve it","I need quick feedback on code quality without setting up a linter or static analysis tool","I want to learn refactoring best practices by seeing AI-suggested improvements with explanations","I need to modernize legacy code patterns to current language standards"],"best_for":["Solo developers and junior engineers learning refactoring patterns","Teams evaluating AI-assisted code review before committing to paid platforms","Developers working on small, isolated code snippets rather than full projects"],"limitations":["No codebase context — suggestions are generic and don't account for project-specific conventions, naming patterns, or architectural constraints","Limited to snippet-level analysis; cannot refactor across multiple files or identify cross-module dependencies","LLM-based suggestions may occasionally be incorrect or contradict team standards without human review","No IDE integration means manual copy-paste workflow, creating friction for frequent use","Latency depends on LLM provider response time; typically 2-5 seconds per analysis"],"requires":["Web browser with internet connectivity","Code snippet (typically under 1000 lines for practical analysis)","No authentication or API keys required"],"input_types":["plain text code","code snippets in any programming language"],"output_types":["text explanation of issues","refactored code suggestions","structured improvement recommendations"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","code-review"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_refactory__cap_1","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.multi.language.code.snippet.parsing.and.normalization","name":"multi-language code snippet parsing and normalization","description":"Accepts raw code input in any programming language and normalizes it for LLM analysis by handling syntax variations, indentation, and language-specific formatting. The system likely uses simple text preprocessing (whitespace normalization, syntax detection) rather than full AST parsing, allowing it to support dozens of languages without language-specific parsers. This enables the LLM to receive consistently formatted input regardless of the source language.","intents":["I want to paste Python, JavaScript, Java, or Go code and get refactoring suggestions without language-specific tools","I need to analyze code from different projects with different formatting styles uniformly","I want to compare refactoring patterns across multiple programming languages"],"best_for":["Polyglot developers working across multiple languages","Teams evaluating refactoring approaches across different tech stacks","Developers learning refactoring patterns in unfamiliar languages"],"limitations":["No language-specific semantic analysis — treats all code as text, missing language-specific idioms or best practices","Cannot validate syntax or catch language-specific errors before sending to LLM","Normalization may lose formatting context that affects readability or intent","No support for code with external dependencies or imports that require resolution"],"requires":["Plain text code input","Code must be syntactically valid or near-valid for LLM to understand intent"],"input_types":["Python","JavaScript","TypeScript","Java","Go","C++","C#","Ruby","PHP","Rust","and other common languages"],"output_types":["normalized code representation","language-agnostic refactoring suggestions"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_refactory__cap_2","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.interactive.refactoring.suggestion.review.and.explanation","name":"interactive refactoring suggestion review and explanation","description":"Presents LLM-generated refactoring suggestions in a web UI with explanations of why each change improves code quality. Users can review suggestions, understand the reasoning, and copy refactored code back to their editor. The system likely uses a simple prompt template that instructs the LLM to provide both the refactored code and a brief explanation of improvements, then formats the output for readability in the browser.","intents":["I want to understand WHY a refactoring is suggested, not just see the change","I need to evaluate whether a suggestion fits my project before applying it","I want to learn refactoring principles by reading explanations alongside code examples"],"best_for":["Junior developers and students learning refactoring best practices","Teams reviewing code quality improvements before committing","Developers who want educational context alongside automated suggestions"],"limitations":["Explanations are LLM-generated and may be verbose, incorrect, or miss nuance","No ability to ask follow-up questions or request alternative refactoring approaches","UI is read-only — cannot iterate or refine suggestions within the tool","No version control integration to track which suggestions were accepted or rejected"],"requires":["Web browser","Code snippet submitted to the tool"],"input_types":["code snippet"],"output_types":["formatted refactored code","text explanation of improvements","structured suggestion list"],"categories":["text-generation-language","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_refactory__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.stateless.session.less.code.analysis.without.authentication","name":"stateless, session-less code analysis without authentication","description":"Provides immediate code analysis without requiring user accounts, login, API keys, or session management. Each code submission is processed independently by the LLM, with no persistent storage of user data or analysis history. This stateless architecture minimizes infrastructure complexity and privacy concerns, allowing users to analyze code with zero friction or setup.","intents":["I want to quickly check code quality without creating an account or providing credentials","I need privacy assurance that my code snippets aren't stored or tracked","I want to share the tool with teammates without managing user licenses or permissions"],"best_for":["Solo developers and small teams avoiding account management overhead","Users with privacy concerns about code storage","Rapid prototyping and evaluation of AI-assisted refactoring"],"limitations":["No analysis history or ability to track refactoring suggestions over time","Cannot build personalized models based on user feedback or accepted suggestions","No team collaboration features — each user analyzes code independently","Cannot integrate with CI/CD pipelines that require persistent state or authentication","No ability to set team-specific refactoring standards or rules"],"requires":["Web browser","Internet connectivity"],"input_types":["code snippet"],"output_types":["refactoring suggestions"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_refactory__cap_4","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.single.snippet.refactoring.scope.without.codebase.context","name":"single-snippet refactoring scope without codebase context","description":"Analyzes code in isolation, treating each submitted snippet as a standalone unit without access to the broader codebase, project structure, or architectural context. The LLM receives only the raw code snippet and generic refactoring guidelines, producing suggestions that optimize the snippet in isolation. This approach avoids the complexity of codebase indexing and dependency resolution but limits the relevance of suggestions to project-specific patterns.","intents":["I want quick feedback on a single function or method without setting up a full project analysis","I need to refactor a code snippet that I'm copying between projects","I want to understand refactoring principles without project-specific context"],"best_for":["Developers analyzing isolated code snippets or utility functions","Learning scenarios where generic refactoring principles are sufficient","Quick code reviews without full project context"],"limitations":["Suggestions ignore project conventions, naming standards, and architectural patterns","Cannot detect cross-file dependencies or suggest refactorings that span multiple modules","May suggest changes that conflict with existing codebase patterns or team standards","No awareness of project-specific libraries, frameworks, or custom utilities","Cannot optimize for performance or compatibility within the broader system"],"requires":["Code snippet (typically under 1000 lines)"],"input_types":["code snippet"],"output_types":["refactoring suggestions for the snippet in isolation"],"categories":["code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":40,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Web browser with internet connectivity","Code snippet (typically under 1000 lines for practical analysis)","No authentication or API keys required","Plain text code input","Code must be syntactically valid or near-valid for LLM to understand intent","Web browser","Code snippet submitted to the tool","Internet connectivity","Code snippet (typically under 1000 lines)"],"failure_modes":["No codebase context — suggestions are generic and don't account for project-specific conventions, naming patterns, or architectural constraints","Limited to snippet-level analysis; cannot refactor across multiple files or identify cross-module dependencies","LLM-based suggestions may occasionally be incorrect or contradict team standards without human review","No IDE integration means manual copy-paste workflow, creating friction for frequent use","Latency depends on LLM provider response time; typically 2-5 seconds per analysis","No language-specific semantic analysis — treats all code as text, missing language-specific idioms or best practices","Cannot validate syntax or catch language-specific errors before sending to LLM","Normalization may lose formatting context that affects readability or intent","No support for code with external dependencies or imports that require resolution","Explanations are LLM-generated and may be verbose, incorrect, or miss nuance","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.67,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:33.094Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.560Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=refactory","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=refactory"}},"signature":"HukD7DSzzAzXNED3WuDm8phYS/H9Jn98ic9AwrkFA2gomdxIPlXn3uBLKoc3WAVDlKIaOwRimJXJIvk/IRIHCg==","signedAt":"2026-06-19T13:49:32.344Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/refactory","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/refactory","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=refactory","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}