{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-recursive-llm-ts","slug":"recursive-llm-ts","name":"recursive-llm-ts","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/howlerops/recursive-llm-ts#readme","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/recursive-llm-ts","categories":["frameworks-sdks"],"tags":["llm","ai","recursive","context","nlp","language-model","structured-output","zod","schema","extraction","file-storage","s3","minio","streaming","caching","retry","resilience","opentelemetry","observability","batch"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-recursive-llm-ts__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.recursive.context.processing.with.unbounded.windows","name":"recursive-context-processing-with-unbounded-windows","description":"Processes arbitrarily large documents and conversations by recursively chunking input into manageable segments, processing each chunk through an LLM, and then recursively combining results until a final output is produced. This enables context windows to effectively exceed the underlying model's token limits by treating the problem as a tree-reduction task where intermediate summaries feed into higher-level processing stages.","intents":["Process documents larger than my LLM's context window without losing information","Analyze multi-hour conversations or transcripts with a single coherent output","Extract insights from large codebases or research papers that exceed token limits","Maintain semantic coherence across recursive processing stages"],"best_for":["Teams building document analysis pipelines with variable input sizes","Researchers processing large corpora or datasets","Developers building RAG systems that need to handle unbounded context"],"limitations":["Recursive processing adds latency proportional to tree depth — processing a 1M token document may require 3-5 LLM calls instead of 1","Information loss at chunk boundaries — recursive summarization may compress away nuanced details from intermediate chunks","No built-in optimization for overlapping context windows — naive chunking may miss cross-boundary relationships","Cost scales with recursion depth — each level of the tree requires additional API calls to the LLM"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+","Node.js 16+","API key for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible)","Zod 3.0+ for schema validation"],"input_types":["text (plain text, markdown, code)","structured data (JSON with text fields)","file paths (for local or S3/MinIO storage)"],"output_types":["structured data (Zod-validated schemas)","text (summaries, analyses)","streaming responses (token-by-token)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-recursive-llm-ts__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.zod.schema.based.structured.output.extraction","name":"zod-schema-based-structured-output-extraction","description":"Enforces structured output from LLM responses using Zod schemas as the contract layer. The system validates LLM outputs against the schema, automatically retrying with schema-aware prompting if validation fails, and returns fully typed TypeScript objects. This ensures type safety and eliminates JSON parsing errors by making the schema the source of truth for both prompting and validation.","intents":["Extract structured data from unstructured text with guaranteed type safety","Ensure LLM outputs conform to my application's data model without manual parsing","Automatically retry failed extractions with schema-aware error messages","Generate TypeScript types from extraction schemas automatically"],"best_for":["TypeScript developers building data extraction pipelines","Teams that need strict type safety for LLM outputs","Applications requiring deterministic output formats for downstream processing"],"limitations":["Zod schema complexity is limited — deeply nested or recursive schemas may cause prompt bloat","Retry logic adds latency and cost — failed validations trigger additional LLM calls","Schema-to-prompt translation may not capture all validation constraints — complex Zod refinements may not translate to natural language prompts","No support for streaming structured outputs — must wait for complete response before validation"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+","Zod 3.0+","Node.js 16+"],"input_types":["text","unstructured data"],"output_types":["structured data (Zod-validated TypeScript objects)","validation errors with schema context"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-recursive-llm-ts__cap_10","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.context.window.aware.chunking.with.overlap","name":"context-window-aware-chunking-with-overlap","description":"Automatically chunks input text based on the target model's context window size, with configurable overlap between chunks to preserve cross-boundary context. The system calculates token counts accurately, respects semantic boundaries (paragraphs, sentences), and minimizes information loss at chunk edges.","intents":["Split large documents into chunks that fit within LLM context windows","Preserve context across chunk boundaries using overlap","Automatically calculate chunk sizes based on model context window","Respect semantic boundaries to avoid splitting mid-sentence or mid-paragraph"],"best_for":["Teams processing documents larger than model context windows","Developers building RAG systems with variable input sizes","Applications requiring semantic-aware chunking"],"limitations":["Overlap increases total token count — processing cost scales with overlap percentage","Semantic boundary detection is heuristic-based — may fail on unusual text formats","Token counting is approximate for non-OpenAI models — actual chunk sizes may vary","No support for structured documents — treats all input as plain text"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+","Node.js 16+","Model context window size (configurable)"],"input_types":["text (plain text, markdown, code)"],"output_types":["arrays of text chunks with metadata (token count, overlap info)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-recursive-llm-ts__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.provider.llm.abstraction.with.streaming","name":"multi-provider-llm-abstraction-with-streaming","description":"Provides a unified TypeScript interface for multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, and compatible APIs) with automatic provider selection, fallback handling, and streaming response support. The abstraction layer normalizes differences in API signatures, token counting, and response formats, allowing code to switch providers without refactoring.","intents":["Use multiple LLM providers without rewriting code for each API","Stream responses token-by-token for real-time user feedback","Automatically fall back to alternative providers if one fails","Count tokens accurately across different model families"],"best_for":["Teams building LLM applications that need provider flexibility","Developers building cost-optimized systems that switch providers based on task complexity","Applications requiring real-time streaming responses"],"limitations":["Provider abstraction adds ~50-100ms overhead per request due to normalization layer","Streaming support varies by provider — some providers have higher latency to first token","Token counting is approximate for non-OpenAI models — actual usage may differ from estimates","Fallback logic requires multiple API keys configured upfront"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+","Node.js 16+","API keys for at least one provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible)"],"input_types":["text prompts","message arrays with role/content structure"],"output_types":["text responses","streaming token streams","structured data (with schema validation)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-recursive-llm-ts__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.distributed.file.storage.with.s3.and.minio","name":"distributed-file-storage-with-s3-and-minio","description":"Abstracts file storage operations (upload, download, delete) across S3 and MinIO backends with a unified TypeScript interface. The system handles multipart uploads for large files, automatic retry with exponential backoff, and configurable storage backends, enabling seamless switching between cloud and self-hosted storage without code changes.","intents":["Store large documents or intermediate results in S3 or MinIO without managing connection details","Automatically handle multipart uploads for files larger than memory","Switch between cloud and self-hosted storage backends without refactoring","Retrieve files with automatic retry and error handling"],"best_for":["Teams processing large files in distributed systems","Applications requiring flexible storage backends (cloud or on-premise)","Developers building data pipelines that need resilient file operations"],"limitations":["Multipart upload adds complexity — requires tracking part ETags and managing state","No built-in deduplication or compression — storage costs scale linearly with input size","Retry logic may mask transient network issues — exponential backoff can delay error reporting","No streaming download support — entire files must be loaded into memory"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+","Node.js 16+","AWS SDK v3 or MinIO client library","S3 bucket or MinIO instance with credentials"],"input_types":["file paths (local filesystem)","file streams","binary data"],"output_types":["file paths (remote storage URLs)","file streams","binary data"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-recursive-llm-ts__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.intelligent.caching.with.content.hashing","name":"intelligent-caching-with-content-hashing","description":"Caches LLM responses based on content hashing of inputs, enabling automatic cache hits for semantically identical requests without explicit cache key management. The system stores cached responses in configurable backends (in-memory, Redis, or file-based) and validates cache freshness using content hashes, reducing redundant API calls and costs.","intents":["Avoid redundant LLM API calls for identical or similar inputs","Reduce costs by caching expensive model outputs","Implement cache invalidation based on input content rather than time","Share cached results across distributed workers"],"best_for":["Applications with repetitive processing patterns","Cost-sensitive systems processing large batches with overlapping inputs","Teams building multi-worker systems that benefit from shared caches"],"limitations":["Content hashing adds ~10-50ms overhead per request for large inputs","Cache invalidation is content-based only — no TTL-based expiration by default","Distributed cache backends (Redis) require additional infrastructure and network latency","Cache misses on semantically similar but syntactically different inputs — no semantic deduplication"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+","Node.js 16+","Optional: Redis client for distributed caching"],"input_types":["text prompts","structured data (JSON)"],"output_types":["cached LLM responses","cache hit/miss metadata"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-recursive-llm-ts__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.retry.logic.with.exponential.backoff.and.jitter","name":"retry-logic-with-exponential-backoff-and-jitter","description":"Implements resilient retry strategies with exponential backoff and jitter for transient failures in LLM API calls and file operations. The system configures retry behavior per operation type (e.g., rate limits vs. network errors), tracks retry attempts, and provides detailed failure telemetry for debugging.","intents":["Automatically recover from transient API failures without manual intervention","Avoid thundering herd problems in distributed systems using jitter","Configure different retry strategies for different failure types","Debug retry behavior with detailed telemetry"],"best_for":["Production systems requiring high availability","Distributed applications processing large batches","Teams building resilient data pipelines"],"limitations":["Exponential backoff increases latency for failed requests — worst-case wait time grows exponentially","Jitter adds randomness — retry timing becomes unpredictable for monitoring","No circuit breaker pattern — system continues retrying even if provider is down","Retry logic doesn't distinguish between retryable and permanent errors — may waste time on unrecoverable failures"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+","Node.js 16+"],"input_types":["any operation that may fail transiently"],"output_types":["successful operation result or final failure"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-recursive-llm-ts__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.opentelemetry.observability.and.tracing","name":"opentelemetry-observability-and-tracing","description":"Integrates OpenTelemetry for distributed tracing, metrics collection, and structured logging across LLM calls, file operations, and recursive processing stages. The system automatically instruments key operations, exports traces to compatible backends (Jaeger, Datadog, etc.), and provides detailed performance metrics for optimization.","intents":["Trace execution flow across recursive processing stages for debugging","Collect performance metrics (latency, token usage, cost) for optimization","Export traces to observability platforms for monitoring","Debug failures with structured logs and span context"],"best_for":["Teams operating production LLM systems requiring visibility","Developers optimizing performance of recursive processing pipelines","Organizations with observability infrastructure (Jaeger, Datadog, etc.)"],"limitations":["OpenTelemetry instrumentation adds ~5-10% overhead to request latency","Trace export to remote backends requires network calls — may add latency in high-throughput systems","Span context propagation requires careful configuration — missing context can break trace continuity","No built-in cost tracking — requires custom metrics to correlate token usage with costs"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+","Node.js 16+","OpenTelemetry SDK and compatible exporter","Optional: observability backend (Jaeger, Datadog, etc.)"],"input_types":["any operation to be traced"],"output_types":["traces (spans with timing and metadata)","metrics (counters, histograms)","structured logs"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-recursive-llm-ts__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.batch.processing.with.concurrency.control","name":"batch-processing-with-concurrency-control","description":"Processes multiple LLM requests concurrently with configurable concurrency limits, automatic rate limiting, and batch result aggregation. The system manages worker pools, handles partial failures gracefully, and provides progress tracking for long-running batches.","intents":["Process large batches of documents or queries efficiently","Control concurrency to avoid overwhelming LLM APIs or downstream services","Aggregate results from parallel processing with error handling","Track progress of long-running batch jobs"],"best_for":["Teams processing large datasets with LLMs","Applications requiring efficient resource utilization","Developers building batch data pipelines"],"limitations":["Concurrency control adds complexity — requires careful tuning of worker pool size","Rate limiting may cause queue buildup — slow consumers can block producers","Partial failures require custom error handling — no built-in recovery strategy for failed items","Progress tracking adds overhead — may slow down high-throughput systems"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+","Node.js 16+"],"input_types":["arrays of items to process","async processing functions"],"output_types":["arrays of results","error reports with item indices","progress metadata"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-recursive-llm-ts__cap_8","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.streaming.response.aggregation.with.backpressure","name":"streaming-response-aggregation-with-backpressure","description":"Handles streaming LLM responses with automatic backpressure management, allowing consumers to control the rate of token consumption. The system buffers tokens intelligently, implements flow control to prevent memory overflow, and provides hooks for processing tokens as they arrive.","intents":["Stream LLM responses to users in real-time without buffering entire responses","Implement backpressure to prevent memory overflow in high-throughput systems","Process tokens incrementally for real-time analysis or filtering","Handle streaming errors gracefully without losing buffered tokens"],"best_for":["Web applications requiring real-time LLM responses","Systems processing high-throughput token streams","Developers building interactive LLM interfaces"],"limitations":["Backpressure handling adds complexity — requires careful buffer management","Streaming errors may lose buffered tokens — no built-in recovery mechanism","Token-by-token processing may be slower than batch processing — overhead per token","Not all LLM providers support streaming equally — latency to first token varies"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+","Node.js 16+","LLM provider with streaming support"],"input_types":["streaming token streams from LLM"],"output_types":["individual tokens","aggregated text chunks","streaming errors"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-recursive-llm-ts__cap_9","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.recursive.output.validation.with.schema.feedback","name":"recursive-output-validation-with-schema-feedback","description":"Validates LLM outputs at each stage of recursive processing against Zod schemas, and feeds validation errors back into the prompt for the next recursion level. This ensures that intermediate outputs conform to expected structures and guides the LLM toward valid final outputs through iterative refinement.","intents":["Ensure intermediate outputs in recursive processing are valid before using them in next stage","Guide LLM toward valid outputs by providing schema-aware error feedback","Prevent cascading errors from invalid intermediate results","Validate final outputs with full schema compliance"],"best_for":["Teams building complex recursive processing pipelines","Applications requiring strict output validation at each stage","Developers optimizing for output quality in multi-stage processing"],"limitations":["Validation at each stage adds latency — multiple validation checks per recursion level","Schema-aware error feedback may not always guide LLM toward valid outputs — complex schemas are hard to describe in natural language","Cascading validation failures can cause exponential retry attempts — no built-in limit on retries per stage","No support for partial validation — entire output must be valid or entire stage fails"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+","Zod 3.0+","Node.js 16+"],"input_types":["LLM outputs at each recursion stage"],"output_types":["validated structured data","validation error messages with schema context"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":33,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["TypeScript 4.5+","Node.js 16+","API key for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible)","Zod 3.0+ for schema validation","Zod 3.0+","Model context window size (configurable)","API keys for at least one provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible)","AWS SDK v3 or MinIO client library","S3 bucket or MinIO instance with credentials","Optional: Redis client for distributed caching"],"failure_modes":["Recursive processing adds latency proportional to tree depth — processing a 1M token document may require 3-5 LLM calls instead of 1","Information loss at chunk boundaries — recursive summarization may compress away nuanced details from intermediate chunks","No built-in optimization for overlapping context windows — naive chunking may miss cross-boundary relationships","Cost scales with recursion depth — each level of the tree requires additional API calls to the LLM","Zod schema complexity is limited — deeply nested or recursive schemas may cause prompt bloat","Retry logic adds latency and cost — failed validations trigger additional LLM calls","Schema-to-prompt translation may not capture all validation constraints — complex Zod refinements may not translate to natural language prompts","No support for streaming structured outputs — must wait for complete response before validation","Overlap increases total token count — processing cost scales with overlap percentage","Semantic boundary detection is heuristic-based — may fail on unusual text formats","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.12232362731029975,"quality":0.47,"ecosystem":0.6000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-22T08:08:13.652Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":836,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=recursive-llm-ts","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=recursive-llm-ts"}},"signature":"J3mBEzFVbZv840Ixs8xKjsZzIQRXKXYwVEtX9SO8o9P+yJJOJuC4/PZVA41Ln+vcjdUrf4GwA+IOYJZvr7FiCQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T10:28:27.080Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/recursive-llm-ts","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/recursive-llm-ts","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=recursive-llm-ts","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}