{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_rebeccai","slug":"rebeccai","name":"RebeccAI","type":"product","url":"https://rebecc.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/rebeccai","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_rebeccai__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.business.idea.to.structured.plan.conversion","name":"business-idea-to-structured-plan-conversion","description":"Transforms unstructured business concepts into formatted, multi-section business plans using prompt-chaining and structured output templates. The system accepts raw idea descriptions and applies sequential LLM passes to extract key components (problem statement, solution, market, revenue model, go-to-market), then synthesizes them into a coherent narrative structure with logical dependencies between sections.","intents":["I have a rough business idea and need to organize it into a formal plan structure quickly","I want to convert my elevator pitch into a document I can share with potential investors or co-founders","I need to break down my vague concept into concrete sections (problem, solution, market, etc.) to identify gaps"],"best_for":["Solo entrepreneurs with nascent ideas lacking formal business planning experience","Early-stage founders who need rapid iteration on concept clarity before investor meetings","Non-technical founders prototyping business models without access to business consultants"],"limitations":["No real-time market data integration — plan sections are generated from LLM knowledge cutoff, not live market signals","Output structure is fixed template-based; cannot adapt to industry-specific planning frameworks (e.g., SaaS vs hardware vs marketplace)","No persistence of plan versions or branching — each regeneration overwrites previous iterations","LLM hallucination risk in market sizing and competitive positioning sections without external validation"],"requires":["Internet connection for API calls to underlying LLM provider","Business idea description of minimum 50 characters (estimated based on typical SaaS planning tools)","User account with freemium tier access or higher"],"input_types":["text (unstructured business idea description, 1-5 paragraphs)"],"output_types":["structured text (formatted business plan document)","JSON (if API-exposed, likely structured plan sections)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_rebeccai__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.ai.driven.assumption.evaluation.and.critique","name":"ai-driven-assumption-evaluation-and-critique","description":"Analyzes business plan sections to identify unstated assumptions, logical gaps, and weak points using adversarial prompting patterns. The system generates critical questions and alternative scenarios for each plan component (market size, unit economics, competitive moat), then surfaces risks and contradictions that founders may have overlooked, enabling rapid hypothesis refinement.","intents":["I want to stress-test my business model assumptions before pitching to investors","What are the hidden assumptions in my go-to-market strategy that could fail?","I need to identify which parts of my plan are weakest and most likely to be challenged"],"best_for":["Founders preparing for investor pitch meetings who need pre-mortem analysis","Solo entrepreneurs without access to experienced advisors or mentors for critical feedback","Teams conducting internal business model validation before committing to execution"],"limitations":["Critique quality depends on LLM knowledge cutoff — may miss emerging market trends or recent competitive moves","No integration with founder's actual market research or customer interviews — critique is generic, not grounded in real validation data","Cannot distinguish between critical risks and theoretical edge cases — all assumptions weighted equally","Critique output is text-based; no quantitative risk scoring or prioritization framework provided"],"requires":["Completed or draft business plan (output from prior capability or user-provided)","Minimum 500 characters of plan content for meaningful critique","User account with evaluation features enabled (likely premium tier)"],"input_types":["text (business plan sections or full plan document)"],"output_types":["text (critique report with identified assumptions, risks, and questions)","structured critique (if API-exposed: JSON with risk categories and severity levels)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_rebeccai__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.iterative.plan.refinement.with.feedback.integration","name":"iterative-plan-refinement-with-feedback-integration","description":"Enables users to provide feedback on generated plan sections and automatically regenerates affected components while maintaining consistency across the full plan. The system tracks which sections depend on others (e.g., go-to-market depends on target customer definition) and re-synthesizes downstream sections when upstream assumptions change, preventing logical inconsistencies.","intents":["I want to adjust my target market definition and have the rest of my plan automatically update to stay consistent","I disagree with the revenue model the AI suggested — let me provide feedback and get alternative options","I want to explore multiple scenarios (e.g., B2B vs B2C) without starting from scratch each time"],"best_for":["Iterative founders who want to explore multiple strategic directions rapidly","Teams collaborating on plan refinement who need version control and feedback tracking","Entrepreneurs testing sensitivity of plan to key assumption changes"],"limitations":["Dependency tracking is likely rule-based and may miss implicit connections between plan sections","No branching or scenario management — feedback overwrites previous versions rather than creating alternatives","Feedback loop latency depends on LLM provider (likely 5-30 seconds per regeneration)","No audit trail of changes — difficult to track which assumptions were modified and why"],"requires":["Existing generated business plan from prior capability","User account with plan editing/refinement features (likely premium tier)","Internet connection for real-time regeneration API calls"],"input_types":["text (user feedback on specific plan sections)","structured feedback (if UI-based: form inputs for assumption changes)"],"output_types":["text (regenerated plan sections with feedback incorporated)","full plan document (updated with consistency maintained across sections)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_rebeccai__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.format.plan.export.and.presentation","name":"multi-format-plan-export-and-presentation","description":"Generates business plans in multiple output formats (PDF, Word, Markdown, presentation slides) optimized for different audiences (investors, team, personal reference). The system applies format-specific styling, section reordering, and emphasis based on audience type, enabling founders to quickly produce investor-ready decks or internal strategy documents from the same underlying plan.","intents":["I need to convert my business plan into a professional PDF to send to investors","I want to create a pitch deck from my plan for a demo day presentation","I need a Markdown version of my plan to share with my co-founder on GitHub"],"best_for":["Founders preparing for investor pitches who need multiple document formats quickly","Teams collaborating on business strategy who need format flexibility for different contexts","Solo entrepreneurs who want to avoid manual document formatting and focus on content"],"limitations":["Export quality depends on template library — custom branding or design not supported","Presentation slide generation is likely basic (bullet points + section headers) without sophisticated visual design","No integration with design tools (Figma, Canva) — exports are static documents, not editable templates","PDF/Word exports may have formatting inconsistencies across different browsers or devices"],"requires":["Completed business plan (from prior capabilities)","User account with export features enabled (likely premium tier)","Internet connection for document generation and download"],"input_types":["structured plan data (from internal plan representation)"],"output_types":["PDF (formatted business plan document)","DOCX (Microsoft Word document)","Markdown (plain text with formatting)","PPTX (PowerPoint presentation slides)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_rebeccai__cap_4","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.business.idea.validation.scoring","name":"business-idea-validation-scoring","description":"Evaluates business plans against quantitative and qualitative criteria (market size, competitive intensity, founder fit, execution feasibility) and produces a composite validation score. The system applies weighted scoring rubrics to plan sections, benchmarks against historical startup success patterns, and surfaces which plan dimensions are strongest and weakest relative to typical successful ventures in the same category.","intents":["How viable is my business idea on a scale that I can compare to other ideas I'm considering?","Which aspects of my plan are strongest and which need the most work before I pitch?","How does my idea compare to typical successful startups in my industry?"],"best_for":["Founders evaluating multiple business ideas and needing objective comparison criteria","Early-stage teams deciding whether to pivot or double down on current direction","Accelerator programs or incubators screening cohort applications for viability"],"limitations":["Scoring rubrics are likely generic and not calibrated to specific industries or markets","Benchmarking data is based on LLM training data (knowledge cutoff) rather than live startup databases","No integration with actual market data (TAM, customer acquisition costs, churn rates) — scoring is qualitative inference only","Score is not predictive of actual success — correlation with real outcomes unknown and likely weak","Weighting of criteria is fixed and not customizable per user or industry context"],"requires":["Completed business plan with sufficient detail across all major sections","User account with validation scoring features (likely premium tier)","Minimum plan length (estimated 1000+ characters) for meaningful scoring"],"input_types":["structured plan data (from internal plan representation)"],"output_types":["numeric score (0-100 or similar scale)","structured scorecard (JSON or text with dimension-level scores)","narrative report (text explanation of scoring rationale and recommendations)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_rebeccai__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.collaborative.plan.sharing.and.feedback.collection","name":"collaborative-plan-sharing-and-feedback-collection","description":"Enables founders to share business plans with advisors, co-founders, or investors via shareable links and collect structured feedback through built-in comment and annotation features. The system tracks who provided feedback, timestamps changes, and aggregates comments by plan section, creating an audit trail of plan evolution and stakeholder input without requiring external collaboration tools.","intents":["I want to share my plan with my co-founder and get their feedback without emailing documents back and forth","I need to collect input from multiple advisors and see their comments organized by plan section","I want to track how my plan has evolved based on feedback from different stakeholders"],"best_for":["Co-founder teams collaborating on business strategy refinement","Founders seeking feedback from multiple advisors or mentors simultaneously","Accelerator programs managing cohort feedback and plan iterations"],"limitations":["Collaboration features are likely basic (comments/annotations) without real-time co-editing","No version control or branching — feedback is linear, not supporting parallel exploration of alternatives","Permission model is likely binary (view-only vs edit) without granular access controls","No integration with external communication tools (Slack, email) — feedback collection is siloed within RebeccAI","Comment threads may lack threading depth for complex multi-turn discussions"],"requires":["Completed business plan to share","User account with collaboration features enabled (likely premium tier)","Shareable link generation capability (standard SaaS feature)","Recipient email addresses or shareable link distribution method"],"input_types":["structured plan data (from internal plan representation)","text comments and annotations (from feedback providers)"],"output_types":["shareable link (for plan access)","annotated plan document (with comments and feedback integrated)","feedback summary report (aggregated comments by section)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":40,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Internet connection for API calls to underlying LLM provider","Business idea description of minimum 50 characters (estimated based on typical SaaS planning tools)","User account with freemium tier access or higher","Completed or draft business plan (output from prior capability or user-provided)","Minimum 500 characters of plan content for meaningful critique","User account with evaluation features enabled (likely premium tier)","Existing generated business plan from prior capability","User account with plan editing/refinement features (likely premium tier)","Internet connection for real-time regeneration API calls","Completed business plan (from prior capabilities)"],"failure_modes":["No real-time market data integration — plan sections are generated from LLM knowledge cutoff, not live market signals","Output structure is fixed template-based; cannot adapt to industry-specific planning frameworks (e.g., SaaS vs hardware vs marketplace)","No persistence of plan versions or branching — each regeneration overwrites previous iterations","LLM hallucination risk in market sizing and competitive positioning sections without external validation","Critique quality depends on LLM knowledge cutoff — may miss emerging market trends or recent competitive moves","No integration with founder's actual market research or customer interviews — critique is generic, not grounded in real validation data","Cannot distinguish between critical risks and theoretical edge cases — all assumptions weighted equally","Critique output is text-based; no quantitative risk scoring or prioritization framework provided","Dependency tracking is likely rule-based and may miss implicit connections between plan sections","No branching or scenario management — feedback overwrites previous versions rather than creating alternatives","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.67,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:32.438Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.560Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=rebeccai","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=rebeccai"}},"signature":"cmW4YMEQRZ8YfGZB7uSZbWAaQCbGj1uu7WOLFsAW2p8sm/RW9DU8MlEpuH8EZe9/FGvzI+2Xb1MW07AuQxdIBg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T20:02:51.515Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/rebeccai","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/rebeccai","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=rebeccai","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}