{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-ramp","slug":"ramp","name":"Ramp","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/ramp-public/ramp-mcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/ramp","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-ramp__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.spend.data.retrieval.via.mcp","name":"spend-data-retrieval-via-mcp","description":"Retrieves structured spend data from Ramp's API through the Model Context Protocol (MCP) interface, enabling LLMs to access real-time transaction records, vendor information, and cost breakdowns without direct API integration. The MCP server acts as a bridge that translates LLM tool calls into authenticated Ramp API requests, handling pagination and data serialization automatically.","intents":["I want my LLM agent to fetch my company's recent transactions and vendor data without building custom API integration","I need to expose Ramp spend data to Claude or other LLM-based tools through a standardized protocol","I want to query specific spend categories or date ranges and get structured JSON responses for analysis"],"best_for":["Finance teams building LLM-powered expense analysis agents","Developers integrating Ramp data into multi-tool LLM workflows","Teams using Claude or other MCP-compatible LLMs for spend insights"],"limitations":["Requires valid Ramp API credentials and active Ramp account","MCP protocol adds request/response serialization overhead (~50-100ms per call)","Limited to Ramp's API rate limits (typically 100-1000 requests/hour depending on plan)","No built-in caching — repeated queries hit the API each time"],"requires":["Ramp API key (obtainable from Ramp dashboard)","MCP-compatible LLM client (Claude, or custom implementation supporting MCP protocol)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ (depending on MCP server implementation)","Network access to Ramp API endpoints (api.ramp.com)"],"input_types":["structured tool parameters (date ranges, vendor filters, category filters)","natural language queries from LLM (converted to parameters by MCP server)"],"output_types":["JSON transaction records with vendor, amount, date, category","Aggregated spend summaries by category or vendor","Structured metadata about available spend dimensions"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-ramp__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.llm.powered.spend.analysis","name":"llm-powered-spend-analysis","description":"Enables LLMs to analyze spend patterns by combining retrieved transaction data with reasoning capabilities, allowing the model to identify trends, anomalies, and cost-saving opportunities. The MCP server provides structured spend data as context, and the LLM applies chain-of-thought reasoning to generate insights, comparisons, and recommendations without requiring pre-built analysis templates.","intents":["I want Claude to analyze my spend data and tell me where we're overspending compared to last quarter","I need an LLM to identify unusual vendor charges or duplicate transactions in my expense data","I want to ask natural language questions about my spend ('What's our top vendor?' 'Are we spending more on SaaS?') and get instant answers"],"best_for":["Finance teams without dedicated data analysts","Startups needing ad-hoc spend insights without BI tool setup","Developers building conversational expense management interfaces"],"limitations":["Analysis quality depends on LLM reasoning capabilities — may miss subtle patterns that statistical tools catch","No persistent analysis state — each query starts fresh without memory of previous insights","LLM context window limits the amount of historical data that can be analyzed in a single request (typically 100K tokens)","Requires LLM API calls for each analysis, incurring per-token costs"],"requires":["Ramp API key with spend data access","LLM API key (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) with function-calling support","MCP server running and configured with both Ramp and LLM credentials","Sufficient LLM API quota for analysis queries"],"input_types":["natural language questions about spend","date ranges or filters for scoped analysis","comparison parameters (e.g., 'vs last quarter')"],"output_types":["natural language insights and recommendations","identified anomalies or cost-saving opportunities","trend summaries and vendor rankings","structured JSON with analysis results"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-ramp__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.tool.schema.exposure","name":"mcp-tool-schema-exposure","description":"Exposes Ramp API capabilities as standardized MCP tool schemas that LLM clients can discover and invoke, defining input parameters, output formats, and descriptions in a format compatible with Claude and other MCP-aware models. The server implements the MCP tools protocol, allowing clients to query available tools and their signatures before making requests.","intents":["I want my LLM to automatically discover what Ramp operations are available without reading documentation","I need to define tool parameters (required fields, types, constraints) so the LLM knows how to call Ramp functions correctly","I want to expose multiple Ramp endpoints as separate tools so the LLM can choose the right one for each task"],"best_for":["Developers building multi-tool LLM agents with Ramp integration","Teams using Claude with tool use, needing standardized Ramp tool definitions","MCP server implementers extending Ramp capabilities"],"limitations":["Tool schema must be manually maintained if Ramp API changes","LLM may misuse tools if schema descriptions are ambiguous or incomplete","No runtime validation of tool parameters — relies on LLM to follow schema constraints","Schema complexity grows with number of Ramp endpoints exposed"],"requires":["MCP server implementation (Node.js or Python)","Ramp API documentation to define tool schemas","MCP-compatible LLM client (Claude 3.5+, or custom MCP implementation)"],"input_types":["MCP tool discovery requests","tool invocation requests with parameters matching schema"],"output_types":["JSON tool schema definitions (name, description, parameters, return type)","tool execution results in format specified by schema"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-ramp__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.authenticated.ramp.api.bridging","name":"authenticated-ramp-api-bridging","description":"Manages Ramp API authentication and request routing within the MCP server, handling credential storage, token refresh, and request signing so LLM clients never directly access Ramp credentials. The server acts as a secure proxy, accepting MCP tool calls and translating them into authenticated Ramp API requests with proper headers and error handling.","intents":["I want to give my LLM access to Ramp data without exposing API keys to the model","I need a secure proxy that handles Ramp authentication so I can safely share the MCP server with multiple users","I want automatic token refresh and error handling so the LLM doesn't need to manage authentication state"],"best_for":["Teams deploying shared MCP servers with multiple LLM clients","Security-conscious organizations requiring credential isolation","Developers building production LLM agents with external API access"],"limitations":["Credential storage must be secured (environment variables, secrets manager) — no built-in encryption","Single point of failure — if MCP server is compromised, all Ramp credentials are exposed","No audit logging of API calls by default — requires custom implementation","Token refresh logic must handle Ramp's specific authentication scheme (OAuth, API keys, etc.)"],"requires":["Ramp API key or OAuth credentials","Secure credential storage (environment variables, AWS Secrets Manager, etc.)","MCP server with HTTPS support for production deployments","Network connectivity to Ramp API endpoints"],"input_types":["MCP tool invocation requests from LLM clients"],"output_types":["Authenticated API responses from Ramp","Error messages with appropriate HTTP status codes"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-ramp__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.spend.data.context.injection","name":"spend-data-context-injection","description":"Automatically injects retrieved spend data into the LLM's context window as structured information, allowing the model to reference transaction details, vendor information, and historical patterns during reasoning without explicit retrieval calls for each analysis step. The MCP server caches recent spend data and provides it as context to reduce API calls and improve response latency.","intents":["I want the LLM to have access to my recent spend history so it can answer questions without fetching data each time","I need to provide spend context to the LLM once, then ask multiple follow-up questions without repeated API calls","I want the LLM to reference specific transactions when explaining cost trends or anomalies"],"best_for":["Conversational spend analysis interfaces with multiple follow-up questions","LLM agents that need to reference spend data across multiple reasoning steps","Applications with limited LLM API budgets where reducing API calls is critical"],"limitations":["Context injection increases LLM input tokens, raising per-request costs","Cached spend data becomes stale — requires periodic refresh for real-time accuracy","Context window limits the amount of historical data that can be injected (typically 100K tokens)","No built-in cache invalidation — requires manual refresh or TTL-based expiration"],"requires":["Ramp API key for initial spend data retrieval","LLM with sufficient context window (Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 200K tokens)","MCP server with caching layer (in-memory or Redis)"],"input_types":["date ranges or filters for spend data to inject","natural language questions about injected spend context"],"output_types":["LLM responses referencing injected spend data","analysis results with transaction-level details"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-ramp__cap_5","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.natural.language.spend.querying","name":"natural-language-spend-querying","description":"Enables users to ask natural language questions about spend data ('What did we spend on software last month?', 'Which vendor had the biggest increase?') and have the LLM translate these into appropriate Ramp API calls and analysis. The MCP server provides tools for data retrieval, and the LLM handles intent parsing, parameter extraction, and response generation without requiring users to know API syntax.","intents":["I want to ask questions about my spend in plain English without learning API syntax","I need the LLM to understand ambiguous queries ('last month', 'top vendors') and fetch the right data","I want conversational follow-ups ('Tell me more about that vendor', 'Compare to last year') to work naturally"],"best_for":["Non-technical finance users who need spend insights","Conversational interfaces and chatbots for expense management","Teams building natural language interfaces to financial data"],"limitations":["LLM may misinterpret ambiguous queries or make incorrect assumptions about date ranges","No validation that extracted parameters match Ramp API constraints — may result in failed API calls","Requires LLM with strong instruction-following and parameter extraction capabilities","Context window limits the complexity of questions that can be answered in a single turn"],"requires":["LLM with function-calling and instruction-following capabilities (Claude 3.5+, GPT-4, etc.)","MCP server with well-documented tool schemas so LLM understands available operations","Ramp API key for data retrieval"],"input_types":["natural language questions about spend"],"output_types":["natural language responses with spend insights","structured data (JSON) with query results"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":28,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Ramp API key (obtainable from Ramp dashboard)","MCP-compatible LLM client (Claude, or custom implementation supporting MCP protocol)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ (depending on MCP server implementation)","Network access to Ramp API endpoints (api.ramp.com)","Ramp API key with spend data access","LLM API key (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) with function-calling support","MCP server running and configured with both Ramp and LLM credentials","Sufficient LLM API quota for analysis queries","MCP server implementation (Node.js or Python)","Ramp API documentation to define tool schemas"],"failure_modes":["Requires valid Ramp API credentials and active Ramp account","MCP protocol adds request/response serialization overhead (~50-100ms per call)","Limited to Ramp's API rate limits (typically 100-1000 requests/hour depending on plan)","No built-in caching — repeated queries hit the API each time","Analysis quality depends on LLM reasoning capabilities — may miss subtle patterns that statistical tools catch","No persistent analysis state — each query starts fresh without memory of previous insights","LLM context window limits the amount of historical data that can be analyzed in a single request (typically 100K tokens)","Requires LLM API calls for each analysis, incurring per-token costs","Tool schema must be manually maintained if Ramp API changes","LLM may misuse tools if schema descriptions are ambiguous or incomplete","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.37,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:04.048Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:15.503Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=ramp","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=ramp"}},"signature":"YEQXd0P9nvLp8xZ34HbqI5BSwKY4j4NCQWKAl3hS36pqtImqMbsfx3mkw9gqGl4FLQ/X7oNea0yT18WMiiofAQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T13:12:22.905Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/ramp","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/ramp","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=ramp","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}