{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-ralph-tui","slug":"ralph-tui","name":"ralph-tui","type":"agent","url":"https://github.com/subsy/ralph-tui","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/ralph-tui","categories":["ai-agents"],"tags":["tui","ai","agent","orchestrator","terminal","cli"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-ralph-tui__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.step.agent.loop.orchestration.with.terminal.ui","name":"multi-step agent loop orchestration with terminal ui","description":"Orchestrates iterative AI agent workflows through a terminal-based interface, managing the execution loop where agents receive tasks, call tools, process results, and decide next steps. The TUI provides real-time visualization of agent state transitions, tool invocations, and reasoning chains as they execute, with structured input/output handling for each loop iteration.","intents":["I want to build an AI agent that runs in the terminal and shows me what it's thinking at each step","I need to orchestrate multi-step workflows where an LLM decides which tools to call and how to handle results","I want to debug agent behavior by watching the execution loop in real-time with a visual interface"],"best_for":["developers building CLI-based AI agents","teams prototyping agentic workflows without web UI overhead","engineers debugging LLM reasoning chains in local environments"],"limitations":["Terminal-only interface limits visualization complexity compared to web-based dashboards","No built-in persistence of agent execution history — state is ephemeral unless manually saved","Single-threaded execution model may bottleneck concurrent tool calls"],"requires":["Node.js 14+ (npm package registry)","Terminal with ANSI color support for TUI rendering","LLM API access (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible provider)"],"input_types":["text prompts","structured task definitions","tool schemas/function definitions"],"output_types":["terminal UI state updates","structured agent decisions","tool call results","reasoning traces"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ralph-tui__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.use.integration.with.schema.based.function.calling","name":"tool-use integration with schema-based function calling","description":"Manages tool/function definitions through a schema registry that agents can query and invoke, supporting structured function calling with parameter validation and result handling. The system translates between agent decisions (which tool to call with what parameters) and actual function execution, handling serialization of complex types and error propagation back to the agent.","intents":["I want my agent to have access to a set of tools and automatically decide which ones to use","I need to define tool schemas that the LLM can understand and call with proper parameter validation","I want to handle tool execution errors gracefully and feed them back to the agent for recovery"],"best_for":["developers building tool-augmented agents","teams integrating multiple APIs/functions into agent workflows","builders prototyping agent capabilities without writing custom orchestration"],"limitations":["Schema definition and validation overhead adds latency per tool call (~50-100ms)","Limited to synchronous tool execution — no native async/await support for concurrent calls","No built-in rate limiting or retry logic for external API calls"],"requires":["Tool schemas defined in JSON Schema or compatible format","Function implementations accessible from the agent runtime","LLM provider with function calling support (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)"],"input_types":["JSON Schema tool definitions","function implementations (JavaScript/TypeScript)","LLM-generated tool call requests"],"output_types":["tool execution results","error messages","structured function call logs"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ralph-tui__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agent.state.machine.with.decision.branching","name":"agent state machine with decision branching","description":"Implements a state machine that tracks agent execution states (idle, thinking, tool-calling, processing-results, deciding-next-step) and manages transitions based on LLM outputs and tool results. The system handles branching logic where agents can decide to continue the loop, call additional tools, or terminate based on task completion criteria.","intents":["I want to ensure my agent follows a predictable execution flow with clear state transitions","I need to handle different agent behaviors based on what the LLM decides (continue loop, call tool, stop)","I want to prevent infinite loops or invalid state transitions in agent execution"],"best_for":["teams building production-grade agents with reliability requirements","developers who need deterministic agent behavior for testing","builders implementing complex multi-step reasoning workflows"],"limitations":["State machine adds complexity for simple single-step tasks","No built-in timeout enforcement per state — requires external timeout management","Limited to linear state transitions; complex branching requires custom logic"],"requires":["Clear definition of valid agent states","LLM outputs structured to indicate state transitions","Terminal/TUI environment for state visualization"],"input_types":["LLM responses","tool execution results","task completion signals"],"output_types":["state transition events","agent decision logs","execution flow traces"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ralph-tui__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.real.time.tui.rendering.of.agent.execution.trace","name":"real-time tui rendering of agent execution trace","description":"Renders agent execution state, tool calls, results, and reasoning chains in a terminal UI with live updates as the agent loop progresses. The TUI displays the current agent state, pending tool calls, recent results, and the reasoning trace in a structured, scrollable format with syntax highlighting for code and JSON.","intents":["I want to watch my agent execute and see exactly what it's thinking and doing in real-time","I need to debug agent behavior by inspecting the execution trace without logging to files","I want a visual representation of the agent loop that's easier to understand than raw logs"],"best_for":["developers debugging agents locally","teams prototyping agent workflows interactively","engineers learning how agents work by observing execution"],"limitations":["Terminal rendering performance degrades with very long execution traces (>1000 steps)","Limited to monospace fonts and ANSI colors — no rich formatting like web UIs","Screen real estate constraints make it difficult to display complex multi-agent scenarios"],"requires":["Terminal with ANSI color support (most modern terminals)","Minimum terminal width of 80 characters (120+ recommended)","Node.js runtime for TUI rendering"],"input_types":["agent state objects","tool call events","LLM responses","execution logs"],"output_types":["rendered terminal UI","interactive navigation (if supported)","exportable execution traces"],"categories":["automation-workflow","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ralph-tui__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.llm.provider.abstraction.for.agent.reasoning","name":"llm provider abstraction for agent reasoning","description":"Abstracts the LLM provider interface so agents can use different LLM backends (OpenAI, Anthropic, local models, etc.) without changing agent logic. The system handles provider-specific API differences, prompt formatting, response parsing, and token counting, translating between a unified agent interface and provider-specific APIs.","intents":["I want to switch between different LLM providers without rewriting my agent code","I need to use a local LLM or custom model for my agent instead of cloud APIs","I want to compare agent behavior across different LLM providers"],"best_for":["teams evaluating multiple LLM providers","developers building provider-agnostic agents","organizations with privacy requirements needing local LLM support"],"limitations":["Abstraction layer adds latency (~10-50ms per request) for provider translation","Not all provider features are exposed through the abstraction — advanced features may require provider-specific code","Token counting varies by provider; estimates may be inaccurate for cost tracking"],"requires":["API keys for supported LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Network access to LLM endpoints or local LLM server running","Unified prompt format compatible with multiple providers"],"input_types":["agent prompts","conversation history","tool schemas"],"output_types":["LLM responses","token usage metrics","provider-agnostic structured outputs"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ralph-tui__cap_5","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.structured.prompt.engineering.for.agent.reasoning","name":"structured prompt engineering for agent reasoning","description":"Constructs agent prompts with structured sections for task definition, tool availability, execution history, and decision instructions, ensuring the LLM has all necessary context to make informed decisions. The system manages prompt composition, context window optimization, and formatting to maximize LLM reasoning quality while staying within token limits.","intents":["I want to give my agent clear instructions on how to use tools and make decisions","I need to include relevant context (previous steps, tool results) in prompts without exceeding token limits","I want to optimize prompts for better agent reasoning without manual tuning"],"best_for":["teams building agents with complex reasoning requirements","developers optimizing agent performance and reliability","builders experimenting with different prompt strategies"],"limitations":["Prompt engineering is still largely empirical — no guarantee of optimal results","Context window limits force trade-offs between history length and instruction clarity","Different LLM models respond differently to the same prompt structure"],"requires":["Clear task definition and tool descriptions","Understanding of target LLM's capabilities and limitations","Feedback mechanism to evaluate and iterate on prompts"],"input_types":["task descriptions","tool schemas","execution history","previous results"],"output_types":["formatted prompts","token usage estimates","structured LLM responses"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ralph-tui__cap_6","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.execution.history.and.context.management","name":"execution history and context management","description":"Maintains a rolling buffer of agent execution history including previous tool calls, results, and reasoning steps, making this context available to the LLM for subsequent decisions. The system manages context window constraints by selectively including relevant history while dropping older or less relevant steps to stay within token limits.","intents":["I want my agent to remember what it's already tried and avoid repeating failed approaches","I need to provide the agent with recent results and context for better decision-making","I want to manage context window usage so the agent can handle long-running tasks"],"best_for":["agents performing multi-step tasks requiring memory of previous steps","teams building agents that need to learn from failures within a session","developers optimizing token usage in long-running agent workflows"],"limitations":["Context window limits force dropping of older history — agents cannot remember arbitrarily long execution traces","No persistent storage of history across sessions — context is lost when agent terminates","Selective history inclusion may miss relevant context if selection heuristics are poor"],"requires":["Mechanism to serialize and store execution history","Token counting to estimate context window usage","Strategy for selecting which history to include (recency, relevance, etc.)"],"input_types":["tool call events","execution results","agent decisions","error messages"],"output_types":["formatted execution history","context summaries","token usage metrics"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ralph-tui__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.error.handling.and.recovery.in.agent.loops","name":"error handling and recovery in agent loops","description":"Catches and handles errors from tool execution, LLM API failures, and invalid agent decisions, feeding error information back to the agent for recovery attempts. The system distinguishes between recoverable errors (retry with different parameters) and terminal errors (stop execution), and provides the agent with error context to inform next steps.","intents":["I want my agent to handle tool execution failures gracefully instead of crashing","I need the agent to learn from errors and try different approaches","I want to distinguish between temporary failures (retry) and permanent failures (stop)"],"best_for":["agents calling external APIs or tools that may fail","teams building resilient agent workflows","developers debugging agent behavior in the face of errors"],"limitations":["No automatic retry logic — requires explicit agent decision to retry","Error messages may not provide enough context for agent to recover intelligently","Cascading errors (tool A fails, causing tool B to fail) may be difficult to diagnose"],"requires":["Error handling in tool implementations","Clear error messages and error types","Agent prompt instructions for handling errors"],"input_types":["tool execution exceptions","LLM API errors","invalid agent decisions"],"output_types":["error logs","recovery suggestions","agent decision to retry or stop"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-ralph-tui__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.task.completion.detection.and.termination","name":"agent task completion detection and termination","description":"Monitors agent execution for signals indicating task completion (explicit stop decision, max iterations reached, timeout exceeded, or success criteria met) and gracefully terminates the agent loop. The system collects final results and execution summary for reporting.","intents":["I want my agent to know when it's done and stop executing","I need to prevent infinite loops by enforcing iteration limits or timeouts","I want to collect and report the final results of agent execution"],"best_for":["agents performing bounded tasks with clear completion criteria","teams building production agents that need execution guarantees","developers preventing runaway agent loops"],"limitations":["Completion detection relies on agent decision or external signals — no automatic detection of task success","Timeout enforcement may interrupt agents mid-step, leaving partial results","Max iteration limits may be too conservative for complex tasks or too permissive for simple ones"],"requires":["Clear completion criteria or success signals","Iteration limit and timeout configuration","Mechanism to collect final results"],"input_types":["agent stop decisions","iteration counters","timeout signals","success criteria"],"output_types":["final results","execution summary","completion status"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":30,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Node.js 14+ (npm package registry)","Terminal with ANSI color support for TUI rendering","LLM API access (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible provider)","Tool schemas defined in JSON Schema or compatible format","Function implementations accessible from the agent runtime","LLM provider with function calling support (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Clear definition of valid agent states","LLM outputs structured to indicate state transitions","Terminal/TUI environment for state visualization","Terminal with ANSI color support (most modern terminals)"],"failure_modes":["Terminal-only interface limits visualization complexity compared to web-based dashboards","No built-in persistence of agent execution history — state is ephemeral unless manually saved","Single-threaded execution model may bottleneck concurrent tool calls","Schema definition and validation overhead adds latency per tool call (~50-100ms)","Limited to synchronous tool execution — no native async/await support for concurrent calls","No built-in rate limiting or retry logic for external API calls","State machine adds complexity for simple single-step tasks","No built-in timeout enforcement per state — requires external timeout management","Limited to linear state transitions; complex branching requires custom logic","Terminal rendering performance degrades with very long execution traces (>1000 steps)","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.12615007731982802,"quality":0.28,"ecosystem":0.5800000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.28,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-22T08:08:13.651Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":913,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=ralph-tui","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=ralph-tui"}},"signature":"nnCauitx4v1p6zMiMrghaACjyjhW+KdokjT4XDGd3FtHsciOTJ/SBy05IQ7xgnO1+GtQ0g1CgbpVW742AoF9CQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T06:23:44.425Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/ralph-tui","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/ralph-tui","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=ralph-tui","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}