{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_raiinmaker","slug":"raiinmaker","name":"Raiinmaker","type":"product","url":"https://raiinmaker.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/raiinmaker","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_raiinmaker__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.immutable.campaign.performance.audit.trail","name":"immutable campaign performance audit trail","description":"Records all campaign metrics, engagement data, and performance indicators on a blockchain ledger, creating a cryptographically-signed, tamper-proof history that cannot be retroactively modified. Each metric update is timestamped and linked to previous records via hash chains, enabling third-party auditors and brands to verify the authenticity of reported influencer performance without relying on platform intermediaries.","intents":["I need to verify that an influencer's reported engagement metrics are authentic and haven't been manipulated after the campaign ended","I want an independent audit trail that proves what performance was actually delivered, to settle disputes with influencers or agencies","I need to demonstrate to stakeholders that our influencer campaign ROI claims are verifiable and not self-reported"],"best_for":["Enterprise brands managing high-value influencer campaigns ($100k+) where performance disputes justify blockchain overhead","Agencies handling multiple concurrent campaigns needing third-party verification for client reporting","Compliance-heavy industries (pharma, finance) requiring immutable audit trails for regulatory purposes"],"limitations":["Blockchain write latency (typically 10-30 seconds per block) means real-time metric updates are not possible; metrics batch and settle asynchronously","Storage costs scale with campaign duration and metric granularity; high-frequency tracking (per-second engagement) becomes economically prohibitive","Blockchain data is public or semi-public depending on chain type; sensitive campaign strategy details cannot be stored on-chain without encryption overhead"],"requires":["Active blockchain network (Ethereum, Polygon, or proprietary chain) with sufficient transaction capacity","Integration with influencer tracking APIs (Instagram Graph API, TikTok Analytics API) to feed metrics into blockchain","Smart contract deployment capability and gas/transaction fee budget"],"input_types":["structured campaign metadata (campaign ID, influencer wallet address, start/end dates)","performance metrics (impressions, engagement rate, click-through rate, conversions)","timestamp data from social media platforms"],"output_types":["blockchain transaction hash (proof of record)","merkle proof for specific metric entries","audit report with cryptographic verification"],"categories":["automation-workflow","blockchain-verification"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_raiinmaker__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.smart.contract.automated.payment.settlement","name":"smart contract-automated payment settlement","description":"Encodes campaign payment terms (milestones, performance thresholds, payment amounts) as self-executing smart contracts that automatically release funds from brand escrow to influencer wallets when predefined conditions are met. The contract monitors on-chain performance data and oracle feeds, triggering payments without intermediary approval, reducing settlement time from weeks to minutes and eliminating manual payment processing.","intents":["I want to guarantee that influencers get paid immediately when they hit agreed performance targets, without waiting for brand approval or accounting review","I need to structure payments around specific milestones (e.g., 'pay 50% on 100k impressions, 50% on 10k clicks') and have them execute automatically","I want to reduce payment disputes by making the payment logic transparent and immutable before the campaign starts"],"best_for":["Influencers and creators who face chronic payment delays from brands and need guaranteed, automated settlement","Agencies managing performance-based campaigns with complex multi-tier payment structures","Cross-border campaigns where traditional payment rails are slow or expensive"],"limitations":["Smart contract logic is immutable once deployed; errors in payment conditions cannot be patched mid-campaign without redeploying and losing escrow state","Oracle data feeds (performance metrics from social platforms) introduce a trust assumption; if the oracle is compromised or delayed, payment triggers may not fire correctly","Gas fees for contract execution and state updates can be significant on high-traffic chains; Ethereum mainnet may cost $50-500 per payment settlement depending on network congestion","Requires influencers to have blockchain wallets and understand crypto payment mechanics; adoption friction among non-technical creators"],"requires":["Solidity or equivalent smart contract language expertise to define payment logic","Blockchain network with sufficient transaction throughput (Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, etc.)","Oracle service (Chainlink, Band Protocol) to feed real-time performance metrics into contracts","Escrow mechanism to hold brand funds in contract until payment conditions are met","Influencer crypto wallet (MetaMask, hardware wallet, or custodial service)"],"input_types":["campaign parameters (payment amount, performance thresholds, milestone dates)","performance data from oracles (impressions, engagement metrics, conversion counts)","brand wallet address and escrow deposit amount"],"output_types":["smart contract bytecode deployed to blockchain","payment transaction hash when conditions are met","settlement confirmation to influencer wallet"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_raiinmaker__cap_10","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.audience.authenticity.verification.and.fraud.detection","name":"audience authenticity verification and fraud detection","description":"Analyzes influencer audience data (follower growth patterns, engagement rates, follower demographics, bot detection) to identify fake followers, engagement pods, and other fraudulent activity. Uses machine learning models trained on historical data to flag suspicious accounts and calculate an authenticity score for each influencer. Results are stored on-chain and factored into reputation scores, enabling brands to identify authentic influencers and avoid paying for fake engagement.","intents":["I want to verify that an influencer's followers are real before paying them for a campaign; I don't want to pay for fake engagement","I need to detect if an influencer is using engagement pods or buying followers, which would inflate their metrics artificially","I want a transparent, third-party assessment of audience authenticity that I can trust"],"best_for":["Brands paying for performance-based campaigns where fake engagement directly impacts ROI","Agencies vetting influencers for high-value campaigns where audience authenticity is critical","Platforms and networks seeking to maintain quality and prevent fraud"],"limitations":["Fraud detection is an arms race; as detection methods improve, fraudsters develop new techniques to evade detection","Machine learning models require large training datasets; models trained on limited data may have high false positive/negative rates","Authenticity scores are probabilistic, not deterministic; an influencer flagged as suspicious may actually be legitimate, and vice versa","False positives damage influencer reputation; if an authenticity check incorrectly flags a legitimate influencer, it can harm their ability to secure campaigns","Influencers may dispute authenticity scores and claim they are inaccurate; without transparent methodology, disputes are difficult to resolve"],"requires":["Access to influencer audience data (follower lists, engagement metrics, follower demographics) via social platform APIs","Machine learning models for fraud detection (trained on historical data of known fraudulent accounts)","Authenticity scoring algorithm (weighted combination of follower growth patterns, engagement rates, bot detection, etc.)","Historical training data of known fraudulent influencers and authentic influencers","Regular model retraining as new fraud patterns emerge"],"input_types":["influencer social media account data (follower list, engagement metrics, follower demographics, growth history)","historical fraud labels (known fraudulent and authentic influencers)"],"output_types":["authenticity score (0-100 or similar)","fraud risk flags (e.g., 'suspicious follower growth', 'engagement pod activity detected')","detailed fraud analysis report","on-chain record of authenticity assessment"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_raiinmaker__cap_11","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.currency.payment.settlement.with.stablecoin.support","name":"multi-currency payment settlement with stablecoin support","description":"Enables campaigns to be priced and settled in multiple currencies (USD, EUR, GBP, etc.) by converting fiat to stablecoins (USDC, USDT, DAI) at the time of payment, then settling to influencer wallets. Implements price feeds from oracles (Chainlink, Band Protocol) to ensure fair exchange rates; brands can pay in fiat via bank transfer or credit card, which is automatically converted to stablecoins for on-chain settlement. Influencers receive stablecoins and can convert back to fiat via exchanges or custodial services.","intents":["I want to pay influencers in their local currency without dealing with international wire transfers or currency conversion fees","I need to settle payments in stablecoins for on-chain smart contracts, but I want to price campaigns in fiat currency","I want to avoid currency volatility risk; I don't want to hold crypto and have it lose value before I can convert to fiat"],"best_for":["Global campaigns with influencers in multiple countries and currencies","Brands seeking to reduce international payment friction and fees","Influencers in countries with unstable currencies who prefer stablecoins to local fiat"],"limitations":["Stablecoin adoption is limited outside crypto-native communities; many influencers are unfamiliar with stablecoins and may be reluctant to accept them","Stablecoin-to-fiat conversion requires access to exchanges or custodial services; in some countries, this infrastructure is limited or regulated","Oracle price feeds introduce trust assumptions; if the oracle is compromised or delayed, exchange rates may be inaccurate","Regulatory uncertainty: stablecoin regulation is evolving and varies by jurisdiction; some countries may restrict stablecoin use","Conversion fees: converting fiat to stablecoins and back to fiat incurs fees from exchanges and custodial services, which may exceed traditional payment fees"],"requires":["Integration with fiat payment gateway (Stripe, PayPal, or bank transfer) to accept brand payments","Stablecoin smart contracts (USDC, USDT, DAI) deployed on blockchain","Oracle service (Chainlink, Band Protocol) for real-time exchange rate feeds","Stablecoin-to-fiat conversion service (exchange API or custodial service) for influencers","Multi-currency price feed to convert between fiat currencies"],"input_types":["brand payment in fiat currency (USD, EUR, GBP, etc.)","influencer preferred payout currency","campaign payment amount"],"output_types":["stablecoin transfer to influencer wallet","exchange rate used for conversion (on-chain record)","fiat conversion receipt for influencer"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_raiinmaker__cap_2","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.decentralized.performance.verification.via.third.party.validators","name":"decentralized performance verification via third-party validators","description":"Enables independent validators (auditors, agencies, or community nodes) to cryptographically sign off on campaign performance metrics, creating a multi-signature verification system where no single party (brand, influencer, or platform) controls the truth. Validators stake reputation or collateral to participate, creating economic incentives for honest validation; false signatures can be challenged and slashed on-chain.","intents":["I need an independent third party to verify that reported metrics are accurate, not just trust the influencer or brand's word","I want to create a reputation system where validators who consistently provide honest audits build credibility for future campaigns","I need to resolve disputes by having a neutral party cryptographically prove what actually happened"],"best_for":["High-value campaigns ($500k+) where the cost of hiring independent auditors is justified by dispute prevention","Industries with regulatory requirements (pharma, finance) needing third-party attestation of marketing claims","Brands and influencers with adversarial relationships who need neutral arbitration"],"limitations":["Validator network must reach critical mass to be meaningful; with few validators, collusion risk remains high and decentralization is theoretical","Validators require technical sophistication to run nodes and understand blockchain verification; limited supply of qualified validators creates bottlenecks","Slashing mechanisms (economic penalties for false signatures) require careful calibration; too harsh and validators won't participate, too lenient and dishonesty is unpunished","Validator selection bias: validators may favor brands or influencers with whom they have relationships, undermining neutrality"],"requires":["Active validator network with staking mechanism and slashing rules defined in smart contracts","Cryptographic signature scheme (ECDSA, BLS) for multi-signature verification","Reputation tracking system (on-chain or off-chain) to score validator accuracy over time","Dispute resolution mechanism (voting, arbitration) to handle validator disagreements","Performance data feeds from social platforms that validators can independently verify"],"input_types":["campaign performance metrics (impressions, engagement, conversions)","validator identity and stake amount","dispute claims with supporting evidence"],"output_types":["multi-signature attestation (cryptographic proof from N validators)","validator reputation score","dispute resolution verdict"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_raiinmaker__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.transparent.campaign.compensation.tracking.and.settlement","name":"transparent campaign compensation tracking and settlement","description":"Maintains a real-time, on-chain ledger of all compensation flows between brands and influencers, including base payments, performance bonuses, and deductions, with each transaction cryptographically linked to the campaign and influencer identity. Influencers can view their earnings in real-time and receive immediate settlement notifications; brands can audit total campaign spend and per-influencer ROI without requesting reports from the platform.","intents":["I want to see exactly how much I've earned from a campaign in real-time, broken down by milestone and performance tier, without waiting for the brand to send me a statement","I need to reconcile my earnings across multiple campaigns and platforms in a single dashboard, with cryptographic proof of each payment","I want to prove to my accountant or lender that my influencer income is real and verifiable, not self-reported"],"best_for":["Full-time influencers and creators who depend on predictable, transparent income and need to track earnings for tax/accounting purposes","Agencies managing payments to hundreds of influencers and needing automated reconciliation","Brands in regulated industries needing to document influencer compensation for compliance audits"],"limitations":["Blockchain transaction costs (gas fees) can exceed the value of small payments; micropayments below $10 become economically inefficient on mainnet chains","Real-time visibility into earnings may create psychological pressure or disputes if performance metrics fluctuate during campaigns","Requires influencers to understand blockchain wallets and crypto; adoption friction for non-technical creators","Privacy concerns: all transactions are visible on-chain (or semi-visible on private chains), potentially exposing influencer earnings to competitors or bad actors"],"requires":["Blockchain network with low transaction costs (Polygon, Arbitrum, or Layer 2 solution)","Integration with payment oracle to convert fiat currency to stablecoins or crypto","Influencer wallet infrastructure (custodial or self-custodial)","Real-time performance metric feeds from social platforms","Dashboard UI for influencers to view earnings and transaction history"],"input_types":["campaign compensation structure (base payment, bonus tiers, deduction rules)","real-time performance metrics (impressions, engagement, conversions)","influencer wallet address","brand payment authorization"],"output_types":["transaction record on blockchain (hash, timestamp, amount)","influencer earnings dashboard (real-time balance, transaction history)","settlement confirmation to wallet"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_raiinmaker__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.campaign.performance.data.aggregation.from.multiple.social.platforms","name":"campaign performance data aggregation from multiple social platforms","description":"Integrates with Instagram Graph API, TikTok Analytics API, YouTube Data API, and other social platform APIs to automatically pull campaign-related metrics (impressions, engagement, reach, conversions) into a unified on-chain data store. Implements retry logic, rate-limit handling, and data validation to ensure metrics are accurate and complete; timestamps each data pull to create an audit trail of when metrics were recorded.","intents":["I want a single dashboard showing campaign performance across Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube without manually exporting reports from each platform","I need to ensure that the metrics used to trigger smart contract payments are accurate and pulled directly from official platform APIs, not self-reported","I want historical snapshots of metrics at specific times (e.g., 'what was engagement at 2pm on day 3?') to detect manipulation or anomalies"],"best_for":["Brands running multi-platform campaigns who need unified performance visibility","Agencies managing campaigns for multiple influencers across different platforms","Performance-based campaigns where payment triggers depend on accurate, verified metrics"],"limitations":["Social platform APIs have rate limits and may not provide real-time data; Instagram and TikTok typically have 24-48 hour reporting delays","API access requires influencer or brand to grant OAuth permissions; some creators are reluctant to share API access due to privacy concerns","Platform API changes or deprecations (common with Instagram and TikTok) require constant maintenance and can break integrations","Metrics definitions vary across platforms (e.g., 'engagement' means different things on TikTok vs. Instagram); normalization requires manual mapping","Some platforms (TikTok, YouTube) restrict API access to verified partners; small brands may not qualify for API credentials"],"requires":["OAuth 2.0 integration with Instagram Graph API, TikTok Analytics API, YouTube Data API","API credentials (app ID, secret) for each platform","Influencer or brand account with sufficient permissions to grant API access","Data validation and transformation logic to normalize metrics across platforms","Scheduled job or webhook handler to pull metrics at regular intervals (hourly, daily)"],"input_types":["influencer or brand social media account credentials (via OAuth)","campaign ID and associated social media post/video IDs","metric types to track (impressions, engagement, reach, conversions)"],"output_types":["structured metric data (JSON) with timestamp and source platform","blockchain transaction recording metric snapshot","aggregated dashboard view across platforms"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_raiinmaker__cap_5","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.blockchain.based.influencer.identity.and.reputation.management","name":"blockchain-based influencer identity and reputation management","description":"Creates persistent, cryptographically-signed digital identities for influencers on the blockchain, linked to their social media accounts and campaign history. Reputation scores are calculated based on historical performance (delivery of promised metrics, on-time content, audience authenticity) and stored on-chain; scores are transparent and portable across platforms, allowing influencers to build verifiable reputation independent of any single platform.","intents":["I want to build a verifiable reputation as an influencer that proves my audience is real and my metrics are accurate, that I can carry to any platform","I need brands to be able to verify my historical performance and audience quality without relying on my self-reported stats or platform-provided badges","I want to access better-paying campaigns by proving my track record through cryptographic verification, not just follower count"],"best_for":["Established influencers with strong track records who want to monetize their reputation across multiple platforms","Brands seeking to identify high-quality, authentic influencers by reviewing on-chain reputation history","Agencies building influencer networks and needing standardized, verifiable quality metrics"],"limitations":["Reputation system is only as good as the data it's based on; if underlying metrics are fraudulent, reputation scores are meaningless","Influencers with poor historical performance cannot easily rebuild reputation; on-chain history is permanent and cannot be deleted","Reputation portability requires widespread adoption across platforms; if only Raiinmaker uses the reputation system, it has limited utility","Gaming risk: influencers may artificially inflate metrics on smaller campaigns to boost reputation scores, then use that reputation to secure high-value campaigns","Privacy concern: on-chain reputation history is public and can be used to dox or harass influencers"],"requires":["Blockchain wallet for influencer identity (Ethereum address, DID, or similar)","Cryptographic signature scheme to link blockchain identity to social media accounts","Historical campaign data (performance metrics, payment records) to calculate reputation scores","Reputation algorithm (weighted scoring based on delivery rate, audience authenticity, payment disputes, etc.)","Smart contract or oracle to update reputation scores as new campaigns complete"],"input_types":["influencer social media account (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, etc.)","historical campaign performance data","audience authenticity metrics (follower growth patterns, engagement authenticity scores)","payment and dispute history"],"output_types":["blockchain-based digital identity (DID or Ethereum address linked to social accounts)","reputation score (numerical or tiered)","reputation history and audit trail","portable reputation credential (verifiable by any platform)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_raiinmaker__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.dispute.resolution.via.on.chain.arbitration.and.voting","name":"dispute resolution via on-chain arbitration and voting","description":"Implements a decentralized dispute resolution mechanism where disagreements between brands and influencers (e.g., 'were metrics actually delivered?', 'was content quality acceptable?') are resolved through on-chain voting by a pool of arbitrators or community validators. Arbitrators stake collateral to participate; losing arbitrators are slashed (lose their stake), creating economic incentives for honest judgment. Disputes are resolved in days rather than weeks, with transparent voting records on-chain.","intents":["I have a dispute with a brand over whether I delivered the promised metrics; I need a neutral third party to review the evidence and make a binding decision","I want to resolve a payment dispute without going to court or hiring a lawyer; I need a faster, cheaper arbitration mechanism","I want the arbitration process to be transparent and auditable, so both parties can see how the decision was made"],"best_for":["Mid-market and enterprise campaigns where dispute resolution costs justify on-chain arbitration","Cross-border campaigns where traditional legal arbitration is expensive or impractical","Influencers and brands with adversarial relationships who need neutral, transparent dispute resolution"],"limitations":["Arbitrator pool must be large and diverse enough to prevent collusion; small pools are vulnerable to coordinated dishonesty","Arbitrators require domain expertise (understanding influencer metrics, social media dynamics) which is rare; most arbitrators will be generalists making suboptimal decisions","Slashing mechanisms create legal and tax complexity; arbitrators may face liability if their decisions are later challenged","Dispute resolution is slower than centralized platforms (days to weeks) due to voting periods and blockchain settlement times","Arbitration decisions are final and immutable on-chain; if an arbitrator makes a mistake, there is no appeal mechanism"],"requires":["Smart contract implementing voting and slashing logic","Arbitrator pool with staking mechanism (collateral requirement to participate)","Voting mechanism (simple majority, weighted voting, or quadratic voting)","Evidence submission and storage system (IPFS or similar for immutable evidence storage)","Slashing and reward distribution logic","Appeal mechanism (optional, adds complexity)"],"input_types":["dispute claim with evidence (screenshots, API data, transaction records)","arbitrator votes and reasoning","arbitrator stake amounts"],"output_types":["dispute resolution verdict (on-chain voting record)","arbitrator rewards or slashing transactions","payment settlement or reversal based on verdict"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_raiinmaker__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.campaign.roi.calculation.and.attribution.modeling","name":"campaign roi calculation and attribution modeling","description":"Aggregates campaign performance data (impressions, clicks, conversions, revenue) and calculates ROI by attributing conversions and revenue to specific influencers and campaigns. Implements multi-touch attribution models (first-click, last-click, linear, time-decay) to handle cases where multiple influencers contributed to a single conversion. Results are stored on-chain with calculation methodology documented, enabling brands to audit ROI claims and influencers to verify they received credit for their contributions.","intents":["I need to calculate the true ROI of my influencer campaign, accounting for the fact that multiple influencers may have contributed to a single sale","I want to prove to my CFO that influencer marketing is delivering positive ROI, with transparent attribution that can be audited","I need to fairly allocate campaign revenue to influencers based on their contribution, not just their follower count"],"best_for":["Brands with sophisticated marketing analytics teams who understand attribution modeling","E-commerce and SaaS companies where conversion tracking is straightforward and ROI is measurable","Agencies managing performance-based campaigns where ROI calculation is critical to client reporting"],"limitations":["Attribution modeling is inherently ambiguous; different models (first-click, last-click, linear) produce different results, and no model is universally 'correct'","Requires conversion tracking infrastructure (UTM parameters, pixel tracking, CRM integration) that many brands lack; without clean conversion data, ROI calculations are unreliable","Cross-device and cross-platform attribution is difficult; a user may see an influencer post on mobile, then convert on desktop, making the attribution chain unclear","Privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA) restrict tracking capabilities; brands may not be able to collect the data needed for accurate attribution","Influencers may dispute attribution results if they feel they were unfairly credited or debited for conversions"],"requires":["Conversion tracking infrastructure (UTM parameters, pixel tracking, CRM API integration)","Campaign performance data (impressions, clicks, conversions, revenue)","Attribution modeling algorithm (first-click, last-click, linear, time-decay, or custom)","Revenue data linked to conversions","Smart contract or oracle to calculate and record ROI on-chain"],"input_types":["campaign performance metrics (impressions, clicks, conversions)","conversion and revenue data from e-commerce or CRM system","influencer identities and their contributions to each conversion","attribution model selection (first-click, last-click, linear, etc.)"],"output_types":["ROI calculation (revenue / campaign spend)","per-influencer attribution (% of conversions/revenue attributed to each influencer)","attribution audit trail (on-chain record of calculation methodology and inputs)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_raiinmaker__cap_8","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.influencer.network.discovery.and.matching","name":"influencer network discovery and matching","description":"Maintains an on-chain registry of influencers with their profile data (follower count, audience demographics, content categories, historical performance, reputation scores) and implements matching algorithms to recommend influencers to brands based on campaign objectives. Matching considers audience alignment, historical performance, pricing, and availability; results are ranked by predicted ROI or fit score. Influencers can opt-in to discovery and set their own pricing and availability.","intents":["I need to find influencers in a specific niche (e.g., sustainable fashion) with authentic audiences and proven track records, without manually searching Instagram","I want to see predicted ROI for different influencers before committing to a campaign, based on their historical performance","I want to discover emerging influencers who are not yet on traditional platforms but have strong engagement and authentic audiences"],"best_for":["Brands and agencies seeking to discover influencers beyond traditional platforms (Instagram, TikTok)","Performance-based campaigns where predicted ROI is critical to influencer selection","Niche campaigns where finding influencers with specific audience demographics is difficult"],"limitations":["Network effects: matching quality depends on the number of influencers in the registry; if adoption is low, the pool of available influencers is limited","Influencer data quality: reputation scores and historical performance are only as good as the underlying data; fraudulent influencers can game the system","Matching algorithms are opaque to users; influencers may not understand why they were or were not recommended for a campaign","Privacy concerns: influencer profile data (audience demographics, earnings history) is visible on-chain or semi-visible, potentially exposing sensitive information","Limited adoption among mainstream influencers; most top-tier influencers prefer traditional platforms and may not register on Raiinmaker"],"requires":["On-chain influencer registry with profile data (follower count, audience demographics, content categories, reputation scores)","Influencer profile creation and management UI","Matching algorithm (collaborative filtering, content-based filtering, or hybrid)","Historical performance data for each influencer (past campaigns, ROI, audience growth)","Brand campaign requirements input (budget, audience demographics, content type, KPIs)"],"input_types":["influencer profile data (follower count, audience demographics, content categories, pricing, availability)","brand campaign requirements (budget, target audience, content type, KPIs, timeline)","historical campaign performance data"],"output_types":["ranked list of recommended influencers with fit scores","predicted ROI for each influencer","influencer contact information and pricing"],"categories":["search-retrieval","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_raiinmaker__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.campaign.contract.generation.and.execution","name":"campaign contract generation and execution","description":"Generates legally-binding campaign contracts from templates, automatically populating terms (deliverables, payment schedule, performance metrics, content rights) based on brand and influencer inputs. Contracts are stored on-chain or linked via IPFS, and both parties cryptographically sign them using blockchain wallets. Signed contracts are immutable and serve as the source of truth for campaign terms; disputes are resolved by referencing the signed contract on-chain.","intents":["I want to quickly generate a campaign contract without hiring a lawyer, with standard terms that protect both the brand and influencer","I need a contract that clearly specifies what content I'm expected to deliver, when I'll be paid, and what happens if I don't deliver","I want the contract to be cryptographically signed and immutable, so neither party can later claim the terms were different"],"best_for":["Small brands and micro-influencers who cannot afford legal review but need basic contract protection","Agencies managing high-volume campaigns where contract generation must be automated","Cross-border campaigns where traditional contract enforcement is difficult"],"limitations":["Template-based contracts may not cover edge cases or industry-specific requirements; legal review is still recommended for high-value campaigns","Cryptographic signatures prove agreement to contract terms but do not provide legal enforceability in traditional courts; if a party breaches, enforcement depends on jurisdiction and applicable law","Influencers may not understand contract terms or may sign without reading; on-chain signature does not prove informed consent","Contract amendments require both parties to sign again; if one party refuses, the contract cannot be updated without creating a new version","Regulatory compliance: contracts must comply with local laws (labor laws, tax laws, advertising regulations) which vary by jurisdiction; template contracts may not be compliant in all regions"],"requires":["Contract template library with standard influencer campaign terms","Contract generation logic to populate templates with brand and influencer inputs","IPFS or similar for immutable contract storage","Blockchain wallet for both parties to sign contracts","Cryptographic signature verification to confirm both parties have signed"],"input_types":["brand and influencer information (names, wallet addresses, contact info)","campaign terms (deliverables, payment schedule, performance metrics, content rights, timeline)","contract template selection"],"output_types":["generated contract (PDF or text format)","contract hash and IPFS link","cryptographic signatures from both parties","signed contract record on-chain"],"categories":["automation-workflow","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":40,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Active blockchain network (Ethereum, Polygon, or proprietary chain) with sufficient transaction capacity","Integration with influencer tracking APIs (Instagram Graph API, TikTok Analytics API) to feed metrics into blockchain","Smart contract deployment capability and gas/transaction fee budget","Solidity or equivalent smart contract language expertise to define payment logic","Blockchain network with sufficient transaction throughput (Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, etc.)","Oracle service (Chainlink, Band Protocol) to feed real-time performance metrics into contracts","Escrow mechanism to hold brand funds in contract until payment conditions are met","Influencer crypto wallet (MetaMask, hardware wallet, or custodial service)","Access to influencer audience data (follower lists, engagement metrics, follower demographics) via social platform APIs","Machine learning models for fraud detection (trained on historical data of known fraudulent accounts)"],"failure_modes":["Blockchain write latency (typically 10-30 seconds per block) means real-time metric updates are not possible; metrics batch and settle asynchronously","Storage costs scale with campaign duration and metric granularity; high-frequency tracking (per-second engagement) becomes economically prohibitive","Blockchain data is public or semi-public depending on chain type; sensitive campaign strategy details cannot be stored on-chain without encryption overhead","Smart contract logic is immutable once deployed; errors in payment conditions cannot be patched mid-campaign without redeploying and losing escrow state","Oracle data feeds (performance metrics from social platforms) introduce a trust assumption; if the oracle is compromised or delayed, payment triggers may not fire correctly","Gas fees for contract execution and state updates can be significant on high-traffic chains; Ethereum mainnet may cost $50-500 per payment settlement depending on network congestion","Requires influencers to have blockchain wallets and understand crypto payment mechanics; adoption friction among non-technical creators","Fraud detection is an arms race; as detection methods improve, fraudsters develop new techniques to evade detection","Machine learning models require large training datasets; models trained on limited data may have high false positive/negative rates","Authenticity scores are probabilistic, not deterministic; an influencer flagged as suspicious may actually be legitimate, and vice versa","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.72,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:32.438Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.560Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=raiinmaker","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=raiinmaker"}},"signature":"NC3HzRlxn8H0zQZ4NPYhXkZTR4Qh8xawLmIE80wmkLGKC6ArjsDi42CmlszmWYry4dOu2phj7uEwBgzUaVy5AQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T02:38:09.564Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/raiinmaker","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/raiinmaker","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=raiinmaker","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}