{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking","slug":"qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking","name":"Qwen: Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking","type":"model","url":"https://openrouter.ai/models/qwen~qwen3-vl-8b-thinking","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking","categories":["image-generation"],"tags":["qwen","api-access","text","image"],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":"$1.17e-7 per prompt token"},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking__cap_0","uri":"capability://image.visual.multimodal.visual.reasoning.with.extended.thinking","name":"multimodal visual reasoning with extended thinking","description":"Processes images and text simultaneously using a unified transformer architecture with extended chain-of-thought reasoning. The model performs iterative visual analysis by decomposing complex scenes into semantic components, maintaining spatial relationships through vision transformer embeddings, and reasoning over visual-textual alignments before generating final outputs. This enables structured problem-solving on visually-grounded tasks rather than direct pattern matching.","intents":["I need to analyze a complex document with tables, charts, and text to extract structured insights","I want to reason through a multi-step visual puzzle or scene understanding task","I need to understand relationships between objects in an image and explain my reasoning","I want to verify claims about image content with step-by-step justification"],"best_for":["AI engineers building reasoning-heavy document processing pipelines","Teams developing visual QA systems requiring explainable outputs","Researchers prototyping multimodal reasoning benchmarks","Enterprise applications needing auditable visual analysis decisions"],"limitations":["Extended thinking adds 2-5x latency compared to standard inference — unsuitable for real-time applications","Reasoning tokens consume significantly more API quota; cost-per-request scales with reasoning depth","Maximum image resolution and sequence length constrained by 8B parameter budget — may struggle with extremely high-resolution or multi-page documents","Reasoning process is opaque to end users; only final output is typically exposed without intermediate reasoning steps"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key or direct Qwen API access","Images in JPEG, PNG, or WebP format","Text prompts in natural language or structured formats","Network connectivity for API calls (no local inference without quantization)"],"input_types":["image (JPEG, PNG, WebP)","text (natural language prompts, structured queries)","multimodal (image + text pairs)"],"output_types":["text (reasoning explanation + final answer)","structured data (JSON-formatted extractions)","reasoning traces (if exposed via API)"],"categories":["image-visual","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking__cap_1","uri":"capability://image.visual.document.and.scene.understanding.with.spatial.reasoning","name":"document and scene understanding with spatial reasoning","description":"Analyzes documents, charts, diagrams, and complex scenes by maintaining explicit spatial relationships between visual elements. Uses region-based attention mechanisms and layout-aware tokenization to preserve document structure (tables, columns, hierarchies) while reasoning over element relationships. The model can reference specific regions of images in its reasoning and outputs, enabling precise localization and structured extraction from visually-complex inputs.","intents":["I need to extract table data from a scanned PDF or image while preserving structure","I want to understand the layout and relationships between elements in a complex diagram","I need to locate and describe specific regions of an image in my analysis","I want to extract structured data from forms, invoices, or other document templates"],"best_for":["Document processing teams handling OCR-adjacent tasks with semantic understanding","Financial/legal tech companies extracting data from unstructured documents","Accessibility tool builders describing image layouts to users","Diagram and technical drawing analysis applications"],"limitations":["Spatial reasoning degrades with extremely cluttered or overlapping elements — may misidentify region boundaries","No native support for multi-page document reasoning — requires splitting and separate API calls","Spatial coordinates are implicit in reasoning; no explicit bounding box output without custom prompting","Performance varies significantly based on image quality and contrast; low-resolution or poor-quality scans reduce accuracy"],"requires":["Images with clear visual structure (documents, diagrams, scenes with distinct elements)","Minimum image resolution ~300 DPI for document text clarity","API access via OpenRouter or direct Qwen endpoint"],"input_types":["image (documents, diagrams, scenes, charts)","text (queries about spatial relationships, extraction instructions)"],"output_types":["text (descriptions with spatial references)","structured data (extracted tables, form fields as JSON)","reasoning traces (spatial analysis steps)"],"categories":["image-visual","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking__cap_2","uri":"capability://image.visual.temporal.sequence.reasoning.for.video.and.animation.frames","name":"temporal sequence reasoning for video and animation frames","description":"Processes sequences of images (video frames, animation sequences, storyboards) by maintaining temporal coherence across frames and reasoning about object motion, state changes, and causal relationships over time. The model uses frame-to-frame attention mechanisms to track entities and events across sequences, enabling understanding of temporal dynamics without requiring explicit optical flow computation. Outputs can include frame-level annotations, temporal event detection, or narrative descriptions of sequences.","intents":["I need to understand what's happening across a sequence of video frames and describe the action","I want to detect when specific events occur in a video sequence and timestamp them","I need to track object movements or state changes across multiple frames","I want to generate a narrative description of a video or animation sequence"],"best_for":["Video understanding and captioning applications","Action recognition and event detection systems","Accessibility tools generating video descriptions","Content moderation systems analyzing video sequences for policy violations"],"limitations":["Temporal reasoning is limited to sequences of ~10-30 frames due to context window constraints — longer videos require segmentation","No native support for variable frame rates or temporal gaps — requires uniform frame sampling","Reasoning about fast motion or rapid scene changes may be less accurate than specialized optical flow models","API costs scale linearly with number of frames; processing long videos becomes expensive"],"requires":["Image sequence in JPEG, PNG, or WebP format","Frames sampled at consistent intervals (e.g., 1 frame per second)","Maximum ~30 frames per API call for optimal performance","OpenRouter or direct Qwen API access"],"input_types":["image sequence (video frames, animation frames, storyboards)","text (queries about temporal events, descriptions, tracking)"],"output_types":["text (narrative descriptions, event summaries)","structured data (frame-level annotations, timestamps, event lists)","reasoning traces (temporal analysis steps)"],"categories":["image-visual","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking__cap_3","uri":"capability://image.visual.visual.question.answering.with.reasoning.justification","name":"visual question answering with reasoning justification","description":"Answers natural language questions about images by performing step-by-step visual reasoning before generating answers. The model decomposes questions into sub-questions, locates relevant image regions, and builds reasoning chains that justify final answers. Unlike standard VQA models that output answers directly, this capability exposes intermediate reasoning steps, enabling verification of the model's visual understanding and error diagnosis when answers are incorrect.","intents":["I need to ask detailed questions about image content and get justified answers","I want to verify that the model correctly understood an image before trusting its answer","I need to debug why a model gave an incorrect answer to a visual question","I want to generate training data with reasoning traces for VQA model fine-tuning"],"best_for":["QA system builders requiring explainable visual understanding","Researchers studying visual reasoning and model interpretability","Teams building educational tools that explain image content","Quality assurance teams validating visual understanding in production systems"],"limitations":["Reasoning traces add 2-5x latency — unsuitable for interactive real-time applications","Reasoning quality depends on question clarity; ambiguous or multi-part questions may produce incomplete reasoning chains","Model may hallucinate details not present in images; reasoning traces don't guarantee factual accuracy","Reasoning output format is not standardized — requires custom parsing to extract structured reasoning steps"],"requires":["Image in JPEG, PNG, or WebP format","Natural language question or query","OpenRouter or direct Qwen API access","Ability to parse text reasoning traces (optional, for structured extraction)"],"input_types":["image","text (natural language questions)"],"output_types":["text (reasoning steps + final answer)","reasoning traces (intermediate analysis steps)"],"categories":["image-visual","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking__cap_4","uri":"capability://image.visual.cross.modal.alignment.and.semantic.matching","name":"cross-modal alignment and semantic matching","description":"Aligns visual and textual content by computing semantic relationships between image regions and text descriptions. The model uses unified embeddings that map both modalities to a shared semantic space, enabling tasks like image-text matching, visual grounding (linking text to image regions), and semantic similarity ranking. This alignment is maintained throughout the reasoning process, allowing the model to reference specific image regions when generating text and vice versa.","intents":["I need to find which image regions correspond to specific text descriptions","I want to rank images by semantic similarity to a text query","I need to verify that image captions accurately describe image content","I want to generate region-specific descriptions that reference exact image locations"],"best_for":["Image retrieval and search systems with semantic understanding","Visual grounding applications linking text to image regions","Content moderation systems matching images to policy descriptions","Accessibility tools generating region-specific image descriptions"],"limitations":["Cross-modal alignment is implicit in reasoning; no explicit similarity scores or embeddings exposed via API","Alignment quality degrades with abstract or metaphorical descriptions that don't directly correspond to visual content","No support for fine-grained region-level embeddings — alignment operates at image-level or implicit region level","Semantic matching may fail for domain-specific terminology or non-English text"],"requires":["Image in JPEG, PNG, or WebP format","Text descriptions or queries in natural language","OpenRouter or direct Qwen API access"],"input_types":["image","text (descriptions, queries, captions)"],"output_types":["text (descriptions with region references)","structured data (region-text mappings as JSON)","reasoning traces (alignment analysis steps)"],"categories":["image-visual","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.reasoning.aware.api.integration.with.token.accounting","name":"reasoning-aware api integration with token accounting","description":"Exposes reasoning tokens separately from output tokens in API responses, enabling builders to track and optimize reasoning depth. The model supports configurable reasoning budgets (via prompting or system parameters) that control how much compute is allocated to thinking versus output generation. This allows cost-conscious applications to trade reasoning depth for latency and API cost, or allocate more reasoning for complex tasks requiring deeper analysis.","intents":["I need to understand how much of my API quota is consumed by reasoning versus output","I want to adjust reasoning depth based on task complexity to optimize cost","I need to implement cost controls that limit reasoning tokens per request","I want to measure reasoning efficiency for different task types"],"best_for":["Cost-conscious teams deploying reasoning models in production","Builders implementing dynamic reasoning budgets based on task complexity","Analytics teams measuring reasoning efficiency across use cases","Enterprise applications with strict API budget constraints"],"limitations":["Reasoning budget control is indirect — requires prompt engineering or system parameters rather than explicit API parameters","No guarantee that reasoning depth will match requested budget — model may use less reasoning for simple tasks","Token accounting may not be real-time; some APIs batch token counts in responses","Reasoning tokens are typically more expensive than output tokens, but pricing varies by provider"],"requires":["OpenRouter or direct Qwen API with token accounting support","API key with access to reasoning model variants","Ability to parse token counts from API responses"],"input_types":["text (prompts with reasoning budget hints)","images (for multimodal reasoning)"],"output_types":["structured data (API response with token counts)","text (reasoning output + final answer)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":23,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["OpenRouter API key or direct Qwen API access","Images in JPEG, PNG, or WebP format","Text prompts in natural language or structured formats","Network connectivity for API calls (no local inference without quantization)","Images with clear visual structure (documents, diagrams, scenes with distinct elements)","Minimum image resolution ~300 DPI for document text clarity","API access via OpenRouter or direct Qwen endpoint","Image sequence in JPEG, PNG, or WebP format","Frames sampled at consistent intervals (e.g., 1 frame per second)","Maximum ~30 frames per API call for optimal performance"],"failure_modes":["Extended thinking adds 2-5x latency compared to standard inference — unsuitable for real-time applications","Reasoning tokens consume significantly more API quota; cost-per-request scales with reasoning depth","Maximum image resolution and sequence length constrained by 8B parameter budget — may struggle with extremely high-resolution or multi-page documents","Reasoning process is opaque to end users; only final output is typically exposed without intermediate reasoning steps","Spatial reasoning degrades with extremely cluttered or overlapping elements — may misidentify region boundaries","No native support for multi-page document reasoning — requires splitting and separate API calls","Spatial coordinates are implicit in reasoning; no explicit bounding box output without custom prompting","Performance varies significantly based on image quality and contrast; low-resolution or poor-quality scans reduce accuracy","Temporal reasoning is limited to sequences of ~10-30 frames due to context window constraints — longer videos require segmentation","No native support for variable frame rates or temporal gaps — requires uniform frame sampling","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.37,"ecosystem":0.27,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.35,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:24.485Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:45.776Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking"}},"signature":"lhSqygNls8Bq6tuL9zut/v5bsSn7J6AqJTDdObWBxR3IKmHB5pWizG4Zh8u2JWvQ5X6Crc57yY2e8dmJPzRWAg==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T19:52:37.137Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=qwen-qwen3-vl-8b-thinking","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}