{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507","slug":"qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507","name":"Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507","type":"model","url":"https://openrouter.ai/models/qwen~qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507","categories":["chatbots-assistants","testing-quality"],"tags":["qwen","api-access","text"],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":"$9.00e-8 per prompt token"},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507__cap_0","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.mixture.of.experts.instruction.following.with.sparse.activation","name":"mixture-of-experts instruction following with sparse activation","description":"A 30.5B-parameter mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture that activates only 3.3B parameters per inference token, enabling efficient instruction-following through gated expert routing. The model uses a sparse gating mechanism to dynamically select which expert sub-networks process each token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining instruction comprehension across diverse task types. This architecture allows the model to specialize different experts for different instruction domains (reasoning, coding, creative writing) while keeping inference latency competitive with smaller dense models.","intents":["I need a language model that can follow complex multi-step instructions without excessive latency or cost","I want instruction-following capability with the knowledge breadth of a 30B model but the inference speed of a 10B model","I need to process high volumes of instruction-based queries cost-effectively via API"],"best_for":["teams building instruction-following chatbots and assistants at scale","developers optimizing for cost-per-inference in production LLM applications","builders prototyping multi-turn dialogue systems with diverse task requirements"],"limitations":["MoE routing adds ~5-15ms latency overhead per token compared to dense models due to gating computation","Expert imbalance during training can cause load imbalance where some experts are underutilized, reducing effective model capacity","Sparse activation means certain instruction types may route to fewer experts, potentially reducing performance on out-of-distribution tasks","No explicit reasoning or chain-of-thought capability — operates in non-thinking mode, limiting complex multi-step problem decomposition"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter or compatible inference endpoint","Support for text input up to model's context window (typically 4K-32K tokens)","Familiarity with instruction-following prompt formatting (system + user message structure)"],"input_types":["text (natural language instructions, prompts, queries)","code snippets (for instruction-based code analysis or generation)","structured prompts with system/user/assistant roles"],"output_types":["text (natural language responses, explanations, completions)","code (generated or refactored code snippets)","structured text (JSON, markdown, formatted responses)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","instruction-following"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507__cap_1","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.multilingual.instruction.comprehension.and.response.generation","name":"multilingual instruction comprehension and response generation","description":"The model is trained on multilingual instruction-following data, enabling it to understand and respond to instructions in multiple languages (including English, Chinese, Spanish, French, German, Japanese, and others) with consistent quality. The architecture uses shared token embeddings and expert routing across languages, allowing the model to leverage cross-lingual knowledge transfer while maintaining language-specific instruction semantics. This capability enables single-model deployment for global applications without language-specific fine-tuning.","intents":["I need a single model that can handle customer support in multiple languages without separate model deployments","I want to build a multilingual chatbot that understands instructions equally well in English and Chinese","I need to process and respond to user queries in mixed-language contexts (code-switching)"],"best_for":["teams building global SaaS applications with multilingual user bases","developers creating chatbots for non-English markets (especially Asia-Pacific)","organizations consolidating multiple language-specific models into a single inference endpoint"],"limitations":["Performance may vary across languages — typically stronger in high-resource languages (English, Chinese, Spanish) than low-resource languages","Code-switching (mixing languages in a single prompt) may degrade performance compared to single-language inputs","No explicit language detection — relies on prompt context to determine response language, which can fail with ambiguous inputs","Instruction-following quality may be asymmetric across languages due to training data distribution"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter or compatible endpoint","UTF-8 encoding support for non-Latin scripts","Awareness of language-specific instruction conventions (e.g., formal vs. informal registers)"],"input_types":["text in multiple languages (English, Chinese, Spanish, French, German, Japanese, etc.)","mixed-language prompts (code-switching)","language-tagged instructions"],"output_types":["text responses in the same language as input","multilingual structured data (JSON with language-specific fields)","code with multilingual comments"],"categories":["text-generation-language","multilingual-support"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507__cap_2","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.non.thinking.mode.inference.with.latency.optimization","name":"non-thinking mode inference with latency optimization","description":"The model operates in non-thinking mode, meaning it generates responses directly without intermediate reasoning steps or chain-of-thought scaffolding. This design choice prioritizes inference latency and token efficiency over explicit reasoning transparency, making it suitable for real-time applications where response speed is critical. The architecture skips the overhead of generating visible reasoning traces, reducing time-to-first-token and total response latency by 20-40% compared to thinking-mode variants.","intents":["I need fast response times for real-time chat applications and cannot tolerate the latency of reasoning-based models","I want to minimize token consumption and API costs by avoiding reasoning trace generation","I need to deploy a model in latency-sensitive environments (mobile, edge, real-time APIs)"],"best_for":["teams building real-time chatbots and conversational interfaces","developers optimizing for cost-per-token in high-volume inference scenarios","applications where response latency is a hard constraint (sub-500ms SLA)"],"limitations":["No explicit reasoning transparency — users cannot see the model's reasoning process, making debugging and trust-building harder","Performance on complex multi-step reasoning tasks may be lower than thinking-mode variants due to lack of intermediate scaffolding","Cannot be used for applications requiring explainability or audit trails of reasoning steps","May produce less reliable answers on tasks requiring deep logical reasoning or mathematical problem-solving"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter or compatible endpoint","Acceptance of direct-response paradigm without reasoning traces","Prompt engineering optimized for non-thinking inference (clear, specific instructions)"],"input_types":["text instructions and queries","prompts optimized for direct response generation"],"output_types":["text responses without reasoning traces","direct answers to queries","code or structured output without intermediate steps"],"categories":["text-generation-language","performance-optimization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.high.quality.instruction.following.with.task.generalization","name":"high-quality instruction-following with task generalization","description":"The model is fine-tuned on diverse instruction-following datasets covering a wide range of task types (summarization, question-answering, creative writing, coding, analysis, etc.), enabling it to generalize to novel instructions and task types not explicitly seen during training. The fine-tuning process uses instruction templates and task diversity to build robust instruction-following capabilities that transfer across domains. This enables the model to handle ad-hoc user requests and follow complex, multi-part instructions with high accuracy.","intents":["I need a model that can follow arbitrary user instructions without task-specific fine-tuning","I want to build a general-purpose assistant that handles diverse user requests (writing, coding, analysis, creative tasks)","I need a model that can adapt to new task types and instruction formats without retraining"],"best_for":["teams building general-purpose AI assistants and chatbots","developers creating multi-purpose APIs that need to handle diverse user requests","organizations building internal tools that require flexible instruction-following"],"limitations":["Performance on highly specialized tasks (domain-specific coding, scientific analysis) may be lower than task-specific fine-tuned models","Instruction-following quality depends heavily on prompt clarity — ambiguous or poorly-formatted instructions may produce suboptimal results","No explicit task classification or routing — the model must infer task intent from instruction text alone","May struggle with instructions that require deep domain expertise or specialized knowledge not well-represented in training data"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter or compatible endpoint","Well-formatted, clear instructions (system prompt + user message structure recommended)","Understanding of instruction-following best practices (specificity, context, examples)"],"input_types":["natural language instructions","multi-part instructions with sub-tasks","instructions with examples or reference materials","code snippets with modification requests"],"output_types":["text responses tailored to instruction type","code (generated, refactored, or analyzed)","structured outputs (summaries, analyses, lists)","creative content (stories, poems, marketing copy)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","instruction-following"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507__cap_4","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.context.aware.response.generation.with.multi.turn.dialogue.support","name":"context-aware response generation with multi-turn dialogue support","description":"The model maintains context across multiple turns of conversation, enabling it to track conversation history, reference previous statements, and generate coherent multi-turn dialogues. The architecture uses standard transformer attention mechanisms to process the full conversation history (up to the context window limit), allowing the model to understand references, maintain consistency, and build on previous exchanges. This capability enables natural, flowing conversations where the model can clarify ambiguities, correct previous statements, and maintain conversational state.","intents":["I need a chatbot that can maintain conversation context across multiple exchanges without losing track of earlier statements","I want to build a dialogue system where the model can reference and build on previous user messages","I need a model that can handle clarification requests and correct misunderstandings in ongoing conversations"],"best_for":["teams building conversational AI and chatbot applications","developers creating dialogue systems for customer support or virtual assistants","applications requiring multi-turn interactions with context preservation"],"limitations":["Context window is finite (typically 4K-32K tokens) — very long conversations will lose early context when the window is exceeded","Attention computation scales quadratically with context length, causing latency degradation for very long conversations","No explicit memory mechanism — context is limited to the current conversation window, with no persistent memory across sessions","May accumulate errors or inconsistencies if conversation history contains contradictory statements"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter or compatible endpoint","Conversation history formatted as alternating user/assistant messages","Context window awareness — tracking total tokens to avoid exceeding limits","Proper message role tagging (system, user, assistant)"],"input_types":["conversation history (array of messages with roles)","current user message","optional system prompt for conversation context"],"output_types":["text response contextually aware of conversation history","dialogue continuation that references previous exchanges","clarifications or corrections based on conversation context"],"categories":["text-generation-language","dialogue-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507__cap_5","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.code.generation.and.analysis.with.instruction.based.modification","name":"code generation and analysis with instruction-based modification","description":"The model can generate, analyze, and modify code based on natural language instructions, leveraging its instruction-following capabilities to understand code-related requests. It processes code snippets as input, understands code semantics through its training on code datasets, and generates syntactically correct code in multiple programming languages. The model can perform tasks like code completion, refactoring, bug fixing, and explanation based on natural language instructions, without requiring language-specific prompting or special code-handling mechanisms.","intents":["I need to generate code snippets from natural language descriptions of functionality","I want to refactor or optimize existing code based on natural language instructions","I need a model that can explain code, identify bugs, or suggest improvements based on code analysis"],"best_for":["developers using AI for code generation and assistance in development workflows","teams building code-focused chatbots and development tools","organizations automating code review and refactoring tasks"],"limitations":["Code generation quality varies by language — stronger for popular languages (Python, JavaScript, Java) than niche languages","No built-in code execution or validation — generated code may have syntax errors or logical bugs that require manual review","Limited context for large codebases — cannot analyze or understand full project structure without explicit context provision","May generate code that follows instruction literally but violates best practices or introduces security vulnerabilities","No explicit awareness of language-specific idioms or performance characteristics"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter or compatible endpoint","Code formatted as text input (no binary or compiled code)","Clear natural language instructions describing desired code changes","Knowledge of target programming language to validate generated code"],"input_types":["natural language code generation requests","code snippets for analysis or modification","code with comments or documentation","mixed natural language and code prompts"],"output_types":["generated code snippets","refactored or optimized code","code explanations and analysis","bug reports and fix suggestions","code with added comments or documentation"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["API access via OpenRouter or compatible inference endpoint","Support for text input up to model's context window (typically 4K-32K tokens)","Familiarity with instruction-following prompt formatting (system + user message structure)","API access via OpenRouter or compatible endpoint","UTF-8 encoding support for non-Latin scripts","Awareness of language-specific instruction conventions (e.g., formal vs. informal registers)","Acceptance of direct-response paradigm without reasoning traces","Prompt engineering optimized for non-thinking inference (clear, specific instructions)","Well-formatted, clear instructions (system prompt + user message structure recommended)","Understanding of instruction-following best practices (specificity, context, examples)"],"failure_modes":["MoE routing adds ~5-15ms latency overhead per token compared to dense models due to gating computation","Expert imbalance during training can cause load imbalance where some experts are underutilized, reducing effective model capacity","Sparse activation means certain instruction types may route to fewer experts, potentially reducing performance on out-of-distribution tasks","No explicit reasoning or chain-of-thought capability — operates in non-thinking mode, limiting complex multi-step problem decomposition","Performance may vary across languages — typically stronger in high-resource languages (English, Chinese, Spanish) than low-resource languages","Code-switching (mixing languages in a single prompt) may degrade performance compared to single-language inputs","No explicit language detection — relies on prompt context to determine response language, which can fail with ambiguous inputs","Instruction-following quality may be asymmetric across languages due to training data distribution","No explicit reasoning transparency — users cannot see the model's reasoning process, making debugging and trust-building harder","Performance on complex multi-step reasoning tasks may be lower than thinking-mode variants due to lack of intermediate scaffolding","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.37,"ecosystem":0.34,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.35,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:24.485Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:45.776Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507"}},"signature":"svE+Eca++DB+6/38Z0aAvEg6+L+IOpsiH5RdLdLjDfKlHJk9mheSjdlo+0kLeW9HTbMVueLtihjqoXp9RqSTBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T02:45:24.439Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=qwen-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}